Hearth Record

One Health Hospice, Inc.

A hospice in Livermore, California 94551

2133 Las Positas Ct, Suite J, Livermore, California 94551. (925) 400-8011.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

7 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 29 hospices serving ZIP code 94551 had 7.

The last inspection on record was on Aug 8, 2025: an initial inspection by The Joint Commission.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

7 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Aug 8, 2025: initial inspection by The Joint Commission7 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 91 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 10 patient records reviewed, it was noted by the nurse surveyor that the comprehensive assessment was not completed within five calendar days of the election of the hospice benefit. For RRHV#2 and RRHV#3, the social worker completed his initial assessment and the bereavement risk assessment two days late. There was no documentation in the electronic medical record to indicate why the visits were not completed timely. Findings were discussed and verified with the Director of Patient Care Services (DPCS) and the RN Case Manager.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 10 patient records reviewed, t was noted by the nurse surveyor that for RRNHV#2 the RN did not visit the hospice patient no less than 15 days to conduct an assessment. The patient did not have a documented RN for a 3 week period. Finding was verified with the Director of Patient Care Services (DPCS) and the RN Case Manager.”

    Rule L0533. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 112 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 10 of 10 patient records reviewed, the nurse surveyor noted that the goals were not measurable or individualized. For example, RRHV#2, “Patient pain will be managed at acceptable level of pain for patient” and RRHV#3, “Patient will maintain the best possible nutritional status and comfort through symptom management and appropriate interventions.” There were no short-term goals at start of care to address issues of immediate needs such as understanding medication management, symptom management, pain management, or safety. Most dates for achieving goals were at the time of death/discharge end Findings were discussed and verified with the Director of Patient Care Services (DPCS) and the RN Case Manager.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(3)(i))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 10 patient records reviewed, it was noted by the nurse surveyor that the spiritual assessment was not completed as part of the comprehensive assessment. For RRHV#1, and RRHV#3 the spiritual counselor did not complete his initial spiritual assessment, nor was it clearly documented that the patient had refused the visit. Findings were discussed and verified with the Director of Patient Care Services (DPCS) and the RN Case Manager.”

    Rule L0598. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 123 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 2 patient records reviewed, reviewed who had the hospice aide, it was noted by the nurse surveyor that the hospice aide care plan did not contain all the necessary or current information. For RRHV#1, the patient had continuous oxygen however the hospice aide care plan did not include any mention of the oxygen or what the aide should do with it during the patient’s bed bath. Additionally, the patient had several wounds that the care plan did not address. Both for RRHV#1 and RRDC#1, there were no instructions as to when the hospice aide should notify the nurse. Findings were discussed and verified with the Director of Patient Care Services (DPCS) and the RN Case Manager.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 2 patient records reviewed, that had a hospice aide, it was noted by the nurse surveyor that hospice aide supervisory visits were not documented no less frequently than every fourteen days. For RRNHV#1, the hospice aide supervisory visit was documented three days late for the last required hospice aide supervisory visit. Finding was verified with the Director of Patient Care Services (DPCS) and the RN Case Manager.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 177 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 2 of 2 home visits conducted, it was noted by the nurse surveyor that the medication profile was inaccurate. During RRHV#2, it was noted during the medication reconciliation by the skilled nurse, that the patient had been taking Eliquis, Tamsulosin (Generic for Flomax), Calcium, Advil (prn for pain), and Vitamin D since admission, however, they had never been added to the patient’s medication profile. Additionally, the patient’s daughter in law was applying Absorbine liquid topically to the patient’s painful shoulder which had not been added to the medication profile. For RRHV#3, it was noted during the medication reconciliation by the skilled nurse, that the patient had been taking Pepcid, Vitamin E, Iron, B-Complex and MiraLAX since admission, however, they had never been added to the patient’s medication profile. The patient had been on service for a little over two months. Findings were verified by the RN Case Manager who was conducting the visits. Findings were then later discussed further with the Director of Patient Care Services (DPCS) and the RN Case Manager.”

    Rule L0674. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 8, 2025Initial inspection by The Joint Commission7 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Sep 4, 2025.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • CMS’s ownership file has no owners listed for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 29 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 94551, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 7.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.