Hearth Record

Essence Hospice

A hospice in Irvine, California 92614

32 Executive Park Suite 150, Irvine, California 92614. (949) 723-0585.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

6 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 45 hospices serving ZIP code 92614 had 9.

The last inspection on record was on Nov 20, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

6 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Nov 20, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner6 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 286 words

    “It is required that the documented comprehensive assessment includes a drug profile that contains the patient’s current: prescription and over the counter (OTC) drugs; supplements; herbal remedies; other alternative treatments that could affect drug therapy. The medication review process includes the identification of the following: the effectiveness of drug therapy, frug side effects, actual or potential drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, drug therapy associated with laboratory monitoring. The assessment includes evidence that common side effects of medication in the hospice populations are anticipated, and as appropriate, preventive measurements are implemented to manage the side effects. The drug profile is updated per the hospice policy and procedure, but, at minimum, at the time of each comprehensive assessment and/or when new medication is added or changes are made to existing medication. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, observation, and interview. In 1 of 19 (5%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure an accurate review of the medications the patient was currently using to identify any potential adverse effects and drug reactions. CLINICAL RECORD 2/HOME VISIT 2: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 11/12/2024 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. The patient resided in a skilled nursing facility (SNF). During the home visit observation on 11/19/2025 with the Social Worker (SW) (Personnel Record 4), a medication review was completed by comparing the SNF medication list (the patient’s current home medications) to the hospice medication profile (printed on 11/19/2025). The hospice medication profile included Lorazepam and Santyl. The SNF medication list did not include Lorazepam and Santyl. During interviews on 11/18/2025 and 11/19/2025, the Clinical Director verified the findings and stated the record was corrected prior to the survey exit on 11/20/2025.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 524 words

    “It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care reflects patient and family goals; Identifies planned interventions based on problems identified in the initial and updated comprehensive assessments; Includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 7 of 19 (37%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure the written plan of care included planned interventions based on problems identified in the initial and updated comprehensive assessments. CLINICAL RECORD 1: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 11/19/2023 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. The Registered Nurse (RN) documented on the initial nursing assessment dated 11/19/2023 the patient had dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), choking, and recurrent aspiration. The plan of care dated 11/19/2023 did not include interventions and goals related to the patient’s nutritional needs and risk of aspiration. CLINICAL RECORD 2: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 11/12/2024 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. The plan of care dated 11/12/2024 included an order for oxygen at 2 liters per minute per nasal cannula as needed. The plan of care did not include interventions and goals related to oxygen precautions. CLINICAL RECORD 3: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 02/02/2025 with a diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain. The admission referral orders dated 02/02/2025 included orders for suction equipment, oxygen at 2 liters per nasal cannula, and Ipratropium small volume nebulizer every 6 hours as needed for shortness of breath. The plan of care dated 02/02/2025 did not include respiratory goals and interventions related to the patient’s use of oxygen, the small volume nebulizer, and suction equipment. CLINICAL RECORD 4: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 10/02/2025 with a diagnosis of Parkinsonism. The nurse documented on the initial nursing assessment dated 10/02/2025 that the patient was using oxygen at 2 liters per nasal cannula. The plan of care dated 10/02/2025 did not include goals and interventions for oxygen safety. CLINICAL RECORD 7: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 10/13/2025 with a diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of left bronchus or lung. The nurse documented on the initial nursing assessment dated 10/13/2025 that the patient had oxygen at 2 liters per minute per nasal cannula continuously. The plan of care dated 10/13/2025 did not include respiratory goals and interventions related to the patient’s diagnosis of lung cancer. CLINICAL RECORD 9: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 10/10/2025 with a diagnosis of acute on chronic heart failure. The nurse documented on the initial nursing assessment dated 10/10/2025 that the patient used oxygen at 2 liters per minute per nasal cannula. The initial plan of care dated 10/10/2025 did not include goals and interventions related to oxygen safety. CLINICAL RECORD 14: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 05/27/2025 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. The initial nursing assessment dated 05/27/2025 and physician orders dated 05/27/2025 included documentation that the patient was using oxygen. The plan of care dated 10/27/2025 did not include goals and interventions related to oxygen safety. During interviews on 11/18/2025 and 11/19/2025, the Clinical Director verified the findings.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 452 words

    “It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness, including the following: a detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet specific patient and family needs. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 5 of 19 (26%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure the individualized written plan of care included the scope and frequency of services. CLINICAL RECORD 2: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 11/12/2024 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. The plan of care dated 11/12/2024 included an order for “SC (spiritual counselor) 1 time then PRN (as needed).” The order on the plan of care did not include the scope and frequency for the spiritual counselor (SC) visits and did not include an indication or reason for the SC visits ordered as needed. CLINICAL RECORD 3: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 02/02/2025 with a diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain. The plan of care dated 02/02/2025 included an order for “Spiritual Counselor 1 time then PRN (as needed).” The order on the plan of care did not include the scope and frequency for the SC visits and did not include an indication or reason for the SC visits ordered as needed. CLINICAL RECORD 4: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 10/02/2025 with a diagnosis of Parkinsonism. The plan of care dated 10/02/2025 included an order for social worker “1 one-time then PRN (as needed).” The order on the plan of care did not include the scope and frequency for the social work (SW) visits and did not include an indication or reason for the SW visits ordered as needed. CLINICAL RECORD 5: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 08/26/2025 with diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain. The plan of care dated 08/26/2025 included an order for “spiritual assessment 1x/then PRN (as needed).” The order on the plan of care did not include the scope and frequency for the SC visits and did not include an indication or reason for the SC visits ordered as needed. CLINICAL RECORD 9: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 10/10/2025 with a diagnosis of acute on chronic heart failure. The plan of care (need date) included an order for social worker frequency “assess as needed 1x and PRN and recert.” The order on the plan of care did not include the scope and frequency for the SW visits and did not include an indication or reason for the SW visits ordered as needed. During interviews on 11/19/2025 and 11/20/2025, the Clinical Director and Executive Director verified the findings.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 475 words

    “It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care included all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness, including drugs and treatment necessary to meet the needs of the patient. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 5 of 19 (26%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure the individualized written plan of care included drugs and treatment necessary to meet the needs of the patient. CLINICAL RECORD 3: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 02/02/2025 with a diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain. The admission referral orders dated 02/02/2025 included orders for suction equipment and oxygen at 2 liters per nasal cannula. The plan of care dated 02/02/2025 did not include the dose and frequency of administrator for oxygen and did not include instructions on when to use the suction equipment. CLINICAL RECORD 9: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 10/10/2025 with a diagnosis of acute on chronic heart failure. The plan of care dated 10/10/2025 included an order for Lidocaine patch “apply to affected area.” The medication order on the plan of care did not include specific instructions for where to apply the lidocaine patch. CLINICAL RECORD 11: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 08/31/2025 with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The plan of care dated 08/31/2025 included orders for Budesonide inhalation therapy every 6 hours “as needed for shortness of breath/wheezing” and Levalbuterol inhalation every 6 hours “as needed for shortness of breath/wheezing.” The medication orders on the plan of care did not include instructions for when to give Budesonide and Levalbuterol, or which medication should be given first, and did not include parameters that would indicate which medication to administer for the patient’s level of shortness of breath. CLINICAL RECORD 12: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 08/08/2025 with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The plan of care dated 09/01/2025 included medication orders for Nystatin cream to “affected areas” and Clotrimazole topical cream for “fungal nail infection.” The medication orders on the plan of care did not include specific instructions for where to apply the Nystatin cream and which nail(s) to apply the Clotrimazole cream. The plan of care also included a medication order for Z-pak as directed; however, the order did not include specific directions for administration of the medication. CLINICAL RECORD 14: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 05/27/2025 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. The plan of care dated 10/29/2025 included an order for Lidocaine patch “to affected area.” The medication order on the plan of care did not include specific instructions for where to apply the lidocaine patch. During interviews on 11/18/2025 and 11/19/2025, the Clinical Director verified the findings and stated the records were corrected prior to the survey exit on 11/20/2025.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    The inspectors’ words, 369 words

    “It is required that hospice volunteers provide day-to-day administrative or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals five percent (5%) of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract staff. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review and interview. The hospice did not ensure volunteers provided day-to-day administrative or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equaled five percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract staff. During a review of the agency’s volunteer program and interview with the Volunteer Coordinator (Personnel Record 6) on 11/18/2025, it was revealed that the agency did not have a Volunteer Coordinator from January 2024 until 11/07/2025. There was also, no documented evidence that the agency had volunteers available from January 2024 through the date of review on 11/20/2025. Review of the volunteer report from January 2024 to January 2025 revealed the volunteer percent of total patient care hours was 0%. The agency had a performance improvement project related to the issue and was able to show evidence of recruitment efforts for 2024 and 2025. The Volunteer Coordinator was hire on 11/07/2025 and there were currently 10 volunteers in the recruitment process. During an interview on 11/20/2025, the Executive Director verified the finding and stated the Volunteer Coordinator was hired on 11/07/2025. During the interview on 11/18/2025 with the volunteer coordinator (PR6) it was revealed that the agency did not have a volunteer coordinator in place from January 2024 until 11/07/2025. There were no volunteers employed from January 2024 through date of review 11/20/2025. The agency had 0% volunteer hours from January 2024 to January 2025, and January 2025 to date of review 11/20/2025. There was a performance improvement plan (PIP) in place 2023 through 2025 which did not record updates related to attempts to hire a volunteer coordinator or volunteers. There were ads placed on 06/05/2023, 06/05/2024, and 01/05 2025 on INDEED and Craig’s List for a volunteer coordinator and volunteers. A volunteer coordinator was hired on 11/07/2025 and is currently in training and developing a training program for volunteers, there are currently approximately 10 volunteers in the recruitment process.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 167 words

    “It is required that a patient clinical record containing past and current findings is maintained for each hospice patient. Each patient’s record includes, at a minimum: any advance directives. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 19 (5%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure documentation of the patient’s advance directive. CLINICAL RECORD 6: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 10/21/2025 with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The nurse documented on the initial nursing comprehensive assessment that the patient was a DNR (do not resuscitate). The POLST (physician orders for life sustaining treatment) form documented patient requested CPR (cardio-pulmonary resuscitation) to be attempted. The clinical record patient information sheet documented patient was “full code.” The documentation in the clinical record related to the patient’s advance directives was not clearly documented. During an interview on 11/19/2025, the Clinical Director confirmed the finding and stated the documentation was corrected prior to the survey exit on 11/20/2025.”

    Rule L0677. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 20, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner6 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Apr 23, 2020.
  • Ownership: other.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 15 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 4.9% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 97.7% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 88% at home, 11% in assisted living, 1% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day15.0 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends4.9%
Visits near death97.7% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 8 owners or officers are people: Emily Davis (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Dana Rambo (corporate director, 100%); Dana Rambo (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Ashley E Mires (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Aran Shelly (owns 5% or more directly, 69.75%); Aran Shelly (corporate officer, 69.75%); Ruben Figueroa (owns 5% or more directly, 18.09%); Emily Davis (owns 5% or more directly, 7.58%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Essence Home Care LLCGeneral partner100%Sep 17, 2021

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 65% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 69% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 93.26% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 22.9% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 45 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 92614, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 9; this one had 6.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.