Hearth Record

Intermountain Health Hospice - Denver

A hospice in Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033

3210 Lutheran Pkwy, Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033. (303) 425-8000.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

9 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 27 hospices serving ZIP code 80033 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Aug 7, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

9 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Aug 7, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission9 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 18 patient records reviewed, the chaplain failed to complete their initial assessments within five days after the election of hospice. In RRNHV#6 the spiritual care provider had not completed their initial assessment until 8 days post EOHB and no documentation had been present to support the delay. This was validated with the Clinical Leadership present during record review.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 94 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 18 patient records reviewed, the Surveyor noted an initial bereavement assessment had not been completed. In RRNHV#11, the patient had been admitted to Hospice in the beginning of June. The Medical Social Worker (MSW) had not been able to make a patient visit due to family declining visits. Since the MSW had not made the initial visit, an initial Bereavement Risk assessment had not been completed in the 2 months the patient has been on service. This was validated with the Clinical Leadership present during record review.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(8))

    The inspectors’ words, 140 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 3 of 4 home visits conducted, where the patient had home Oxygen, the Surveyor noted a failure to assess risks related to oxygen storage and ensure back up cylinders had been stored in a safe manner consistent with HCO policy, by securing in a stand or lying flat . For example, in RRHV#1, the patient had 1 back up cylinder standing upright and not secured. In RRHV#4, the patient had 1 Oxygen cylinder freestanding and a 2nd cylinder leaning against a wall. In RRHV#6, the patient had 4 cylinders free-standing in a laundry room, unsecured. The patient also had 6 cylinders secured in a stand in their garage that had not been climate controlled and had been less than 5 feet from a gas-powered lawnmower and a propane tank. This was validated with Clinical Leadership.”

    Rule L0532. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 299 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 18 patient records reviewed, the surveyor noted care provided to the patient without a written order. For example, in RRHV#1, the clinician completing the evaluation assessment noted the patient had 30 post-operative sutures in place in her hip and upper leg. This had been discussed in the Interdisciplinary Group Meeting post visit. On the next clinician visit, there had been documentation that the sutures had been removed; however, there had been no order written to remove the sutures. In RRNHV#7, the RN documented care provided to the patient PICC line that included a dressing change, however, there had not been an order to complete this. This was validated with the Clinical Leadership present during the record reviews. Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 18 patient records reviewed, the Surveyor noted the patient plan of care (POC) had not been updated post interdisciplinary group (IDG) meeting. For example, in RRHV#3, the patient had been identified as having new onset difficulty with swallowing that required thickening of fluids and associated aspiration risks; however, the POC had not been updated to include this. This was validated with the Clinical Leadership present during record review. Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 18 patient records reviewed, the Surveyor noted not all patient identified issues had been included on the patient plan of care (POC). For example, in RRNHV#1, the patient had a PEG tube through which feedings were administered. The PEG tube care requirements had not been included on the POC. In RRNHV#7, the patient POC had been missing care orders for the PICC line (including dressing changes) and the Ostomy. Of note, the patient was extremely complex with a lot of interventions. This was validated with the Clinical Leadership present during the record review.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 6 of 6 patient records reviewed, where the Hospice Aide (HA) had been providing care to a patient on home oxygen therapy, the HA plan of care (POC) had not addressed all patient needs. For example, in RRHV#1,RRHV#5, RRNHV#3, RRNHV#6, RRNHV#10 and RRNHV#12, the patient was on continuous oxygen and the care plan had not addressed whether the oxygen could be removed for the bathing. This was validated with the Clinical Leadership present during the record review.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 15 patient records reviewed, where the patient had hospice aide (HA) services, the supervisory visit had not occurred every 14 days as required. In RRNHV#12, the HA started services the 2nd week of July. A Supervisory visit had not been completed for 20 days post initiation of services. This was validated with the Clinical Leadership present during the record review.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 93 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 18 patient records reviewed, The medication profile in the EMR had not been updated to reflect the medications the patient was being administered. For example, in RRHV#3, the patient EMR medication profile had Bactrim DS still listed as an active medication; however, the medication had been completed at the end of June. In RRNHV#1, the patient had been started on Home Oxygen, but this had not been added to the medication profile (per HCO policy). This was validated with the Clinical Leadership present during record review.”

    Rule L0674. Standard-level.

  • N/a (42 CFR 418.110(d)(1)(i))

    “Observed in Building Tour. In 1 of 6 smoke barrier wall checks, it was observed above the ceiling at smoke door C-20, the smoke barrier had a penetration that was not properly sealed. This was confirmed with the Director of Facilities. This finding was observed during survey activity, but corrected onsite prior to the surveyor’s departure. The corrective action taken needs to be included in the organization’s Evidence of Standards Compliance submission.”

    Rule L0827. Standard-level.

  • N/a (42 CFR 418.110(e))

    “Observed in Document Review. In 1 of 1 annual fire alarm system testing, it was observed that the documentation of the annual fire alarm system testing and inspection did not have a complete inventory of all of the Audio/Visual alarm devices. The documentation showed 4 circuits were tested and all A/V devices passed, however did not have an itemized inventory of all A/V devices. This was confirmed with the Director of Facilities.”

    Rule L0828. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 7, 2026Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission9 deficiencies cited
Apr 30, 2025Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jul 12, 1985.
  • Ownership: other.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 14.7 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 16.4% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 93.3% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 75% at home, 6% in assisted living, 10% in a skilled nursing facility, 8% in an inpatient hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day14.7 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends16.4%
Visits near death93.3% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Integrity Health owns 100% directly since Jul 1, 2024.
  • Intermountain Health Care, Inc. runs it.
  • 24 owners or officers are people: Rebecca G Resnik (managing employee (on the payroll)); David R Kinnard (corporate director); Donald Arthur Childears (corporate director); Steven Brien Brown (corporate director); James Capps (corporate director); Alice Murray (corporate officer); Alice Murray (managing employee (on the payroll)); Cynthia Camela Delaria (corporate director); Christine Forkner (corporate director); Stephen K Frankel (corporate director); Amanda Shon (corporate director); Teresa Kostenbauer (corporate director); Ben Stevenson (corporate officer); Ben Stevenson (managing employee (on the payroll)); Elisa Castaneda Young (corporate director); Faye Hummel (corporate director); Jeffrey Bernard (corporate director); Holly Clouner (corporate director); Katherine Boelter (corporate director); Pradeep Dhar (corporate director); Jennifer Carroll (managing employee (on the payroll)); Melissa Whitmer (corporate director); Kelly Dunkin (corporate director); Lacey Kirby (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Integrity HealthOwns 5% or more directly100%Jul 1, 2024
Intermountain Health Care, Inc.Runs it (operational or managerial control)Apr 1, 2022

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 85% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 87% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 93.19% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 56.2% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 27 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 80033, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 9.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.