Hearth Record

Saint Laura Palliative and Hospice Care, Inc.

A hospice in Covina, California 91723

271 E Workman St., Suite 200, Covina, California 91723. (626) 364-7534.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

8 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 70 hospices serving ZIP code 91723 had 7.5.

The last inspection on record was on Mar 21, 2025: an initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

8 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Mar 21, 2025: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care8 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 14 (Patient #5) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment identifies the physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the hospice patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process. Patient #5: There was not a spiritual care initial assessment completed on this patient, despite the RN noting in the initial assessment that spiritual care was needed.”

    Rule L0524. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 113 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #1) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient #1: The patient has 2 wounds. A stage 3 on the coccyx as well as a DTI on right heel. The nurse is assessing the wounds, however the assessment is incomplete as there are no measurements of the wounds. The agency policy requires wound measurement at least once every two weeks.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 476 words

    “Upon patient record review, 9 of 14 (Patient #1,2,3,4,5,6,7,9,10) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #1: The patient has a nebulizer and a suction machine. There are no goals or interventions for the nebulizer or suction machine in the POC. There are no interventions or goals for spiritual care, despite SC seeing patient monthly. Patient #2: There are no interventions or goals for SC, despite SC seeing patient monthly. There are no interventions and goals for nutrition. The patient is receiving Ensure. Patient #3: The patient has a Hoyer lift. There are no interventions or goals related to the Hoyer lift on the Mobility POC. Patient #4: The IDG states that Spiritual care was declined, although the SC is seeing the patient monthly. There are no interventions or goals for SC, despite SC seeing patient monthly. The patient is admitted with a primary diagnosis of Prostate cancer. There are no interventions or goals related to cancer diagnosis on the POC. Patient #5: The patient is on anticoagulants, however, bleeding precautions as well as interventions for education to patient/caregiver regarding use of anticoagulants are included in the POC. Patient #6: The patient is on anticoagulants, however, bleeding precautions as well as interventions for education to patient/caregiver regarding use of anticoagulants are included in the POC. There are no interventions or goals for SC, despite SC seeing patient monthly. Patient #7: The patient is on anticoagulants, however, bleeding precautions as well as interventions for education to patient/caregiver regarding use of anticoagulants are included in the POC. There are no interventions or goals for SC, despite SC seeing patient monthly. The Endocrine POC states blood sugars will be in range. There is no range listed. Patient #9: The patient is on anticoagulants, however, bleeding precautions as well as interventions for education to patient/caregiver regarding use of anticoagulants are included in the POC. There are no interventions or goals for SC, despite SC seeing patient monthly. The patient has a nebulizer and a suction machine. There are no goals or interventions for the nebulizer or suction machine in the POC. Patient #10: The patient is on anticoagulants, however, bleeding precautions as well as interventions for education to patient/caregiver regarding use of anticoagulants are included in the POC. There are no interventions or goals for SC, despite SC seeing patient monthly. The patient has a nebulizer, and oxygen concentrator, and a suction machine. There are no goals or interventions for the nebulizer, oxygen concentrator, or suction machine in the POC.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 154 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #3) did not have evidence the plan of care must includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including the following: • A detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs • The IDG demonstrates a proactive approach in developing each patient’s plan of care by planning ahead for anticipated patient changes and needs. Decisions should reflect the patient/family preferences rather than be solely a response to a crisis. Patient #3: The MSW is seeing the patient monthly, however, the existing Frequency order in the IDG states “initial and prn”. This order has not been updated since July of 23. PRN frequencies cannot stand alone as this is not a detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 209 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #1,3,5) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #1: The wound order for this patient states, “Stage 3 to coccyx. Cleanse with wound wash, pat dry, apply Medi-honey, cover with Mepilex border daily for 21 days” A second location states, “DTI to R Heel, Cleanse with wound wash, pat dry, apply Medi-honey, cover with Mepilex border daily for 21 days” neither of these orders specify who will do the dressing. Patient #3: The wound order for this patient states, “Right Heel DTI. Cleanse with NS, pat dry, apply Medi-honey then cover with Mepilex border dressing dressing daily x 21 days then reassess”. The order does not specify who will change the dressing. Patient #5: The wound order for this patient reads, “Sacral wound Pressure ulcer stage 3 - Cleanse around wound edges and peri wound using Vashe wash or antimicrobial wound cleanser. Do not put anything on the wound bed. Cover with silicone bordered foam dressing. Change superficial dressing daily and as needed for the loss of integrity/soiling. The order does not specify who will change the dressing.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon client record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #3,4) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #3: The MSW is seeing the patient monthly, without evidence of an order for monthly visits. Patient #4: The POC states SC is declined, however, SC is seeing the patient monthly without an order.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 143 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #5) did not have evidence that the hospice has offered and/or provided spiritual counseling in accordance with the patient/family’s desires which include: •Providing an assessment of the patient’s and family’s spiritual needs (individual comprehensive assessments missing the spiritual assessment is cited under L524) •Providing spiritual counseling to meet these needs in accordance with the patient’s and family’s acceptance of this service and in a manner consistent with their beliefs and desires •Making all reasonable efforts to facilitate visits by local clergy, pastoral counselors, or other individuals who can support the patient’s spiritual needs to the best of their ability •Advising the patient and family of this service Patient #5: The RN noted in the initial assessment that spiritual care was needed and there was no evidence of a spiritual visit up to day of survey.”

    Rule L0598. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 330 words

    “Upon patient record review, 7 of 14 (Patient #1,2,3,6,7,9,10) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient #1: The Aide POC states to encourage fluids and diet as tolerated. The patient is on a mechanical soft diet. The patient is on oxygen, though oxygen and oxygen precautions are not on the aide POC. Patient #2: The aide POC states diet as tolerated. The patient is on a mechanical soft diet. The patient has prn oxygen, though it is not listed with oxygen precautions on the aide POC. Patient #3: The patient has DME of a Hoyer lift. This is not included in the Aide POC. Patient #6: The aide POC does not contain bleeding precautions as patient is on anticoagulants. Patient #7: The aide POC is blank. There are no tasks included in the Aide POC. Patient #9: The aide POC states patient uses wheel chair and Geri-chair. This needs to specify which will be used, there cannot be a choice for the aide. The aide POC does not include bleeding precautions despite patient being on anticoagulants. The patient has oxygen. Oxygen and Oxygen precautions are not included in the aide POC. Patient #10: The aide POC states to encourage fluids, however, there is no diet listed. The patient has seizures, though seizure precautions are not included in the aide POC.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Mar 21, 2025Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care8 deficiencies cited
Apr 26, 2024Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Aug 30, 2022.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 10.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 12% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 95.5% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 44% at home, 56% in assisted living.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day10.3 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends12%
Visits near death95.5% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 7 owners or officers are people: Rolando S. San Gabriel (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Rolando S. San Gabriel (corporate officer, 100%); Rolando S. San Gabriel (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Rolando S. San Gabriel (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Marjorie A Bandonill (corporate officer, 100%); Marjorie A Bandonill (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Marjorie A Bandonill (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 8 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 94.92% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold8 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 70 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91723, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7.5; this one had 8.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.