West Valley Hospice, Inc.
A hospice in Van Nuys, California 91401
14349 Victory Boulevard, Suite 203a, Van Nuys, California 91401. (818) 452-3646.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.
- 68 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- Not rated family caregiver rating
- Not available CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
68 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 252 hospices serving ZIP code 91401 had 4.
The last inspection on record was on Nov 22, 2024: an initial follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.
12 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
68 deficiencies in 3 months of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Nov 22, 2024: initial follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care1 deficiency
-
Retention of records (42 CFR 418.104(d))
The inspectors’ words, 91 words
“Upon observation, there was no evidence all patient records are retained for a minimum of six years from the date of the most recent discharge or the death of the patient, unless state law stipulates a longer period of time. The agency has been unable to obtain records from the previous owner. There are currently staying in ongoing communication with previous owner in order to obtain the records. The agency does have a current system in place to maintain records appropriately. All records since change in ownership are being maintained appropriately.”
Oct 14, 2024: initial follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care28 deficiencies
-
Patients rights (42 CFR 418.52)
“Condition of Participation: Patient’s Rights. L500”
-
Initial & comprehensive assessment of patient (42 CFR 418.54)
“Condition of Participation: Initial and Comprehensive Assessment of the Patient.”
-
IDG, care planning, coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56)
“Condition of Participation: Interdisciplinary Group, Care Planning, and Coordination of Services. L536”
-
Hospice aide and homemaker services (42 CFR 418.76)
“Condition of Participation: Hospice Aide and Homemaker Services. L607”
-
Clinical records (42 CFR 418.104)
“Condition of Participation: Clinical Records.”
-
Drugs biologicals medical supplies & dme (42 CFR 418.106)
“Condition of Participation: Drugs and Biologicals, Medical Supplies, and Durable Medical Equipment.”
-
Notice of rights and responsibilities (42 CFR 418.52(a)(2))
“Upon patient record review there was not evidence that the hospice informed and provided written information to the patient concerning its policies on advance directives, including a description of applicable state law. Condition Level Deficiency cannot be abated as there have been no new admissions since last survey and/or compliance date.”
-
Notice of rights and responsibilities (42 CFR 418.52(a)(3))
“Upon patient record review there was not evidence that the hospice obtained the patient’s or representative’s signature confirming that they received a copy of the Patient’s Rights and Responsibilities. Condition Level Deficiency cannot be abated as there have been no new admissions since last survey and/or compliance date.”
-
Exercise of rights/respect for proprty/person (42 CFR 418.52(b)(3))
“Upon patient record review there was not evidence that if a state court has not adjudged a patient incompetent, any legal representative designated by the patient in accordance with state law may exercise the patient’s rights to the extent allowed by state law. Condition Level Deficiency cannot be abated as there have been no new admissions since last survey and/or compliance date.”
-
Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(4))
“Upon patient record review there was not evidence that the patient chooses a health care provider, including an attending physician. Condition Level Deficiency cannot be abated as there have been no new admissions since last survey and/or compliance date.”
-
Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(5))
“Upon patient record review there was not evidence of the appropriate documentation for release of confidential information. Condition Level Deficiency cannot be abated as there have been no new admissions since last survey and/or compliance date.”
-
Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(6))
“Upon observation, there was no evidence the patient has the right to be free of mistreatment, neglect, or verbal, mental, sexual and physical abuse, including injuries of unknown source, and misappropriation of patient property. Condition Level Deficiency cannot be abated as there have been no new admissions.”
-
Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(7))
“Upon patient record review there was not evidence that the patient received information about the services covered under the hospice benefit. Condition Level Deficiency cannot be abated as there have been no new admissions since last survey and/or compliance date.”
-
Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(8))
“Upon patient record review there was not evidence that the patient received information about the scope of services that the hospice will provide and specific limitations on those services. Condition Level Deficiency cannot be abated as there have been no new admissions since last survey and/or compliance date.”
-
Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))
“Upon patient record review there was not evidence in the patient record that the hospice interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completed the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Condition Level Deficiency cannot be abated as there have been no new admissions since last survey and/or compliance date.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))
“Upon patient record review there was not evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment identifies the physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the hospice patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process. Condition Level Deficiency cannot be abated as there have been no new admissions since last survey and/or compliance date.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))
“Upon patient record review there was not evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring No deficiencies identified in clinical record review, but cannot abate deficiency as no visits available afternoon of survey.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))
The inspectors’ words, 92 words
“Upon patient record review there was not evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Condition Level Deficiency cannot be abated as there have been no new admissions since last survey and/or compliance date.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
“Upon patient record review there was not evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Condition Level Deficiency cannot be abated as there have been no new admissions since last survey and/or compliance date.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 5 (Patient #1, 2, 4) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #1: RN 2/mo and 1/mo prn. SN frequency 1/wk and 2 prn visits/mo. Last documented SN visit 9/30/24. Patient #2: RN 2/mo and 1/mo prn. SN frequency 1/wk and 2 prn visits/mo. Last documented SN visit 9/26/24. Patient #4 RN 2/mo and 2/mo prn. SN frequency 1/wk and 3 prn visits/mo. Last documented SN visit 10/4/24.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 141 words
“Upon patient record review there was not evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Condition Level Deficiency cannot be abated as there have been no Hospice Aide services provided since last survey and/or compliance date”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))
“Upon patient record review there was not evidence in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Condition Level Deficiency cannot be abated as there have been no Hospice Aide services provided since last survey and/or compliance date”
-
Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))
“Upon patient record review there was not evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Condition Level Deficiency cannot be abated as there have been no Hospice Aide services provided since last survey and/or compliance date.”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))
“Upon patient record review there was not evidence that each patient record contains: • Signed copies of the notice of patient rights in accordance with 418.52 • Signed election statement in accordance with 418.24 Condition Level Deficiency cannot be abated as there have been no new admissions since last survey and/or compliance date.”
-
Retention of records (42 CFR 418.104(d))
“Deficiency cannot be abated, as initial survey records are still not available.”
-
Label dispose storage drugs (42 CFR 418.106(e)(2)(i)(A))
“Upon observation, there was no evidence a copy is provided of the hospice written policies and procedures on the management and disposal of controlled drugs to the patient or patient representative and family. Condition Level Deficiency cannot be abated as there have been no new admissions since last survey and/or compliance date.”
-
Label dispose storage drugs (42 CFR 418.106(e)(2)(i)(B))
“Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice discussed the policies and procedures for managing the safe use and disposal of controlled drugs with the patient or representative and the family in a language and manner that they understand to ensure that these parties are educated regarding the safe use and disposal of controlled drugs. Condition Level Deficiency cannot be abated as there have been no new admissions since last survey and/or compliance date.”
-
Label dispose storage drugs (42 CFR 418.106(e)(2)(i)(C))
“Upon patient record review there was not evidence that the written policies and procedures for managing controlled drugs was provided and discussed. Condition Level Deficiency cannot be abated as there have been no new admissions since last survey and/or compliance date.”
Aug 28, 2024: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care39 deficiencies
-
Patients rights (42 CFR 418.52)
“Condition of Participation: Patient’s Rights. L500”
-
Initial & comprehensive assessment of patient (42 CFR 418.54)
“Condition of Participation: Initial and Comprehensive Assessment of the Patient.”
-
IDG, care planning, coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56)
“Condition of Participation: Interdisciplinary Group, Care Planning, and Coordination of Services. L536”
-
Hospice aide and homemaker services (42 CFR 418.76)
“Condition of Participation: Hospice Aide and Homemaker Services. L607”
-
Clinical records (42 CFR 418.104)
“Condition of Participation: Clinical Records.”
-
Drugs biologicals medical supplies & dme (42 CFR 418.106)
“Condition of Participation: Drugs and Biologicals, Medical Supplies, and Durable Medical Equipment.”
-
Notice of rights and responsibilities (42 CFR 418.52(a)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 130 words
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 9 (Patient #1,5) did not have evidence that the hospice informed and provided written information to the patient concerning its policies on advance directives, including a description of applicable state law. Patient #1, Patient primary diagnosis is heart disease with secondary of Alzheimer disease. Plan of care and nursing assessment documents patient is anxious , awake, lethargic, confused. The patient was seen awake, lethargic at times and with confusion and disorientation. Patient is only oriented to place and person, reoriented patient as needed. Patient signed his own consents. Patient #5, Patient primary diagnosis is senile degeneration of brain, documenting primary disease as dementia. RN initial assessment documents alert and oriented x2 with forgetfulness and confusion. CTI documents patient is awake, mostly confused and disoriented.”
-
Notice of rights and responsibilities (42 CFR 418.52(a)(3))
The inspectors’ words, 127 words
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 9 (Patient #1,5) did not have evidence that the hospice obtained the patient’s or representative’s signature confirming that they received a copy of the Patient’s Rights and Responsibilities. Patient #1, Patient primary diagnosis is heart disease with secondary of Alzheimer disease. Plan of care and nursing assessment documents patient is anxious , awake, lethargic, confused. The patient was seen awake, lethargic at times and with confusion and disorientation. Patient is only oriented to place and person, reoriented patient as needed. Patient signed his own consents. Patient #5, Patient primary diagnosis is senile degeneration of brain, documenting primary disease as dementia. RN initial assessment documents alert and oriented x2 with forgetfulness and confusion. CTI documents patient is awake, mostly confused and disoriented.”
-
Exercise of rights/respect for proprty/person (42 CFR 418.52(b)(3))
The inspectors’ words, 141 words
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 9 (Patient #1,5) did not have evidence that if a state court has not adjudged a patient incompetent, any legal representative designated by the patient in accordance with state law may exercise the patient’s rights to the extent allowed by state law. Patient #1, Patient primary diagnosis is heart disease with secondary of Alzheimer disease. Plan of care and nursing assessment documents patient is anxious , awake, lethargic, confused. The patient was seen awake, lethargic at times and with confusion and disorientation. Patient is only oriented to place and person, reoriented patient as needed. Patient signed his own consents. Patient #5, Patient primary diagnosis is senile degeneration of brain, documenting primary disease as dementia. RN initial assessment documents alert and oriented x2 with forgetfulness and confusion. CTI documents patient is awake, mostly confused and disoriented.”
-
Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 118 words
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 9 (Patient #1,5) did not have evidence that the patient chooses a health care provider, including an attending physician. Patient #1, Patient primary diagnosis is heart disease with secondary of Alzheimer disease. Plan of care and nursing assessment documents patient is anxious , awake, lethargic, confused. The patient was seen awake, lethargic at times and with confusion and disorientation. Patient is only oriented to place and person, reoriented patient as needed. Patient signed his own consents. Patient #5, Patient primary diagnosis is senile degeneration of brain, documenting primary disease as dementia. RN initial assessment documents alert and oriented x2 with forgetfulness and confusion. CTI documents patient is awake, mostly confused and disoriented.”
-
Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(5))
The inspectors’ words, 115 words
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 9 (Patient #1,5) did not have evidence of the appropriate documentation for release of confidential information. Patient #1, Patient primary diagnosis is heart disease with secondary of Alzheimer disease. Plan of care and nursing assessment documents patient is anxious , awake, lethargic, confused. The patient was seen awake, lethargic at times and with confusion and disorientation. Patient is only oriented to place and person, reoriented patient as needed. Patient signed his own consents. Patient #5, Patient primary diagnosis is senile degeneration of brain, documenting primary disease as dementia. RN initial assessment documents alert and oriented x2 with forgetfulness and confusion. CTI documents patient is awake, mostly confused and disoriented.”
-
Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(7))
The inspectors’ words, 119 words
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 9 (Patient #1,5) did not have evidence that the patient received information about the services covered under the hospice benefit. Patient #1, Patient primary diagnosis is heart disease with secondary of Alzheimer disease. Plan of care and nursing assessment documents patient is anxious , awake, lethargic, confused. The patient was seen awake, lethargic at times and with confusion and disorientation. Patient is only oriented to place and person, reoriented patient as needed. Patient signed his own consents. Patient #5, Patient primary diagnosis is senile degeneration of brain, documenting primary disease as dementia. RN initial assessment documents alert and oriented x2 with forgetfulness and confusion. CTI documents patient is awake, mostly confused and disoriented.”
-
Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(8))
The inspectors’ words, 127 words
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 9 (Patient #1,5) did not have evidence that the patient received information about the scope of services that the hospice will provide and specific limitations on those services. Patient #1, Patient primary diagnosis is heart disease with secondary of Alzheimer disease. Plan of care and nursing assessment documents patient is anxious , awake, lethargic, confused. The patient was seen awake, lethargic at times and with confusion and disorientation. Patient is only oriented to place and person, reoriented patient as needed. Patient signed his own consents. Patient #5, Patient primary diagnosis is senile degeneration of brain, documenting primary disease as dementia. RN initial assessment documents alert and oriented x2 with forgetfulness and confusion. CTI documents patient is awake, mostly confused and disoriented.”
-
Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))
“Upon patient record review 1 of 9 (Patient #5) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completed the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Patient #5, MSW completed initial assessment on 5/14, patient was admitted on 2/15. MSW documented on 2/16, patient declined MSW service.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))
“Upon patient record review 2 of 9 (Patient #7,8) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment identifies the physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the hospice patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process. Patient #7,8, No evidence of psych social assessment completed. RN initial assessment documented need for visit due to lack of coping skills.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))
The inspectors’ words, 151 words
“Upon patient record review, 4 of 9 (Patient #1,2,3,9) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #1, Upon home visit, patient caregiver states patient is no longer taking Calcium. Calcium remain on medication profile. Patient #2, Upon home visit, patient takes Vitamin D3 every day. No evidence of Vitamin D3 on medication profile. Patient #3, Upon home visit, medication profile states Metoprolol 50mg 2x/day. Patient medication bottle reads Metoprolol 25mg 2x/day. Patient #9, Oxygen @2lpm via nasal cannula as needed shortness of breath. No evidence order was documented on medication profile. Order documented under treatment.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))
The inspectors’ words, 97 words
“Upon patient record review, 6 of 9 (Patient #1,2,3,5,6,8) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient #1,2,3,5,6,8, No evidence of bereavement assessment completed, MSW documents patient did not want MSW to talk with family.”
-
Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))
The inspectors’ words, 134 words
“Upon patient record review, 7 of 9 (Patient #3,4,5,6,7,8,9) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment is updated including and by: • The hospice interdisciplinary group (in collaboration with the individual’s attending physician, if any) • Changes that have taken place since the initial assessment • Information on the patient’s progress toward desired outcomes • Reassessment of the patient’s response to care • The assessment update must be accomplished as frequently as the condition of the patient requires, but no less frequently than every 15 days Patient #3,4,5,6,7,8,9, No evidence of discussion of home health aide during IDG. Patient #6, RN completed initial visit on 1.27.24. No evidence that RN made any additional visits. LVN completed visits on 2.10, 2.24, 3.9, 3.23, 4.6, 4.20, 5.4, 5.18, 6.1, 6.15, 6.29.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 148 words
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 9 (Patient #1,4) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #1, Patient has heart disease as primary diagnosis. No evidence of cardiac care plan. Patient is a full code, no evidence of full code status care plan. Patient #4, Spiritual care documents patient has loss of faith on initial assessment. No evidence of care plan identifying loss of faith. No evidence of care plan addressing 16 year old granddaughter who lives in home. No evidence of care plan for full code status.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))
“Upon patient record review, 4 of 9 (Patient #1,2,3,4) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient #1,2,3, No evidence of DME documented on plan of care. Patient has walker identified during home visit. Patient #4, No evidence of DME documented on plan of care. Patient has walker documented on initial assessment.”
-
Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))
The inspectors’ words, 94 words
“Upon client record review, 3 of 9 (Patient #4,6,7) did not have evidence that the IDG in collaboration with the attending physician reviewed, revised and documents the individualized plan as frequently as the patient’s condition requires but no less frequently then every 15 calendar days. Patient #4, No evidence of MD review on IDG notes on 7/4/, 7/15, 7/29. Patient #6, No evidence of MD review on IDG notes on 1/29, 2/12, 2/26, 3/11, 3/25, 4/8, 4/22, 5/6, 5/20, 6/3, 6/17, 7/1. Patient #7, No evidence of MD review on IDG notes on 5/20.”
-
Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 9 (Patient #5) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient #5, No evidence of MSW documented progress toward goals on 8/12. No evidence of MSW or SC updating progress toward goals on 8/26.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 250 words
“Upon client record review, 8 of 9 (Patient #1,2,3,4,5,7,8,9) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #1, LVN frequency 1x/week, 2 visits completed the first week on 7/14 and 7/19. MSW order for eval, no evidence of visit completed or documentation of missed visit or order to discontinue. SC order for eval, no evidence of initial assessment completed, missed visit or order to discontinue. Patient #2, LVN frequency 1x/week, visits missing week of 7/28, 8/4, 8/11, 8/18. MSW completed telephone visit on 7/6/24, no evidence of order for telephone visits. SC eval, no evidence of visit, missed visit or discontinued order. Patient #3, LVN frequency 1x/week, missed visit first week. B/p order to notify MD of b/p greater than 160, b/p 161/84, no evidence of b/p reported to MD. MSW eval, no evidence of visit, missed visit or discontinued order for visit. SC eval, no evidence of visit, missed visit or discontinued order for visit. Patient #4, SN 1x/week, no evidence of visit completed week of 7/14. Completed 2 visits within one week on 7/31 and 8/3. Patient #5, No evidence of order for 5/14 MSW visit. Patient #7, Frequency documented as RN every 14 days till 4/18/24, LVN 1x/week until 4/18/24. No evidence of order frequency after 4/18/24, patient was seen with continued frequency until 5/17/24. Patient #8,9, MSW and SC order for eval, no evidence of visit, missed visit or discontinued services.”
-
Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))
“Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice follows acceptable standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases, including standard precautions. Patient #1,2,3, Upon observation of visits, all had clean area for b/p, thermometer, pulse ox. Upon using the first item, this item was returned to the clean area.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 160 words
“Upon patient record review, 4 of 9 (Patient #3,5,6,7) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient #3,5,7, Order for aide services. No evidence of care plan completed for aide service. Patient #6, Aide care plan instructs aide to report any change is condition. No evidence of documentation of what changes.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 131 words
“Upon patient record review 6 of 9 (Patient #3,5,6,7,8,9,) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient #3,5,8, Order for Aide 2x/week, no evidence of any visits. Patient #6, Order for Aide 1x/week, no evidence of any visits. Patient #7, No evidence of bed bound/chair to bed, objects within reach on aide care plan. Aide documented completed. Patient #9, Aide frequency 2x/week, no evidence of visits the first week and only 1 visit the second and third week. No evidence of any additional visits or order to discontinue visits.”
-
Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))
“Upon patient record review 1 of 9 (Patient #7) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient #7, No evidence of aide supervisory visits completed on 4/27/24 and 5/11/24.”
-
Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))
“Upon personnel record review, 1 of 13 (Personnel #2 ) did not have evidence the alternate administrator’s personnel record verifies that: • The employee has appropriate education and experience requirements • There is a signed job description for this role • The employee has been orientated to this role Personnel #2, Alt Administrator does not meet the job description requirements of RN or Business Administration.”
-
Continuation of care (42 CFR 418.100(d))
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 9 (Patient #8) did not have evidence that a hospice that provides hospice care to a Medicare or Medicaid beneficiary does not discontinue or reduce care because of the beneficiary’s inability to pay. Patient #8, Patient had Medicaid California, discharge summary documents patient had not updated his Medicaid and the agency discharged patient for not having a payor source. Discharge summary states MSW instructed patient on importance to update their insurance. No evidence of MSW visit made to patient in record.”
-
Initial certification of terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(b))
The inspectors’ words, 118 words
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 9 (Patient #5,6) did not have evidence that the medical director or physician designee provides written certification that it is anticipated that the patient’s life expectancy is 6 months or less if the illness runs its normal course. The physician must consider the following when making this determination: • The primary terminal condition • Related diagnosis • Current subjective and objective medical findings • Current medication and treatment orders • Information about the medical management of any of the patient’s conditions unrelated to the terminal illness Patient #5, No evidence of MD narrative documented on CTI dated 8/13/24 for recertification. Patient #6, No evidence of MD narrative documented on CTI dated 1/27/24”
-
Recertification of the terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(c))
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 9 (Patient #6) did not have evidence that before the recertification period for each patient, the medical director or physician designee must review the patient’s clinical information and provide written documentation that it is anticipated that the patient’s life expectancy is 6 months or less. Patient #6, No evidence of MD narrative documented on CTI dated 4/26/24.”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 145 words
“Upon patient client record review, 3 of 9 (Patient #1,5,6) did not have evidence that each patient record contains: • Signed copies of the notice of patient rights in accordance with 418.52 • Signed election statement in accordance with 418.24 Patient #1, Patient primary diagnosis is heart disease with secondary of Alzheimer disease. Plan of care and nursing assessment documents patient is anxious , awake, lethargic, confused. The patient was seen awake, lethargic at times and with confusion and disorientation. Patient is only oriented to place and person, reoriented patient as needed. Patient signed his own consents. Patient #5, Patient primary diagnosis is senile degeneration of brain, documenting primary disease as dementia. RN initial assessment documents alert and oriented x2 with forgetfulness and confusion. CTI documents patient is awake, mostly confused and disoriented. Patient #6, No election benefit date documented on the election benefit form.”
-
Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))
“Upon patient client record review, 1 of 9 (Patient #6) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient #6, IDG note on 7/1, missing MD, RN,SC signatures, 6/17, 6/3, 5/20, missing MD and SC signatures.”
-
Retention of records (42 CFR 418.104(d))
“Upon observation,all patient records are retained for a minimum of six years from the date of the most recent discharge or the death of the patient Agency has 9 unduplicated for the last 3 years. Requested to review the discharges of agency active patients from initial survey. Agency was not able to produce these charts and state they have become lost.”
-
Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2))
“Upon client record review, 4 of 9 (Patient #6,7,8,9) did not have evidence that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care or is discharged from hospice in accordance with §418.26, the hospice must forward to the patient’s attending physician: • A copy of the hospice discharge summary • The patient’s clinical record, if requested Patient #6,7,8,9, No evidence of discharge summary sent to MD.”
-
Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3))
“Upon client record review, 4 of 9 (Patient #6,7,8,9) did not have evidence that the discharge summary includes all required information. Patient #6,7,8,9, No evidence of brief description of services provided. Documentation was the first visit note and the last visit note.”
-
Label dispose storage drugs (42 CFR 418.106(e)(2)(i)(A))
The inspectors’ words, 126 words
“Upon observation, there was no evidence a copy is provided of the hospice written policies and procedures on the management and disposal of controlled drugs to the patient or patient representative and family. Patient #1, Patient primary diagnosis is heart disease with secondary of Alzheimer disease. Plan of care and nursing assessment documents patient is anxious , awake, lethargic, confused. The patient was seen awake, lethargic at times and with confusion and disorientation. Patient is only oriented to place and person, reoriented patient as needed. Patient signed his own consents. Patient #5, Patient primary diagnosis is senile degeneration of brain, documenting primary disease as dementia. RN initial assessment documents alert and oriented x2 with forgetfulness and confusion. CTI documents patient is awake, mostly confused and disoriented.”
-
Label dispose storage drugs (42 CFR 418.106(e)(2)(i)(B))
The inspectors’ words, 148 words
“Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice discussed the policies and procedures for managing the safe use and disposal of controlled drugs with the patient or representative and the family in a language and manner that they understand to ensure that these parties are educated regarding the safe use and disposal of controlled drugs. Patient #1, Patient primary diagnosis is heart disease with secondary of Alzheimer disease. Plan of care and nursing assessment documents patient is anxious , awake, lethargic, confused. The patient was seen awake, lethargic at times and with confusion and disorientation. Patient is only oriented to place and person, reoriented patient as needed. Patient signed his own consents. Patient #5, Patient primary diagnosis is senile degeneration of brain, documenting primary disease as dementia. RN initial assessment documents alert and oriented x2 with forgetfulness and confusion. CTI documents patient is awake, mostly confused and disoriented.”
-
Label dispose storage drugs (42 CFR 418.106(e)(2)(i)(C))
The inspectors’ words, 120 words
“Upon client record review, 2 of 9 (Patient #1,5) did not have evidence that the written policies and procedures for managing controlled drugs was provided and discussed. Patient #1, Patient primary diagnosis is heart disease with secondary of Alzheimer disease. Plan of care and nursing assessment documents patient is anxious , awake, lethargic, confused. The patient was seen awake, lethargic at times and with confusion and disorientation. Patient is only oriented to place and person, reoriented patient as needed. Patient signed his own consents. Patient #5, Patient primary diagnosis is senile degeneration of brain, documenting primary disease as dementia. RN initial assessment documents alert and oriented x2 with forgetfulness and confusion. CTI documents patient is awake, mostly confused and disoriented.”
All 3 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2024 | Initial follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 1 deficiency cited |
| Oct 14, 2024 | Initial follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 28 deficiencies cited |
| Aug 28, 2024 | Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 39 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Sep 21, 2021.
- CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- CMS’s ownership file has no owners listed for this hospice.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What do families say?
- CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
- CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
- 61.29% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 252 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91401, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4; this one had 68.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Victory Hospice Care | 20 |
| Holy Care Hospice, Inc. | 6 |
| Ama Hospice and Palliative Care, Inc. | Not given |
| Monarch Hospice, Inc. | Not given |
| Angelical Hospice | Not given |
| Light Angel Hospice Inc. | 1 |
| Peace Hospice and Palliative Care, Inc. | Not given |
| All Inclusive Hospice Care, Inc. | Not given |
| AZ Hospice Palliative Care, Inc. | Not given |
| Golden Gate Hospice Care | Not given |
| La Best Hospice Care | 5 |
| Community Care Hospice, Inc. | 9 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.