Hearth Record

Pathways Home Health and Hospice

A hospice in Oakland, California 94621

333 Hegenberger Road, Suite 700, Oakland, California 94621. (510) 632-4390.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 32 hospices serving ZIP code 94621 had 7.

The last inspection on record was on Mar 18, 2025: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jan 30, 2025: recertification inspection by the state2 deficiencies
  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 572 words

    “Based on interview and record review the Hospice Agency did not provide services based on the needs for one of 13 sampled patients (Patient 5) when Patient 5 was not fully assessed for end-of-life symptoms and had no access to end-of-life medications (comfort kit). This failure placed Patient 5 at high risk and high probability of experiencing unnecessary agitation and falls. During a record review of the admission booklet, “;Patient Handbook for Hospice Services” dated 11/2024, the booklet showed “;Hospice care is aggressive management of symptoms which allows the patient to live with the highest possible quality of life. Constant, proactive and timely management means that the patient rarely needs to be hospitalized for symptom control.” During a record review of the document “;Admission Criteria Process and Initial Hospice Assessment dated 1/30/2025, the document showed, “Hospice accepts patients based on their care needs. A reasonable expectation must exist that Hospice can adequately take care of the patient at home.” “;Patients referred to home hospice are terminally ill and generally experience a variety of symptoms as their condition progresses and their health declines. These symptoms include pain, dyspnea, nausea/vomiting, delirium, anxiety...Symptoms may develop quickly and unexpectedly, often at night or on the weekends. Prompt relief of symptoms can be facilitated by timely access to medications.” [National Institute of Health. National Library of Medicine pmc.ncbi.nim.nih.gov/articles/PMC4118704/] During a record review of the document “;Visit Note Repor(VNR)...RN Hospice Start of Care” dated 11/16/2024, the VNR showed the hospice agency admitted Patient 5 on 11/16/2024 with diagnoses which included dementia (a loss of brain function that occurs with certain diseases, affecting one or more brain functions such as memory, thinking, language, judgment, or behavior). During a record review of the documents,” Visit Note Report(s)” (nursing visit notes), the VNR showed the following: VNR dated 11/24/2024: Patient 5 had experienced a fall. VNR dated 11/30/2024: Patient 5 had tried to get out of his wheelchair and fell against the pole/divider, which created an abrasion and bleeding to his philtrum. (vertical indentation in the middle area of the upper lip) VNR dated 12/13/2024: Patient 5 had been “;Found on the floor” that morning. VNR dated 12/27/2024: Patient 5 was found on the floor and sustained an injury to his forehead. Patient 5 had continued to “;...Attempt to stand without assist...” There was no documentation in the clinical record which showed agency staff assessed Patient 5 for end-of-life agitation or discussed providing medication to control the symptoms and potentially prevent future falls. During an interview on 1/28/2025 at 1:53 p.m. Registered Nurse 1 (RN 1) confirmed there was no documentation in the clinical record which showed she had evaluated the reasons for the falls or if it had possibly been due to end-of-life agitation. RN 1 stated the facility staff had reported to her that Patient 5 had been sent to the emergency department a couple of times per day for his falls and had fallen again that morning on 1/28/2025. During an interview on 1/30/2025 at 11:21 a.m. with the Manager of Clinical Services (MCS), MCS stated Patient 5 had fallen several times and staff should have been assessing why it continued to happen. The MCS stated the facility where Patient 5 resided did not allow the agency to keep a comfort kit on hand. The MCS stated it was important to have a comfort kit present in the facility so symptoms can be controlled, and potential falls prevented.”

    Rule L0556. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 2,784 words

    “Based on interview and record review, the hospice agencys staff did not coordinate care to address frequent falls for one of 13 sampled patients (Patient 5) when Patient 5 sustained falls with injuries and staff did not coordinate a care conference to discuss ways to prevent the falls. This resulted in unnecessary falls with injuries for Patient 5. During record review of the document “;Interdisciplinary Group Coordination of Care” (IDG) dated 1/28/2025, the document showed the purpose was to “;Ensure the coordination of services for each Hospice patient. The IDG will initiate changes as the patient, caregiver and/or family needs evolve during the terminal illness. It is the responsibility of the IDG to facilitate communication about changes in the patients status among all assigned employees.” During a review of the document “;Job Description”, the document showed the duties of the Medical Social Worker included, based on the comprehensive assessment, “;...Develops a comprehensive psychosocial plan of care, including individualized goals, interventions, and projected visit frequencies. Continually reviews and updates psychosocial plan of care. Integrates input from other disciplines to create a comprehensive interdisciplinary plan of care.” During a record review of the document, “;Visit Note Report...RN Hospice Start of Care” dated 11/16/2024, the report indicated Patient 5 had a history of falls which required visits to the Emergency Department. He had weakness in his legs which required “;Maximal Assistance” while transferring from the bed to chair. Record review of the documents, “;Visit Note Report(s)” (VNR) (nursing visit notes) showed the following: VNR dated 11/24/2024: Patient 5 had experienced a fall. VNR dated 11/30/2024: Patient 5 had tried to get out of his wheelchair and fell against the pole/divider, which created an abrasion and bleeding to his philtrum. (vertical indentation in the middle area of the upper lip). VNR dated 12/13/2024: Patient 5 had been “;Found on the floor” that morning. VNR dated 12/27/2024: Patient 5 was found on the floor and sustained an injury to his forehead. Patient 5 had continued to “;...Attempt to stand without assist...” During a review of patient 5’s clinical records, there was no documentation in the clinical record which showed agency staff had reported the incidences to the social worker so a care conference could be coordinated with the assisted living facility and the family in order to address the continued falls. During an interview on 1/28/2025 at 1:15 p.m. the agencys Manager of Clinical Services (MCS) stated there was no documentation under “;Coordination Notes” which showed the falls had been addressed. During an interview on 1/28/2025 at 1:53 p.m. with RN1, Registered Nurse 1 (RN 1) confirmed there was no documentation in the clinical record which showed she had communicated with the family or the agencys social worker the need for a care conference to address the continued falls. RN1 stated Patient 5 had again fallen that morning on 1/28/2025. During a record review of the VNRs for the Agencys Medical Social Worker dated 11/18/2024 and 1/6/2025, the VNR’s showed no documentation regarding Patient 5s falls. During a record review of the documents, “;Hospice IDG comprehensive Assessment and Plan of Care Update Report(s)” dated 11/29/2024, 12/13/2024 and 12/27/2024, the records indicated no documentation regarding a plan to address the falls. During an interview on 1/30/2025 at 12:36 p.m. with Agencys Medical Social Worker (MSW, MSW stated he knew about the falls and typically, when there is a safety concern, he alerts the case manager and brings together the caregiver and the facility to address the problem. The MSW confirmed no coordinated meeting had taken place in regard to Patient 5s falls and injuries. During record review of the document “;Interdisciplinary Group Coordination of Care” (IDG) dated 1/28/2025, the document showed the purpose was to “;Ensure the coordination of services for each Hospice patient. The IDG will initiate changes as the patient, caregiver and/or family needs evolve during the terminal illness. It is the responsibility of the IDG to facilitate communication about changes in the patients status among all assigned employees.” During a review of the document “;Job Description”, the document showed the duties of the Medical Social Worker included, based on the comprehensive assessment, “;...Develops a comprehensive psychosocial plan of care, including individualized goals, interventions, and projected visit frequencies. Continually reviews and updates psychosocial plan of care. Integrates input from other disciplines to create a comprehensive interdisciplinary plan of care.” During a record review of the document, “;Visit Note Report...RN Hospice Start of Care” dated 11/16/2024, the report indicated Patient 5 had a history of falls which required visits to the Emergency Department. He had weakness in his legs which required “;Maximal Assistance” while transferring from the bed to chair. Record review of the documents, “;Visit Note Report(s)” (VNR) (nursing visit notes) showed the following: VNR dated 11/24/2024: Patient 5 had experienced a fall. VNR dated 11/30/2024: Patient 5 had tried to get out of his wheelchair and fell against the pole/divider, which created an abrasion and bleeding to his philtrum. (vertical indentation in the middle area of the upper lip). VNR dated 12/13/2024: Patient 5 had been “;Found on the floor” that morning. VNR dated 12/27/2024: Patient 5 was found on the floor and sustained an injury to his forehead. Patient 5 had continued to “;...Attempt to stand without assist...” During a review of patient 5’s clinical records, there was no documentation in the clinical record which showed agency staff had reported the incidences to the social worker so a care conference could be coordinated with the assisted living facility and the family in order to address the continued falls. During an interview on 1/28/2025 at 1:15 p.m. the agencys Manager of Clinical Services (MCS) stated there was no documentation under “;Coordination Notes” which showed the falls had been addressed. During an interview on 1/28/2025 at 1:53 p.m. with RN1, Registered Nurse 1 (RN 1) confirmed there was no documentation in the clinical record which showed she had communicated with the family or the agencys social worker the need for a care conference to address the continued falls. RN1 stated Patient 5 had again fallen that morning on 1/28/2025. During a record review of the VNRs for the Agencys Medical Social Worker dated 11/18/2024 and 1/6/2025, the VNR’s showed no documentation regarding Patient 5s falls. During a record review of the documents, “;Hospice IDG comprehensive Assessment and Plan of Care Update Report(s)” dated 11/29/2024, 12/13/2024 and 12/27/2024, the records indicated no documentation regarding a plan to address the falls. During an interview on 1/30/2025 at 12:36 p.m. with Agencys Medical Social Worker (MSW, MSW stated he knew about the falls and typically, when there is a safety concern, he alerts the case manager and brings together the caregiver and the facility to address the problem. The MSW confirmed no coordinated meeting had taken place in regards to Patient 5s falls and injuries. During record review of the document “;Interdisciplinary Group Coordination of Care” (IDG) dated 1/28/2025, the document showed the purpose was to “;Ensure the coordination of services for each Hospice patient. The IDG will initiate changes as the patient, caregiver and/or family needs evolve during the terminal illness. It is the responsibility of the IDG to facilitate communication about changes in the patients status among all assigned employees.” During a review of the document “;Job Description”, the document showed the duties of the Medical Social Worker included, based on the comprehensive assessment, “;...Develops a comprehensive psychosocial plan of care, including individualized goals, interventions, and projected visit frequencies. Continually reviews and updates psychosocial plan of care. Integrates input from other disciplines to create a comprehensive interdisciplinary plan of care.” During a record review of the document, “;Visit Note Report...RN Hospice Start of Care” dated 11/16/2024, the report indicated Patient 5 had a history of falls which required visits to the Emergency Department. He had weakness in his legs which required “;Maximal Assistance” while transferring from the bed to chair. Record review of the documents, “;Visit Note Report(s)” (VNR) (nursing visit notes) showed the following: VNR dated 11/24/2024: Patient 5 had experienced a fall. VNR dated 11/30/2024: Patient 5 had tried to get out of his wheelchair and fell against the pole/divider, which created an abrasion and bleeding to his philtrum. (vertical indentation in the middle area of the upper lip). VNR dated 12/13/2024: Patient 5 had been “;Found on the floor” that morning. VNR dated 12/27/2024: Patient 5 was found on the floor and sustained an injury to his forehead. Patient 5 had continued to “;...Attempt to stand without assist...” During a review of patient 5’s clinical records, there was no documentation in the clinical record which showed agency staff had reported the incidences to the social worker so a care conference could be coordinated with the assisted living facility and the family in order to address the continued falls. During an interview on 1/28/2025 at 1:15 p.m. the agencys Manager of Clinical Services (MCS) stated there was no documentation under “;Coordination Notes” which showed the falls had been addressed. During an interview on 1/28/2025 at 1:53 p.m. with RN1, Registered Nurse 1 (RN 1) confirmed there was no documentation in the clinical record which showed she had communicated with the family or the agencys social worker the need for a care conference to address the continued falls. RN1 stated Patient 5 had again fallen that morning on 1/28/2025. During a record review of the VNRs for the Agencys Medical Social Worker dated 11/18/2024 and 1/6/2025, the VNR’s showed no documentation regarding Patient 5s falls. During a record review of the documents, “;Hospice IDG comprehensive Assessment and Plan of Care Update Report(s)” dated 11/29/2024, 12/13/2024 and 12/27/2024, the records indicated no documentation regarding a plan to address the falls. During an interview on 1/30/2025 at 12:36 p.m. with Agencys Medical Social Worker (MSW, MSW stated he knew about the falls and typically, when there is a safety concern, he alerts the case manager and brings together the caregiver and the facility to address the problem. The MSW confirmed no coordinated meeting had taken place in regards to Patient 5s falls and injuries. During record review of the document “;Interdisciplinary Group Coordination of Care” (IDG) dated 1/28/2025, the document showed the purpose was to “;Ensure the coordination of services for each Hospice patient. The IDG will initiate changes as the patient, caregiver and/or family needs evolve during the terminal illness. It is the responsibility of the IDG to facilitate communication about changes in the patients status among all assigned employees.” During a review of the document “;Job Description”, the document showed the duties of the Medical Social Worker included, based on the comprehensive assessment, “;...Develops a comprehensive psychosocial plan of care, including individualized goals, interventions, and projected visit frequencies. Continually reviews and updates psychosocial plan of care. Integrates input from other disciplines to create a comprehensive interdisciplinary plan of care.” During a record review of the document, “;Visit Note Report...RN Hospice Start of Care” dated 11/16/2024, the report indicated Patient 5 had a history of falls which required visits to the Emergency Department. He had weakness in his legs which required “;Maximal Assistance” while transferring from the bed to chair. Record review of the documents, “;Visit Note Report(s)” (VNR) (nursing visit notes) showed the following: VNR dated 11/24/2024: Patient 5 had experienced a fall. VNR dated 11/30/2024: Patient 5 had tried to get out of his wheelchair and fell against the pole/divider, which created an abrasion and bleeding to his philtrum. (vertical indentation in the middle area of the upper lip). VNR dated 12/13/2024: Patient 5 had been “;Found on the floor” that morning. VNR dated 12/27/2024: Patient 5 was found on the floor and sustained an injury to his forehead. Patient 5 had continued to “;...Attempt to stand without assist...” During a review of patient 5’s clinical records, there was no documentation in the clinical record which showed agency staff had reported the incidences to the social worker so a care conference could be coordinated with the assisted living facility and the family in order to address the continued falls. During an interview on 1/28/2025 at 1:15 p.m. the agencys Manager of Clinical Services (MCS) stated there was no documentation under “;Coordination Notes” which showed the falls had been addressed. During an interview on 1/28/2025 at 1:53 p.m. with RN1, Registered Nurse 1 (RN 1) confirmed there was no documentation in the clinical record which showed she had communicated with the family or the agencys social worker the need for a care conference to address the continued falls. RN1 stated Patient 5 had again fallen that morning on 1/28/2025. During a record review of the VNRs for the Agencys Medical Social Worker dated 11/18/2024 and 1/6/2025, the VNR’s showed no documentation regarding Patient 5s falls. During a record review of the documents, “;Hospice IDG comprehensive Assessment and Plan of Care Update Report(s)” dated 11/29/2024, 12/13/2024 and 12/27/2024, the records indicated no documentation regarding a plan to address the falls. During an interview on 1/30/2025 at 12:36 p.m. with Agencys Medical Social Worker (MSW) stated he knew about the falls and typically, when there is a safety concern, he alerts the case manager and brings together the caregiver and the facility to address the problem. The MSW confirmed no coordinated meeting had taken place in regards to Patient 5s falls and injuries. Based on interview and record review, the hospice agencys staff did not coordinate care to address frequent falls for one of 13 sampled patients (Patient 5). Patient 5 sustained falls with injuries. Staff did not coordinate a care conference to discuss ways to prevent the falls. This resulted in unnecessary falls with injuries for Patient 5. Record review of the document “;Interdisciplinary Group Coordination of Care” (IDG) dated 1/28/2025 showed the purpose was to “;Ensure the coordination of services for each Hospice patient. The IDG will initiate changes as the patient, caregiver and/or family needs evolve during the terminal illness. It is the responsibility of the IDG to facilitate communication about changes in the patients status among all assigned employees.” Review of the document “;Job Description” showed the duties of the Medical Social Worker included, based on the comprehensive assessment, “;...Develops a comprehensive psychosocial plan of care, including individualized goals, interventions, and projected visit frequencies. Continually reviews and updates psychosocial plan of care. Integrates input from other disciplines to create a comprehensive interdisciplinary plan of care.” Record review of the document “;Visit Note Report...RN Hospice Start of Care” dated 11/16/2024 showed Patient 5 had a history of falls which required visits to the Emergency Department. He had weakness in his legs which required “;Maximal Assistance” while transferring from the bed to chair. Record review of the documents “;Visit Note Report(s)” (VNR) (nursing visit notes) showed the following: VNR dated 11/24/2024: Patient 5 had experienced a fall. VNR dated 11/30/2024: Patient 5 had tried to get out of his wheelchair and fell against the pole/divider, which created an abrasion and bleeding to his philtrum. (vertical indentation in the middle area of the upper lip) VNR dated 12/13/2024: Patient 5 had been “;Found on the floor” that morning. VNR dated 12/27/2024: Patient 5 was found on the floor and sustained an injury to his forehead. Patient 5 had continued to “;...Attempt to stand without assist...” There was no documentation in the clinical record which showed agency staff had reported the incidences to the social worker so a care conference could be coordinated with the assisted living facility and the family in order to address the continued falls. During an interview on 1/28/2025 at 1:15 p.m., the agencys Manager of Clinical Services (MCS) stated there was no documentation under “;Coordination Notes” which showed the falls had been addressed. During an interview on 1/28/2025 at 1:53 p.m. Registered Nurse 1 (RN 1) confirmed there was no documentation in the clinical record which showed she had communicated with the family or the agencys social worker the need for a care conference to address the continued falls. RN 1 stated Patient 5 had again fallen that morning on 1/28/2025. Record review of the VNRs for the Agencys Medical Social Worker dated 11/18/2024 and 1/6/2025 showed no documentation regarding Patient 5s falls. Record review of the documents “;Hospice IDG comprehensive Assessment and Plan of Care Update Report(s)” dated 11/29/2024, 12/13/2024 and 12/27/2024, showed no documentation regarding a plan to address the falls. During an interview on 1/30/2025 at 12:36 p.m., the Agencys Medical Social Worker (MSW) stated he knew about the falls and typically, when there is a safety concern, he alerts the case manager and brings together the caregiver and the facility to address the problem. The MSW confirmed no coordinated meeting had taken place in regards to Patient 5s falls and injuries.”

    Rule L0557. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Mar 18, 2025Recertification inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Jan 30, 2025Recertification inspection by the state2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Mar 16, 1984.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 18.4 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 12.9% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 96.2% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 62% at home, 28% in assisted living, 8% in a skilled nursing facility, 1% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day18.4 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends12.9%
Visits near death96.2% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • El Camino Hospital owns 50% directly since Apr 1, 1986; Dignity Community Care owns 50% directly since Apr 1, 1986.
  • Consolidated Health Services LLC runs it.
  • 12 owners or officers are people: Thomas Harshman (corporate director); Andrew M Robinson (managing employee (on the payroll)); Deobrah A Muro (corporate director); Daniel Scott Dietz (corporate director); Jeffrey P Daneff (corporate director); Eleanor Linda Vigilante (corporate director); Kim Marie Costello (corporate director); Cheryl Lynn Reinking (corporate director); Trisha L Crissman (corporate director); Jack D Hawkins (corporate officer); Jagmohan S Khaira (managing employee (on the payroll)); Mary Pat Larsen (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Consolidated Health Services LLCRuns it (operational or managerial control)100%Nov 1, 2019
El Camino HospitalOwns 5% or more directly50%Apr 1, 1986
Dignity Community CareOwns 5% or more directly50%Apr 1, 1986

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 87% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 88% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.16% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 70.1% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 32 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 94621, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 2.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.