Hearth Record

Angels Protection Hospice, Inc.

A hospice in Glendale, California 91201

1616 Victory Blvd Suite 103, Glendale, California 91201. (747) 215-6404.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 12 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

12 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 185 hospices serving ZIP code 91201 had 4.

The last inspection on record was on Mar 14, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

12 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

12 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Mar 14, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care12 deficiencies
  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 10 (Patient: #2 and #4) did not contain evidence in the patient record that the patient chooses a health care provider, including an attending physician. Patient #2: Attending Physician declined the Role as Attending Physician. Record revealed no evidence of Patient/CG Choice of Attending Physician Role was offered. Patient #4: Recertification signed by Physician with no evidence of affiliation and not by patient/family choice of Attending Physician. Record revealed no evidence of Patient/CG Choice of Attending Physician Role was offered.”

    Rule L0515. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 97 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 10 (Patient #9 and #10) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #9 and #10: Medical record did not show evidence of oxygen 2L via NC as needed for shortness of breath on medication profile.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 108 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 10 (Patient #7) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient # 7: documentation of SW Initial Assessment stated that no SW goals were needed due to residing in Board and care home, despite documentation stating Patient declining fast and needs continued support.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 10 (Patient #9 and #10) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #9 and #10: Medical record did not show evidence of order for oxygen 2L via NC as needed for shortness of breath.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 113 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 10 (Patient #7) did not have evidence the hospice offers bereavement counseling that includes: • Making bereavement services available to the family and other individuals in the bereavement plan of care up to 1 year following the death of the patient. • Ensuring that bereavement services reflect the needs of the bereaved • Development of a bereavement plan of care that notes the kind of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery Patient #7: Record indicated documentation of MSW of family requesting Chaplain/Bereavement support and daughter exhibiting difficulty coping with patient death on 07/12/23 with no evidence of follow up for Bereavement services.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 154 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 10 (Patient #1, #3, #5, #6, #7) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: Upon record review, Home health Aide Care Plans did not have evidence of specific frequencies in which to perform tasks assigned. • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient #1. #3, #5 , #6, #7: Aide plan of care did not contain evidence of specified task frequency in medical record.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 10 (Patient #8) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient #8: Medical Record did not indicate Supervisory visit complete by RN (LVN documentation of Aide Supervisory visit completed on 06/06/23)”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Recertification of the terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(c))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 10 (Patient #4) did not have evidence that before the recertification period for each patient, the medical director or physician designee must review the patient’s clinical information and provide written documentation that it is anticipated that the patient’s life expectancy is 6 months or less. Patient #4 Recertification Order on 12/30/23 was not signed by Medical Director involved in case. Signed by another Provider who was not an agency designee or involved in case.”

    Rule L0668. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 10 (Patient #2) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient # 2: The Recertification of patient for 7th Benefit Period contains inconsistent dates, signed by Physician with no affiliation to patient on 01/01/24 and RN signed 09/07/23.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Protection of information (42 CFR 418.104(c))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the organization follows their policies and procedures to maintain the the patient’s clinical record in confidential manner. The unduplicated admission number for the past year was 10. The agency changed ownership in Dec 2022. Surveyors requested to review records from the time prior to the past year and/or prior to the CHOW. The administrator/DPCS who was on site for the survey could not produce these records.”

    Rule L0680. Standard-level.

  • Retention of records (42 CFR 418.104(d))

    “Upon observation, there was not evidence that all patient records are retained for a minimum of six years from the date of the most recent discharge or the death of the patient, unless state law stipulates a longer period of time. The unduplicated admission number for the past year was 10. The agency changed ownership in Dec 2022. Surveyors requested to review records from the time prior to the past year and/or prior to the CHOW. The administrator/DPCS who was on site for the survey could not produce these records.”

    Rule L0681. Standard-level.

  • Retrieval of clinical records (42 CFR 418.104(f))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the patient record, whether hard copy or in electronic form, is made readily available on request by an appropriate authority. The unduplicated admission number for the past year was 10. The agency changed ownership in Dec 2022. Surveyors requested to review records from the time prior to the past year and/or prior to the CHOW. The administrator/DPCS who was on site for the survey could not produce these records.”

    Rule L0685. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Mar 14, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care12 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Mar 26, 2021.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 176.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 1.4% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 100% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day176.3 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends1.4%
Visits near death100.0% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 5 owners or officers are people: Richuel M Flores (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Jose J Guerra (managing employee (under contract)); Richuel M Flores (corporate officer); Richuel M Flores (corporate director); Richuel M Flores (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 8 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 88% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold8 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 185 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91201, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4; this one had 12.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.