Hearth Record

East Valley Hospice, Inc.

A hospice in Granada Hills, California 91344

10646 Zelzah Ave, Suite 201, Granada Hills, California 91344. (818) 643-5050.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 38 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

38 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 258 hospices serving ZIP code 91344 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Sep 9, 2024: a follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

3 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

38 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

38 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Sep 9, 2024: follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care4 deficiencies
  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 196 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 5 (Patient #1,2,3,4) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment is updated including and by: • The hospice interdisciplinary group (in collaboration with the individual’s attending physician, if any) • Changes that have taken place since the initial assessment • Information on the patient’s progress toward desired outcomes • Reassessment of the patient’s response to care • The assessment update must be accomplished as frequently as the condition of the patient requires, but no less frequently than every 15 days #1-RN frequency ordered every 14 days - no RN visits documented since 08/14/24 therefore no RN assessments were completed no less frequently than every 15 days. #2-Comprehensive assessment was only completed by an LPN and no evidence of a comprehensive assessment head-to toe assessment completed by the RN prior to benefit period #2 dated 09/02/24-11/30/24. #3-Comprehensive assessment was only completed by an LPN and no evidence of a comprehensive assessment head-to toe assessment completed by the RN from 08/01/24-08/22/24. #4-RN frequency ordered every 14 days - no RN visits documented since 08/15/24 therefore no RN assessments were completed no less frequently than every 15 days.”

    Rule L0533. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 5 (Patient #4) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. #4-SC frequency ordered 1 x month, frequency not followed with only 2 visits made since SOC.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 5 (Patient #2) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training #2-Aide frequency ordered 2 x wk. Frequency not followed week of 08/25/24, only one visit was made and there is no missed visit documentation.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Recertification of the terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(c))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 5 (Patient #2) did not have evidence that before the recertification period for each patient, the medical director or physician designee must review the patient’s clinical information and provide written documentation that it is anticipated that the patient’s life expectancy is 6 months or less. #2-There is no CTI or narrative statement for recert dated 09/02/24.”

    Rule L0668. Standard-level.

Jul 10, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care34 deficiencies
  • Initial & comprehensive assessment of patient (42 CFR 418.54)

    “Condition of Participation: Initial and Comprehensive Assessment of the Patient.”

    Rule L0520. Condition-level.

  • IDG, care planning, coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56)

    “Condition of Participation: Interdisciplinary Group, Care Planning, and Coordination of Services. L536”

    Rule L0536. Condition-level.

  • Quality assessment & performance improvement (42 CFR 418.58)

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the organization develops, implements, and maintains an effective, on-going, organization wide Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program.”

    Rule L0559. Condition-level.

  • EP Program Patient Population (42 CFR 418.113(a)(3))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the The Emergency Preparedness plan addresses patient population, including, but not limited to: • The type of services the hospice has • The ability to provide in an emergency; and continuity of operations, including delegations of authority and succession plans No evidence of emergency drill tabletop for major earthquake included the care of patients with East Valley Hospice.”

    Rule E0007. Standard-level.

  • Notice of rights and responsibilities (42 CFR 418.52(a)(3))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #13) did not have evidence that the hospice obtained the patient’s or representative’s signature confirming that they received a copy of the Patient’s Rights and Responsibilities. Patient #13, Patient is missing page 2 of acknowledgement of informed consent which would identify the Bill of Rights.”

    Rule L0504. Standard-level.

  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #11) did not have evidence that the patient chooses a health care provider, including an attending physician. Patient #11, No evidence of election of attending documented on acknowledgement of consents.”

    Rule L0515. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))

    “Upon patient record review 9 of 14 (Patient #1,3,5,6,7,9,10,11,12) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment identifies the physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the hospice patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process. Patient #1,5,6,9,10, No evidence of SC assessment completed, by SC or RN. Patient #3,7,11,12, No evidence of SC assessment or MSW assessment completed by discipline or RN.”

    Rule L0524. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 101 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #3,11) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient #3, No evidence of bereavement assessment completed. Patient #11, No evidence of bereaved family member identified on bereavement assessment completed on 5/15/24.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 109 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #11) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment is updated including and by: • The hospice interdisciplinary group (in collaboration with the individual’s attending physician, if any) • Changes that have taken place since the initial assessment • Information on the patient’s progress toward desired outcomes • Reassessment of the patient’s response to care • The assessment update must be accomplished as frequently as the condition of the patient requires, but no less frequently than every 15 days Patient #11, RN visit completed on 2/2/24 then on 2/27/24. No evidence of continuous assessment of this patient.”

    Rule L0533. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 209 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 14 (Patient #1,3,5,7,13) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #1, No evidence of psych social care plan identifying no funeral home and full code status. No evidence of initial care plan addressing wound care. Patient #3, No evidence of psych social care plan addressing full code status. No evidence of care plan addressing hemodialysis, who transports to dialysis, who manages the central line, safety issues related to central line such as bleeding complications. Patient #5, No evidence of psych social care plan for addressing family wanting to be re-evaluated for additional hours through IHSS. Patient #7, No evidence of psych social care plan addressing full code status. Patient #13, No evidence of psych social care plan to addressing no funeral home, stating daughter will provide when information is found. No evidence of spiritual care plan to address pray to support patient faith.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #1) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #1, Wound care order to right posterior forearm wound, cleanse with wound cleanser, pat dry with gauze, apply teracyte to wound, cover with border gauze 3x/week. No evidence identifying who will complete the wound care.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #4) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient #4, Initial RN assessment documents patient has overbed table and walker. No evidence of overbed table and walker documented on plan of care under DME.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 fo 14 (Patient #12) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient #12, SN note on 3/7/24 documents patient was started on furosemide. No evidence care plan was updated with problems/goals/interventions.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 333 words

    “Upon client record review, 13 of 14 (Patient #1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,13,14) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #1, Frequency RN every 14 days, Visit made on 6/25/24 then 7/5/24. No evidence visits were every 14 days. Patient #2, Frequency RN every 14 days, Visits made on 5/21/24 and 5/23/24. No evidence visits were every 14 days. MSW completed evaluation on 5/23/24 via telephone. No evidence of order for visits to be completed via telephone. Patient #3, Frequency LVN 1x/week, first visit completed by LVN was 2/22/24. No evidence of LVN visit the week of 2/15/24. RN every 14 days, visits completed 3/8/24, 3/13/24. No evidence of visits every 14 days. Patient #4, Frequency RN every 14 days, patient seen on 6/6/24 then 6/19/24. No evidence of visits every 14 days. Frequency SN 1x/week, patient seen by LVN on 6/12/24 and RN on 6/12/24. Patient #5, Frequency SN 1x/week, Patient seen 2x the week of 6/4/24, 6/18/24, 6/25/24, 7/6/21. Patient # 6, Frequency SN 1x/week, patient seen 2x week of 5/29/24, 6/10/24. Patient #7, Frequency SN 1x/week, patient seen 6/12/24 by LVN and 6/12/24 by RN. Patient seen 2x the week of 6/26/24. Patient #8, Frequency SN 2x/week, patient seen 6/5/24 by LVN and 6/5/24 by RN. Patient #9, Frequency MSW every recertification, patient seen 5/26/24 and 6/21/24. No evidence of orders for monthly visits. Patient #10, Frequency SN 1x/week, SN visits on 5/9/24, 5/14/24, 5/15/24, 5/17/24. No evidence visits were completed 1x/week. Patient #11, Frequency RN every 14 days. RN visits on 2/2/24 then 2/27/24. No evidence of visit every 14 days. Patient #13, Frequency MSW every certification. visits made 1/8/24 and 4/1/24. Certification period 1/5/24 to 4/3/24. No evidence of order for extra scheduled visit. RN frequency 2x/week, LVN visit 3/25/24, RN visit 3/25/24 LVN visit 3/27/24. No evidence visit schedule was followed. Patient #14, Frequency SN 3x/week. No evidence of SN visits the week of 10/20/23.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(3))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 14 (Patient #3) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services provided are based on all assessments of the patient and family needs. Patient #3, Initial RN assessment documents request hospice to contact local clergy. No evidence local clergy was contacted.”

    Rule L0556. Standard-level.

  • Program scope (42 CFR 418.58(a)(1))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the program shows measurable improvement in indicators related to improved palliative outcomes and hospice services.”

    Rule L0561. Standard-level.

  • Program data (42 CFR 418.58(b)(1))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the program must use quality indicator data, including patient care, and other relevant data, in the design of the program.”

    Rule L0563. Standard-level.

  • Program data (42 CFR 418.58(b)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 108 words

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the QAPI program uses quality indicator data, including patient care and other relevant data in the design of its program. The hospice must use the data collected to: • Monitor the effectiveness and safety of services and quality of care • Identify opportunities and priorities for improvement Agency documents, b/p cuff, hand hygiene, flu vaccines, employees, anticoagulation, comfortable dying, continuous care, DME, pharmacy, medication error, grievance, satisfaction survey, incident report, infection control, oxygen safety. Incident report, infection control, comfortable dying and oxygen safety have collected data. Each of these reports have evaluation and goals. No evidence of how to accomplish these goals.”

    Rule L0564. Standard-level.

  • Program activities (42 CFR 418.58(c)(1)(i))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence QAPI activities focus on high risk ,high volume, or problem prone areas.”

    Rule L0566. Standard-level.

  • Program activities (42 CFR 418.58(c)(1)(ii))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement activities focus on high risk, high volume or problem-prone areas by considering incidence, prevalence, and the severity of problems.”

    Rule L0567. Standard-level.

  • Program activities (42 CFR 418.58(c)(1)(iii))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement activities focus on high risk, high volume or problem-prone areas by understanding how they affect palliative outcomes, patient safety and quality of care.”

    Rule L0568. Standard-level.

  • Performance improvement projects (42 CFR 418.58(d)(1))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the number and scope of distinct QAPI projects conducted annually is based on the needs of the hospice’s population and internal organizational needs and must reflect the scope, complexity, and past performance of the hospice’s services and operations.”

    Rule L0572. Standard-level.

  • Performance improvement projects (42 CFR 418.58(d)(2))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice documents what QAPI projects are being conducted, the reasons for conducting these projects, and the measurable progress achieved on these projects.”

    Rule L0573. Standard-level.

  • Executive responsibilities (42 CFR 418.58(e)(2))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice’s governing body is responsible for ensuring that the hospice-wide Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement efforts address priorities for improved quality of care and patient safety, and that all improvement actions are evaluated for effectiveness.”

    Rule L0575. Standard-level.

  • Control (42 CFR 418.60(b)(1))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence in QAPI reports that the hospice maintains a coordinated agency-wide program for the surveillance, identification, prevention, control, and investigation of infectious and communicable diseases that is an integral part of the hospice’s Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement program.”

    Rule L0580. Standard-level.

  • Control (42 CFR 418.60(b)(2))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence in the QAPI reports that the hospice maintains a coordinated agency-wide program for the surveillance, identification, prevention, control, and investigation of infectious and communicable diseases.”

    Rule L0581. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 223 words

    “Upon patient record review 6 of 14 (Patient #1,2,3,7,8,14) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient #1, aide care plan identifies under bath hygiene; safety razor. No evidence task was completed on aide sheet. Patient #2, aide frequency 1x/week, aide visits on 5/21/24 and 5/25/24. Patient #3, aide frequency 3x/week. No evidence of aide visits the week of 2/15/24. Aide care plan documents vitals every visit. No evidence task was completed on 6/17/24 or 6/26/24. Patient #7, aide frequency 2x/week effective 5/29/24. No evidence of aide visits the week of 5/29/24. Aide note on 6/3/24 documents as completed; objects within reach and bed in low position. No evidence of aide care plan directing these tasks to be completed. 6/5/24 Aide documents as completed; objects within reach. No evidence of aide care plan directing this task to be completed. Patient #8, aide frequency 2x/week effective 5/22/24. No evidence of aide visits the week of 5/22/24. Patient #14, aide frequency 2x/week. No evidence of visits on 10/20/23, only one visit the week of 10/25/23 and 3 visits provided on 11/20/24, 11/22/24, 11/24/24.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 113 words

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 14 (Patient #1) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice aides report: • Changes in the patient’s medical, nursing, rehabilitative, and social needs to a registered nurse, as the changes relate to the plan of care and quality assessment and improvement activities • Hospice aides must also complete appropriate records in compliance with the hospice’s policies and procedures Patient #1, Aide care plan states to notify RN is b/p less than 90/60. On 6/22/24, b/p 103/58 documented on aide sheet. No evidence aide reporting b/p to RN. On 6//15/24, b/p 105/55 documented on aide sheet. No evidence of aide reporting b/p to RN.”

    Rule L0628. Standard-level.

  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 14 (Personnel #1) did not have evidence that the administrator is a hospice employee and possesses the education and experience required by the governing body. No evidence of Administrator meeting the qualifications per the job description. Job description states Administrator must have a Bachelor degree in Business Administrator or Masters in health care field. Administrator has a Bachelor of Science in Marketing.”

    Rule L0651. Standard-level.

  • Initial certification of terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 203 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #3) did not have evidence that the medical director or physician designee provides written certification that it is anticipated that the patient’s life expectancy is 6 months or less if the illness runs its normal course. The physician must consider the following when making this determination: • The primary terminal condition • Related diagnosis • Current subjective and objective medical findings • Current medication and treatment orders • Information about the medical management of any of the patient’s conditions unrelated to the terminal illness Patient #3, No evidence of certifying physician narrative includes current status. Narrative states “I certify that patient’s condition is terminal and may lead to death in six months or less if the disease continues to run its normal course.” “ I attest/confirm that I composed this narrative based on my review of patients medical records, team assessment and/or examination of the patient” IDT discussed patient’s current condition and all agreed to continue hospice services at this time. Patient documented face to face narrative for certification #2. Certification signed on 5/15/24 stating patient has 3+ pitting edema. SN visit notes on 5/6, 5/7, 5/14, 5/21, all document “none” for assessment of edema.”

    Rule L0667. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 93 words

    “Upon patient client record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #10,11,13) did not have evidence that each patient record contains: • Signed copies of the notice of patient rights in accordance with 418.52 • Signed election statement in accordance with 418.24 Patient #10, Patient acknowledgement of informed consent was completed and signed by staff. No evidence patient signed consent. Signature space left empty. Patient #11, Patient did not complete election date on acknowledgement of informed consent. Patient #13, Patient is missing page 2 of acknowledgement of informed consent which would identify the election date.”

    Rule L0673. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(6))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #5) did not have evidence that each patient record contains Advance Directives. Patient #5, Advance Directive was documented yes on acknowledgement of informed consent. No evidence of copy of Advanced Directive was received.”

    Rule L0677. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #13) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient #13, Patient is missing page 6 of acknowledgement of informed consent which would identify the Advance Directive.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Professional management (42 CFR 418.112(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 193 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #13) did not have evidence that the hospice assumes responsibility for professional management of the resident’s hospice services in accordance with the hospice plan of care. The hospice is responsible for providing all hospice services including: • Ongoing assessment, care planning, monitoring, coordination and provision of care by the Hospice IDG • Assessment, coordination and provision of any needed general inpatient or continuous care • Coordination by the hospice RN for the implementation of the plan of care for the patient • Provision, in a timely manner, of all supplies, medications, and DME needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions • Financial management responsibility for all medical supplies, appliances, medications and biologicals related to the terminal illness and related conditions • Determination of the appropriate level of care to be given to the patient (routine homecare, inpatient, or continuous care) Patient #13, Level of care changed on 4/12/24 to continuous care. No evidence of RN assessment prior to change of level of care or during the time patient was on continuous care which ended due to death on 4/13/24.”

    Rule L0762. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 9, 2024Follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care4 deficiencies cited
Jul 10, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care34 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jun 28, 2021.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 7.6 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 10.1% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 59.1% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 64% at home, 36% in assisted living.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day7.6 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends10.1%
Visits near death59.1% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 8 owners or officers are people: Atthapak Daruthayan (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Ferdinand C Bondoc (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Ferdinand C Bondoc (corporate officer, 100%); Ferdinand C Bondoc (corporate director, 100%); Ferdinand C Bondoc (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Ferdinand C Bondoc (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Iluminada G Ladera (corporate director, 100%); Eliza S Ahn (managing employee (under contract)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 7 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 65% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 14.3% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold7 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 258 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91344, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 38.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.