Hearth Record

All Family Hospice, Inc.

A hospice in Burbank, California 91502

103 W Alameda Ave #130, Burbank, California 91502. (818) 660-5357.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

9 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 159 hospices serving ZIP code 91502 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Oct 24, 2024: an initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

9 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Oct 24, 2024: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care9 deficiencies
  • Notice of rights and responsibilities (42 CFR 418.52(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 174 words

    “Upon home visit interview/observation, there was no evidence that during the initial assessment visit in advance of furnishing care, the hospice provided the patient and/or family with verbal (meaning spoken) and written notice of the Patient’s Rights and Responsibilities in a language and manner that the patient understands. Patient 1: Pt is alert and oriented times 3. He signed his own consents. He stated via nurse interpreter that he cannot speak or read English and he was alone during admission on 8/29/24. The The Patient Rights and Responsibilities were given to the pt in English not in Armenian the language the pt understands. Patient 3: The patient and caregiver were the only two present during admission on 9/10/24, per pt and caregiver via nurse interpreter. The pt signed his own consents and is alert and oriented x3. Pt and care giver stated “no” when asked if they can speak or read English. The Patient Rights and Responsibilities were given to the pt in English not in Armenian the language the pt and caregiver understands.”

    Rule L0502. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 14 of 14 (Patient #1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment takes into consideration the imminence of death. Patients 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14: the medical records did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment takes into consideration the imminence of death. The section on imminence of death was blank and this was not addressed in the narrative.”

    Rule L0528. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 208 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 14 (Patient #1,3,10,13) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: Patient 1: Upon home visit finding pt is taking Losartan 100-25mg the medication profile has 100-12.5, the fill date on the bottle is 9/30/24. Pt is taking Metoprolol succinate since 9/5/24 and medication profile has Metoprolol tartrate. Pt is taking Protonix since 9/30/24 medication profile has Omeprazole. Corrected on site Patient 3: The medication profile contains Clotrimazole 1 topical as directed. There is no dose or frequency or site and Triamcinolone Cream 1 topical as directed. There is no site, frequency or dose documented. Upon home visit finding the patient is taking Vitamin D3 5000 units daily since 5/24/24. This is not on the medication profile. Corrected on site. Patient 10: The medication profile contains Diclofenac 1 gel topical. There is no site noted to apply to or dosage. The medication profile also has Salonpas with no site to apply. Corrected on site. Patient 13: The SN documented on 12/17/24 pt is taking Melatonin for sleep. This was not added to the medication profile.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 92 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #7) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient 7: Record did not contain evidence of an initial bereavement assessment being completed.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 100 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #10) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 10: The comprehensive assessment 3/22/24 contains documentation by the RN pt requires a cane and walker. There was no fall risk care plan initiated.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 415 words

    “Upon patient record review, 7 of 14 (Patient #1,2,3,6,9,10,13) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 1: The SN documented on 10/18/24 “Caregiver reminded to apply barrier cream with each diaper change”. This is not on the POC, SN removed from documentation stating it was an error, pt does not wear diapers or use barrier cream. The POC 8/29/24 contains orders for both “SC with in 5 days of admission and once each certification period” and “SC declined”. There was no evidence in the documentation of who refused the SC. Upon home visit finding pt is taking Losartan 100-25mg the POC has 100-12.5, the fill date on the bottle is 9/30/24. Pt is taking Metoprolol succinate since 9/5/24 and POC has Metoprolol tartrate. Pt is taking Protonix since 9/30/24 POC has Omeprazole. Corrected on site. Patient 2: The POC 6/10/24 contains orders for both “SC with in 5 days of admission and once each certification period” and “SC declined”. There was no evidence in the documentation of who refused the SC. Patient 3: The POC contains Clotrimazole 1 topical as directed. There is no dose or frequency or site and Triamcinolone Cream 1 topical as directed. There is no site, frequency or dose documented. The POC contains orders for both SC with in 5 days of admission and once each certification period and SC declined. There was no evidence in the documentation of who refused the SC. Upon home visit finding the patient is taking Vitamin D3 5000 units daily since 5/24/24. This is not on the POC. Medication orders all corrected on site. Patient 6: The POC 8/28/24 contains orders for both “SC with in 5 days of admission and once each certification period” and “SC declined”. There was no evidence in the documentation of who refused the SC. Patient 9: The POC 9/16/24 contains orders for both “SC with in 5 days of admission and once each certification period” and “SC declined”. There was no evidence in the documentation of who refused the SC. Patient 10: The POC contains an order for Diclofenac 1 gel topical. There is no site noted to apply to or dosage. POC also has Salonpas with no order for where to apply. Corrected on site. Patient 13: The SN documented on 12/17/24 pt is taking Melatonin for sleep. This was not added to the POC.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 357 words

    “Upon client record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #3,5,8) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 3: The POC contains an order for SN 1 time per week and 2 prn for symptom management or change in condition. The RN made a visit on 10/8/24 and the LVN made a visit 10/10/24 both in the same Medicare week. Both visits were routine and the RN was not making a supervisory visit. The RN made a visit 9/24/24 routine and the LVN made a visit 9/26/24 that was routine as well in the same Medicare week. The RN was not making a supervisory visit and neither visit was PRN. There was no evidence of an order to increase visits for either of these weeks. The RN amended the note and entered the supervisory visit in the supervisory visit section. Patient 5: The SN documented on 10/14/24 “Administered the prescribed pain medication and advised the caregiver on nonpharmacological interventions. There is no evidence the nurse followed the POC. Patient 7: The SN made a visit on 10/3/24 from 6-7pm and the documentation is blank, there was another SN visit 10/7/24 from 12-1pm and the only thing documented was pain “0”. Therefore, unable to confirm visits completed. In addition, per agency Documentation Policy all documentation is to be turned in within 24-48 hours of visit. Patient 8: The POC contains an order for SN 1 time per week and 2 prn for change in condition or symptom management. The LVN saw the pt on 10/10/24 as a routine visit and the RN saw the pt on 10/13/24 as a routine visit and it was not a supervisory visit. There is no evidence of an order to increase visits that Medicare week. The RN amended the note and entered the supervisory visit in the supervisory visit section. The SN made a visit on 10/13/24 @0700-0730 the documentation is not completed yet therefore unable to confirm visit made. In addition, per agency Documentation Policy all documentation is to be turned in within 24-48 hours of visit.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 138 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #6) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient 6: The aide POC contains an order for pajamas/gown with no frequency.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 14 (Patient #6) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient 6: The aide POC has an order for aspiration precautions every visit. The aide did not do this task on any visit from 8/30/24-10/18/24.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Oct 24, 2024Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care9 deficiencies cited
Aug 2, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health CareAccreditation denied: the survey was refused

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Aug 11, 2021.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
  • An accrediting organisation denied it accreditation in the last three years because it refused a survey.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 8.2 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 16.8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 84.6% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day8.2 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends16.8%
Visits near death84.6% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • CMS’s ownership file has no owners listed for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 8 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold8 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 159 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91502, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 9.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.