Hearth Record

Trilogy Hospice, Inc.

A hospice in Van Nuys, California 91401

14328 Victory Blvd Suite K, Van Nuys, California 91401. (747) 207-9377.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 10 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

10 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 252 hospices serving ZIP code 91401 had 4.

The last inspection on record was on Jun 4, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

10 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

10 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jun 4, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care10 deficiencies
  • Notice of rights and responsibilities (42 CFR 418.52(a)(1))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence that during the initial assessment visit in advance of furnishing care, the hospice provided the patient and/or family with verbal (meaning spoken) and written notice of the Patient’s Rights and Responsibilities in a language and manner that the patient understands. Patient#1,#2,#3: Patient primary language was not English. There was no evidence that Patient rights and responsibilities we provided in a written language the patient understands. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0502. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 14 (Patient #4) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment identifies the physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the hospice patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process. Patient#4: There is no evidence of an initial spiritual assessment completed for patient.”

    Rule L0524. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 92 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 4 (Patient #4) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient#4: There is no evidence of an initial bereavement assessment being completed for patient.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #9) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient#9: There is no evidence RN included wound measurements in comprehensive assessment between 5/2/25-5/30/25.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 139 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #3, #4) did not have evidence that the IDG in collaboration with the attending physician reviewed, revised and documents the individualized plan as frequently as the patient’s condition requires but no less frequently then every 15 calendar days. Patient#3: There is no evidence of documentation of patient needs or progress of goals by MSW for IDG 2/28, 3/24, 3/28, and 4/11. MSW only states that she will continue working on enhancing coping strategies and will continue to provide psychosocial support to the patient and family. Patient#4: There is no evidence of documentation of patient needs or progress of goals by MSW for IDG 4/11, 4/25, 5/9, 5/23. MSW only states that she will continue working on enhancing coping strategies and will continue to provide psychosocial support to the patient and family.”

    Rule L0552. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 127 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #7,8) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient#7: The record indicates the plan of care contains an intervention stating the SN to perform diabetic foot exam and care upon every visit. There is no evidence or documentation this was completed or performed on SN visits 5/23, 5/21, 5/16 and 5/9. Plan of care corrected on site. Patient#8: The record indicates the plan of care contains an intervention stating the SN to perform diabetic foot exam and care upon every visit. There is no evidence or documentation this was completed or performed on SN visits 5/29, 5/24, 5/22. Plan of care corrected on site.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(3))

    “Upon patient record review 2 of 14 (Patient #2, #3) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services provided are based on all assessments of the patient and family needs. Patient#2: The record indicates an order was placed on 4/9/25 for podiatry. There is no evidence of follow- up on this order documented. Patient#3: The record indicates an order was placed on 2/27/25 for podiatry. There is no evidence of follow- up on this order documented.”

    Rule L0556. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(5))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #9) did not have evidence that the IDG shares information on a on-going basis with non-hospice healthcare providers furnishing services unrelated to the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient#9: There is no evidence on any IDG meeting of documented collaboration of care and communication with the wound care company providing debridement care of the stage IV sacral wound.”

    Rule L0558. Standard-level.

  • Recertification of the terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(c))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #3) did not have evidence that before the recertification period for each patient, the medical director or physician designee must review the patient’s clinical information and provide written documentation that it is anticipated that the patient’s life expectancy is 6 months or less. Patient#3: The record indicates there is a physician narrative for recertification starting 5/6/25. However, there is no evidence of physician signature on recertification for 5/6/25-8/13/25.”

    Rule L0668. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #8) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient#8: The record indicates patient signed form for full code. However, the electronic medical record shows patient is DNR. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 4, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care10 deficiencies cited
Feb 22, 2024Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jun 6, 2022.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.7 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 19.1% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 82.6% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 82% at home, 18% in assisted living.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.7 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends19.1%
Visits near death82.6% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 6 owners or officers are people: Babken Sisakyan (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Babken Sisakyan (corporate officer, 100%); Babken Sisakyan (corporate director, 100%); Babken Sisakyan (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Lee L Nelson (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Tamara Aboyan (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 8 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 78.57% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold8 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 252 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91401, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4; this one had 10.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.