Hearth Record

Home Connect Hospice Socal

A hospice in Anaheim, California 92804

1811 W Katella Ave, Suite 109, Anaheim, California 92804. (714) 912-2570.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 15 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

15 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 224 hospices serving ZIP code 92804 had 7.

The last inspection on record was on Dec 4, 2025: an initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

2 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

15 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

15 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Dec 4, 2025: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care8 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 153 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #3,4,9) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 3: Medications verified with family during home visit, stated patient has been taking aspirin 81mg daily for years. Aspirin is not on the hospice medication profile. Corrected on site. Patient 4: On the medication profile there is a medication Nystop 100,000 unit/gm, topical 4 times daily for redness and irritation. There is no directions for where to apply the medication. Corrected on site. Patient 9: On the medication profile there is a medication, MiraLAX daily as needed, there is no diluent.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 111 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #8) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 8: In the patient record there is an order for aspirin 81mg daily, there is not a risk for bleeding on the plan of care with goals and interventions. Corrected on site. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 128 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #3, 4, 9) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 3: Medications verified with family during home visit, stated patient has been taking aspirin 81mg daily for years. Aspirin is not on the hospice plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 4: On the current plan of care there is a medication Nystop 100000 unit/gm, topical 4 times daily for redness and irritation. There is no directions for where to apply the medication. Corrected on site. Patient 9: Patient 9: On the plan of care there is a medication, MiraLAX daily as needed, there is no diluent.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #10) did not have evidence that the IDG in collaboration with the attending physician reviewed, revised and documents the individualized plan as frequently as the patient’s condition requires but no less frequently then every 15 calendar days. Patient 10: On the IDG note 10/10/25 there are missing signatures from the IDG team including the medical director, chaplain, MSW, and nursing.”

    Rule L0552. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 461 words

    “Upon patient record review, 6 of 14 (Patient #1,2,4,5,9,10) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient 1: On the hospice aide plan of care there are orders to assist with clothing, complete bed bath, foot care: apply lotion to feet, nail care: wash under nails and file, oral care, partial bed bath, perineal care, shampoo, skin care: lotion to all extremities, these orders do not contain a frequency. Corrected on site. Patient 2: On the aide plan of care there are orders to assist with clothing, complete bed bath, foot care, nail care: clean under nails and file, oral care, partial bed bath, perineal care, shampoo, skin care: apply lotion to extremities after bed bath, these orders do not contain a frequency. Corrected on site. Patient 4: On the aide plan of care there are orders to assist with clothing, complete bed bath, foot care: wash with warm water and soap, pat dry ensuring dry between toes, nail care, oral care, perineal care, shampoo, shave, skin care: apply lotion to all extremities, face and back, these orders do not contain a frequency. Corrected on site. Patient 5: On the aide plan of care there are orders to assist with clothing, completed bed bath, foot care, nail care, oral care, partial bed bath, perineal care, shampoo, skin care, these orders do not contain a frequency. Corrected on site. Patient 9: On the aide plan of care there are orders to assist with clothing, complete bed bath, foot care: wash with warm water and soap, pat dry ensuring dry between toes and apply lotion, nail care: clean under nails and file, oral care, clean dentures, partial bed bath, perineal care, shampoo, skin care: apply lotion to all extremities, face, and back, these orders do not contain a frequency. Patient 10: On the aide plan of care there are orders to assist with clothing, complete bed bath, foot care: wash with soap and water, dry, apply lotion, nail care, oral care, partial bed bath, perineal care, shampoo, skin care: apply lotion to all extremities, chest and back, these orders do not contain a frequency.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(3))

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #1,8) did not have evidence that each patient record contains responses to medications, symptom management, treatments, and services. Patient 1: On the RN assessment 11/19/25 the RN documented “wound care rendered as ordered” RN did not document how patient tolerated the wound care. Patient 8: On the SN assessment 11/14/25 there is documentation of wound care performed, the SN did not document how the patient tolerated the wound care.”

    Rule L0674. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 168 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #1,3,8) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 1: On the initial RN assessment there is documentation, UTA, UTA is not an approved abbreviation. On the RN assessment 11/19/25 the RN documented “wound care rendered as ordered” RN did not document the details of wound care performed. Patient 3: On the RN initial comprehensive assessment 6/18/25 the RN documented, “Pt. is able to ambulate with FWW”. FWW is not an approved abbreviation. On the SN assessment dated 9/18/25 there is documentation, “On arrival patient SLUP”, SLUP is not an approved abbreviation. Patient 8: On the SN assessment 11/14/25 there is documentation of wound care performed, the SN did not document the details of wound care performed.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(1))

    “Upon personnel record review,1 of 12 (Personnel #12 ) did not have evidence the hospice obtained a criminal background check on all contracted individuals who have direct patient care and access to patient records. Personnel 12: There is no evidence the hospice has obtained a criminal background check for this contracted employee.”

    Rule L0795. Standard-level.

Jun 27, 2024: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care7 deficiencies
  • Organizational environment (42 CFR 418.100)

    The inspectors’ words, 99 words

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence BOD/governing body minutes reflect the involvement in the hospice’s management and administration of its resources to provide hospice services to patients and families. The agency did not have possession of the patient records from the previous owner. The agency stated that the original owner indicated that there were no admissions after the initial survey 3 years ago. The current owner took possession of the agency in September 2023. The agency has had only 2 admissions in the past 3 years and they were admitted on 6/14/24 and 6/16/24. Date of survey was 6/25/24.”

    Rule L0648. Condition-level.

  • Clinical records (42 CFR 418.104)

    “Condition of Participation: Clinical Records.”

    Rule L0670. Condition-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 2 (Patient #1, 2) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy Patient 1, 2: The patient’s oxygen does not appear on the medication list. (corrected onsite)”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 2 (Patient #1, 2) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 1, 2: The patient utilizes a bed, over the bed table, wheelchair, oxygen, nebulizer, and suction machine for management of the terminal illness; however, this DME does not appear on the plan of care. (corrected onsite)”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 138 words

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 2 (Patient #1) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 1: On 06.18.2024 the patient had both a comprehensive psychosocial and spiritual assessment; at the conclusion of these assessments, each discipline determined monthly visits would be made. Visit orders were entered, and the initial plan of care reflects this frequency. However, a manual treatment order entered reflects both that the monthly visits will be made and that psychosocial and spiritual care visits were offered and declined. The DPCS verified that this was a typographical error. (corrected onsite)”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Protection of information (42 CFR 418.104(c))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the organization follows their policies and procedures to maintain the the patient’s clinical record in confidential manner. The agency does not know the location of the patient records from three years ago.”

    Rule L0680. Standard-level.

  • Retention of records (42 CFR 418.104(d))

    “Upon observation, the present hospice owner obtained the business in September 2023, with CMS and NGS approval of the change received on 05.03.2024. However, the present owner did not obtain the previous patient records from the former owner. As a result, these records were not available for inspection during survey and there was no evidence that the records are retained for a minimum of 6 years from the most recent discharge or death of the patient.”

    Rule L0681. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Dec 4, 2025Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care8 deficiencies cited
Jun 27, 2024Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care7 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Apr 28, 2021.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Valor SE LLC owns 100% directly since Sep 1, 2023.
  • Valor SE LLC runs it.
  • 8 owners or officers are people: Shannon Errington (owns 5% or more through other companies, 80%); David T Rodriguez (owns 5% or more through other companies, 10%); Javier Blanco (owns 5% or more through other companies, 10%); Abdelsalam M Mogasbe (corporate director); David T Rodriguez (corporate officer); David T Rodriguez (managing employee (on the payroll)); Shannon Errington (corporate officer); Javier Blanco (corporate officer).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Valor SE LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Sep 1, 2023
Valor SE LLCRuns it (operational or managerial control)Sep 1, 2023

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 224 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 92804, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 15.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.