Hearth Record

Compassionate Care Hospice

A hospice in San Ramon, California 94583

2821 Crow Canyon Road, Suite 101, San Ramon, California 94583. (415) 651-3632.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 17 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

17 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 36 hospices serving ZIP code 94583 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on Nov 7, 2024: an initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

17 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

17 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Nov 7, 2024: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care17 deficiencies
  • Names and Contact Information (42 CFR 418.113(c)(1))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the Emergency Plan communication plan includes all of the following: • Names and contact information for the following: • Hospice employees • Entities providing services under arrangement • Patients’ physicians The agency did not have employee and service provider phone numbers included in their emergency communication plan. Corrected on site.”

    Rule E0030. Standard-level.

  • Primary/Alternate Means for Communication (42 CFR 418.113(c)(3))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the Emergency Plan communication plan must includes a primary and alternate means for communicating with hospice’s employees and Federal, state, tribal, regional, and local emergency management agencies.”

    Rule E0032. Standard-level.

  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 14 (Patient #5) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completed the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Patient 5: The medical record contained a comprehensive spiritual assessment completed 4/9/24 with a start of care 4/1/24.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 14 (Patient #3) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment identifies the physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the hospice patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process. Patient 3: There was no evidence of a comprehensive spiritual assessment.”

    Rule L0524. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 262 words

    “Upon patient record review, 7 of 14 (Patients #2,#3,#4,#5,#6,#7,#9) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications. Patient 2: The medical record contained nursing documentation identifying patient having oxygen in the home. There was no evidence of oxygen included on the medication profile. Corrected on site. Patient 3: The medication profile contained Miralax oral powder with no instructions to mix with a diluent. Corrected on site. Patient 4: The medication profile contained Septra DS ordered for 7 days on 7/18/24 that was still listed as a current medication. Corrected on site. Patient 5: The medication profile contained Metamucil oral powder with no instructions to mix with a diluent. The profile also contained cipro ordered 7/11/24 for 7 days and bactrim ordered 9/11/24 for 7 days that were still listed as current medications. Corrected on site. Patient 6: The medication profile contained Septra DS ordered 10/5/24 for 10 days and cipro ordered 10/28/24 for 5 days that were still listed as current medications. Corrected on site. Patient 7: Upon medication reconciliation with the home visit, the facility medication profile did not contain acetaminophen scheduled dose before noon and had 7.5mg morphine tablet dose every 6 hours as needed instead of liquid 5mg every 4 hours as needed. Patient 9: Upon medication reconciliation with the home visit, the facility medication profile contained a lidocaine patch that was not on the hospice profile. The hospice medication profile also contained cipro ordered 10/21/24 for 7 days still listed as a current medication, corrected on site.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 92 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #6) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient 6: There was no evidence of an initial bereavement assessment. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 173 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 14 (Patients #1,#3,#4,#13) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment is updated including and by: • The hospice interdisciplinary group (in collaboration with the individual’s attending physician, if any) • Changes that have taken place since the initial assessment • Information on the patient’s progress toward desired outcomes • Reassessment of the patient’s response to care • The assessment update must be accomplished as frequently as the condition of the patient requires, but no less frequently than every 15 days Patient 1: There was no evidence of a comprehensive physical assessment completed by an RN between 9/23/24 and 10/16/24. Patient 3: There was no evidence of a comprehensive physical assessment completed by an RN between 9/19/24 and 10/21/24. Patient 4: There was no evidence of a comprehensive physical assessment completed by an RN between 9/2/24 and 9/27/24. Patient 13: There was no evidence of a comprehensive physical assessment completed by an RN after 4/23/24. Patient was discharged 5/10/24 due to extended prognosis.”

    Rule L0533. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 206 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patients #1,#2,#9) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 1: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient is a high risk for falls and ordered spiritual care visits. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to fall safety and spiritual needs. Corrected on site. Patient 2: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient wounds and ordered social work and spiritual care visits. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to skin impairment, psychosocial, and spiritual needs. Corrected on site. Patient 9: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient issues with dysphagia, high risk for falls, and ordered social work and spiritual care visits. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to dysphagia, fall safety, psychosocial, and spiritual needs. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 180 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 14 (Patients #2,#3,#5,#8,#9) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 2: The medical record contained nursing documentation identifying patient having oxygen in the home. There was no evidence of an order for oxygen rate, frequency, and delivery method. Corrected on site. Patient 3: The medical record also contained an order for Miralax oral powder with no instructions to mix with a diluent. Corrected on site. Patient 5: The medical record contained an order for Metamucil oral powder with no instructions to mix with a diluent. Corrected on site. Patient 8: The medical record contained nursing documentation 10/2/24 identifying patient’s diet advanced to requiring nectar thick liquids. There was no evidence of an order for the diet modification. Corrected on site. Patient 9: The medical record contained nursing documentation 10/21/24 identifying patient’s diet advanced to requiring thickened liquids. There was no evidence of an order for the diet modification. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 182 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 14 (Patients #2,#4,#7,#8) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 2: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of a Hoyer lift for transfers. There was no evidence of an order for the lift included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 4: The medical record contained an order for a DuoNeb. There was no evidence of an order for a nebulizer included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 7: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of a wheelchair. There was no evidence of an order for the wheelchair included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 8: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of a wheelchair, walker, and colostomy supplies. There was no evidence of orders for the DME and supplies included in the plan of care. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #13) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient 13: There was no evidence the plan of care was updated with the plan to discharge the patient due to extended prognosis.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 186 words

    “Upon client record review, 6 of 14 (Patients #2,#3,#4,#5,#7,#10) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 2: The medical record contained nursing documentation 10/28/24 and 10/31/24 identifying nurse was completing wound care. There was no evidence of an order for wound care. Patient 3: The medical record contained documentation of social work visits completed monthly since admission. The current order received 8/6/24 stated patient declined social work services. Patient 4: The medical record contained an order for spiritual care visits once monthly. There was no evidence of any spiritual care visits completed since admission. Patient 5: The medical record contained an order for spiritual care visits once monthly. There was evidence of two spiritual care visits completed in July, August, and October. Patient 7: The medical record also contained an order for spiritual care visits once monthly and evidence of two scheduled visits completed in September. Patient 10: The medical record contained an order for spiritual care visits once monthly. There was no evidence of a visit completed in October.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Licensed professional services (42 CFR 418.62(c))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence licensed professionals participate in the hospice’s QAPI program.”

    Rule L0586. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 134 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patients #11,#12) did not have evidence the hospice offers bereavement counseling that includes: • Making bereavement services available to the family and other individuals in the bereavement plan of care up to 1 year following the death of the patient. Bereavement counseling also extends to residents of a SNF/NF or ICF/IID when appropriate and identified in the bereavement plan of care • Ensuring that bereavement services reflect the needs of the bereaved • Development of a bereavement plan of care that notes the kind of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery Patients 11, 12: There was no evidence of bereavement plans of care developed to reflect the needs of the bereaved, the services to be offered, and the frequency of service delivery.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 107 words

    “Upon patient record review 2 of 14 (Patients #1,#4) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient 1: The medical record contained an order for aide visits twice weekly. There was no evidence of a second visit the week of 10/13/24. Patient 4: The medical record contained an order for aide visits twice weekly. There was three visits completed the weeks of 10/20/24 and 10/27/24.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 156 words

    “Upon patient record review 4 of 14 (Patients #1,#4,#8,#10) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient 1: There was no evidence of a supervisory visit made by the RN until 10/16/24 with aide services started 10/1/24. Patient 4: There was no evidence of a supervisory visit made by the RN between 9/2/24 and 9/27/24. Patient 8: There was no evidence of a supervisory visit made by the RN between 7/30/24 and 10/1/24; and 10/1/24 to current with chart reviewed 11/5/24. Patient 10: There was no evidence of a supervisory visit made by the RN between 9/16/24 and 10/11/24; and 10/11/24 to current with chart reviewed 11/5/24.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #1) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 1: The aide documentation 10/22/24, 10/24/24, 10/29/24, and 10/31/24 contained conflicting documentation with tasks for personal cares marked as completed and entry stating patient declined care.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 7, 2024Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care17 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Aug 5, 2021.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 13.9 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 10.8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 100% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 40% at home, 60% in assisted living.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day13.9 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends10.8%
Visits near death100.0% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Lenuscare Group LLC owns 100% directly since Sep 21, 2022.
  • Lenuscare Group LLC runs it.
  • 7 owners or officers are people: Marina Yastreb (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Ann Nguyen Traxler (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Sharmin Qureshi (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Lamberto H Valiente (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Lamberto H Valiente (corporate officer, 100%); Lamberto H Valiente (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Marie Grace Lizardo (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Lenuscare Group LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Sep 21, 2022
Lenuscare Group LLCRuns it (operational or managerial control)100%Sep 21, 2022

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 90.14% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 28.1% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 36 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 94583, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 17.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.