Gamma Hospice Care, Inc.
A hospice in Los Angeles, California 90039
3111 Los Feliz Blvd, Unit 108, Los Angeles, California 90039. (714) 257-5620.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.
- 16 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- Not rated family caregiver rating
- Not available CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
16 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 108 hospices serving ZIP code 90039 had 5.
The last inspection on record was on Jun 18, 2025: a follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.
1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
16 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Jun 18, 2025: follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care5 deficiencies
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 5 (Patients #3 and 5) did not contain a current/comprehensive Medication Profile: Patient #3: The Medication Profile listed, “Lidocaine Patch 5%, on 12 hours and off 12 hours, without a location on the body for which to locate such patch. Patient #5: The Medication Profile listed, “Oxygen 0.995 mg/ml. This is not a correct Oxygen dosage.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
“Upon patient record review, the agency did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient as there was no new admissions after compliance date therefore unable to abate.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 102 words
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 5 (Patient #1,#4) did not contain evidence that the IDG had ensured that care and services were provided in accordance with the Plan of Care: Patient #1: The POC ordered SN visits 1x per week. There was no documented SN visit for the week of June 1-7, 2025. Patient #4: The IDG POC dated 06/03/25 listed, “SW visits one per week” however, there was no evidence of visits the week of 06/01 or 06/09/25. The RN Case Manager reported that this was an incorrect entry. It should have been entered as, “SW visits one per month.””
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 123 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 5 (Patient #3) did not contain evidence that the IDG had documented the sharing of information between all disciplines providing care and services in all settings, whether the care and services are provided directly or under arrangement: Patient #3: The RN documents within the 05/30/25 home visit, “Notable respiratory distress, SOB at rest, wheezing, dry cough, and reliance on accessory muscles to breath. Auscultation reflects decreased breath sounds, and scattered rhonchi; indicating an active infection and worsening of condition.” There was no documented evidence that the RN had reported these findings to the Hospice Medical Director. Neither did the next subsequent 06/03/25 IDG Meeting notes reflect the patient’s updated condition/status to the rest of the Interdisciplinary Team.”
-
Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))
The inspectors’ words, 109 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 5 (Patients #2) did not contain evidence that all entries were legible, clear, and complete: Patient #2: The IDG POC dated 06/03/25 included: 1. SN - Visits 1x per week; and 2) Other - Visits 2x per month. The RN Case Manager states that the “SN” visit frequency entry is intended to reflect the frequency of LVN visits, and the “Other” frequency entry is intended to reflect the frequency of an RN conducting LVN supervisory visits every 2 weeks (per their practice). This is unclear documentation, as the neither of these entries specify what clinician is to be making these entered visit frequencies.”
May 7, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care11 deficiencies
-
IDG, care planning, coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56)
“Condition of participation: Interdisciplinary group, care planning, and coordination of services. The hospice must designate an interdisciplinary group or groups as specified in paragraph (a) of this section which, in consultation with the patient’s attending physician, must prepare a written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must specify the hospice care and services necessary to meet the patient and familyspecific needs identified in the comprehensive assessment as such needs relate to the terminal illness and related conditions.”
-
Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))
The inspectors’ words, 137 words
“Upon patient record review 4 of 14 (Patient #3,4,7,9) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completed the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Patient 3: Patient admitted 1/5/25 and referred to SC for initial spiritual assessment. Initial spiritual assessment documented in the medical record on 1/16/25. Patient 4: Patient admitted 10/29/24 and referred to SC for initial spiritual assessment. Initial spiritual assessment documented in the medical record on 1/27/25. Patient 7: Patient admitted 7/3/24 and referred to SC for initial spiritual assessment. Initial spiritual assessment documented in the medical record 1/20/25. Patient 9: Patient admitted 8/12/24 and referred to SC for initial spiritual assessment. Initial spiritual assessment documented in the medical record 2/10/25.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))
The inspectors’ words, 303 words
“Upon patient record review, 7 of 14 (Patient #1,2,3,4,5,6,8) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 1,2,3,8: Patient has oxygen listed as a treatment in the plan of care. There is no evidence of this medication on the medication list. COS Patient 4: Patient with medication lidocaine 5% ointment on the medication list. Instructions: apply to affected area, 12 hours on and 12 hours off, for pain management. There is no evidence of application site for this medication. COS Patient 5,6: Patient has oxygen listed as intervention in the plan of care. There is no evidence of this medication on the medication list. COS Patient 6: Medication diclofenac 1% topical ointment on medication list with instructions: apply to affected area daily, use as directed. There is no evidence of application site or indication for this medication on the medication list. Medication nitroglycerin 0.4mg on the medication list with instructions: one tablet sublingual as needed for angina. There is evidence of incomplete medication instructions for this medication on the medication list. Medication lidocaine patches on the medication list with instructions: one patch topical (see note) 12 hours on/12 hours off. There is no evidence of patch dosage, application site, application amount, indication. There is also no evidence of referred note for this medication on the medication list. Medication potassium chloride on the medication list with instructions: KCl 8, 1 tab by mouth daily for nausea, vomiting. There is no evidence of dose on the medication list. All COS”
-
Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))
The inspectors’ words, 103 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #6) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment is updated including and by: • The hospice interdisciplinary group (in collaboration with the individual’s attending physician, if any) • Changes that have taken place since the initial assessment • Information on the patient’s progress toward desired outcomes • Reassessment of the patient’s response to care • The assessment update must be accomplished as frequently as the condition of the patient requires, but no less frequently than every 15 days Patient 6: There is no evidence of documented RN visit since 4/18/25.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 274 words
“Upon patient record review, 8 of 14 (Patient #1,2,3,4,5,6,8,10) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 1,2,3,5,8,10: Respiratory care plan with intervention: instruct proper and safe use of oxygen at _ liters per minute via nasal cannula or mask. There is no evidence of oxygen dose in this intervention. All COS Patient 1: Seizure precautions identified as a need during initial comprehensive assessment, dated 3/11/25. There is no evidence of seizure plan of care with problems, goals, interventions in the medical record. COS Patient 2: Immobility and incontinence X2 both on plan of care with problems, goals, interventions due to identified needs during initial comprehensive assessment dated 7/22/24. There is no evidence of problems, goals, interventions on the plan of care for high risk for skin breakdown. COS Patient 4: Edema was identified during initial comprehensive assessment dated 10/29/24. There is no evidence of edema plan of care including problems, goals, interventions. COS Patient 6: Aspirin 81mg on plan of care with indication CVA prophylaxis, added on admission 4/1/25. There is no evidence of bleeding risk plan of care with problems, goals, interventions. COS Patient 8: Aspiration precautions identified as a need during initial comprehensive assessment, dated 5/3/24. There is no evidence of plan of care with problems, goals, interventions for this identified need.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 291 words
“Upon patient record review, 7 of 14 (Patient #1,2,3,4,5,6,8) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 1,2,3,8: Patient has oxygen listed as a treatment in the plan of care. There is no evidence of this medication order on the plan of care. COS Patient 4: Patient with medication lidocaine 5% ointment on the plan of care. Instructions: apply to affected area, 12 hours on and 12 hours off, for pain management. There is no evidence of application site for this medication in the plan of care. COS Patient 5,6: Patient has oxygen listed as intervention in the plan of care. There is no evidence of this medication order on the plan of care. COS Patient 6: Medication diclofenac 1% topical ointment on plan of care with instructions: apply to affected area daily, use as directed. There is no evidence of application site or indication for this medication on the plan of care. Medication nitroglycerin 0.4mg on the plan of care with instructions: one tablet sublingual as needed for angina. There is evidence of incomplete medication instructions for this medication on the plan of care. Medication lidocaine patches on the plan of care with instructions: one patch topical (see note) 12 hours on/12 hours off. There is no evidence of patch dosage, application site, application amount, indication. There is also no evidence of referred note for this medication on the plan of care. Medication potassium chloride on the plan of care with instructions: KCl 8 1 tab by mouth daily for nausea, vomiting. There is no evidence of dose for this medication on the plan of care. All COS”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))
The inspectors’ words, 115 words
“Upon patient record review, 6 of 14 (Patient #2,4,5,6,7,10) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 2,4,6: DME need identified with no evidence of DME in the plan of care: oxygen. COS Patient 5: DME need identified with no evidence of DME in the plan of care: oxygen. Oxygen supplies listed, concentrator/tanks not listed. COS Patient 7: DME need identified with no evidence of DME in the plan of care: wheelchair. COS Patient 10: DME need identified with no evidence of DME in the plan of care: walker, shower chair. COS”
-
Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #10,11) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient 10: 4/19/25 recertification visit documents oxygen use. There is no evidence of updated plan of care to include oxygen problems, goals, interventions. COS Patient 11: Patient was discharged due to being no longer terminally ill. There is no evidence of discharge planning in the patient’s medical record.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 243 words
“Upon patient record review, 6 of 14 (Patient #1,2,3,4,5,7) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 1: SC visit frequency order is evaluation only. Documented SC visits 3/13 and 4/11. Clarification order entered during survey for monthly SC visits. Patient 2: SC visit frequency order is once per certification period. Documented SC visits 10/25/24, 1/22, 2/21, 3/18/25. Clarification order entered during survey for monthly SC visits. Patient 3: SC visit frequency order is evaluation only. Documented SC visits 1/16, 3/13, 4/11/25. Clarification order entered during survey for monthly SC visits. Social worker visit frequency order is evaluation only. Documented social worker visits 1/9, 4/6/25. Patient 4: Patient admitted 10/29/24 in certification period 2. SC visit frequency order is once per certification period. Documented SC visits: 1/27, 2/27, 3/21/25. All visits occurred during certification 3, dating 1/27/25-3/27/25. Patient 5: SC visit frequency order is evaluation only. Documented SC visits 2/10, 3/10, 4/10/25. Clarification order entered during survey for monthly SC visits. Patient 7: SC visit frequency orders: one visit during certification periods dated 10/1/24-12/29/24 (2 of these orders); 12/30/24-2/27/25 and 4/29/25-6/27/25 (2 of these orders). Documented SC visits: 1/20/25, 2/20/25, 3/20/25. Social worker visit frequency orders: one visit during certification periods dated 7/3-9/30/24; 10/1/24-12/29/24 (3 of these orders); 12/30/24-2/27/25; X1 visit on 2/28/25; and 4/29/25-6/27/25; and one PRN. Documented social worker visits: 7/6, 10/2, 10/5, 12/31/24, 1/3, 4/30/25.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 149 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #10) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient 10: Visit frequency order for aide beginning 7/24/24 is twice weekly. There is no evidence of aide care plan in the medical record.”
-
Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #13) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 13: In the visit summary for the death note, another patient’s name is used. Addendum was added during survey day 2, acknowledging and correcting error.”
All 2 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2025 | Follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 5 deficiencies cited |
| May 7, 2025 | Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 11 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Mar 2, 2022.
- CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- 9 owners or officers are people: Lilian Villareal (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Lilian Villareal (corporate officer, 50%); Lilian Villareal (corporate director, 50%); Alberto Abundo (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Alberto Abundo (corporate officer, 50%); Alberto Abundo (corporate director, 50%); Alberto Abundo (managing employee (on the payroll), 50%); Lilian Villareal (managing employee (on the payroll)); Kamyar Kamjoo (managing employee (under contract)).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What do families say?
- CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
- CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 108 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 90039, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 16.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| In the Arms of Grace Hospice, Inc. | 0 |
| Ojax Hospice, Inc. | 31 |
| Gamma Hospice Care, Inc. This hospice | 16 |
| Pro-Med Health Hospice | Not given |
| Crown Hospice, Inc. | 12 |
| Rose Garden Hospice, Inc. | 5 |
| Mimas Hospice and Palliative Care, Inc. | 0 |
| Verdugo Hospice Care Center | 0 |
| Grace Hospice, Inc. | 10 |
| Angel’s Smile Hospice, Inc. | 2 |
| Comprehensive Hospice Care, Inc. | Not given |
| Hospice of Nation, Inc. | 13 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.