Hearth Record

Sangre De Cristo Hospice & Palliative Care

A hospice in Pueblo, Colorado 81008

1920 Valley Dr, Pueblo, Colorado 81008. (719) 542-0032.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 8 hospices serving ZIP code 81008 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on Oct 1, 2024: a complaint inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Apr 4, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner5 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 233 words

    “It is required that the hospice Interdisciplinary Group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completes an initial comprehensive assessment no later than five (5) calendar days after the election of hospice care, in accordance with CMS §418.24–the elements of the hospice care election statement. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 23 (4%) clinical records reviewed, it was revealed that the agency did not ensure the interdisciplinary group (IDG) completed an initial assessment no later than 5-calandar days after election of hospice. Clinical Record 15: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 01/18/2024, with a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. The plan of care (POC) dated 01/18/2024 - 04/16/2024, ordered a medical social worker (MSW) to assess and evaluate. The MSW documented a phone call to the caregiver on 01/22/2024, that stated, “Left a message for the family, will attempt again on another date.” On 01/24/2024 (one day after the 5-calendar day requirement), the social worker documented, “Spoke with patients’ spouse on the phone for a very short conversation and spouse declined having regular SW visits.” During an interview on 04/04/2024, the Director of Compliance confirmed the finding and stated in part, “The MSW reported that the family had called the office sometime between 01/22/2024 and 01/24/2024, and asked the MSW to call back on 01/24/2024. However, the conversation was not documented.””

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 317 words

    “It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care: identifies planned interventions based on problems identified in the initial and updated comprehensive assessments. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, observation and interview. In 2 of 26 (8%) clinical records reviewed, it was revealed that the agency did not ensure that each patient’s individualized plan of care identified planned interventions. Clinical Record 1: The initial comprehensive assessment dated 02/06/2024, documented the patient had a terminal diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease, and stated in part, “Chronic aspiration due to esophageal stricture. Suction machine available for PRN (as needed) secretions.” The assessment also documented the patient was NPO (nothing by mouth), had a diagnosis of esophageal dyskinesia, and received bolus tube feedings via a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube. The plan of care (POC) effective 02/06/2024, documented the following: a goal that stated, “Patient can describe techniques to prevent aspiration;” and an intervention that stated, “Teach techniques to prevent aspiration.” There were no specific interventions related to suctioning, tube feedings, care of the PEG tube, or NPO status. During a joint record review and interview on 04/02/2024, the Director of Compliance confirmed the finding and stated in part, “The interventions were not modified to meet the specific needs of the patient.” Clinical Record 9: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 07/27/2023, with a primary diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and a comorbidity of chronic aspiration. The initial comprehensive assessment dated 07/27/2023, documented the patient had chronic aspiration due to an anatomical deformity. The nursing assessment dated 07/28/2023, documented in part, “Patient just had something to drink and is having trouble swallowing.” The POC dated 07/27/2024 - 10/24/2024, did not include specific interventions for aspiration precautions. During a joint record review and interview on 04/03/2024, the Director of Compliance confirmed the finding and stated that the POC should have included aspiration precautions.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 311 words

    “It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care: includes measurable outcomes anticipated from implementing and coordinating the plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 26 (8%) clinical records reviewed, it was revealed that the agency did not ensure that each patient’s individualized plan of care included measurable outcomes. Clinical Record 7: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 02/02/2024, with a primary diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. The certification of terminal illness (CTI) and the initial comprehensive assessment dated 02/02/2024, stated in part, “Patient was also found to have C-diff and started on antibiotics.” Multiple nursing assessments documented the RN and caregiver concerns of diarrhea, and patient being very sore due to the diarrhea. Communication dated 03/10/2024, documented the patient was transferred to the emergency department for evaluation of diarrhea and rectal tube placement. The plan of care (POC) effective 02/02/2024 - 05/01/2024, included the following intervention: “Assess gastrointestinal status including bowel sounds and bowel elimination; and assess bowel management regimen; modify as needed.” There were no measurable outcomes or goals documented for these interventions. During a joint record review and interview on 04/02/2024, the Director of Compliance confirmed there were no goals documented for the patient interventions. Clinical Record 9: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 07/27/2023, with a primary diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and a comorbidity of chronic aspiration. The initial comprehensive assessment dated 07/27/2023, documented the patient had chronic aspiration due to an anatomical deformity. The nursing assessment dated 07/28/2023, documented in part, “Patient just had something to drink and is having trouble swallowing.” The POC dated 07/27/2024 - 10/24/2024, did not include measurable outcomes or goals for aspiration. During a joint record review and interview on 04/03/2024, the Director of Compliance confirmed there were no goals documented for aspiration.”

    Rule L0548. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 449 words

    “It is required that hospice aides are assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse who is a member of the Interdisciplinary Group. Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide are prepared by a RN who is responsible for the supervision of the hospice aide. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 4 of 23 (17%) clinical records reviewed, of patients who received aide services, it was revealed that the agency did not ensure written patient care instructions for a hospice aide were prepared by a registered nurse (RN). Clinical Record 1: The initial comprehensive assessment dated 02/06/2024, documented in part, “Chronic aspiration due to esophageal stricture, the patient was NPO (nothing by mouth), had a diagnosis of esophageal dyskinesia, and receives bolus tube feedings via a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube.” The hospice aide care plan, effective 02/06/2024, included the following tasks: shower; bed bath; and oral hygiene. The care plan did not instruct the aide as follows: the patient had a PEG tube; what action(s) to take if the PEG tube site dressing became wet or soiled; the patient was NPO; and the patient was on aspiration precautions. Clinical Record 3: The initial comprehensive assessment dated 03/28/2024, documented that the patient had a gastrostomy tube (G-tube) in place. The aide care plan effective 03/28/2024, included the following tasks: shower; and bed bath. The care plan did not instruct the aide as follows: the patient had a G-tube; and what action to take if the G-tube site dressing became wet or soiled. Clinical Record 18: The initial comprehensive assessment dated 03/20/2024, documented that the patient was diagnosed with malignant neoplasm of the brain, and new onset of seizures. The aide care plan effective 03/22/2024, included the task of shower. The care plan instructed the aide that the patient was on fall precautions, standard precautions, and oxygen precautions. However, the care plan did not instruct the aide regarding seizure precautions. Clinical Record 22: The initial comprehensive assessment dated 01/22/2024, documented that the patient had an Aspire drain intact to the peritoneum. The interdisciplinary team (IDT) meeting dated 03/20/2024, documented in part, “Monitor abdominal distension and pain, drain with Aspire drainage system as necessary.” The aide care plan effective 01/23/2024, included the task of shower. The care plan did not instruct the aide of the following: the patient had a drain in place to the abdomen; and precautions needed to be followed during the shower. During an interview on 04/04/2024, the Director of Compliance confirmed the findings, and stated that the aide care plans should include tubes, dressings, diet restrictions, and precautions that could impact how the aide performs the task(s).”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 291 words

    “It is required that a patient clinical record containing past and current findings is maintained for each hospice patient. The record contains correct clinical information that is available to the patient’s attending physician and hospice staff. The record may be maintained electronically or on paper. Each patient’s record includes, at a minimum: Physician orders. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, observation and interview. In 1 of 26 (4%) clinical records reviewed, it was revealed that the agency did not ensure the record contained physician orders specific for the nutritional needs and treatment of the patient. Clinical Record 1 / Home Visit 1: The initial comprehensive assessment dated 02/06/2024, documented that the patient had a terminal diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease, and stated in part, “Chronic aspiration due to esophageal stricture. Suction machine available for PRN (as needed) secretions.” The assessment also documented that the patient was NPO (nothing by mouth), had a diagnosis of esophageal dyskinesia, and received bolus tube feedings via a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube. During the observed home visit on 04/01/2024, the patient had a tube feeding pump and a suction machine at bedside. The registered nurse (RN) reported that the patient continues to receive the tube feedings and had to be suctioned “any time she sneaks in food or fluids.” The clinical record did not contain orders for the tube feeding formula or amount, the NPO status, or an order for suctioning. During the interview with the Director of Compliance, on 04/04/2024, it was confirmed that the hospice record did not contain the physician orders for these items. It was reported that the medical director recalled giving a verbal order for the tube feedings, but it was not entered into the record.”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Oct 1, 2024Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Jul 10, 2024Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Apr 4, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner5 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Aug 15, 1985.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 10.5 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.4% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 99.5% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 71% at home, 7% in assisted living, 20% in a nursing facility, 1% in an inpatient hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day10.5 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends7.4%
Visits near death99.5% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 14 owners or officers are people: Sean Jung (corporate director); Brian Arant (corporate director); Abner Fernandez (managing employee (on the payroll)); Ann Marie Pruden (corporate director); Christian Heyn (corporate director); Jeffrey Sloan (corporate director); Nancy L Greenstreet (corporate director); Desirea Atencio (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Aminoritse Onyejekwe (corporate director); Melinda A Egging (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Glen Griesheim (corporate director); Doreen Gonzales (corporate director); Robert Drake (corporate director); Joni L Phillips-Escalante (corporate director, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 85% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 88% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 97.55% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 78.6% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 8 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 81008, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 8 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 81008
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Sangre De Cristo Hospice & Palliative Care This hospice5
Centercare Hospice, LLC6
Abode Hospice of Colorado6
Pikes Peak Hospice and Palliative Care11
Compassus - Greater Colorado Springs4
Fremont Regional Hospice0
Gentiva INot given
Colorado Palliative & Hospice Care of Colorado Springs, LLC49

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.