Hearth Record

Bristol Hospice - Noco

A hospice in Frederick, Colorado 80516

3770 Puritan Way, Unit E, Frederick, Colorado 80516. (970) 618-8378.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 21 hospices serving ZIP code 80516 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on May 29, 2026: a complaint inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jan 16, 2025: recertification inspection by the state2 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 205 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to incorporate the initial bereavement assessment into the plan of care for seven of ten active patients reviewed (Patients #2, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8 and #9). Findings include: 1. On 1/13/25 Review of Patient #2s medical record revealed a start of care date of 11/13/24. The initial Plan of Care assessment was completed on 11/13/24 and revealed the patient was admitted to the hospice with a terminal illness of hypertensive heart disease with heart failure. The plan of care was completed on 11/14/24 for the certification period of 11/13/24 through 2/10/25. a. The agency failed to ensure the initial bereavement assessment was utilized and incorporated into the plan of care. Further record review revealed the plan of care was completed on 11/14/24 and reviewed by the interdisciplinary group (IDG) on 11/21/24. The plan of care revealed that the bereavement assessment considerations were not included on the plan of care. 2. Similar findings were found for Patients #4, #5, #6, #7, #8 and #9. 3. During an interview on 1/15/25 at 3:43p.m., the administrator confirmed the initial start of care assessment included bereavement however this assessment was not documented and incorporated into the plan of care.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 1,021 words

    “Based on interview and record review, the hospice failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) completed hospice aide (HA) supervised visits every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the aide for 5 of 7 patient records reviewed who received HA services (Patients #1, #4, #5, #8, #9). Findings include: Agency Policy According to the agency policy titled, “;Hospice Aide Supervisory Visits,” dated November, 2021 (in pertinent parts): “;The frequency of supervisory visits will be based upon the needs of the patient after the plan of care is established. They must be conducted no less frequently than every 14 days.” 1. The clinical record for Patient #5 was reviewed on 1/15/25. The patient was admitted to hospice care and services on 10/12/24, with a terminal diagnosis of cerebral atherosclerosis. The plan of care (POC) for the certification period dated 10/12/24 to 1/9/25, included orders for skilled nurse (SN) two times a week for disease management, pain management, and comfort measures; hospice care aid (HA) three times a week for bathing and personal care; and Medical Social Work (MSW) one time a month for advanced care planning and client/family coping. The patient resided at home. Subsequent POC for the time period dated 1/10/25 to 4/9/25 included orders for SN one time a week for one week and two times a week for 13 weeks; HA visits one time a week for one week, three times a week for 13 weeks, two times a week for one week, and three times a week for 12 weeks; and MSW visit one time a month for four months. a) Clinical record review revealed the hospice failed to ensure HA supervisory visits were completed, at a minimum, of every 14 days. Review of the clinical record from 10/12/24 to 1/14/25 revealed Patient #5 received SN and HA visits in accordance with the POC. However, the record failed to reveal documentation of required supervisory visits. There were a total of six supervisory visits without documentation of HA supervision to assess the quality of care provided to Patient #5 by the HA in accordance with the POC. During an interview on 1/14/25 at 2:30 p.m. with the Director of Clinical Services (DCS) and the Executive Director (ED), staff verbalized awareness that supervisory visits for the HA were not being completed by the registered nurse (RN) every 14 days. 2. The clinical record for Patient #8 was reviewed on 1/14/25. The patient was admitted for hospice services on 11/21/23 with a terminal diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The POC for the certification period of 11/15/24 to 1/13/25 included orders for SN one time a week for oxygen safety, pain status, and respiratory status; HA one time a week for companionship, personal care, and support service; and MSW one time a month for advanced care planning and client/family coping. Patient #8 resides at home. Subsequent review of Patient #8 clinical records revealed HA visits were initiated on 9/12/24. a) Clinical record review revealed the hospice failed to ensure HA supervisory visits were completed, at a minimum, every 14 days. Review of the clinical record from 9/12/24 to 1/14/25 revealed Patient #5 received SN and HA visits in accordance with the POC. Record review revealed HA supervisory visits were documented as completed by the RN on 9/18/24, 11/11/24, 11/19/24, 12/23/24, and 1/14/25. However, the record failed to reveal documented supervisory visits between 9/18/24 and 11/11/24. Additionally, it was revealed that supervisory visits were missing between 11/19/24 to 12/23/24 and 12/23/24 to 1/14/25. A total of six HA supervisory visits were not documented as completed for Patient #8. During an interview on 1/14/25 at 10:45 a.m. with the Registered Nurse (RN) #4, the RN stated she was the primary RN assigned to Patient #8. RN #4 stated HA supervisory visits were supposed to be completed on a regular schedule. She further stated that sometimes the visits are missed if the electronic medical record (EMR) does not prompt that documentation to be completed. During an interview on 1/15/25 at 3:43 p.m., the ED confirmed HA supervisory visits were not completed every 14 days by the scheduled RN. 3. The clinical record for Patient #1 was reviewed on 1/15/25. The patient was admitted for hospice services on 11/25/24 with a terminal diagnosis of chronic kidney disease with heart failure. The POC for the certification period of 11/25/24 to 2/22/25 included orders for SN visits one time a day for one day, one time a week for 13 weeks, and as needed visits for sign and symptom complication; HA visits two times a week for 12 weeks for bathing and personal care; MSW visits one time a day for one day and two times per month for three months for bereavement needs and client/family coping; and clergy visits one time a day for one day and one time a week for 12 weeks for funeral planning and spiritual needs. The patient resides in an assisted living facility (ALF). a) Clinical record review revealed the hospice failed to ensure HA supervisory visits were completed, at a minimum, every 14 days. Review of the clinical record from 11/25/24 to 1/14/25 revealed Patient #1 received SN and HA visits in accordance with the POC. Record review showed one HA supervisory visit was completed by RN #9 on 12/3/24. However, additional records failed to reveal any additional completed supervisory visits from 12/3/24 to 1/14/25. A total of four HA supervisory visits were documented as incomplete. During an interview on 1/15/25 at 2:45 p.m. with the RN clinical supervisor, staff stated supervisory visits for Patient #1 were not documented as completed during those dates. 4. Similar findings of the hospice failing to complete HA supervisory visits every 14 days was found with Patients #4 and #9. 5. A follow up interview on 1/15/25 on 3:22 p.m. with the executive director and DCS the staff stated they reviewed the missing documentation of completed supervisory visits for Patient #1, #5, and #8. They produced a performance improvement plan (PIP) to address the missing visits. The DCS indicated that training for the RNs would be started immediately.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

All 4 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 29, 2026Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Mar 11, 2026Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Apr 21, 2025Recertification inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Jan 16, 2025Recertification inspection by the state2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jan 19, 2007.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.4 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.7% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 95.5% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 27% at home, 51% in assisted living, 21% in a nursing facility, 1% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.4 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends7.7%
Visits near death95.5% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Bristol Hospice, L.L.C. owns 100% directly since Feb 27, 2020.
  • 11 owners or officers are people: Alex Edward Mauricio (corporate officer, 0%); Alex Edward Mauricio (corporate director, 0%); John Charles Garbarino (corporate officer, 0%); John Charles Garbarino (corporate director, 0%); Susan K. Klingner (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Michael Derrick (corporate officer, 0%); Betty J Brennan (corporate director, 0%); Hyrum Kirton (corporate director, 0%); Sandy Kello (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); David A Malm (corporate officer, 0%); David A Malm (corporate director, 0%).
  • A private-equity firm is among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Bristol Hospice Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 27, 2020
Bristol Ultimate Holdco, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Sep 1, 2023
Bristol Hospice, L.L.C.Owns 5% or more directly100%Feb 27, 2020
Bristol Hospice Topco Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 27, 2020
Webster Equity Partners Bristol Cf LPOwns 5% or more through other companies69.8%Sep 1, 2023
Aware Super Pty, Ltd.Owns 5% or more through other companies8.28%Jan 24, 2022
Webster Equity Partners IV Bristol Cf LPOwns 5% or more through other companies5.72%Sep 1, 2023

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 78% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 81% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.57% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 63.8% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 53 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 21 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 80516, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 2.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.