Hearth Record

Allelon Hospice and Palliative Care

A hospice in Pueblo, Colorado 81003

503 N Main St, Ste 215, Pueblo, Colorado 81003. (719) 242-0043.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 7 hospices serving ZIP code 81003 had 5.5.

The last inspection on record was on Jan 30, 2025: an initial inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jan 30, 2025: initial inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner4 deficiencies
  • Emergency Officials Contact Information (42 CFR 418.113(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 190 words

    “It is required that the hospice maintains an emergency preparedness communication plan that complies with federal, state and local laws. The communication plan includes contact information for the federal, state, tribal, regional, local emergency preparedness staff, and other sources of assistance. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review and interview. The hospice did not ensure the emergency preparedness communication plan included contact information for the federal, state, tribal, regional, local emergency preparedness staff. Review of the agency’s Emergency Preparedness (EP) binder and EP program revealed no documented evidence that the communication plan included contact information for the federal, state, tribal, regional, local emergency preparedness staff, and other sources of assistance. During a joint review of the Emergency Preparedness Plan and interview on 01/30/2025, the Executive Director agreed that the communication plan did not include the contact information required and stated, “We need to add the contact information to the emergency preparedness plan, we missed that.” A review of the Emergency Preparedness Binder revealed the hospice did not ensure that the emergency preparedness communication plan included contact information for the federal, state, tribal, regional, local emergency preparedness staff.”

    Rule E0031. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 440 words

    “It is required that the documented comprehensive assessment includes a drug profile that contains the patient’s current prescription and over the counter (OTC) drugs; supplements; herbal remedies; and other alternative treatments that could affect drug therapy. The medication review process includes the identification of the following: The effectiveness of drug therapy; Drug side effects; Actual or potential drug interactions; Duplicate drug therapy; Drug therapy associated with laboratory monitoring. The assessment includes evidence that common side effects of medication in the hospice populations are anticipated, and as appropriate, preventive measurements are implemented to manage the side effects. The drug profile is updated per the hospice policy and procedure, but, at minimum, at the time of each comprehensive assessment and/or when new medication is added, or changes are made to existing medication. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, observation, and interview. In 2 of 13 (15%) clinical records reviewed, the hospice did not ensure the medication profile was updated when new medications were added, or changes are made to existing medication(s). Clinical Record 2/Home Visit 2: During the home visit observation with Hospice Aides (HHA) (Personnel Record 3 and Personnel Record 8) on 01/29/2025, a medication review was completed by comparing the hospice medication profile to the patient’s current home medications. The caregiver/daughter assisted with the medication review. The patient’s home medications included Fentanyl 25mcg patch-apply one patch every 72 hours, dated 01/17/2025 and Dexamethasone 2mg-take one tablet every morning by mouth, dated 01/17/2025. The caregiver/daughter confirmed the patient was receiving the Fentanyl and Dexamethasone. Fentanyl and Dexamethasone were not listed on the hospice medication profile reviewed on 01/29/2025. Clinical Record 3/Home Visit 3: During the home visit with the Social Worker (SW) (Personnel Record 6) on 01/29/2025, a medication review was completed by comparing the hospice medication profile to the patient’s current home medications. The patient and spouse assisted with the review. The hospice medication profile reviewed on 01/29/2025 included Trelegy Ellipta 100mcg/62.5mcg-25mcg powder inhalation and Breztri Aerosphere 160mcg/9mcg-4.8mcg/actuation. The patient stated, “The hospice wanted me to start those, but I refused so they never sent them.” During a joint record review and interview on 01/29/2025, the Clinical Director agreed the hospice medication profiles were not updated when changes were made in the patient’s medications. When reviewing Home Visit 3, the Clinical Director stated, “Yes we never sent the Trelegy or Breztri to the patient because the patient refused to take them after the doctor ordered them, these should have been discontinued.” The Clinical Director also stated, “We need to provide more education to the nurses on visualizing the medications and keeping the medication list updated.””

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 413 words

    “It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness, including the following, measurable outcomes anticipated from implementing and coordinating the plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 4 of 13 (31%) clinical records reviewed, the hospice did not ensure the individualized plan of care included measurable outcomes anticipated from implementing and coordinating the plan of care. Clinical Record 1: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 12/13/2024, with a terminal diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The plan of care dated 12/13/2024 to 01/30/2025 included a patient problem related to bowel regimen the associated goal documented, “patient/caregiver will report no bowel movement within _ [left blank] days to hospice.” The goal on the plan of care was not measurable when it did not include the number of days for the patient to report a bowel movement. Clinical Record 2: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 11/19/2024, with a terminal diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of unspecified part of unspecified bronchus or lung. The plan of care dated 11/19/2024 to 01/30/2025 included a patient problem related to respiratory status, the associated goal documented, “patient will achieve optimal breathing patterns, airway patency and comfort.” The goal on the plan of care was not measurable when it did not define the patient’s optimal breathing pattern and comfort. Clinical Record 4: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 11/13/2024, with a terminal diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The plan of care dated 11/13/2024 to 01/30/2025 included a patient problem related to pain, the associated goal documented, “patient will receive optimal level of pain.” The goal on the plan of care was not measurable when it did not identify what the patient’s optimal level of pain would be. Clinical Record 5: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 09/05/2024, with a terminal diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The plan of care dated 09/05/2024 to 01/30/2025 included a patient problem related to respiratory status, the associated goal documented, “patient will achieve optimal breathing patterns, airway patency and comfort.” The goal on the plan of care was not measurable when it did not define the patient’s optimal breathing pattern and comfort. During a joint record review and interview on 01/30/2025, the Clinical Director agreed that the goals were not defined and measurable and stated, “We need to provide more education to the nurses.””

    Rule L0548. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 239 words

    “It is required that the designated IDG member provides the SNF/NF or ICF/IID with the following information for each patient/resident: The most recent hospice plan of care, Hospice election form and any advance directives, Physician certification and recertification of the terminal illness, Names and contact information for hospice staff involved in the patient’s care, Instructions on how to access the hospice’s 24-hour on-call system, Hospice medication information, and Hospice physician and attending physician (if any) orders. This standard was not met as evidenced by observation and interview. In 1 of 1 (100%) home visit observation for a patient that resided in a SNF (skilled nursing facility), the hospice did not ensure the SNF was provided with the hospice plan of care and physician certification of terminal illness. Home Visit 1: During the home visit observation on 01/29/2025 with the Registered Nurse (RN) (Personnel Record 5), the hospice binder in the SNF was reviewed jointly with the RN. The SNF’s electronic chart with hospice documents uploaded was reviewed with the facility social worker and hospice RN. There was no documented evidence in the hospice binder and the facility electronic chart that the hospice plan of care and physician certification were provided to the SNF. During an interview on 01/29/2025, the Clinical Director agreed the plan of care and physician certification should have been provided to the SNF and stated, “We do not have any documentation to show it was done.””

    Rule L0781. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 30, 2025Initial inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Feb 21, 2025.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Widgets, Inc. owns 100% directly since Aug 18, 2023.
  • Widgets, Inc. runs it.
  • 7 owners or officers are people: Jack Byers (runs it (operational or managerial control), 90%); Jonathan Rhodes (owns 5% or more through other companies, 25%); Jeffrey W Young (owns 5% or more through other companies, 25%); Jack Byers (owns 5% or more through other companies, 25%); Mark A Lietzke (owns 5% or more through other companies, 25%); Marla Velez (managing employee (on the payroll), 9%); Melchor Sipalay (managing employee (under contract), 1%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Widgets, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Aug 18, 2023
Widgets, Inc.Runs it (operational or managerial control)100%Aug 18, 2023

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 7 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 81003, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5.5; this one had 4.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 7 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 81003
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Allelon Hospice and Palliative Care This hospice4
Sangre De Cristo Hospice & Palliative Care5
Centercare Hospice, LLC6
Abode Hospice of Colorado6
Compassus - Greater Colorado Springs4
Gentiva INot given
Colorado Palliative & Hospice Care of Colorado Springs, LLC49

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.