Hearth Record

True Care Hospice Southern California, Inc.

A hospice in Canoga Park, California 91303

7355 Topanga Canyon Blvd, Suite 201, Canoga Park, California 91303. (818) 762-7171.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

8 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 106 hospices serving ZIP code 91303 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Mar 6, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

8 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Mar 6, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care8 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 108 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #1,#2) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 1: Facility medication profile contains Morphine 10mg/5ml administer 0.5ml Q3H PRN, however, the hospice medication profile contains Morphine 20mg/ml administer 0.5ml Q3H PRN. Patient 2: Medication profile contains Polyethylene Glycol powder with no instructions for diluent.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 184 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #1,#6,#8) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 1: Patient was identified as an aspiration risk upon admission, however, there is no evidence of problems, goals and interventions for aspiration precautions. Patient has been taking an anticoagulant since admission with no evidence of a care plan for risk for bleeding. Patient 6: Patient has been taking an anticoagulant since admission with no evidence of a care plan for bleeding risk. Patient 8: Patient has been taking an anticoagulant since admission with no evidence of a care plan for risk for bleeding. Also, on admission a care plan was opened for suspected blood in the stool and sample obtained. Results were negative, however, care plan remains open.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #1,#2) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 1: Facility medical record contains an order for Morphine 10mg/5ml, to administer 0.5ml Q3H PRN, however, there is an order in the hospice medical record for Morphine 20mg/ml, to administer 0.5ml Q3H PRN. Patient 2: Order for Polyethylene Glycol powder contains no instructions for diluent.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 195 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 14 (Patient #1,#5,#6,#10) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 1: In the home, patient has an e-tank, bedside commode, and shower chair with no evidence of orders in the plan of care. In addition, DME order on 12/15/25 for hospital bed with 1/2 rails. On 2/18/26 another DME order was obtained for full rails due to fall risk, however, home visit confirmed patient still has 1/2 rails the plan of care for DME was not updated. Patient 5: On admission, patient identified as using a walker, and in the home, patient has a bedside commode. However, there was no evidence of orders in the plan of care for DME. Patient 6: On admission, patient identified as using a walker, and in the home, patient has an e-tank, portable oxygen concentrator, and wheelchair. However, there was no evidence of orders for the DME. Patient 10: Patient identified on admission as using a walker, however, there was no evidence of orders in the plan of care.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 117 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #2,#6) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient 2: Care Plan opened on 2/9/26 for vaginal discharge related to antibiotic therapy. However, the problem was resolved but care plan remained open. Patient 6: 3 care plans are open for potential for altered neuro status; increased agitation. The care plan on 5/26/25 with intervention of Seroquel 25mg BID, 8/26/25 with intervention of Seroquel 50mg BID and 12/19/25 with intervention of Seroquel 75mg BID which is current. The other 2 care plans should have been discontinued.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 219 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 14 (Patient #1,#2,#6,#10) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient 1,6: Patient taking an anticoagulant, however no evidence of bleeding precautions on the aide care plan. Patient 2: Patient taking an anticoagulant, however no evidence of bleeding precautions on the aide care plan. Also, there was no frequency instructions for task to empty foley collection bag. Patient 10: Admission POC contains order for wheelchair and bedrails, however, there was no tasks or instructions in the aide care plan. Patient also identified on admission as a standby assist when using a walker, however, no instruction provided for standby assist on the aide care plan.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 97 words

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 14 (Patient #1) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient 1: Supervisory visit was made on 1/25/26 and not another supervisory visit until 2/16/26. On 2/6/26, RN documented supervision of LVN and Aide, but only the LVN supervision section was completed.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #2) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 2: On admission, patient is identified as incontinent and foley is not marked in the genitourinary section, however narrative documentation states patient has a 16F 10cc balloon foley catheter.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Mar 6, 2026Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care8 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jan 31, 2017.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 15.9 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.9% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 90.2% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 90% at home, 10% in assisted living.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day15.9 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends7.9%
Visits near death90.2% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 5 owners or officers are people: Mike G Fayfel (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Mike G Fayfel (corporate officer, 100%); Mike G Fayfel (corporate director, 100%); Mike G Fayfel (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Mike G Fayfel (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 81% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 90% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 15.2% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 106 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91303, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 8.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 106 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 91303
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Mirafaith Hospice, Inc.Not given
True Care Hospice, Inc.0
Silver Years Healthcare, Inc.Not given
True Care Hospice Southern California, Inc. This hospice8
Blessed Care Hospice Inc.Not given
Hospice Group of Southern California, Inc.11
Regent Hospice, Inc.Not given
Mount Olives Hospice0
Lucky Palliative Services Incorporated5
Empress Hospice, Inc.9
Everloving Hospice, Inc.Not given
Great Choice Hospice, Inc.Not given

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.