Hearth Record

Care Companion Hospice, Inc.

A hospice in Anaheim, California 92804

9778 Katella Ave, Suite 217, Anaheim, California 92804. (949) 396-2555.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 13 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

13 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 224 hospices serving ZIP code 92804 had 7.

The last inspection on record was on Jun 13, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

13 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

13 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jun 13, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care13 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 275 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 10 (Patient #2,#5,#7,#8,#9) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #2: Medication profile dated 1/28/2024 included Salon Pas pain relief topical patch 1 Q 8-12 hrs. for pain if not relieved add one more, should not be for more than 3 days in a row. No evidence of an area to apply patch. Corrected on site. Patient #5: Medication profile dated 4/18/2024 included Toradol 50mg 1 PO Q 6 hrs. PRN pain moderate or severe. Dated 4/5/2024 included Roxanol 20mg/ml give 0.25ml=5mg PO/SL Q 4Hrs. PRN pain or SOB. No evidence of parameters to give Roxanol. Patient #7: Medication profile dated 2/10/2024 included Hydrocortisone 1% cream topical apply 1 app. as needed to affected area. No evidence of area to apply. Patient #8: Medication profile dated 9/30/2023 include Acetaminophen 325 mg 2 tabs PO Q 6 Hrs. PRN mild pain or fever. Dated 9/30/2023 included Morphine Sulfate 20mg/ml 0.25ml=5mg PO/SL Q 4 Hrs. PRN pain or SOB. No evidence of parameters for when to give Morphine. Patient #9: Medication profile dated 12/10/2023 include Acetaminophen 325 mg 2 tabs PO Q 6 Hrs. PRN mild pain or fever. Dated 12/10//2023 included Morphine Sulfate 20mg/ml 0.25ml=5mg PO/SL Q 4 Hrs. PRN pain or SOB. No evidence of parameters for when to give Morphine for pain.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 105 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 10 (Patient #3) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment is updated including and by: • The hospice interdisciplinary group (in collaboration with the individual’s attending physician, if any) • Changes that have taken place since the initial assessment • Information on the patient’s progress toward desired outcomes • Reassessment of the patient’s response to care • The assessment update must be accomplished as frequently as the condition of the patient requires, but no less frequently than every 15 days Patient #3: SN comprehensive visits occurred on SOC 8/26/2023 and 9/11/2023 (16 days apart).”

    Rule L0533. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 317 words

    “Upon patient record review, 7 of 10 (Patient #1,#2,#3,#4,#6,#9,#10) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #1: Psychosocial assessment at SOC identified pt. “not open to funeral planning”, no evidence on POC for problem/intervention/goals for funeral planning. Corrected on site.. Patient #2: Psychosocial assessment at SOC identified pt. “not ready to discuss funeral arrangements”, no evidence on POC for problem/intervention/goals for funeral planning. Corrected on site. Patient #3: Psychosocial assessment at SOC identified pt. “do not have funeral plans in place”, no evidence on POC for problem/intervention/goals for funeral planning. SN on SOC assessment identified need for aspiration precautions, no evidence on POC of problem/interventions/goals for risk of aspiration. Patient #4: Psychosocial assessment at SOC identified pt. “no final arrangements”, no evidence on POC for problem/intervention/goals for funeral planning. SN on SOC identified pt. on Eliquis, and Braden score of 13 moderate risk for pressure ulcers. No evidence on POC for problems/interventions/goals for risk of bleeding or skin integrity/risk of pressure ulcers. Patient #6: Psychosocial assessment at SOC identified pt. “no funeral plans, pt. permission to phone son to discuss”, no evidence on POC for problem/intervention/goals for funeral planning. Patient is on O2, no evidence on POC for problem/interventions/goals for O2 therapy. Patient #9: Psychosocial assessment at SOC identified pt. “no burial plans”, no evidence on POC for problem/intervention/goals for funeral planning. Patient is on O2, no evidence on POC for problem/interventions/goals for O2 therapy. Patient #10: Psychosocial assessment at SOC identified pt. “not open to funeral planning”, no evidence on POC for problem/intervention/goals for funeral planning.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 132 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 10 (Patient #1, #3) did not have evidence the plan of care must includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including the following: • A detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs • The IDG demonstrates a proactive approach in developing each patient’s plan of care by planning ahead for anticipated patient changes and needs. Decisions should reflect the patient/family preferences rather than be solely a response to a crisis. Patient #1: MSW and SC visits at SOC for 1x then PRN. No evidence of specificity to visit frequency. Corrected on site. Patient #3: Order dated 4/17/2024 included MSW with no visit frequency. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 244 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 10 (Patient #2,#5,#7,#8,#9) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #2: Order dated 1/28/2024 included Salon Pas pain relief topical patch 1 Q 8-12 hrs. for pain if not relieved add one more, should not be for more than 3 days in a row. No evidence of an area to apply patch. Corrected on site. Patient #5: Order dated 4/18/2024 included Toradol 50mg 1 PO Q 6 hrs. PRN pain moderate or severe. Order dated 4/5/2024 included Roxanol 20mg/ml give 0.25ml=5mg PO/SL Q 4Hrs. PRN pain or SOB. No evidence of parameters to give Roxanol for pain.. Patient #7: Order dated 2/10/2024 included Hydrocortisone 1% cream topical apply 1 app. as needed to affected area. No evidence of area to apply. Patient #8: Order dated 9/30/2023 include Acetaminophen 325 mg 2 tabs PO Q 6 Hrs. PRN mild pain or fever. Order dated 9/30/2023 included Morphine Sulfate 20mg/ml 0.25ml=5mg PO/SL Q 4 Hrs. PRN pain or SOB. No evidence of parameters for when to give Morphine for pain. Patient #9: Order dated 12/10/2023 include Acetaminophen 325 mg 2 tabs PO Q 6 Hrs. PRN mild pain or fever. Order dated 12/10//2023 included Morphine Sulfate 20mg/ml 0.25ml=5mg PO/SL Q 4 Hrs. PRN pain or SOB. No evidence of parameters for when to give Morphine for pain.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon client record review, 2 of 10 (Patient #3, #7) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #3: Order dated 8/26/2023 included MSW initial and every certification. Visits were completed 9/27/2023, 12/20/2023, 1/20/2024, and 3/17/2024- not related to recertification and without orders. Patient #7: Order dated 2/5/2024 include SN 1x week and 3 PRN. Week of 3/25/2024 no evidence of a SN visit or missed visit.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 10 (Patient #8) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient #8: Order dated 1/23/2024 included HHA 2x week. Week of 2/4/22024 visit occurred on 2/6/2024,there was no evidence for a second visit or missed visit.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the annual report documents the use of volunteers providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract personnel. The annual report for 2023 included 0% for volunteer hours.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(1))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 11 (Personnel #8 ) did not have evidence the hospice employees and contract employees have received orientation on the hospice philosophy. Personnel #8: No evidence of orientation to the hospice philosophy.”

    Rule L0661. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(2))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 11 (Personnel # 8) did not have evidence that the hospice employees have received orientation on their specific job requirements. Personnel #8: No evidence of orientation to specific job requirements.”

    Rule L0662. Standard-level.

  • Retention of records (42 CFR 418.104(d))

    “There is no evidence that all patient records are retained for a minimum of six years from the date of the most recent discharge or the death of the patient, unless state law stipulates a longer period of time. Agency has access to 10 records, beginning 7/2/2022. There were 5 records from original ACHC survey in June of 2021, Agency does not have these records “consultant took them with him””

    Rule L0681. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 112 words

    “Upon client record review, 2 of 10 (Patient #5,#7) did not have evidence that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care or is discharged from hospice in accordance with §418.26, the hospice must forward to the patient’s attending physician: • A copy of the hospice discharge summary • The patient’s clinical record, if requested Patient #5: There is no evidence in the patient record that a discharge summary and a copy of patient record (if requested) was sent to that attending physician. Patient #7: There is no evidence in the patient record that a discharge summary and a copy of patient record (if requested) was sent to that attending physician.”

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

  • Label dispose storage drugs (42 CFR 418.106(e)(2)(i)(C))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 10 (Patient #2) did not have evidence that the written policies and procedures for managing controlled drugs was provided and discussed. Patient #2: No evidence of documentation in record that the written policies and procedures for managing controlled drugs was provided and discussed.”

    Rule L0697. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 13, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care13 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jun 16, 2021.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 2 owners or officers are people: Rupinder K Maan (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Gurpreet Maan (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
  • 90.48% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 224 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 92804, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 13.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.