Pd Hospice Inc.
A hospice in Granada Hills, California 91324
10324 Balboa Blvd Suite 200, Granada Hills, California 91324. (747) 202-0733.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.
- 12 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- Not rated family caregiver rating
- 10of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
12 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 196 hospices serving ZIP code 91324 had 5.
The last inspection on record was on Apr 23, 2024: a follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission.
4 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
12 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Mar 14, 2024: initial inspection by The Joint Commission12 deficiencies
-
Exercise of rights/respect for proprty/person (42 CFR 418.52(b)(1)(iii))
The inspectors’ words, 187 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 1 staff interviews, related to patient complaints, the organization failed to allow the patient/ family/ CG the right to have complaints reviewed per organizational policy. During home visit for RRHV#2, the Med Tech at the facility advised this surveyor that she had called the Hospice the week prior regarding a family complaint related to the HHA visit. She stated that the family told her the HHA stayed only 10 minutes and that the patient was still very wet and his clothes were wet. The organization advised this surveyor that the complaint was taken by the office manager and that she also documented it. The organizational policy stated that the staff receiving the complaint will discuss, verbally and in writing, the grievance with the clinical supervisor/ nursing supervisor and the clinical supervisor/ nursing supervisor will investigate the grievance. The Nursing Supervisor was unaware of the complaint until she heard the Med Tech advise the surveyor of the situation. And the complaint documentation did not state that the nursing supervisor was included. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice DPCS Designee.”
-
Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))
The inspectors’ words, 114 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 6 of 15 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to assess and reassess its patients. During record review for RRHV#3, RRNHV#2, RRNHV#7, RRNHV#8, RRDC#1, and RRDC#2, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the Registered Nurse was not making visits at least every 15 days. The organization utilized primarily LVN’s. For example in RRNHV#7, the patient had a gap in RN visits of 5 weeks. In RRNHV#8, the RN had not visited in over a month. In RRDC#1, the RN had a gap in visits of almost 3 months, and in RRDC#2, the RN had a gap in visits of 6 weeks. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the DPCS Designee.”
-
Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))
“Observed in Tracer Activities. There was no evidence that the governing body and leadership had established requirements to support patient care, treatment and services as evidenced by lack of implementation of policy for patient assessments, aide supervision, notice of non-coverage implementation, and the complaint process/ policy. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice DPCS Designee.”
-
Federal, state, local laws & regulations (42 CFR 418.116)
“Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 3 patient records reviewed, that required an ABN, the organization failed to involve the patient in making decisions about their care, treatment, or services. During record review for RRDC#1, RRDC#2, and RRNHV#4, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the documentation of the Notice of Non-Coverage was not signed at least 48 hours before discharge. For example RRDC#1 and RRDC#2 were signed the day before discharge and RRNHV#4 was signed the same day. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the DPCS Designee.”
-
Initial assessment (42 CFR 418.54(a))
“Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 15 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to assess the patient condition according to defined time frames. During record review for RRHV#3, RRNHV#4, RRNHV#5 and RRNHV#8, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the organization did not have documentation of why the initial nursing assessments were not completed within 48 hours. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the DPCS Designee.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))
The inspectors’ words, 123 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 15 of 15 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to assess and reassess as defined by policy. During record review for all records, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the initial Psychosocial, Spiritual and Bereavement Assessments were completed telephonically with no documentation that in person visits were offered. All documentation stated pt/cg agreed to telephonic. 

For all records reviewed, the POC stated may do telephonic remote visits as applicable and as per patient request. Staff were not following the POC. The SW stated in an interview with the surveyor that since the pandemic all visits were done remotely due to potential risk, unless the patient specifically requested in person. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice DPCS Designee.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 103 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 17 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to provide care, treatment, or services in accordance with orders, as required by law and regulation. During record review for RRHV#1, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed visit frequency orders were not being following. 

For RRHV#1, the SW and SC were ordered monthly but they were only going at recertification. The RN was ordered once every other week. But did not go at all during the month of December and then had a lapse of 21 days between Jan/ Feb. 



This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice DPCS Designee.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(5))
The inspectors’ words, 116 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 15 of 15 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to coordinate the patient’s care, treatment, or services based on the patient’s needs. During record review for all records the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the SC/SW/Bereavement assessments were being done telephonically with the staff documenting notes that patient/CG agreed. The POC of all patients stated may do telephonic remote visits as applicable and as per patient request. Staff were not following the POC. The SW stated in an interview with the surveyor that since the pandemic all visits were done remotely due to potential risk, unless the patient specifically requested in person. This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice DPCS Designee.”
-
Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))
The inspectors’ words, 189 words
“Observed in Patient Home. In 2 of 3 home visits conducted, the organization failed to implement the infection prevention and control activities it had planned. During home visits for RRHV#1 and RRHV#2, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed staff did not follow the organizational policy for hand hygiene. For example in RRHV31, the nurse did not do hand hygiene each time she re-entered her nursing bag. And in RRHV32, the Chaplain did not do hand hygiene before touching the patient or after touching the patient’s blankets. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice DPCS Designee. Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 3 home visits conducted, the organization failed to implement the infection prevention and control activities related to reusable medical equipment they had planned. During home visit for RRHV#1, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the nurse utilize generic brand Clorox wipes to clean her blood pressure cuff, pulse oximeter, stethoscope and thermometer. She immediately dried them with a loose paper towel from her bag. The organizational policy stated equipment would be washed with soap and water or alcohol. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice DPCS Designee.”
-
Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))
“Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 5 patient records reviewed, patients receiving aide services, the organization failed to supervise staff effectively. During record review for RRHV#1, RRHV#3, RRNHV#5, and RRDC#1 the hospice aides were not being supervised at least every 14 days. 

For example in RRHV#1, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the Hospice Aide Supervision had not been performed for 53 days. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice DPCS Designee.”
-
Use and mintenance of equipment and supplies (42 CFR 418.106(f)(2))
“Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 3 home visits conducted, the organization failed to provide patient education and training based on each patient’s needs and abilities. During home visit for RRHV#1, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the oxygen sign was not on the door and that the oxygen concentrator and portable tanks were being stored in a closet. Upon record review, it was noted that there was no documentation of education to the family related to these items. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice DPCS Designee.”
-
N/a (42 CFR 418.110(c)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 137 words
“Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 1 home visits conducted, patients with oxygen orders, the organization failed to manage safety and security risks related to oxygen storage. During home visit for RRHV#1, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor asked the caregiver if the patient had oxygen ordered. The nurse stated she did not. The caregiver led the surveyor to a closet where a concentrator and portable oxygen container were being stored with the closet door closed. The organization’s policy stated that oxygen would not be stored in a closet. The nurse and the DPCS designee did not step in during the visit to assist and did not offer education to the caregiver. The DPCS designee did advise she would be sending an RN out to remedy the situation. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice DPCS Designee.”
All 2 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2024 | Follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission | No deficiencies cited |
| Mar 14, 2024 | Initial inspection by The Joint Commission | 12 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Aug 7, 2021.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 10.5 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 22.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 95% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 58% at home, 33% in assisted living, 3% in a nursing facility, 5% in a skilled nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 10.5 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 22.6% |
| Visits near death | 95.0% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- Mi-Raquel Corp owns 100% directly since Mar 11, 2022.
- 8 owners or officers are people: Raquel Lacuesta (owns 5% or more through other companies, 100%); Princess D Garcia (managing employee (on the payroll)); Raquel Lacuesta (corporate officer); Raquel Lacuesta (corporate director); Raquel Lacuesta (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Princess Rhobella Q Kataoka (managing employee (on the payroll)); Aaron Acquisto (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Joanna Claire Uri Garcia (managing employee (on the payroll)).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mi-Raquel Corp | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Mar 11, 2022 |
What do families say?
- CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 87.76% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | Not rated |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 10 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 196 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91324, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 12.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Aasta Hospice | 5 |
| Premier Hospice, Inc. | Not given |
| Valley Crest Hospice, Inc. | 7 |
| Sunlit Hospice Inc. | Not given |
| Honest Hospice | 26 |
| Lumen Hospice, Inc. | Not given |
| Tulip Hospice, Inc. | Not given |
| A1kare Hospice & Palliative Care, Inc. | Not given |
| Red Cross Hospice Inc. | 2 |
| Tram Hospice Care, Inc. | 30 |
| Loving Hands Hospice | 3 |
| Bravo Hospice and Palliative Care | 4 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.