Bridge Hospice
A hospice in Salinas, California 93907
6 Quail Run Circle, Suite 103, Salinas, California 93907. (831) 216-5585.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.
- 22 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- Not rated family caregiver rating
- 8of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
22 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 10 hospices serving ZIP code 93907 had 7.
The last inspection on record was on Aug 22, 2024: a complaint inspection by the state.
1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
22 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Aug 2, 2024: follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care2 deficiencies
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 120 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 5 (Patient #5) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 5: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient suffered a fall recent to admission and was a high risk for falls. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to fall safety included in the initial plan of care.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))
The inspectors’ words, 157 words
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 5 (Patients #2,#4,#5) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 2: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of an over the bed table, and an order for nebulized duoneb identifying use of a nebulizer. There was no evidence of orders for the table and nebulizer included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 4: The medical record contained an order for nebulized albuterol identifying patient use of a nebulizer. There was no evidence of an order for the nebulizer included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 5: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of a wheelchair. There was no evidence of an order for the wheelchair included in the plan of care.”
Jun 19, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care20 deficiencies
-
IDG, care planning, coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56)
“Condition of Participation: Interdisciplinary Group, Care Planning, and Coordination of Services. L536”
-
EP Testing Requirements (42 CFR 418.113(d)(2))
“Upon observation, there was no evidence the agency has conducted exercises to test the emergency plan every two years. The agency has evidence of a table top exercise being performed 4/1/24. They have evidence of a certificate from the Great American shake out for 2022 and 2023. There is no evidence of the hospice analyzing the hospice’s response to and maintaining documentation of the 2022 and 2023 drills.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))
The inspectors’ words, 107 words
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #1,2,4) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: Patient 1:Medication profile contains Docusate Sodium, Dulcolax, Haldol, Percocet, lorazepam, loperamide however, the facility MAR did not have these meds. Corrected on site. Patient 2:Medication profile contains Acetaminophen 650 rectal, calcium carbonate, loperamide,Morphine, Prilosec, quetiapine however, the facility MAR did not have these orders. Corrected on site. Patient 4: The medication profile has Loratadine daily PRN, facility has ordered daily. Corrected on site.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 199 words
“Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patient #3,4,10,14) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 3: Pt has a fall mat on her DME list on POC though no fall risk care plan initiated. Corrected on site. Patient 4: SN documented in initial assessment pt. has history of several falls. No fall care plan initiated. Corrected on site. Patient 10: The MD documented on initial CTI 2/22/24 pt. with dysphagia. There was no risk for aspiration care plan initiated. SN documented on initial assessment 2/22/24 pt. with “left sided paralysis, max assist with ADL’s. There was no fall risk care plan initiated. Pt is on Eliquis and there is no risk for bleeding care plan initiated. Corrected on site. Patient 14: SN documented uses a w/c on initial assessment. however, there is not fall risk care plan initiated.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 131 words
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #3,4,9) did not have evidence the plan of care must includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including the following: Patient 3: The POC 5/21/24 contains nursing orders with 12 PRN nursing visits which is not a detailed statement of the scope and frequency to meet individual patient needs. Patient 4: The POC 5/21/24 contains nursing visit orders with 9 PRN visit orders which is not a detailed statement of the scope and frequency to meet individual patient needs. Patient 9: The medical record contains an order on 5/15/24 to add 6 PRN SN visits for symptom management which is not a detailed statement of the scope and frequency to meet individual patient needs.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 325 words
“Upon patient record review, 14 of 19 (Patient #1,2,3,4,5,6,8,9,10,11,12,16,17,18) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patients 1,3,5,6,8,9,10,11,12,17,18: Initial POC has orders to educate patients on how to use O2 safely and monitor effectiveness. There is no O2 ordered. Patients are not on O2. Corrected on site. Patient 1: POC 4/22/24 contains Docusate Sodium, Dulcolax, Haldol, Percocet, lorazepam, loperamide however, the facility MAR did not have these meds. Corrected on site. Patient 2: Pt has a Foley catheter inserted on 4/26/24 there is no evidence of order. Corrected on site. POC 6/9/24 Acetaminophen 650 rectal, calcium carbonate,loperamide,Morphine, Prilosec, quetiapine the facility MAR did not have these orders. Corrected on site. Patient 3: Order 5/20/24 “clean with NS pat dry apply triple ATB ointment & cover with foam”, no frequency or who to perform. 5/30/24 SN documented “Skin sensitive when TED hose removed”. No order for TED hose. Corrected on site. Patient 4: POC 5/21/24 with Loratadine daily PRN, facility has ordered daily, POC has Quetiapine daily the facility does not have this order. It was discontinued 5/9/24 per the medical record but remained on POC 5/21/24. Corrected on site. Patient 5: Foley orders 1/16/24 & 3/31/24 have Irrigation orders with no amount of NS and frequency to flush and change every 30 days and PRN no reason. Corrected on site. Patient 6: POC 1/25/24& 4/24/24 “May irrigate Foley with NS” no amount or frequency. Corrected on site Patient 16: Order 3/19/24 “Pleurex drain cleanse site & redress every time fluid is drained”. No cleansing agent, dressing ordered or frequency. Patient 17: POC 4/14/24 “Change catheter every 31 days and as needed with no reason”. Patient 18: Order 6/8/23 “Supplies-incontinent and skin care”. POC 6/4/23 Foley orders with “may irrigate with NS no amount and change every 30 days and PRN with no reason.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))
The inspectors’ words, 129 words
“Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patient #1,3,6,8) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 1: The POC has Oxygen on the DME list. Pt does not have oxygen orders. Corrected on site. Patient 3: Upon home visit finding pt. has a lift chair. This was not ordered on the POC. Corrected on site. Patient 6: SN documented on 5/31/24 “pt. in w/c”. There is no order for a w/c. Corrected on site. Patient 8: SN documented on initial assess 1/24/24 “pt. following wife around house with walker”. There are no orders for a walker on the POC 1/24/24 or 4/9/24. Corrected on site.”
-
Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))
The inspectors’ words, 92 words
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #1,2) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient 1: The SN documented 4/9/24 recertification assessment that pt. is a high fall risk. There is no fall care plan initiated. Corrected on site. Patient 2: Upon home visit finding, pt. has a Foley. Per SN documentation the Foley was place 4/26 however, there are no problems/goals/interventions related to new need.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 375 words
“Upon client record review, 7 of 19 (Patient #2,3,5,6,10,14,16) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 2: The SN documented inserting a Foley catheter on 4/26/24, did not document technique used and there is no order for a Foley. On 5/23/24 the SN documented irrigating the Foley with 60cc NS with no order to irrigate. Corrected on site. Patient 3: 5/21/24 SN documented “Skin tears to BUE, band aid applied to LUE and steri strip to RUE”. There is no order. Patient 5: On 6/14/24 SN documented Foley catheter changed inserted 18fr 8cc balloon. Pt did not tolerate 10cc’s. Order is for 18fr 10ml balloon. There is no evidence of a new order obtained for the smaller balloon size. Patient 6: POC orders to change catheter every 30 days and PRN. There is evidence the pt. had the Foley upon admission 1/25/24. The SN did not change the Foley until 3/14/24 and nurse documented “writer did take out old catheter and inserted new 16fr catheter”. The order is for a 20fr 10cc balloon catheter. The next change of the Foley is documented 4/21/24 which is greater than 30 days. The nurse documented 6/11/24 “catheter cloudy with sediment”. Then made another PRN visit 6/11/24 for the Foley becoming dislodged. SN documented “F/C reinserted 20fr draining clear yellow”. There is no evidence of an order to keep Foley in place greater than 30 days. Patient 10: SN documented 6/17/24 “Application of barrier cream” There is no order for barrier cream. Corrected on site. 6/7/24 SN documented “pt. was evaluated by SNF ST and diet changed from puree to mechanical soft, chopped diet and nectar thickened fluids”. There is not order for the ST eval or diet change in the record. Corrected on site diet order. Patient 14: The SN documented on initial assessment 3/10/23 “oxygen initiated” There was no order at that time for oxygen. There was not order for oxygen until 10/31/23. Patient 16: On 3/21/24 “Writer drained 1000cc from Pleurex drain” there is no evidence the SN completed cleansing of site,a dressing change each time the fluid was drained as ordered. There is no description of the fluid drained.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(3))
The inspectors’ words, 91 words
“Upon patient record review 1 of 19 (Patient #19) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services provided are based on all assessments of the patient and family needs. Patient 19: The SN documented 6/16/23 “Grand daughter giving morphine every 3 hours and Ativan every 6 hours, reports being exhausted. Offered MS to f/u with VA for possible long term placement. Declines at this time. Educated on caregiver expectations” There is no evidence that a respite stay was offered to meet the needs of the patient/family.”
-
Program activities (42 CFR 418.58(c)(2))
“Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice investigates all adverse events, incidents, accidents, variances or unusual occurrences that involve patient care and develops a plan of correction to prevent the same or similar event from occurring again. Patient 19: The medical record contains evidence of pt. having a fall on 6/12/23. There is no evidence of an incident report being filed.”
-
Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))
“Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice follows acceptable standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases, including standard precautions. Patient 2: The SN has a nursing bag on wheels that rolled on the floor. It was on the floor with no barrier (per agency policy) during visit and the RN rolled her bag out of the visit on the ground.”
-
Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #19) did not have evidence the hospice offers bereavement counseling that includes: Patient 19: The Bereaved was documented at High risk for bereavement. The Bereavement POC has orders for a visits post death with in 7-14 days, at 30, 90, and 120 days post death. There is evidence of 1 phone call being made post death. No visits have been made to the bereaved family member. There is no evidence the family member refused the Bereavement visits.”
-
Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c))
The inspectors’ words, 127 words
“Upon personnel record review, 1 of 13 (Personnel #5) did not have evidence in the personnel file that the following competency assessment was performed by the aide with a patient: (This standard applies to all Hospice Aides providing care/service who are directly employed by the hospice or through a contractual agreement.) Personnel 5: The aide did not have evidence of performing a competency for the following tasks upon hire or annually: ·Reading and recording temperature, pulse, and respiration ·Safe transfer techniques and ambulation. ·Normal range of motion and positioning ·Appropriate and safe techniques in personal hygiene and grooming that include-- ·(A) Bed bath ·(B) Sponge, tub, and shower bath ·(C) Shampoo, sink, tub, and bed ·(D) Nail and skin care ·(E) Oral hygiene ·(F) Toileting and elimination”
-
Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))
“Upon patient record review 1 of 19 (Patient #5) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient 5: The medical record contains evidence of an aide supervisory visit being completed on 5/7/24 and the next one was not completed until 5/24/24.”
-
Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(2))
“Upon personnel record review, 3 of 13 (Personnel #1,2,12) did not have evidence that the hospice employees have received orientation on their specific job requirements. Personnel 1,2,12: These personnel files did not contain evidence the employee received an orientation to their specific job requirements.”
-
Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))
“Upon personnel record review, 3 of 13 (Personnel #3,5,9) did not have evidence that a skills competency assessment, specific to each discipline had been conducted for all personnel including volunteers initially during orientation. Personnel 3,5,9: The personnel files do not contain evidence of an initial competency being performed.”
-
Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))
The inspectors’ words, 303 words
“Upon patient client record review, 8 of 19 (Patient #1,2,4,5,6,9,11,16) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 1: The SN documented on 6/13/24 Oxygen in home is safely stored and pt understands use. Pt is not on oxygen. 6/11/24 SN documented “DD/T” this is not an approved abbreviation. The SN documented wound care on 6/3/24 “Cleanse with NS and apply dry dressing, wound care to be provided by facility staff every 3 days and prn for soiling, wound care performed”. The care needs to be in past tense indicating what the nurse performed. Patient 2: SN documented 6/11/24 “Tx done by RNCM per MD order” which does not contain details of treatment performed. Patient 4: SN documented “RP aware”. This is not an approve abbreviation. 6/13/24 SN documented “wound care to great toe provided per doctors orders” which does not contain details of wound care completed. Patient 5: SN documented 6/15/24 “foley flushed and working properly”. 5/14/24 SN documented “Inserted 18fr 10cc balloon foley catheter per agency protocol” which does not contain details of how nurse provided care. Patient 6: RN documented 2/21/24 “Catheter bag changed and catheter flushed” which does not say what it was flushed with. Patient 9: SN documented 6/13/24 “collaborated with HMD”. This is not an approved abbreviation. Patient 11: SN documented on 6/5/24 “PRN visit due to COC”. This is not an approved abbreviation. Patient 16: The SN documented on 3/17/24 “Removed 1000cc of fluid and placed dressing over insertion site”. Does not state type of dressing applied or the cleansing of the site.”
-
Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d)(1))
“Upon client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #2) did not have evidence that the hospice plan of care identifies the care and services that are needed and specifically identify which provider (nursing facility or hospice) is responsible for performing the respective functions that have been agreed upon and included in the hospice plan of care. Patient 2: The medical record contains an order for wound care 6/11/24, does not state who is to perform the wound care. Pt is in a facility.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3))
The inspectors’ words, 98 words
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #1,2) did not have evidence that the hospice provided the following information: Patients 1,2: The facility hospice chart did not contain evidence of: The most recent hospice plan of care specific to each patient, Hospice election form and any Advance Directives specific to each patient, Physician certification and recertification of the terminal illness specific to each patient, Names and contact information for hospice personnel involved in hospice care of each patient, Hospice medication information specific to each patient, Hospice physician and attending physician (if any) orders specific to each patient.”
All 3 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2024 | Complaint inspection by the state | No deficiencies cited |
| Aug 2, 2024 | Follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 2 deficiencies cited |
| Jun 19, 2024 | Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 20 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Jul 2, 2021.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.8 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.2% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 86.4% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 50% at home, 30% in assisted living, 16% in a nursing facility, 4% in a skilled nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 11.8 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 6.2% |
| Visits near death | 86.4% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- Bridge Group Hh Inc. owns 100% directly since Mar 20, 2018.
- Bridge Group Hh Inc. runs it.
- 9 owners or officers are people: Jennifer Robinson (managing employee (under contract)); Jennifer Robinson (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Vincent Castaldo (corporate officer); Jeffrey W Mongonia (corporate officer); Jennifer L Prouty Boertje (managing employee (under contract)); Jennifer L Prouty Boertje (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Cortland Young (managing employee (under contract)); Cortland Young (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Vivek Rudrapatna (managing employee (under contract)).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bridge Group Holdco LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Mar 20, 2018 |
| Bridge Group Hh Inc. | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Mar 20, 2018 |
| Ahp Hh&h Holdco LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 82.8% | Aug 31, 2023 |
| Bridge Group Hh Inc. | Runs it (operational or managerial control) | Mar 20, 2018 |
What do families say?
- CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
- In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 72% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 73% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 8 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 83.92% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 24.3% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | Not rated |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 8 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 10 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 93907, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 22.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Bridge Hospice This hospice | 22 |
| Central Coast VNA & Hospice, Inc. | Not given |
| Hospice of the Central Coast | 5 |
| Hospice of Santa Cruz County | 10 |
| Adventist Health Home Care Services | 2 |
| Continuum Care Hospice LLC | 7 |
| Bonita Springs Hospice Care LLC | 6 |
| Universal Health Net Monterey, Inc. | 3 |
| Affinity Hospice Care, Inc. | 20 |
| Home Connect Hospice, LLC | 10 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.