Hearth Record

Personal Touch Hospice Care, Inc.

A hospice in Encino, California 91316

17547 Ventura Blvd. Suite 302a, Encino, California 91316. (747) 200-9785.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 18 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

18 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 124 hospices serving ZIP code 91316 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Dec 18, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

18 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

18 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Dec 18, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care18 deficiencies
  • Primary/Alternate Means for Communication (42 CFR 418.113(c)(3))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the Emergency Plan communication plan must includes a primary and alternate means for communicating with hospice’s employees and local emergency management agencies. Corrected on site.”

    Rule E0032. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 14 (Patient #4) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment identifies the physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the hospice patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process. Patient #4: No evidence of a spiritual needs assessment by any discipline. Patient declined spiritual care discipline.”

    Rule L0524. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 250 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #2,#12,#14) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #2: Order dated 9/27/2024 included Clotrimazole/betamethasone Dipropionate topical cream 0.05% apply to affected area BID. There was no evidence of an area to apply. During home visit two errors found on prescription bottles (error from pharmacy) Bottle for Ibuprofen 600mg one Q 6 hours PO PRN pain (Hospice order and medication profile was for Q 8 hours), and bottle for Clonidine hydrochloride stated to give medication if BP under 160 systolic (Hospice order and medication profile did not specify). Corrected on site (Ibuprofen order changed to Q6hr) Patient #12: Medication profile dated 11/7/2024 included Diclofenac Sodium topical gel 1% apply to affected area 3x day PRN, no evidence of an area to apply. Patient #14: Mediation profile dated 9/19/2024 included Diclofenac Sodium topical gel 1% apply to affected area 3x day PRN, no evidence of an area to apply. 9/19/2024 MiraLAX 17Gm oral PO as needed for laxative, no evidence of a diluent. On SN SOC assess identified patient is using O2 and on SN notes of 10/17/2024 O2 at 4L+, no evidence on medication profile for O2.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 249 words

    “Upon patient record review, 8 of 14 (Patient #3,#4,#6,#7,#8,#9,#11,#14) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #3: SOC MSW assessment identified no mortuary plans, no evidence on POC for problem/Goals/interventions for funeral planning. Corrected on site. Patient #4: SOC MSW assessment identified no mortuary plans, no advance directive, no evidence on POC for problem/Goals/interventions for funeral planning and advance directives. Corrected on site Patient #6: SOC MSW assessment identified no mortuary plans “undecided”, no evidence on POC for problem/Goals/interventions for funeral planning. Corrected on site Patient #7: SOC MSW assessment identified no mortuary plans “undecided”, no evidence on POC for problem/Goals/interventions for funeral planning. Corrected on site Patient #8: SOC MSW assessment identified no mortuary plans, no evidence on POC for problem/Goals/interventions for funeral planning. Corrected on site Patient #9: SOC MSW assessment identified no mortuary plans, no evidence on POC for problem/Goals/interventions for funeral planning. Patient #11: SOC MSW assessment identified no mortuary plans, no evidence on POC for problem/Goals/interventions for funeral planning. Patient #14: SOC SN identified patient using O2 and MSW identified no mortuary planning. No evidence on POC for problem/goals/interventions for respiratory/O2 or funeral/mortuary planning.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 132 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #2) did not have evidence the plan of care must includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including the following: • A detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs • The IDG demonstrates a proactive approach in developing each patient’s plan of care by planning ahead for anticipated patient changes and needs. Decisions should reflect the patient/family preferences rather than be solely a response to a crisis. Patient #2: No evidence of detailed frequency of services, SOC 9/27/2024 order included MSW 1 visit within 5 days,as needed and recert. Spiritual Care 1 visit within 5 days, as needed and recert. Order corrected on site.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 217 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #2,#12,#14) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #2: Order dated 9/27/2024 included Clotrimazole/betamethasone Dipropionate topical cream 0.05% apply to affected area BID. There was no evidence of an area to apply. During home visit two errors found on prescription bottles (error from pharmacy) Bottle for Ibuprofen 600mg one Q 6 hours PO PRN pain (Hospice order and medication profile was for Q 8 hours), and bottle for Clonidine hydrochloride stated to give medication if BP under 160 systolic (Hospice order and medication profile did not specify). Corrected on site(Ibuprofen order changed to Q6hr) . Patient #12: Order dated 11/7/2024 included Diclofenac Sodium topical gel 1% apply to affected area 3x day PRN, no evidence of an area to apply. Patient #14: Order dated 9/19/2024 included Diclofenac Sodium topical gel 1% apply to affected area 3x day PRN, no evidence of an area to apply. 9/19/2024 MiraLAX 17Gm oral PO as needed for laxative, no evidence of a diluent. On SN SOC assess identified patient is using O2 and on SN notes of 10/17/2024 O2 at 4L+, no evidence on POC of and order for O2.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #12) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #12: SOC order for MSW was initial within 5 days this was done. An additional visit was done on 10/10/24 with no evidence of an order. All IDG orders from SOC until current date include MSW declined by family- with no orders to visit.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 155 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #14) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient #14: SOC SN identified fall risk of 17>4 high risk, on Enoxaparin blood thinner and is using O2. No evidence on aide assignment of O2, bleeding or fall risk/precautions.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Role (42 CFR 418.78(b))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence volunteers are used in day to day administrative and/or direct patient care roles. Only volunteer provides administrative functions, no evidence of ability to provide direct care volunteer.”

    Rule L0644. Standard-level.

  • Recruiting and retaining (42 CFR 418.78(c))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice documents and demonstrates viable and ongoing efforts to recruit and retain volunteers. Has a schedule to provide volunteer posters to churches in 2024, no actual dates or evidence provided that this was done. No retention efforts.”

    Rule L0645. Standard-level.

  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 117 words

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 13 (Personnel #2) did not have evidence the alternate administrator’s personnel record verifies that: • The employee has appropriate education and experience requirements • There is a signed job description for this role • The employee has been orientated to this role Personnel #2: Job Description for Director of Operations/Alternate Administrator included requirements of: Business degree in administration. Masters in health or related field. 3-5 years health care administration. This employee has the years of experience and is a BSN, does not have evidence of the education and experience required of the governing body as evidenced by the job description requirements. Corrected on site- GB held meeting 12/17/2024, updated Job description.”

    Rule L0651. Standard-level.

  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 105 words

    “Upon personnel record review,1 of 13 (Personnel #1) did not have evidence that the administrator is a hospice employee and possesses the education and experience required by the governing body. Personnel #1: Job Description for Director of Operations/Administrator included requirements of: Business degree in administration. Masters in health or related field. 3-5 years health care administration. This employee has the years of experience and is a LPN, does not have evidence of the education and experience required of the governing body as evidenced by the job description requirements. Corrected on site- GB held meeting 12/17/2024, updated Job description, saw documentation of state approving administrator change.”

    Rule L0651. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #10) did not evidence that each patient record contains physician orders. Patient #10: No evidence of a discharge order.”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 233 words

    “Upon patient client record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #4,#10) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient #4: Patient information of front of file identified patient as a male. CTI SOC identifies patient 80 year old female, speaks of patient as “her” then states consents signed by “patient himself”. CTI BP 2 identified patient as 80 year old male. Patient is in fact a male. Corrected on site. Patient #10: F2F signed and dated by physician for 9/26/2024 included “pt. weak, some SOB on mild exertion, uses walker for ambulation, eats 30-40% of meals, KPS 50%, dependent on max assist of 4 or > ADL’s, due to state of health as well as decline life expectancy is 6 months or less if terminal illness runs normal course”. CTI dated and signed by physician for 9/26/2024 describes same “steady decline” and is recertified for BP3. Dated 9/26/2024 is NOMNC form, and DC summary states discharge for extended prognosis and notes “per hospice physician patient condition remains stable and shows no signs of decline, Dr does not find it appropriate to recertify this patient for hospice benefit period 3. Pt dc’d””

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #11) did not have evidence that the hospice forwarded a summary and a copy of the patient record, if requested, to a facility when transferring the patient to that facility. Patient #11: No evidence of transfer summary forwarded to the hospital patient was transferred.”

    Rule L0682. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 92 words

    “Upon client record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #9,#10,#12) did not have evidence that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care or is discharged from hospice in accordance with §418.26, the hospice must forward to the patient’s attending physician: • A copy of the hospice discharge summary • The patient’s clinical record, if requested Patient #9: No evidence of a discharge summary forwarded to attending physician. Patient #10: No evidence of a discharge summary forwarded to attending physician. Patient #12: No evidence of a discharge summary forwarded to attending physician.”

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3))

    “Upon client record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #9,#10,#12) did not have evidence that the discharge summary includes all required information. Patient #9: No evidence of a discharge summary (form blank). Patient #10: No evidence of any required elements on discharge summary. Patient #12: No evidence of any required elements on discharge summary.”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level.

  • Label dispose storage drugs (42 CFR 418.106(e)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 110 words

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #2) did not have evidence that all drugs and biologicals are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional practice and include appropriate usage and cautionary instructions, as well as an expiration date, if applicable. Patient #2:During home visit two errors found on prescription bottles (error from pharmacy) Bottle for Ibuprofen 600mg one Q 6 hours PO PRN pain (Hospice order and medication profile was for Q 8 hours), and bottle for Clonidine hydrochloride stated to give medication if BP under 160 systolic (Hospice order and medication profile did not specify- and would have been intended for BP > 160 systolic per staff).”

    Rule L0693. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Dec 18, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care18 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Nov 15, 2021.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 8.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 14.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 42.9% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 97% at home, 3% in assisted living.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day8.3 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends14.6%
Visits near death42.9% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • CMS’s ownership file has no owners listed for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 7 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold7 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 124 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91316, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 18.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.