Hearth Record

Bonita Springs Hospice Care LLC

A hospice in Gilroy, California 95020

8545 Monterey Road, Suite B, Gilroy, California 95020. (408) 848-1114.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

6 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 30 hospices serving ZIP code 95020 had 5.5.

The last inspection on record was on Mar 20, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

6 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Mar 20, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner6 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 1,092 words

    “It is required that the documented comprehensive assessment includes a drug profile that contains the patient’s current prescription and over the counter (OTC) drugs, supplements, herbal remedies, and other alternative treatments that could affect drug therapy. The medication review process includes the identification of the effectiveness of drug therapy, drug side effects, actual or potential drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, and drug therapy associated with laboratory monitoring. The drug profile is updated per the hospice policy and procedure, but, at minimum, at the time of each comprehensive assessment and/or when new medication is added, or changes are made to existing medication. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review, clinical record review, and interview. In 13 of 14 (93%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure that the drug profile included the patient’s current prescription and over the counter (OTC) drugs, supplements, herbal remedies, and other alternative treatments that could affect drug therapy and as a result, the medication reconciliation and review did not include all the patient’s current medications. Document 1: Policy 11.10.1 Medication Profile review date 2015 stated in part “The RN [Registered Nurse] checks all medications a patient may be taking and documents on the medication profile. All prescribed medications, over the counter (OTC) medications and home remedies will be documented on the medication profile.” Clinical Record 1: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 01/04/2024. Clinical record review revealed a physician order dated 01/04/2024 for Oxygen 2-6 lpm [liters per minute] via nasal cannula as needed for shortness of breath. The clinical record contained no documented evidence that Oxygen was included on the patient’s medication profile dated 01/04/2024 and no evidence Oxygen was included in the medication review dated 01/15/2024. Clinical Record 2: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 03/22/2023. Clinical record review revealed a physician order dated 03/21/2023 for Oxygen 2-6 lpm via nasal cannula as needed for shortness of breath. The clinical record contained no documented evidence that Oxygen was included on the patient’s medication profile dated 03/22/2023 and no evidence Oxygen was included in the medication review. Clinical Record 3: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 12/20/2023. Clinical record review revealed a physician order dated 12/20/2023 for Oxygen 2-6 lpm [liters per minute] via nasal cannula as needed for shortness of breath and a physician order dated 01/24/2024 for Ciprofloxacin 500mg bid [twice daily] for 7 days. The clinical record contained no documented evidence that Oxygen and Ciprofloxacin were included on the patient’s medication profile dated 12/20/2023 and no evidence Oxygen and Ciprofloxacin were included in the medication reviews dated 01/01/2024, 01/15/2024, and 01/29/2024. Clinical Record 4: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 12/05/2023. Clinical record review revealed a physician order dated 12/05/2023 for Oxygen 2-6 lpm via nasal cannula as needed for shortness of breath. The clinical record contained no documented evidence that Oxygen was included on the patient’s medication profile dated 12/05/2023 and no evidence Oxygen was included in the medication review dated 12/18/2023. Clinical Record 5: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 11/06/2023. Clinical record review revealed a physician order dated 11/06/2023 for Oxygen 2-6 lpm via nasal cannula as needed for shortness of breath. The clinical record contained no documented evidence that Oxygen was included on the patient’s medication profile dated 11/06/2023 and no evidence Oxygen was included in the medication review dated 11/20/2023. Clinical Record 6: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 08/10/2023. Clinical record review revealed a physician order dated 08/09/2023 for Oxygen 2-6 lpm via nasal cannula as needed for shortness of breath. The clinical record contained no documented evidence that Oxygen was included on the patient’s medication profile dated 08/10/2023 and no evidence Oxygen was included in the medication review dated 08/14/2023. Clinical Record 7: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 02/05/2024. Clinical record review revealed a physician order dated 02/05/2024 for Oxygen 2-6 lpm via nasal cannula as needed for shortness of breath. The clinical record contained no documented evidence that Oxygen was included on the patient’s medication profile dated 02/05/2024 and no evidence Oxygen was included in the medication review dated 02/12/2024. Clinical Record 8: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 02/29/2024. Clinical record review revealed a physician order dated 02/28/2024 for Oxygen 2-6 lpm via nasal cannula as needed for shortness of breath. The clinical record contained no documented evidence that Oxygen was included on the patient’s medication profile dated 02/29/2024 and no evidence Oxygen was included in the medication review dated 03/11/2024. Clinical Record 9: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 12/01/2023. Clinical record review revealed a physician order dated 12/01/2023 for Oxygen 2-6 lpm via nasal cannula as needed for shortness of breath. The clinical record contained no documented evidence that Oxygen was included on the patient’s medication profile dated 12/01/2023 and no evidence Oxygen was included in the medication review dated 12/04/2023. Clinical Record 10: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 08/02/2023. Clinical record review revealed a physician order dated 08/02/2023 for Oxygen 2-6 lpm via nasal cannula as needed for shortness of breath. The clinical record contained no documented evidence that Oxygen was included on the patient’s medication profile dated 08/02/2023 and no evidence Oxygen was included in the medication review dated 08/14/2023. Clinical Record 12: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 10/27/2023. Clinical record review revealed a physician order dated 10/27/2023 for Oxygen 2-6 lpm via nasal cannula as needed for shortness of breath. The clinical record contained no documented evidence that Oxygen was included on the patient’s medication profile dated 10/27/2023 and no evidence Oxygen was included in the medication review dated 11/06/2023. Clinical Record 13: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 01/28/2023. Clinical record review revealed a physician order dated 01/27/2023 for Oxygen 2-6 lpm via nasal cannula as needed for shortness of breath. The clinical record contained no documented evidence that Oxygen was included on the patient’s medication profile dated 01/28/2023 and no evidence Oxygen was included in the medication review dated 01/30/2023. Clinical Record 14: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 03/19/2023. Clinical record review revealed a physician order dated 03/19/2023 for Oxygen 2-6 lpm via nasal cannula as needed for shortness of breath. The clinical record contained no documented evidence that Oxygen was included on the patient’s medication profile dated 03/19/2023. During an interview and review of findings on 03/19/2024, the Director of Patient Care Services and the Licensed Vocational Nurse (staff 4) confirmed that the hospice medication profiles, and medication reviews did not include all the patient’s medications.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 405 words

    “It is required that the update of the comprehensive assessment is completed by the hospice Interdisciplinary Group [IDG], who, in collaboration with the individual’s attending physician, if any, consider the changes that have taken place since the initial assessment. The update of the comprehensive assessment includes information on the patient’s progress toward desired outcomes and reassessment of the patient’s response to care. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review, clinical record review, and interview. In 1 of 14 (7%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure that the updated comprehensive assessment included information on the patient’s progress towards desired outcomes and reassessment of the patient’s response to care. Agency policy 9.8.1 Reassessments/Update to the Comprehensive Assessment, revised February 2021, stated in part “Staff will analyze the date from assessments and reassessments. Such analysis of data will assist staff in identifying and prioritizing patient needs and problems to direct care and services and update the IDG care plan.” Agency policy 9.12.3 IDG Care Planning Process, revised February 2022, stated in part “The IDG in collaboration with the patient’s attending physician, if any reviews, revises and documents the individualized plan of care as frequently as the patient’s condition requires, but no less frequently than every 15 calendar days. The revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and notes the patient’s progress toward outcomes and goals specified in the plan of care, advance directives, effectiveness of pain and symptom management, and spiritual and psychosocial needs. Clinical Record 3: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 12/20/2023 with a terminal diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain. The clinical record included a physician order for Cephalexin [antibiotic] 500mg BID [twice daily] beginning 01/24/2024, Calazime to peri area every brief change and as needed until resolved beginning 02/14/2024, and Cephalexin 500mg QID [four times a day] for 7 days beginning 03/01/2024, for suspected urinary infections and related skin breakdown. Review of nursing notes and IDG updates to the plan of care from the date of initiation of care on 01/24/2024 through the date of record review on 03/19/2024 revealed no documented evidence of reassessment of the patient’s response to care related to the medications initiated. During an interview and record review on 03/19/2024, the Director of Patient Care Services and the Licensed Vocational Nurse (staff4) confirmed that clinical record 3 lacked evidence of the reassessment of the patient’s response to care.”

    Rule L0533. Standard-level.

  • Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 829 words

    “It is required that hospice care and services provided to patients and families follow the individualized plan of care established by the hospice IDG [interdisciplinary group] in collaboration with the attending physician (if any), the patient or patient representative, and the primary caregiver in accordance with the patient’s needs. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review, clinical record review, and interview. In 6 of 14 (43%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure the hospice care and services provided to patients and families followed the patient’s individualized plan of care. Agency policy 9.20.2 Physician Orders, revised 2014, stated in part “Care and services will be provided according to physician orders. Orders are current and updated. The IDG [interdisciplinary group] plan of care is established in consultation with the physician, Medical Director, hospice staff, the patient, and members of the patient’s family. The plan of care may include types of services required, equipment and supplies required.” Agency policy 9.12.1 IDG Care Planning Process, revised February 2022, stated in part “An individualized written plan of care is developed for each patient. The plan of care reflects patient and family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated assessments. The plan of care is written to include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness.” Clinical Record 1: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 01/04/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of atherosclerotic heart disease. The Registered Nurse (RN) obtained a physician order for wound care on 01/04/2024 to cleanse the wound with normal saline, pat dry, cover with bandage and wrap with kerlix as needed. The Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) completed a visit on 01/05/2024 and documented wound care provided as “Cleanse with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply foam dressing.” The LVN documented on the nursing visit note dated 01/08/2024 “Skin tear appears to be healing well and scabbing. Covered wound with bordered gauze.” The clinical record contained no documented evidence that the LVN provided wound care as ordered by the physician and included on the plan of care. The updated plan of care dated 02/12/2024 included an order for social worker visits once a month and as needed. The clinical record contained no documented evidence that a social worker visit was completed in February. Clinical Record 2: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 03/22/2023 with a terminal diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. The updated plan of care dated 01/10/2024 included an order for social worker visits once a month and as needed. The clinical record contained no documented evidence that a social worker visit was completed in February. Clinical Record 3: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 12/20/2023 with a terminal diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain. The clinical record included a physician order for Cephalexin [antibiotic] 500mg BID [twice daily] beginning 01/24/2024, Calazime to peri area every brief change and as needed until resolved beginning 02/14/2024, and Cephalexin 500mg QID [four times a day] for 7 days beginning 03/01/2024, for suspected urinary infections and related skin breakdown. Review of nursing notes and IDG updates to the plan of care from the date of initiation of treatment on 01/24/2024 through the date of record review on 03/19/2024 revealed no documented evidence of nursing assessment or reassessment of the patient’s response to the medications initiated. Clinical Record 4: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 12/05/2023, with a terminal diagnosis of atherosclerotic heart disease. The updated plan of care dated 12/05/2024 and the updated plan of care dated 01/01/2024 included orders for hospice aide visits once a week. The clinical record contained no documented evidence that the hospice aide provided a visit the week of 12/31/2023, the visit was scheduled 01/04/2024. The record contained no documentation of a missed visit or physician notification of missed visit. Clinical Record 6: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 08/10/2023 with a terminal diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain. Clinical record review revealed the skilled nurse documented on the 12/19/2024 visit note, that wound care was provided to “Left ankle cleansed, pat dry, apply wound dressing, cover with sterile gauze.” The clinical record lacked evidence that physician orders were obtained for wound care provided on 12/19/2023 or that a wound care order was included in the updated plans of care dated 12/18/2023 and 01/01/2024. Clinical Record 13: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 01/28/2023. The Licensed Vocational Nurse documented on the skilled nurse visit note dated 05/22/2023 that the “Pt [patient] transferred back into Geri chair and brought to living room prior to leaving.” The updated plan of care dated 05/22/2023 did not include an order for the Geri chair. During an interview and review of records on 03/19/2024, the Director of Patient Care Services and the Licensed Vocational Nurse (staff 4) confirmed that the clinical records did not include documentation that staff provided services as ordered by the physician and included in the plan of care.”

    Rule L0543. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 284 words

    “It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care reflect patient and family goals, and identify planned interventions based on problems identified in the initial and updated comprehensive assessments. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review, clinical record review, and interview. In 1 of 14 (7%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure that the patient’s individualized written plan of care included goals and planned interventions based on problems identified in the updated comprehensive assessment. Agency policy 9.12.1 IDG Care Planning Process, revised February 2022, stated in part “An individualized written plan of care is developed for each patient. The plan of care reflects patient and family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated assessments. The plan of care is written to include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness.” Clinical Record 2: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 03/22/2023 with a terminal diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. The skilled nurse documented on the nursing visit note dated 01/18/2024 “Pt’s [patient’s] hands noted to begin to get contracted. Reinforced with caregivers using hand rolls or rolled towels if needed to prevent further contractures in patient.” The clinical record contained no documented evidence that the interventions implemented to prevent further contractures were included in the plan of care dated 01/15/2024 and updated plan of care dated 01/29/2024. During an interview and review of findings on 03/19/2024, the Director of Patient Care Services and the Licensed Vocational Nurse (staff 4) confirmed that the individualized written plan of care for clinical record 2 did not include goals and planned interventions based on problems identified in the updated comprehensive assessment.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1)(iv))

    The inspectors’ words, 399 words

    “It is required that counseling services include an organized program for providing bereavement services delivered by or under the supervision of a qualified professional with experience or education in grief or loss counseling. Bereavement services are available to the family and other individuals up to one (1) year following the death of the patient. Bereavement counseling extends to residents of a SNF/NF (skilled nursing facility/nursing facility) or ICF/IDF (intermediate care facility/intellectual disability facility) when appropriate and identified in the bereavement plan of care. The bereavement services reflect the needs of the bereaved per a bereavement plan of care that includes the types of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review, clinical record review, and interview. In 2 of 2 (100%) bereavement clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure the clinical record included a bereavement plan of care that reflected the types of bereavement services offered and the frequency of service delivery. Agency policy 4.26.1 Bereavement Services, revised June 2019, stated in part “An initial Bereavement Risk Assessment will be performed as a part of the Comprehensive Assessment. Depending on the initial assessment, a plan of care will be developed to include specific counseling to patient and family members to be provided by the Social Worker, Chaplain, or Bereavement Counselor. The [bereavement] plan of care will reflect family needs, as well as a clear delineation of services to be provided and the frequency of service delivery.” Clinical Record 13: Clinical record review revealed the patient’s date of death was 05/28/2023. The clinical record contained no documented evidence that a bereavement plan of care was created that included the types of bereavement services offered and the frequency of service delivery. Clinical Record 14: Clinical record review revealed the patient’s date of death was 03/26/2023. A Bereavement Initial Assessment/Care Plan form was added to the clinical record and dated 04/06/2023. The clinical record contained no documented evidence that the bereavement plan of care included the types of bereavement services offered and the frequency of service delivery. During an interview and review of findings on 03/202/2024, the Director of Patient Care Services and the Licensed Vocational Nurse (staff 4) confirmed that the clinical records did not include a bereavement plan of care that reflected the types of bereavement services that were offered and the frequency of service delivery.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 852 words

    “It is required that each patient’s record includes, at a minimum: the initial plan of care, updated plans of care, initial assessment, comprehensive assessment, updated comprehensive assessments, and clinical notes including the care and services provided. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review, clinical record review, and interview. In 8 of 14 (57%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure that the clinical record included past and current clinical notes and correct clinical information as required by agency policy. Agency policy 11.2.1 Patient Record Content, revised 2015, stated in part “Hospice will initiate and maintain an individual and accurate patient record containing past and current findings for each patient receiving care in compliance with all federal/state laws and regulations. The record must contain correct clinical information that is available to the patient’s attending physician and Hospice staff.” Agency policy 11.6.1 Timely Submission of Patient Documentation, revised 2014, stated in part “Itineraries, with all visit reports attached, must be submitted the next scheduled workday, not exceeding three (3) business days.” Clinical Record 1: Clinical record review revealed a skilled nursing visit was provided to the patient on 01/08/2024, but documentation for the completed visit was signed and submitted on 01/14/2024, 4 business days after the visit was completed and 1 day outstanding. The skilled nurse completed a nursing visit on 01/11/2024, but documentation for the completed visit was signed and submitted on 01/19/2024, 5 business days after the visit was completed and 2 days outstanding. A skilled nursing visit was completed on 01/15/2024, but documentation for the completed visit was signed and submitted on 01/21/2024, 4 business days after the visit was completed and 1 day outstanding. Clinical Record 3: Clinical record review revealed a skilled nursing visit was completed on 02/20/2024. The documentation for the completed visit was signed and submitted on 03/05/2024, 9 business days after the visit was completed and 6 days outstanding. The skilled nurse completed a nursing visit on 02/06/2024, documentation for the completed visit was signed and submitted on 02/19/2024, 8 business days after the visit was completed and 5 days outstanding. The hospice aide completed a visit on 12/27/2023, documentation for the completed aide visit was signed and submitted on 01/28/2024, 20 business days after the visit was completed and 17 days outstanding. A hospice aide visit was completed on 01/22/2024, but documentation for the completed aide visit was signed and submitted on 02/20/2024 20 business days after the visit was completed and 17 days outstanding. Clinical Record 4: Clinical record review revealed the social worker provided a visit to the patient on 01/02/2024. The documentation for the completed visit was signed and submitted on 03/08/2024, 47 business days after the visit was completed and 44 days outstanding. Clinical Record 6: Clinical record review revealed the skilled nurse provided a nursing visit to the patient on 12/19/2023. The documentation for the completed visit was signed and submitted on 01/02/2024, 7 business days after the visit was completed and 4 days outstanding. Clinical Record 8: Clinical record review revealed a skilled nursing visit was provided to the patient on 02/20/2024, but documentation for the completed visit was signed and submitted on 03/05/2024, 9 business days after the visit was completed and 6 days outstanding. The skilled nurse completed a nursing visit on 02/06/2024, documentation for the completed visit was signed and submitted on 02/19/2024, 8 business days after the visit was completed and 5 days outstanding. The hospice aide completed a visit on 12/27/2023. The documentation for the completed visit was signed and submitted on 01/28/2024, 20 business days after the visit was completed and 17 days outstanding. A hospice aide visit was completed on 01/22/2024, but documentation for the completed visit was signed and submitted on 02/20/2024, 20 business days after the visit was completed and 17 days outstanding. Clinical Record 9: Clinical record review revealed the spiritual counselor provided a visit on 12/12/2023, documentation for the completed visit was signed and submitted on 01/01/2024, 12 business days after the visit was completed and 9 days outstanding. Clinical Record 12: Clinical record revealed the social worker provided a visit on 11/14/2023, documentation for the completed visit was signed and submitted on 12/12/2023, 18 business days after the visit was completed and 15 days outstanding. A social worker visit was completed on 12/01/2023. The documentation for the completed visit was signed and submitted on 12/12/2023, 6 business days after the visit was completed and 3 days outstanding. Clinical Record 13: Clinical record review revealed the social worker provided a visit to the patient on 05/02/2023, documentation for the completed visit was signed and submitted on 05/31/2023, 19 business days after the visit was completed and 16 days outstanding. A social worker visit was completed on 05/22/2023. The documentation for the completed visit was signed and submitted on 05/31/2023, 5 business days after the visit was completed and 2 days outstanding. During an interview on 03/19/2024, the Director of Patient Care Services and the Licensed Vocational Nurse (staff 4) confirmed the findings that that documentation was not completed timely as required by agency policy.”

    Rule L0672. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Mar 20, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner6 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Oct 10, 2015.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.2 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5.1% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 79.4% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 53% at home, 40% in assisted living, 6% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.2 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends5.1%
Visits near death79.4% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 3 owners or officers are people: Syeda M Omer (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Syeda M Omer (runs it (operational or managerial control), 50%); Mohammed O Qureshi (corporate officer, 50%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 95.2% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 3.8% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 30 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 95020, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5.5; this one had 6.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.