Hearth Record

Elite Hospice and Palliative Care LLC

A hospice in Escondido, California 92025

224 E Grand Avenue, Suite 100, Escondido, California 92025. (480) 217-2034.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 10 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

10 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 79 hospices serving ZIP code 92025 had 8.

The last inspection on record was on Oct 10, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

10 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

10 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Oct 10, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission10 deficiencies
  • Exercise of rights/respect for proprty/person (42 CFR 418.52(b)(1)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 129 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to respect the patient’s right to participate in decisions about their care, treatment, or services. For example: on review of RRNHV#5 the patient elected to receive the patient notification of non-covered items, services, and drugs on admission. At the time of survey nearly 2 weeks post start of care there was no documentation that the notification had been supplied to the patient/family. In RRNHV#7 the patient elected notification of non-covered items yet there was no documentation that the document was presented within the 5 days after start of care. Similar lack of documentation of the notice delivered within 5 days of admission was noted in RRNHV#10. These observations were reviewed with the Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0505. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(5))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to conduct and document a patient-specific comprehensive assessment and reassessment that identified the patient’s need for hospice care and services. For example: on review of RRNHV#9 the documentation noted wounds to the ankle and sacrum however there was not consistent wound assessment to include all elements as required by the organization documented in the patient record. This observation was reviewed with the Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0529. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 178 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 7 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the plan of care include all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. For example: on review of RRNHV#5 there was documentation that the patient was a high fall risk with multiple past falls yet fall safety was not reflected in the plan of care. In review of RRHV#3, RRNHV#6, RRNHV#7, RRNHV#8 the patient was being seen by the Medical Social Worker yet there were no psychosocial care plans to guide the care. In RRNHV#6 the patient was admitted with protein calorie malnutrition with nutrition being a focus of the care yet there was no nutrition care plan open. In RRNHV#9 there was documentation of an ankle, and sacral wound but no care plan to address skin integrity. In RRHV#2 the documentation and discussion in the home observation revealed many psychosocial issues surrounding family conflict yet there was no psychosocial care plan to guide the care. These observations were reviewed with the Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0546. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 107 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the plan of care include all drugs and treatments needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. On review of RRNHV#9 there was documentation of a stage3 sacral wound that required treatment yet there was no physicians order noted on the plan of care for the wound. In RRHV#3 there was documentation of a skin tear to the left calf with wound treatment yet no physicians order for treatment noted as part of the plan of care. These observations were reviewed with the Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 115 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the care and services were provided in accordance with the plan of care. In review of RRNHV#5 the hospice aide was ordered per the plan of care 2 times a week, yet there were no visits documented provided the week following admission. In RRNHV#6 and RRNHV#8 the plan of care ordered the chaplain monthly yet per documentation the chaplain was available to the patient as needed and monthly visits were not being made. In RRNHV#9 the chaplain was ordered monthly but there was no visits documented in July or August. These observations were reviewed with the Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Performance improvement projects (42 CFR 418.58(d)(2))

    “Observed in Data Session. The organization failed to document what performance improvement projects were being conducted the reasons for conducting the projects and measurable progress achieved on the project, as this documentation was unavailable at the time of survey. This observation was reviewed with the Director of Nursing Designee who was name as QAPI coordinator.”

    Rule L0573. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the written patient care instructions for a hospice aide was prepared by the registered nurse. In review of RRNHV#5 the hospice aide was scheduled to provide care 2 times a week yet at the time of survey there was no aide assignment/plan of care noted in the record. This observation was reviewed with the Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 102 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the patient record contain information that reflects the patient’s care, treatment, and services. For example: on review of RRHV#1 during the home observation of the medication reconciliation it was noted the medications metoprolol, Eliquis, and Ocuvite supplement were being given to the patient as part of the facility medication profile yet were not part of the hospice medication profile. In discussion with the Director of Nursing the medications had been discontinued months prior on the hospice profile. This observation was reviewed with the Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 112 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 2 patient records reviewed, for live discharge, the organization failed to ensure the discharge summary include all required elements. In review of RRDC#2 the patient revoked hospice services yet the discharge summary only noted that the patient/family revoked seeking aggressive treatment yet did not include a summary of the patient’s stay, including treatments, symptoms, and pain management - The patient’s current plan of care - The patient’s latest physician orders - Any other documentation that will assist in post discharge continuity of care or that is requested by the attending physician or receiving provider as required. This observation was reviewed with the Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level.

  • Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(1))

    “Observed in Competency Session. In 1 of 4 contracts reviewed, The organization failed to ensure the written agreement with an outside agency providing contracted services provide a stipulation that the outside agency will complete criminal background checks on contracted employees that provide patient care or have access to patient records. In review of the contract for pharmacy there was no stipulation for background checks as required. This observation was reviewed with the Marketer who oversees HR.”

    Rule L0795. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Oct 10, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission10 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Oct 28, 2021.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.8 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 10.8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 77.5% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 77% at home, 23% in assisted living.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.8 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends10.8%
Visits near death77.5% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 4 owners or officers are people: Hamid R Mirbod (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Hamid R Mirbod (corporate officer, 100%); Hamid R Mirbod (corporate director, 100%); Hamid R Mirbod (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 89.8% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 30.6% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 79 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 92025, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 8; this one had 10.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.