Hearth Record

Accentcare Hospice & Palliative Care of CA - Oakla

A hospice in Oakland, California 94621

7677 Oakport Street, Suite 500, Oakland, California 94621. (408) 372-7024.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 12 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

12 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 32 hospices serving ZIP code 94621 had 7.

The last inspection on record was on Jun 6, 2024: a follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission.

3 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

12 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

12 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Apr 25, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission12 deficiencies
  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 111 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 7 of 7 patient records reviewed, of patient records with recertification, the organization failed to document patient’s progress toward desired outcomes. During record review for RRHV#1, RRHV#2, RRNHV#2, RRNHV#3, RRNHV#5, RRNHV#6, and RRNHV#7, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the patients had been recertified, at least once, and there was no documentation of measurable progress towards goals and desired outcomes. Upon conversation with the Director, she stated that the EMR kept track of percentage of goals closed and the one’s that remain open but that there was no documentation of measurable progress by discipline or by individual goal. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Team.”

    Rule L0533. Condition-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 242 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 8 of 14 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to plan the patient’s care. 

During record review forRRHV#1, RRDC#2 and RRNHV#5, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the patients had documented information for DNR status but the status was not included on the Plan of Care. 

During record review for RRHV#1, RRHV#3, RRNHV#1, RRNHV#2, RRNHV#3, RRNHV#5, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the orders for PRN medications did not include indications for use. For example in RRHV#1, RRHV#3, and RRNHV#3, the patient had orders for PRN Morphine and Tylenol but no indication when to use which medication. In RRNHV#1, the patient had Morphine and Ibuprofen for pain with indication for the Morphine but not the Ibuprofen. In RRNHV#2, the patient had Morphine and Tylenol for pain with indication for the Morphine but not the Tylenol. 

During record review for RRHV#2, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the organization failed to maintain an accurate patient medication list. During record review for RRHV#2, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the patient medication contained many errors. The Tylenol Supp, Hycosamine, Compazine, Biscodyl, Morphine, Acetaminophen extra strength, and Hydrocodone all contained scheduled orders but were intended to be PRN. This surveyor reviewed the record with the Hospice Director who confirmed. If orders had been correct the patient would be getting round the clock Tylenol, Acetaminophen extra strength and Hydrocodone which would be above the acceptable amount. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Team.”

    Rule L0549. Condition-level.

  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. The organization failed to implement policies and procedures. During tracer activities for Leadership, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the organizational leaders did not implement policies related to the Plan’s of Care which results in non-compliance with 418.54, 418.56, and 418.100. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Leadership Team.”

    Rule L0651. Condition-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 130 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 14 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to assess and reassess. During record review for RRNHV#1 and RRNHV#7, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed required initial comprehensive assessments were not completed timely. Organizational policy s;tated a comprehensive spiritual care and psychosocial assessment would be done within 5 days. The RN did a brief assessment of psychosocial and spiritual care needs at start of care but did not assess all needs. 

For example, RRNHV#1, the bereavement assessment was completed one month after start of care. 

In RRNHV#7, the start of care nurse documented open to all disciplines and there was no further communication. The comprehensive spiritual care assessment was completed a month after start of care. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Team.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(8))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 14 of 14 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to assess and reassess its patients. During record review for all records, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the records did not include the need for volunteer services to offer support or respite to the patient, family, or other caregivers. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Team.”

    Rule L0532. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 94 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 14 of 14 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to plan the patient’s care. During record review for all records, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the goals listed did not include timeframes to meet those goals. For example in RRHV#1, a goal was listed as need skilled teaching regarding alternate pain measures with no timeframe to meet that goal. And in RRHV#3, the patient had a goal stated patient/ CG will demonstrate appropriate knowledge of insulin administration with no timeframe. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Team.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 144 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 14 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to plan the patient’s care. During record review for RRHV#1, and RRHV#2, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the plan of care did not include documentation of all services needed for the palliation and management of terminal illness and related conditions. For example in RRHV#1, the plan of care did not include orders related to goals and interventions for dizziness and nausea ,which upon conversation with the daughter, the patient had been experiencing for awhile. For RRHV#2, the patient had recent orders for wound care of a Stage 1 pressure ulcer but it was not addressed on the plan of care. And the patient had goals and interventions for Music Therapy but the organization no longer had a music therapist on staff. This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Team.”

    Rule L0546. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 184 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to provide care, treatment, or services according to the plan of care. During record review for RRNHV#4, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the orders for nursing frequency was 1week 9 but no visits were made for the week of 3/31. And the Home Health Aide frequency orders were for 2 week 12 to begin week of 3/24. No HHA visits were made the week of 3/24 and only one visit was made the following week. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Team. Observed in Record Review. In 5 of 14 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to provide care, treatment, or services in accordance with orders. During record review for RRHV#3, RRNHV#1, RRHV#1, RRHV#2, and RRNHV#6, the Hospice nurse surveyor observed the frequency orders were not followed. For example in RRHV#3, the nursing orders were for 4wk1 and the nurse only made one visit that week. In RRHV#2, there were no aide visits the weeks of 11/13 and 11/20. This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Team.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 101 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 13 patient records reviewed, patients receiving aide services, the organization failed to plan the patient’s care. During record review for RRNHV#3, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the aide care plan had not been updated to reflect a new order 2 months prior to survey stating thickened liquids and cannot use a straw. The patient was also on Eliquis and bleeding precautions were not addressed on the aide POC. 

For RRNHV#4, the aide patient was on aspirin but bleeding precautions were not on the aide POC. 


This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Team.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. The organization failed to provide services that meet the patient needs. During tracer activities for volunteer services, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the rolling volunteer percentage was 1% and the organization currently had no volunteers. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Team.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to maintain an accurate patient medication list. During record review for RRNHV#1, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the patient had orders for Metronidazole to be given for 7 days but it had never been updated. The order was a month old. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Team.”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

  • Use and mintenance of equipment and supplies (42 CFR 418.106(f)(2))

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 3 home visits conducted, the organization failed to provide patient education and training based on each patient’s needs and abilities. During home visit for RRHV#1, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the patient did not have an individualized emergency preparedness plan in the home. She had been on service for 4 months. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Hospice Team.”

    Rule L0702. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 6, 2024Follow-up inspection by The Joint CommissionNo deficiencies cited
Apr 25, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission12 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jan 27, 2019.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 17.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 9.8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 91.5% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 69% at home, 7% in assisted living, 24% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day17.3 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends9.8%
Visits near death91.5% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • CMS’s ownership file has no owners listed for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 100% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 51.5% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 32 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 94621, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 12.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.