Hearth Record

Allpeace Care

A hospice in Torrance, California 90501

20710 Manhattan Pl, Suite 132, Torrance, California 90501. (626) 593-8133.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 17 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

17 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 132 hospices serving ZIP code 90501 had 8.

The last inspection on record was on Oct 25, 2024: a follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

17 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

17 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Oct 25, 2024: follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care1 deficiency
  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 5 (Patient #4, 5) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 4, 5: The patient has an oxygen concentrator ordered as DME and the RN confirms is present in the home; however, there is no treatment order present for the PRN use of oxygen. (corrected onsite)”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

Sep 11, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care16 deficiencies
  • IDG, care planning, coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56)

    “Condition of Participation: Interdisciplinary Group, Care Planning, and Coordination of Services. L536”

    Rule L0536. Condition-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 91 words

    “Upon patient record review 6 of 14 (Patient #2,8,10,11,13,14) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment identifies the physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the hospice patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process. Patients 2,10,11: No evidence of initial spiritual or psychosocial assessment in patients’ medical record. Patient 8: No evidence of initial psychosocial assessment in patient’s medical record. Patients 13,14: No evidence of initial spiritual assessment in patients’ medical record.”

    Rule L0524. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 245 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 14 (Patient #2,4,5,6,8) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 2: Patient’s medication list with order for Voltaren gel 1%. Order instructions state to apply one thin layer topical twice daily as needed for pain. There is no evidence of application site for this medication. COS Patient 4: Patient’s medication list with order for muscle rub cream 10-15%. Order instructions state to apply to affected area twice daily as needed for pain. There is no evidence of application site for this medication. Patient has oxygen concentrator on plan of care. There is no evidence of physician’s order for oxygen on patient’s medication list. COS Patient 5: Patient has oxygen concentrator on plan of care. There is no evidence of physician’s order for oxygen on patient’s medication list. COS Patient 6: Patient has oxygen concentrator on plan of care. There is no evidence of physician’s order for oxygen on patient’s medication list, it is instead listed as a treatment. COS Patient 8: Patient has oxygen concentrator on plan of care. There is no evidence of physician’s order for oxygen on patient’s medication list. COS”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    “Upon patient record review, 6 of 14 (Patient #2,8,9,10,13,14) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 202 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 14 (Patient #1,2,5,7,8) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 1: There is no evidence of care planning for skin breakdown precautions, despite Braden score of 9. Patient 2: There is no evidence of care planning for falls precautions or skin breakdown precautions despite documented fall on 5/8/24 and Braden score of 11. Patient 5: There is no evidence of care planning for edema, oxygen, or aspiration risk. This is despite evidence of oxygen in the home; patient with pitting edema present; and patient with aspiration precautions. Patient 7: There is no evidence of care planning for skin breakdown precautions despite Braden score of 12. Patient 8: There is no evidence of care planning for falls precautions despite terminal diagnosis of Parkinson’s. There is no evidence of aspiration precautions despite puree diet with nectar thick liquids.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 248 words

    “Upon patient record review, 8 of 14 (Patient #1,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) did not have evidence the plan of care must includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including the following: • A detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs • The IDG demonstrates a proactive approach in developing each patient’s plan of care by planning ahead for anticipated patient changes and needs. Decisions should reflect the patient/family preferences rather than be solely a response to a crisis. Patient 1,9: Ordered visit frequency for MSW and SC is recertification and as needed. Ordered visit frequency for BC is as needed. There is no evidence of quantifiers for any of these visit frequency orders. COS Patient 3,6: Ordered visit frequency for MSW and SC is recertification and as needed. There is no evidence of quantifiers for any of these visit frequency orders. COS Patient 4,5: Ordered visit frequency for BC is as needed. There is no evidence of quantifiers for this visit frequency order. COS Patient 7: Ordered visit frequency for MSW is recertification and as needed. Ordered visit frequency for SC is one as needed and recertification, need quantifiers as needed. Ordered visit frequency for BC is as needed. There is no evidence of quantifiers for these visit frequency orders. COS Patient 8: Ordered visit frequency for SC is once monthly, as needed and recertification. Need quantifiers for as needed. COS”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 214 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 14 (Patient #2,4,5,6,8) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 2: Patient’s plan of care with order for Voltaren gel 1%. Order instructions state to apply one thin layer topical twice daily as needed for pain. There is no evidence of application site for this medication. COS Patient 4: Patient’s plan of care with order for muscle rub cream 10-15%. Order instructions state to apply to affected area twice daily as needed for pain. There is no evidence of application site for this medication. Patient has oxygen concentrator on plan of care. There is no evidence of oxygen medication order on patient’s plan of care. COS Patient 5: Patient has oxygen concentrator on plan of care. There is no evidence of oxygen medication order on patient’s plan of care. COS Patient 6: Patient has oxygen concentrator on plan of care. There is no evidence of oxygen medication order on patient’s plan of care, oxygen is instead listed as a treatment. COS Patient 8: Patient has oxygen concentrator on plan of care. There is no evidence of oxygen medication order on patient’s plan of care. COS”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 341 words

    “Upon patient record review, 10 of 14 (Patient #1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 1: Assessed DME needs: walker and air mattress. There is no evidence of this DME on the plan of care. COS Patient 2: Assessed DME needs: walker, hospital bed, bedside commode. There is no evidence of: walker, hospital bed on the plan of care. COS Patient 3: Assessed DME needs: walker, wheelchair, shower chair, nebulizer. There is no evidence of these DME on the plan of care. COS Patient 4: Assessed DME needs: hospital bed, air mattress, overbed table, wheelchair, oxygen concentrator, oxygen e-tanks, nebulizer. There is no evidence of: hospital bed, air mattress, overbed table, wheelchair, oxygen e-tanks, nebulizer on the plan of care. COS Patient 5: Assessed DME needs: hospital bed, air mattress, overbed table, wheelchair, walker, shower chair, bedside commode, egg crate mattress, oxygen concentrator, oxygen e-tanks, nebulizer, suction. There is no evidence of: hospital bed, overbed table, wheelchair, walker, shower chair, bedside commode, egg crate mattress on the plan of care. COS Patient 6: Assessed DME needs: walker, shower chair, oxygen concentrator, oxygen e-tanks, nebulizer, suction. There is no evidence of: walker, shower chair on the plan of care. COS Patient 7: Assessed DME needs: hospital bed, walker, bedside commode, wheelchair. There is no evidence of hospital bed or walker on the plan of care. COS Patient 8: Assessed DME needs: hospital bed, overbed table, wheelchair, oxygen concentrator, nebulizer, suction. There is no evidence of: hospital bed, overbed table on the plan of care. COS Patient 9: Assessed DME needs: bedside commode, nebulizer, overbed table, oxygen concentrator, shower chair, suction, walker. There is no evidence of: walker on the plan of care. COS Patient 10: Assessed DME needs: hospital bed, air mattress, hoyer lift, oxygen concentrator, oxygen e-tanks, high back reclining wheelchair. There is no evidence of: hospital bed, hoyer lift on the plan of care. COS”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 239 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 14 (Patient #3,5,6,7) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 3: Ordered visit frequency for MSW is recertification and as needed. There is no evidence of MSW visit made during certification period 03/19/2024-06/16/2024. There is a communication note dated 03/19/2024 that MSW was unable to reach patient/caregiver. Notification was added to IDG for 09/13/2024that MSW was unable to reach patient/caregiver. Notification was added to IDG on 09/13/2024. Patient 5: Ordered visit frequency for MSW and SC is once a recertification and once as needed. There is no evidence of a MSW visit during certification period dated 04/01/2024-05/30/2024. There is no evidence of a SC visit during certification period dated 05/31/2024–07/29/2024. There is not documentation of missed visit. Patient 6: Ordered visit frequency for SC is recertification and as needed. During certification period 08/05/2023-11/02/2023, SC visited 10/26/2023 and 11/01/2023. Both of these visits were documented as recertification visits. There is no evidence that either of these visits were PRN. Patient 7: Ordered visit frequency for MSW is recertification and as needed. Ordered frequency for BC is as needed. There is no evidence of a MSW visit made during the certification period 07/13/2024-09/10/2024. There is no documentation of a missed visit. BC follow up is documented every certification period. There is no evidence documenting that these visits are PRN.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 182 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #3,5,7) did not have evidence that the IDG documents the sharing of information between all disciplines providing care and services in all settings, whether the care and services are provided directly or under arrangement. Patient 3: Ordered visit frequency for MSW is recertification and as needed. There is no evidence of MSW visit made during certification period 03/19/2024-06/16/2024. There is a communication note dated 03/19/2024 that MSW was unable to reach patient/caregiver. There is no evidence that MD was notified of missed visit. Patient 5: Ordered visit frequency for MSW and SC is once a recertification and once as needed. There is no evidence of a MSW visit during certification period dated 04/01/2024-05/30/2024. There is no evidence of a SC visit during certification period dated 05/31/2024–07/29/2024. There is no evidence that MD was notified of missed visit. Patient 7: Ordered visit frequency for MSW is recertification and as needed. There is no evidence of a MSW visit made during the certification period 07/13/2024-09/10/2024. There is no evidence that MD was notified of missed visit.”

    Rule L0557. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 320 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 14 (Patient #1,2,5,7,8) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable All COS: Patient 1: No evidence of frequencies on aide care plan: chair to bed; turn and reposition; record bowel movement; dressing pajama/gown; dressing street clothes; feeding assistance; encourage fluids; change linens. No evidence of precautions despite being on POC: bleeding, oxygen. No evidence of vital signs parameters despite ordered frequency of every visit. Patient 2: No evidence of frequencies on aide care plan: transfer; record bowel movement; dressing pajama/gown; change linens. No evidence of vital signs parameters (blood pressure, pulse, temperature) despite ordered frequency of every visit. Patient 5: No evidence of frequencies on aide care plan: turn and reposition; 1-person transfer; record bowel movement; dressing pajama/gown; encourage fluids; change linens. Patient 7: No evidence of frequencies on aide care plan: turn and reposition; 1-person transfer; encourage fluids; change linens; feeding assistance; dentures. There is a warning in aide care plan that states that patient uses oxygen. Do not use petroleum products. Patient does not have an order for oxygen in the plan of care. Patient 8: No evidence of frequencies on aide care plan: turn and reposition; record bowel movement; encourage fluids; change linens. No evidence of precautions despite being on POC: oxygen.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 222 words

    “Upon patient record review 3 of 14 (Patient #4,7,9) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient 4: Visit frequency order for aide is twice weekly. This physician’s order written on admission, 10/01/2023. Patient has been seen three times weekly, beginning on the Monday at the start of the current certification period, 08/05/2024. COS. Patient 7: Patient with ordered aide task of dentures. There is no evidence of documentation that this task has been completed since the first aide visit of the current certification period, 07/16/2024. There is also no documentation of why the task is not completed. Patient 9: The following aide tasks have been ordered. On the noted dates for the tasks in the current certification period, there is no documentation that the tasks have been completed. There is also no documentation of why the tasks were not completed. Safety razor/shave: 07/16/2024, 07/23/2024, 08/08/2024, 08/15/2024, 08/22/2024, 09/03/2024, 09/05/2024. Objects in reach and Bed in lowest position: 07/16/2024, 08/13/2024, 08/15/2024, 08/29/2024, 09/03/2024. Oxygen: 07/16/2024, 07/18/2024, 07/23/2024, 07/25/2024, 07/30/2024, 08/01/2024, 08/06/2024, 08/08/2024, 08/13/2024, 08/15/2024, 08/20/2024, 08/22/2024, 08/27/2024, 08/29/2024, 09/03/2024, 09/05/2024.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 91 words

    “Upon patient record review 3 of 14 (Patient #4,5,8) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient 4,5: There is no evidence of aide supervisory visit after 08/26/2024. Patient 8: There is no evidence of aide supervisory visit between 07/25/2024 and 09/05/2024.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Initial certification of terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 179 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #6,9) did not have evidence that the medical director or physician designee provides written certification that it is anticipated that the patient’s life expectancy is 6 months or less if the illness runs its normal course. The physician must consider the following when making this determination: • The primary terminal condition • Related diagnosis • Current subjective and objective medical findings • Current medication and treatment orders • Information about the medical management of any of the patient’s conditions unrelated to the terminal illness Patient 6: In certification period 1, there is no evidence of a physician’s narrative including patient’s individual clinical circumstances and a clinical justification narrative: There is only evidence of patient’s comorbid conditions. Certification period dates 08/05/2023-11/02/2023. Patient 9: In certification period 1, there is no evidence of a physician’s narrative including patient’s individual clinical circumstances and a clinical justification narrative: There is only evidence of patient’s comorbid conditions, KPS, PPS, and a single sentence that states, “increased weakness and dyspnea with moderate exertion.” Certification period dates 04/16/2024-07/14/2024”

    Rule L0667. Standard-level.

  • Recertification of the terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 186 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #6,9) did not have evidence that before the recertification period for each patient, the medical director or physician designee must review the patient’s clinical information and provide written documentation that it is anticipated that the patient’s life expectancy is 6 months or less. Patient 6: In certification period 2 and 6, there is no evidence of a physician’s narrative including current subjective and objective medical findings; Current medication and treatment orders; Information about the medical management of any of the patient’s conditions unrelated to the terminal illness. There is only evidence of patient’s comorbid conditions. Certification period 2 dates 11/03/2023-01/31/2023. Certification period 6 dates 07/30/2024-09/28/2024. Patient 9: In certification period 2, there is no evidence of a physician’s narrative including current subjective and objective medical findings; Current medication and treatment orders; Information about the medical management of any of the patient’s conditions unrelated to the terminal illness. There is only evidence of patient’s comorbid conditions, KPS, PPS, and a single sentence that states, “increased weakness, tires easily, edema and episodes of shortness of breath.” Certification period dates 07/15/2024-10/12/2024.”

    Rule L0668. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #13) did not have evidence that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care or is discharged from hospice in accordance with §418.26, the hospice must forward to the patient’s attending physician: • A copy of the hospice discharge summary • The patient’s clinical record, if requested”

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Oct 25, 2024Follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care1 deficiency cited
Sep 11, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care16 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Sep 14, 2021.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.5 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 9.1% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 91.7% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 73% at home, 17% in assisted living, 10% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day12.5 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends9.1%
Visits near death91.7% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 9 owners or officers are people: Catherine V Hoenig (owns 5% or more directly, 85%); Iris M Merino-Cornejo (owns 5% or more directly, 15%); Iris M Merino-Cornejo (corporate officer, 0%); Iris M Merino-Cornejo (corporate director, 0%); Iris M Merino-Cornejo (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Iris M Merino-Cornejo (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); Lawrence Bruce Greenberg (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Catherine V Hoenig (corporate officer, 0%); Catherine V Hoenig (corporate director, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 93.67% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 17.6% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 132 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 90501, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 8; this one had 17.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.