Hearth Record

Partners Hospice Quality Care, LLC

A hospice in La Habra, California 90631

317 W La Habra Blvd Suite 200, La Habra, California 90631. (562) 245-7580.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

8 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 153 hospices serving ZIP code 90631 had 7.

The last inspection on record was on Nov 21, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

8 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Nov 21, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care8 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 179 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #3,#4,#7) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient#3: During home visit it was noted that Melatonin 10mg tablet was present. Caregiver states patient is currently taking 1 by mouth as needed at bedtime for sleep. There is no evidence of this medication on the Medication profile. Corrected on site. Patient#4: The record indicates patient ordered Voltaren 1% apply 2g to affected area twice a day PRN. There is no evidence of a specified area of application on medication profile. Corrected on site. Patient#7: The record indicates patient ordered hydrocortisone 1% topical to be applied 2-3 times a day prn. There is no evidence of a specified area of application on medication profile. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 124 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #3) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment is updated including and by: • The hospice interdisciplinary group (in collaboration with the individual’s attending physician, if any) • Changes that have taken place since the initial assessment • Information on the patient’s progress toward desired outcomes • Reassessment of the patient’s response to care • The assessment update must be accomplished as frequently as the condition of the patient requires, but no less frequently than every 15 days Patient#3: There is no evidence of RN visit between the dates of 8/25/24- 9/13/24. There was a missed visit on 09/08. RN visit on 9/13 was 19 days after RN visit on 8/25.”

    Rule L0533. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 114 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #1) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient#1: Patient admitted with wound to sacrum on 12/18/23. Wound resolved 1/27/24. There were no measurements or RN assessment of wound documented from admit to 1/27. The wound reoccurred 10/21/24 to present. Wound was measured and assessment documented on 10/18 and 10/25. There is no evidence of measurements or assessment documented after 10/25.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 242 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 14 (Patient #1,#2,#3,#5) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient#1: The record indicates the patient was admitted with a terminal diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. There is no evidence or problems, interventions or goals related to this diagnosis on the plan of care. Corrected on site Patient#2: The record indicates the patient is taking Basaglar 100 units/1ml 20 units before lunch to manage high blood sugar and metformin. There is no evidence of problems interventions or goals related to diabetes. The record indicates that the patient had a foley catheter placed on 11/11/24. There is no evidence of foley catheter care, interventions or goals on plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient#3: The record indicates the patient has issues with depression, incontinence, and high fall risk. There is no evidence of problems interventions or goals related to these issues on plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient#5: The record indicates the patient has issues with pain and constipation. There is no evidence of interventions or goals related to these issues on plan of care. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #1) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient#1: The record indicates the agency is providing boost for supplemental nutrition. There is no evidence of a physician order regarding amount or frequency to take the boost for nutritional needs.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 198 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 14 (Patient #1,2,3,5,6) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient#1: There is documentation in record of wound care being provided on admit for sacral pressure wound. There is no evidence of wound care physician order. Documentation indicates on 10/18/24 that a pressure wound to sacrum was noted. No evidence of a physician order is found. Patient#2: There is no evidence of physician order for foley catheter placed on 11/11/24. Corrected on site. Patient#3: There is no evidence of RN visit between the dates of 8/25/24- 9/13/24. There was a missed visit on 09/08. Patient#5: The record indicates nurse frequency of visits for nurse is 1 time per week. There is evidence of 2 visits in the same week on 9/3 and 9/5. There is no evidence that one of these visits as PRN. Corrected on site. Patient#6: No order for 3/13/24 to keep foley for patient/family request. There is no evidence of an order for foley to be changed on 3/7. There is no evidence of an order to remove foley on 7/11. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(3))

    “Upon patient record review 2 of 14 (Patient #1,6) IDG ensures that the care and services provided are based on all assessments of the patient and family needs. Patient #1: The record indicates a Podiatry referral was made on 2/20/24. There is no evidence of follow up or visit being made. Per agency staff this visit did occur. Corrected on site. Patient#6: The record indicates PT was requested for patient on 3/4/24. There is no evidence that the visits occurred.”

    Rule L0556. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(6))

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #3,#5) did not have evidence that each patient record contains Advance Directives. Patient#3: The record indicates patient has a POA who signed consents. There is no evidence of the POA documents in the chart. Documents were obtained and Corrected on site. Patient#5: The record indicates patient has a POA who signed consents. There is no evidence of the POA documents in the chart. Documents were obtained and Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0677. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 21, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care8 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Dec 23, 2021.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.5 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.9% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 100% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 86% at home, 14% in assisted living.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day12.5 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends7.9%
Visits near death100.0% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 5 owners or officers are people: Evangeline C Co (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Evangeline C Co (corporate officer); Evangeline C Co (corporate director); Evangeline C Co (managing employee (on the payroll)); Evangeline C Co (runs it (operational or managerial control)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 95.65% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 153 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 90631, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 8.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.