Hearth Record

Bright Source Hospice LLC

A hospice in Chatsworth, California 91311

22024 Lassen St, Office 113, Chatsworth, California 91311.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

11 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 213 hospices serving ZIP code 91311 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Apr 9, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

11 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Apr 9, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care11 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 211 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #1,6,8) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #1-Order dated 9/18/24 for Lidocaine 4% patch does not indicate specific location to apply patch on the medication profile. Order dated 9/8/24 for A&D ointment does not indicate specific location on medication profile. Orders dated 1/28/25 for Acetaminophen 500mg tab 1 tab Q4 PRN and order dated 11/25/24 for Acetaminophen 650mg RS 1 Q4 PRN exceed 4000mg daily amount, no evidence of maximum allowable on medication profile. Corrected on site. Patient #6-Order dated 4/5/25 for Oxygen Concentrator DME, however no evidence of oxygen administration orders on medication profile. Patient #8-Orders dated 3/17/25 for Norco 5/325mg 1 tab Q6 PRN and Acetaminophen 650mg RS 1 Q4 PRN exceed 4000mg daily amount, no evidence of maximum allowable on medication profile. Order dated 3/27/25 for 10L Oxygen Concentrator DME, however no evidence of oxygen administration orders on medication profile. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 91 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 14 (Patient #1,2,3,7,10) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient #1,2,3,7,10-No evidence of initial bereavement assessment completed within 5 days of SOC.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 124 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #3,6) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient #3-Order dated 2/18/25 for wound care orders, SN visit 4/1/25 narrative states “No signs of skin breakdown” and SN visits completed 4/2/25 and 4/7/25 however no evidence of wound care or measurements completed. Patient #6-MD narrative states patient with Stage 3 sacral wound and blisters to legs and hip with a discussion with wound care team, no evidence of assessment by RN.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 91 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #8) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #8-Patient with medication orders for Eliquis daily, no bleeding precautions in place. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 183 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #1,6,8) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #1-Order dated 9/18/24 for Lidocaine 4% patch does not indicate specific location to apply patch.. Order dated 9/8/24 for A&D ointment does not indicate specific location. Orders dated 1/28/25 for Acetaminophen 500mg tab 1 tab Q4 PRN and order dated 11/25/24 for Acetaminophen 650mg RS 1 Q4 PRN exceed 4000mg daily amount, no evidence of maximum allowable. Corrected on site. Patient #6-Order dated 4/5/25 for Oxygen Concentrator DME, however no evidence of oxygen administration orders. MD narrative states patient has Stage 3 sacral wound and blisters to legs and hip, no evidence of wound care orders or follow up. Patient #8-Orders dated 3/17/25 for Norco 5/325mg 1 tab Q6 PRN and Acetaminophen 650mg RS 1 Q4 PRN exceed 4000mg daily amount, no evidence of maximum allowable. Order dated 3/27/25 for 10L Oxygen Concentrator DME, however no evidence of oxygen administration orders. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #6) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient #6-MD narrative upon SOC 4/5/25 states patient with Stage 3 sacral wound and blisters to legs and hip with a discussion with wound care team, no evidence of discussion outcome or update to plan of care.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 188 words

    “Upon client record review, 5 of 14 (Patient #3,7,8,9,10) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #3-Order dated 2/18/25 for SN frequency 2x/week, Order dated 3/22/25 for SN frequency 3x/week. Duplicate SN frequency orders. Corrected on site. Order dated for 2/18/25 for wound care orders, no evidence of wound care completed at subsequent SN visits. Patient #7-Order dated 4/1/25 contain duplicate orders for SN frequency, no evidence incorrect order being discontinued. Corrected on site. Patient #8- Order dated 3/26/25 for LVN visits 3x/week, no evidence of RN visit order frequency. RN supervisory visit completed 3/31/25. Corrected on site. Patient #9- Order dated 1/23/25 for MSW visit frequency for 1x/recert, visits completed 2/6/25, 3/28/25 and 4/1/25 with no orders for visits. Corrected on site. Patient #10 Orders dated 2/1/25 for LVN visit frequency 1x/week, RN supervisory visits completed 4/3/25, 3/30/25, 3/14/25, 3/2/25 and 2/26/25, no evidence of orders for RN visits. Corrected on site.SN visit completed 3/18/25 include notation of 3 wound treatments completed, no evidence of wound care orders. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 105 words

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 14 (Patient #1) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient #1 Aide visits completed 3/26/25, 3/24/25, 3/21/25, 3/18/25, 3/15/25 and 3/1/25 documented the task for Bowel Movement completed, no evidence of task on aide care plan. Aide visits completed 3/26/25 and 3/24/25 documented the task for Vitals obtained, no evidence of task on aide care plan.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 14 (Patient #1) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient #1 9/13/24 order frequency for aide visits 3x/week, no evidence of aide supervisory visits completed since 9/13/2024 Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(3))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #10) did not have evidence that each patient record contains responses to medications, symptom management, treatments, and services. Patient #10 SN visit completed 3/18/25 include notation of 3 wound treatments completed, no evidence of how patient tolerated wound treatment.”

    Rule L0674. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #10) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient #10 SN visit completed 3/18/25 include notation of 3 wound treatments completed, no evidence of details of wound care/treatment.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 9, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care11 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Mar 11, 2022.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.2 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 21.8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 70.8% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 97% at home, 3% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day12.2 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends21.8%
Visits near death70.8% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 2 owners or officers are people: Querubin Ignacio (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Querubin Ignacio (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 87.27% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 213 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91311, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 11.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.