Hearth Record

Uni Care Hospice Inc.

A hospice in Escondido, California 92025

1510 South Escondido Blvd, Suite 104, Escondido, California 92025. (760) 566-3345.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 14 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

14 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 79 hospices serving ZIP code 92025 had 8.

The last inspection on record was on Jun 13, 2025: an initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

14 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

14 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jun 13, 2025: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care14 deficiencies
  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #10) did not have evidence that the patient chooses a health care provider, including an attending physician. Patient #10: Space allocated to confirm patient’s choice or decision not to choose physician is left blank. Unable to verify”

    Rule L0515. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 196 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #6) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient #6: 5/25/25 note regarding call from facility reporting hypotension of 76/39. PRN visit made shows bp 72/40. Next day, LVN noted call to facility with no answer and no follow up noted. 5/28/25 call from facility reported unable to give meds related to deep sleep. LVN made call to provide education. 5/29/25 RN visit made. BP 91/45. Per RN patient appears weak and tired, decreased energy and decreased ability to participate in activities, unable to bear weight at times. SpO2 recorded as 85% on room air. Respiratory system assessment documented - assessed no issue specified. Patient has order in place for Oxygen prn and order to notify MD SpO2<85%. Although there is previous documentation of patient’s refusal of Oxygen, there is no re-education/reoffering related to current symptoms. Not seen again by nursing until 6/5/25.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 104 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #1, 2) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #1: Eliquis prescribed with no bleeding precautions identified in problems, goals, interventions. patient #2: Oxygen prescribed with no Oxygen related problems, goals, interventions including no safety precautions.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 100 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #3, 7) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #3: 9/26/25 Treatment order as needed for any new skin tears: Cleanse with wound cleanser. Pat dry. Cover with border gauze. Notify hospice. Patient #7: 5/9/25 Order to apply Bacitracin topical antibiotic ointment to open wounds daily, (without specifying wound locations). 4/24/25 order for Foley catheter, change monthly, without specifying catheter/balloon size and or circumstance for change. corrected on site”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #7) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #7: 5/5/25 SN visit: 16 fr. Foley discontinued and new one placed. 5/20/25 SN visit: A 16 fr. Foley was replaced today. No orders for 16fr. foley to be used. Corrected on site”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 171 words

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 15 (Personnel #7) did not have evidence in the personnel file that the following competency assessment was performed by the aide with a patient: (This standard applies to all Hospice Aides providing care/service who are directly employed by the hospice or through a contractual agreement.) ·Communication skills, including the ability to read, write, and verbally report clinical information to patients, caregivers, and other hospice staff. ·Reading and recording temperature, pulse, and respiration ·Safe transfer techniques and ambulation. ·Normal range of motion and positioning ·Appropriate and safe techniques in personal hygiene and grooming that include-- ·(A) Bed bath ·(B) Sponge, tub, and shower bath ·(C) Shampoo, sink, tub, and bed ·(D) Nail and skin care ·(E) Oral hygiene ·(F) Toileting and elimination The other subject areas in this section may be evaluated through written examination, oral examination or after observation of a Hospice Aide with a patient. Personnel #7: Competency form utilized by agency for hospice aide lists shampoo only not specifically sink, tub, and bed.”

    Rule L0615. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 230 words

    “Upon patient record review, 6 of 19 (Patient #1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 10) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient #1: Patient on Eliquis since admission, but bleeding precautions is not marked for Hospice Aide assignment. Aspiration precautions are marked. Encourage fluids as tolerated if not contraindicated is marked. There is an order for Nectar Thickened Liquids not noted on aide assignment. Patient #2, 3, 7: Oxygen section is blank, although patient has order for prn Oxygen. Patient #8: Oxygen flow rate addressed, but not Oxygen related safety precautions. Patient #10: Colostomy care assigned every visit as needed. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 19 (Patient #2) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient #2: 5/1/25 Hospice Aide frequency 2x/wk. Only 1 visit week of 5/27/25 (on 5/27).”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the annual report documents the use of volunteers providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract personnel. Volunteer service provided was less than 5 percent requirement of total patient care hours per agency’s documented tracking report for 2024.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(1))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 19 (Personnel #13) did not have evidence the hospice employees and contract employees have received orientation on the hospice philosophy. Personnel #13: No evidence of orientation to hospice philosophy. (PT has made visits in distant past per staff).”

    Rule L0661. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #10) did not have evidence that each patient record contains: • Signed copies of the notice of patient rights in accordance with 418.52 • Signed election statement in accordance with 418.24 Patient #10: Admitted 2/6/25 I choose and I do not choose attending physician are both blank in the election.”

    Rule L0673. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 172 words

    “Upon patient client record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #6, 7) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient #6: Per CTI: (Patient name) is an 89 year old female with a hospice eligible dx of bladder carcinoma. She had been on hospice services but revoked upon transport to the ER following a fall. Interview with RN identifies that physician was mistaken. Patient did not revoke hospice but was discharged upon transport to ER by facility without hospice contact/authorization. Patient #7: Foley catheter changes 5/5 and 5/20/25. 5/5/25 visit: 16 Fr Foley discontinued and new one placed. 5/20/25 SN visit: A 16 Fr Foley was replaced today. Neither note included specifics of procedure including balloon size and or deflating prior to removal. Documentation was updated with details, during survey.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Label dispose storage drugs (42 CFR 418.106(e)(2)(i)(A))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence a copy is provided of the hospice written policies and procedures on the management and disposal of controlled drugs to the patient or patient representative and family. Upon observation, the actual policy is not provided to patients at time of survey. Staff implemented corrective action plan prior to end of survey.”

    Rule L0695. Standard-level.

  • Label dispose storage drugs (42 CFR 418.106(e)(2)(i)(C))

    “Upon client record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #1, 2) did not have evidence that the written policies and procedures for managing controlled drugs was provided and discussed. Patient #1,2: Initial comprehensive and consent/admission forms do not include documentation to verify discussion.”

    Rule L0697. Standard-level.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 13, 2025Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care14 deficiencies cited
Jun 26, 2024Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Jun 4, 2024Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Oct 26, 2015.
  • Ownership: other.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.5 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 9.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 93.3% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 77% at home, 16% in assisted living, 7% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.5 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends9.6%
Visits near death93.3% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 5 owners or officers are people: Patricia A Shader (corporate director, 0%); Patricia A Shader (managing employee (on the payroll)); Jodi Rae Schloss (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Albert Keshavarzi (corporate officer); Genaro A Martinez (managing employee (under contract), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 85% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 83% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 90.76% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 17.9% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 53 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 79 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 92025, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 8; this one had 14.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.