Hearth Record

Cardinal Care Hospice, Inc.

A hospice in Los Angeles, California 90029

1110 N Western Avenue, Suite 206, Los Angeles, California 90029. (323) 962-3840.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

11 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 201 hospices serving ZIP code 90029 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Oct 24, 2024: an initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

11 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Oct 24, 2024: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care11 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 295 words

    “Upon patient record review, 9 of 12 (Patient #1,#3,#4,#5,#6,#7,#8,#9,#10) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient#1: The record indicates the patient was ordered calmoseptine and A&D ointment by physician on admit order. There is no evidence of these items on the medication profile. Corrected on site. Patient#3: The record indicates patient has a physician order for Oxygen 2-3LPM via NC PRN, calmoseptine, and A&D ointment. There is no evidence of these item on the medication profile. Corrected on Site. Patient#4: The record indicates Oxygen was ordered 2lpm prn on 10/13/23. On 11/13/23, calmoseptine was ordered by physician to be applied to coccyx. There is no evidence of these items being included on the medication profile. Corrected on site. Patient#5: The record indicates an order on admit for calmoseptine and A&D ointment. On 12/6/23 nurse documents using Neosporin for wound near left eye. There is no evidence of these items on the medication profile. Corrected on site. Patient#6,#8,#10: The record indicates a physician order for Oxygen, calmoseptine, and A&D ointment. There is no evidence of these items on the medication profile. Corrected on site. Patient#7: The record indicates a physician order for Oxygen, calmoseptine, and A&D ointment. There is no evidence of these items on the medication profile. Corrected on site Patient#9: The record indicates a physician order for Oxygen and A&D ointment. There is no evidence of these items on the medication profile. Corrected on site. Corrected on site”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 12 (Patient #8) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient#8: The record indicates patient had wounds on admit. There is no evidence of measurements of wounds during comprehensive assessment on admit or week of April 15th.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 340 words

    “Upon patient record review, 9 of 12 (Patient #1,#2,#3,#4,#5,#7,#8,#9,#10) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient#1,#4,#9,#10: The record indicates patient is ordered oxygen PRN. There is no evidence of goals or interventions related to this on the plan of care. Corrected on site Patient#2: The record indicates the patient has an IV and is receiving Normal saline intravenously. There is no evidence of goals or interventions related to this on the plan of care. The record indicates Nurse performing site care for 16 Fr g-tube. There is no evidence of goals or interventions related to g-tube care on the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient#3: The record indicates patient has needs for fall precautions, soft diet, ensure, crushed meds, oxygen, and risk of skin impairment. There is no evidence of goals or interventions related to these issues on plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient#4: The patient was admitted with a terminal diagnosis of atherosclerotic heart disease. There is no evidence of goals or interventions related to this diagnosis on plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient#5: The record indicates the patient has been diagnosed with dysphagia. There are no evidence of goals or interventions related to this on plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient#7: The record indicates patient was ordered oxygen, puree diet and ensure. There is documentation of patient requiring aspiration precautions. There is no evidence of goals or interventions related to these needs on plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient#8: The record indicates patient has an order for oxygen and is receiving wound care. There is no evidence of goals or interventions related to these needs on the plan of care. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 181 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 12 (Patient #2,4,8,9) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient#2: The record indicates patient has an IV that is being used to administer fluids. There is no evidence of a physician order for IV care or maintenance including changing of IV tubing and cannula. Corrected on site Patient#4: The record indicates patient is receiving wound care which includes cleaning with wound cleanser, covering with nickel thick layer of Santyl and covering with mepilex. There is no evidence of physician order for wound care. Corrected on site Patient#8: The record indicates patient receiving wound care for venous stasis to bilateral lower extremities, or pressure wound to Left heel and Right hip. There is no evidence of physician order for wound care. Corrected on site Patient#9: The record indicates an order for Miralax 17grams per powder dose one time daily and PRN. There is no evidence of instructions specific to diluent. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 287 words

    “Upon patient record review, 8 of 12 (Patient #1,#2,#4,#5,#6,#7,#9,#10) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient#1: The record indicates patient having wheelchair, walker, bed, oxygen, chux, gloves, diaper, suction, nebulizer, and oral swabs. There is no evidence of these items being included on plan of care. Corrected on site Patient#2: The record indicates patient having wheelchair, oxygen, bed, IV supplies, oxygen, nebulizer, suction, OTB table, diaper gloves, oral swabs. There is no evidence of these items being included on plan of care. Corrected on site Patient#4: The record indicates patient having wheelchair, oxygen, bed, over the bed table, diapers, gloves, chux, suction. Corrected on site Patient#5: The record indicates patient having Bed, over the bed table, diaper, chux, gloves, oral swabs. There is no evidence of these items being included on plan of care. Corrected on site Patient#6: The record indicates patient having wheelchair, oxygen, transfer equipment, bed, oxygen, diaper, chux, oral swabs. There is no evidence of these items being included on plan of care. Corrected on site Patient#7: The record indicates patient having oxygen, walker, suction, neb, oral swabs, gloves, diaper. There is no evidence of these items being included on plan of care. Corrected on site Patient#9: The record indicates patient having oxygen bed, suction, neb, chux, gloves, diaper, swab. There is no evidence of these items being included on plan of care. Corrected on site Patient#10: The record indicates patient having oxygen, bed, neb, suction, chux, gloves, diaper, oral swabs, disposable wash cloths. There is no evidence of these items being included on plan of care. Corrected on site”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 137 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 12 (Patient #1,#2) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient#1: The nurse visit frequency is 1 time per week and 2 prn visits. There is no evidence of a visit or a missed visit for the week of 3/3/24 and week of 4/14/24. The visit frequency for spiritual care is 1 time per month and 1 PRN. There is no evidence of a visit documented and no missed visit documented for March or April. Corrected on site. Patient#2: The nurse frequency is ordered 1 time for week one with 1 prn visit, then 2 times a week with 1 prn visit. The record indicates patient has received daily SN visits since admit. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 12 (Patient #4) did not have evidence that the IDG documents the sharing of information between all disciplines providing care and services in all settings, whether the care and services are provided directly or under arrangement. Patient#4: The record indicates Hastings Wound Solutions was providing specialized care to patient for graft on wound. There is no evidence in any IDG notes mentioning Hastings wound care being provided or coordination of care between agency and Hastings.”

    Rule L0557. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 92 words

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 12 (Patient #2) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient #2: The aide frequency is ordered for 2 times a week starting on week 2. There is no evidence of any aide visits being made or missed since admission 10/10/24. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Initial certification of terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 113 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 12 (Patient #1) did not have evidence that the medical director or physician designee provides written certification that it is anticipated that the patient’s life expectancy is 6 months or less if the illness runs its normal course. The physician must consider the following when making this determination: • The primary terminal condition • Related diagnosis • Current subjective and objective medical findings • Current medication and treatment orders • Information about the medical management of any of the patient’s conditions unrelated to the terminal illness Patient#1: There is no evidence of a physician narrative for initial CTI on 2/22/24, the CTI was signed by the physician.”

    Rule L0667. Standard-level.

  • Recertification of the terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 109 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 12 (Patient #1, 4) did not have evidence that before the recertification period for each patient, the medical director or physician designee must review the patient’s clinical information and provide written documentation that it is anticipated that the patient’s life expectancy is 6 months or less. Patient#1: There is no evidence of a physician narrative for recertification CTI on 5/7/24. The CTI was signed by the physician. Patient#4: There is no evidence of a physician narrative or a physician signature for recertification CTI on 3/17/24. There is no evidence of a narrative on CTI for 1/17/24, this CTI is signed by the physician.”

    Rule L0668. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 12 (Patient #8) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient#8: The documentation of nurse for 4/3/24-4/18/24 states that wound care was performed. However, there is no evidence of documentation as to what the nurse did for the wound care.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Oct 24, 2024Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care11 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Sep 30, 2021.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 43% at home, 57% in assisted living.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 5 owners or officers are people: Moses S Shirinian (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Moses S Shirinian (corporate officer, 100%); Moses S Shirinian (corporate director, 100%); Moses S Shirinian (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Gemma Alvarez (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
  • 69.57% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 201 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 90029, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 11.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.