Hearth Record

Luminere Hospice, Inc.

A hospice in Canoga Park, California 91303

7301 Topanga Canyon Blvd Ste 356, Canoga Park, California 91303. (323) 210-8405.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

8 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 106 hospices serving ZIP code 91303 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Feb 27, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

8 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Feb 27, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care8 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 16 (Patient #6) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment identifies the physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the hospice patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process. Patient #6 SCP visit on 11/27/23 was not completed and no evidence of an initial comprehensive spiritual assessment performed by any discipline.”

    Rule L0524. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 112 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 16 (Patient #3,6) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #3 Medication profile lists Clotrimazole Cream and Triamcinolone cream with instructions to “apply to affected area” no evidence of specific location. Patient #6 Medication profile lists CBD Roll on states to “apply to affected area” no evidence of specific location.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 178 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 16 (Patient #3,4,6,8) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment is updated including and by: • The hospice interdisciplinary group (in collaboration with the individual’s attending physician, if any) • Changes that have taken place since the initial assessment • Information on the patient’s progress toward desired outcomes • Reassessment of the patient’s response to care • The assessment update must be accomplished as frequently as the condition of the patient requires, but no less frequently than every 15 days Patient #3 RN visit completed 4/8/24, 3/1/24 and 1/19/24, no evidence of assessment completed in 15 days following the visit dates. RN assessment visits were made 4/26/24, 3/25/24 and 3/2/24. Patient #4 RN comprehensive assessment due 7/30/23 and was not completed until 8/2/23. Patient #6 RN visit completed 4/8/24, no evidence of visit completed within 15 days by 4/22/24. Patient #8 RN visit completed 4/23/24 and 3/21/24, no evidence of assessment completed in 15 days following the visit dates. RN assessment visits were made 5/14/24 and 4/9/24.”

    Rule L0533. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 184 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 16 (Patient #4,5,6,8,12) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient #4 SN visit on 7/23/24 states “Patient with pain to bilateral knees and back”, no evidence of any interventions completed. Patient #5 SN visits on 3/29/24, 4/5/24, 4/19/24 and 4/26/24 did not have a comprehensive pain assessment completed in full. Patient #6 SN visit on 7/26/24 states “Patient is still not satisfied with sleep”, no evidence of any interventions completed. Visits on 7/5/24, 7/12/24, 7/19/24 and 7/25/24 did not have a comprehensive pain assessment completed in full and no evidence of any pain interventions despite patient pain rated 6/10. Patient #8 SN visits on 5/28/24, 6/4/24 and 6/18/24 narrative states “Patient in pain”, no evidence of pain assessment or interventions completed. Patient #12 5/20/24 RN did not completed a comprehensive pain assessment.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 97 words

    “Upon patient record review, 7 of 16 (Patient #3,4,5,6,8,11,12) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #3,4,5,6,8,11,12 Pain Goals/Interventions state “Patient will report pain is relieved/controlled in 2 weeks”, no evidence of a measurable outcome for pain.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 16 (Patient #3,6) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #3 10/6/23 orders for Clotrimazole Cream and Triamcinolone cream with instructions to “apply to affected area” no evidence of specific location on medication profile. Patient #6 7/22/24 orders for CBD Roll on states to “apply to affected area” no evidence of specific location on medication profile.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 128 words

    “Upon patient client record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #3,6,7) did not have evidence that each patient record contains: • Signed copies of the notice of patient rights in accordance with 418.52 • Signed election statement in accordance with 418.24 Patient #3 Patient requested to receive the “Notification of Non-Covered Items”, no evidence the patient received the document. Patient #6 Consents dated for 11/28/23 and SOC date was 11/27/23. SOC date 11/27/23 was not filled out in the appropriate election of hospice date section of consents. Patient requested to receive the “Notification of Non-Covered Items”, no evidence the patient received the document. Patient #7 Patient requested to receive the “Notification of Non-Covered Items”, no evidence the patient received the document. This was COS and uploaded to patient EMR.”

    Rule L0673. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 300 words

    “Upon patient client record review, 5 of 16 (Patient #4,5,9,11,13) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient #4 RN Supervisory visits were completed on 8/27/23, 8/6/23, 7/16/23 and 7/2/23 as stated by RN in narrative “Supervisory Visit”, the supervisory visits on records are incomplete. The record only indicates the supervisory visit was done . There is no documentation to support assessment of the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs.(the specific check off information related to assessment of care is blank in the note) “. 9/17/24 Supervisory visit completed, however patient was discharged 9/5/24. Patient #5 D/C Summary for 4/28/24 has 2 different dates documented in summary to include 3/15/24 and 4/28/24. Visit on 4/8/24 as stated by RN in narrative “Supervisory Visit”, the supervisory visits on records are incomplete. The record only indicates the supervisory visit was done . There is no documentation to support assessment of the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs.(the specific check off information related to assessment of care is blank in the note) “ Patient #9 D/C Summary states discharge date of 2/4/25, however the d/c was completed 2/24/25. Patient #11 Patient discharged 4/19/24, however there are 2 incomplete SN visit notes in the EMR for 4/24/24 and 5/1/24. Patient #13 D/C summary stated discharge date effective 5/31/24, however discharge date was 3/31/24.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Feb 27, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care8 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Feb 14, 2022.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 7 owners or officers are people: Maria Donna B Santos (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Maria Donna B Santos (corporate officer, 100%); Maria Donna B Santos (corporate director, 100%); Maria Donna B Santos (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Maria Donna B Santos (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Ronald Tang (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Luz Torres (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 106 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91303, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 8.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.