Hearth Record

Bridgewater Hospice

A hospice in Torrance, California 90501

2420 W. Carson Street, Suite 205, Torrance, California 90501. (909) 000-0000.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 12 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

12 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 132 hospices serving ZIP code 90501 had 8.

The last inspection on record was on Dec 18, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

12 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

12 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Dec 18, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care12 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 14 (Patient #1) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completed the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Patient #1 - Patient was admitted on 12/05/25. The spiritual comprehensive assessment was not completed until 12/17/25.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 14 (Patient #12) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment identifies the physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the hospice patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process. Patient #12 - Patient was admitted on 02/18/25. There is no evidence of an psychosocial comprehensive assessment in the medical record. The elements of that comprehensive were not captured in the nursing comprehensive dated 02/18/25.”

    Rule L0524. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 113 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #11) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient #11 - The medical record showed a LVN visit on 05/09/25 regarding complaints from the patient and the caregiver of constipation. There was no evidence of follow up with the patient by the RN, no bowel regimen initiated and no follow up visit documented. Patient transferred to another hospice on 05/12/25.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 233 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 14 (Patient #1,3,6,7) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #1 - The nursing comprehensive assessment documented the patient was a 12 on the Braden scale or at high risk for skin integrity. There was no evidence of problems, goals, or interventions related to skin integrity. Corrected and updated onsite. Patient #3 - The patient’s advanced directive indicated patient was undecided as to his code status. There was no evidence of problems, goals, or interventions related to the code status. Corrected and updated onsite. Patient #6 - The medical record showed patient’s admitting diagnosis was heart failure with a related diagnosis of COPD. There was no evidence of problems, goals, or interventions related to these diagnoses. Patient’s medication profile listed ASA daily as a blood thinner. There was no bleeding risk problems, goals, or interventions listed. Patient #7 - The nursing comprehensive dated 12/18/24 documented patient was on a pureed diet with thickened liquids. There was no evidence of problems, goals, or interventions related to that diet.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 242 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #2,13,14) did not have evidence the plan of care must includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including the following: • A detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs • The IDG demonstrates a proactive approach in developing each patient’s plan of care by planning ahead for anticipated patient changes and needs. Decisions should reflect the patient/family preferences rather than be solely a response to a crisis. Patient #2 - The medical record showed a frequency order dated 03/03/25, for spiritual care frequencies as “1 visit within first 5 days and then per spiritual care recommendation to assess spiritual support needs and provide spiritual guidance and counseling.” There was no indication of the quantity of visits. Patent #13 - The medical record showed a frequency order dated 04/08/25, for spiritual care frequencies as “1 visit within first 5 days and then per spiritual care recommendation to assess spiritual support needs and provide spiritual guidance and counseling.” There was no indication of the quantity of visits. Patient #14 - The medical record showed a frequency order dated 08/14/25, for spiritual care frequencies as “1 visit within first 5 days and then per spiritual care recommendation to assess spiritual support needs and provide spiritual guidance and counseling.” There was no indication of the quantity of visits.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #7) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #7 - The nursing comprehensive dated 12/18/24 documented patient’s diet as a pureed diet with thickened liquids. There was no evidence of an order on the patient’s plan of care for this diet.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #6) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient #6 - The medication profile indicated patient was on nebulized albuterol and ipratropium. There was no evidence of a nebulizer on the plan of care.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #12) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #12 - The initial plan of care dated 02/18/25, contained an order for spiritual care assessments to be completed monthly. Spiritual care assessments were completed on 02/21/25, 04/16/25, and 06/16/25. There was no evidence of assessments completed in March or May.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 134 words

    “Upon patient record review 2 of 14 (Patient #2,3) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient #2 - The aide plan of care dated 03/03/25 outlined frequency of aide visits at 2 times per week. There is no evidence of aide visits since 11/27/25 and no order to change or discontinue aide frequency. Patient #3 - The aide plan of care dated 01/24/25 outlined frequency of aide visits at 2 times per week. There is no evidence of aide visits since 11/27/25 and no order to change or discontinue aide frequency.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #11) did not have evidence that the hospice forwarded a summary and a copy of the patient record, if requested, to a facility when transferring the patient to that facility. Patient #11 - Patient signed a transfer form transferring to another hospice on 05/12/25. There was no evidence indicating that transfer form or summary was forwarded to the receiving hospice.”

    Rule L0682. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #11) did not have evidence that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care or is discharged from hospice in accordance with §418.26, the hospice must forward to the patient’s attending physician: • A copy of the hospice discharge summary • The patient’s clinical record, if requested Patient #11 - The discharge summary dated 05/12/25, stated “tx to another hospice”. There was no evidence this summary was sent to patient’s attending MD.”

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3))

    “Upon client record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #11,12) did not have evidence that the discharge summary includes all required information. Patient #11 - The discharge summary dated 05/12/25, stated “tx to another hospice”. The summary did not include the necessary elements of the discharge summary. Patient #12 - The medical record indicated the patient was discharged due to extended prognosis on 06/17/25. There was no evidence that the discharge summary was completed.”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Dec 18, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care12 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jan 3, 2020.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 13.6 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.2% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 40% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day13.6 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends7.2%
Visits near death40.0% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 5 owners or officers are people: Adeoye M Ogunlade (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Adeoye M Ogunlade (corporate officer, 100%); Adeoye M Ogunlade (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Christiana O Ogunlade (corporate director, 100%); Christiana O Ogunlade (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 77.78% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 132 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 90501, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 8; this one had 12.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.