Hearth Record

Good Heart Hospice & Palliative Care, Inc.

A hospice in Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730

8237 Rochester Avenue Suite 115, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. (909) 989-9988.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 13 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

13 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 170 hospices serving ZIP code 91730 had 7.

The last inspection on record was on Mar 26, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

13 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

13 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Mar 26, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission13 deficiencies
  • Plan Based on All Hazards Risk Assessment (42 CFR 418.113(a)(2))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. The hospice surveyor noted that the organization developed an all hazards vulnerability assessment but did not complete the mitigation activities. This was reviewed and validated with the Administrator.”

    Rule E0006. Standard-level.

  • Exercise of rights/respect for proprty/person (42 CFR 418.52(b)(1)(i))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, the hospice surveyor observed in HOSRRHV #1 where the Revocation was signed by the patient’s daughter on admission. This was reviewed and validated with the Administrator. Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, the hospice surveyor observed in HOSRRHV #1 where the patient’s family requested a notice of non-covered items at admission; however, the HCO did not provide until 6 days later. This was reviewed and validated with the Administrator.”

    Rule L0505. Standard-level.

  • Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 99 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 3 patient records reviewed, the hospice surveyor observed that the organization failed to provide patient education and training based on the patient’s needs. In HOSRRHV #1 the patient had orders for Metoprolol 25 mg one tablet daily and Losartan 10 mg tablet daily with the parameters to hold if SPB is <100 or HR <60 per the medication orders. The pill bottle in the home that the granddaughter uses did not include the parameters and she stated she was no aware of the parameters. This was reviewed and validated with the Administrator.”

    Rule L0544. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 197 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 14 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to individualize the patient’s care. In HOSRRHV #3 the patient’s pain goal was assessed to be 4/10 or less but the plan of care stated a pain goal of 3/10 or less. The organization’s Pain Assessment Policy 2-031 stated that the patient’s pain goal will be assessed and entered into the plan of care. For this patient the MSW care plan stated, provide comfort and dignity and emotional well being. The MSW goal is not measurable. In HOSRRHV #2 the MSW goal stated, Patient adjustment to terminal diagnosis and anticipatory grief related to decline. The MSW goal was not measurable. In HOSRRNHV #3 the MSW plan of care stated Patient to remain free of signs or symptoms of psychosocial distress and the Chaplain care plan stated, Chaplain to facilitate a spiritual environment to begin the bereavement process. The MSW and Chaplain goals were not measurable. In HOSRRNHV #4 the MSW plan of care stated, Patient and family will verbalize understanding of hospice services and receive emotional support. The MSW plan of care was not measurable. This was reviewed and validated with the Administrator.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 148 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 14 patient records reviewed, the hospice surveyor observed that the Hospice plan of care was missing interventions. In HOSRRHV #1 the chaplain failed to include interventions in the Plan of Care. Additionally, this patient was assessed to be an aspiration risk and the RN did not include a care plan in the plan of care addressing this precaution. During the home visit the patient’s granddaughter asked if a podiatrist could come out to cut the patient’s toenails as they were fungal, thick and curling into the patient’s skin and there was no care plan addressing this in the Plan of Care. In HOSRRHV #3 the patient was taking Hydroxyurea HCL daily for sickle cell disease, there was no care plan addressing this diagnosis and the pain the patient was eliciting during the visit. This was reviewed and validated with the Administrator.”

    Rule L0546. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 554 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 9 of 14 patient records reviewed, the hospice surveyor observed that there were duplicate medications for the same indication. In HOSRRHV #1 the patient had orders for Morphine Sulfate 20 mg orally every 4 hours as needed for mild pain or shortness of breath and there was also an order for Acetaminophen Rectal Suppository 650 mg one every 6 hours and as needed for mild pain or fever >100.1. It was not clear when to take one medication over the other for mild pain. In HOSRRHV #2 the patient had orders for Acetaminophen Rectal Suppository 650 mg 1 every 6 hours and as needed for mild pain or fever >100.1 and she also had orders for Norco 5mg-325 mg one tablet every 6 hours and as needed for pain. It was not clear when the patient should take one medication over the other for pain. In HOSRRHV #3 the patient had an order for Acetaminophen Rectal Suppository 650 mg one every 6 hours and as needed for mild pain and fever >100.1 and he also had an order for Tramadol 25 mg one tablet every day and as needed for mild pain, and Morphine Sulfate 20 mg oral every 4 hours and as needed for mild pain and Shortness of breath. It was not clear which one the patient should take for mild pain. In HOSRRNHV #2 the patient had orders for both Ibuprofen 600mg tablets 1 tablet every 6 hours and as needed for moderate pain, and Tramadol HCL 50 mg one tablet every 6 hours for moderate pain. It is not clear which one the patient should take for moderate pain. In HOSRRNHV #6 the patient had orders for Tramadol 50 mg one tablet every 6 hours and as needed for moderate pain and Norco 5-325 mg 1 tablet every 6 ours as needed for moderate pain. It is not clear which one the patient should take for moderate pain. This patient also had orders for Acetaminophen 500 mg 2 tablets every 12 hours as needed for mild pain and Acetaminophen 650 mg suppository one every 6 hours and as needed for mild pain. It is not clear which one the patient should take for mild pain. In HOSRRNHV #4 the patient had Morphine Sulfate 20 mg oral solution every four as needed for severe pain and Oxycontin 5 mg one tablet every 6 hours for severe pain. It is not clear which one to take for severe pain. In HOSRRNHV #5 the patient was on Tramadol 50 mg one every 12 hours for pain and Acetaminophen Suppository 650 mg one every 6 hours as needed for pain. It is not clear which one the patient should take for pain. In HOSRRDC #1 the patient was on Acetaminophen 325 mg two tablets every 6 hours for pain and also Hydrocodone Acetaminophen 5-325 mg 1 tablet every 6 hours and as needed for pain. It is not clear which medication should be taken for pain. In HOSRRDC#2 the patient was on Morphine Sulfate 20mg/ml sublingual every 4 hours as needed for pain and shortness of breath and Tylenol 325 mg 2 tablets every 6 hours as needed for pain. It is not clear which medication should be taken for pain. This was reviewed and validated with the Administrator.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 106 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 1 home visits conducted, where the home health aide provided personal care the hospice surveyor observed that she used the same pair of gloves and water to clean the dirty to the clean areas e.g. perineal area. the aide washed the vaginal area then turned the patient and used the same water and gloves to clean her bottom and back. She then dressed the patient and began making the bed with the same gloves. The aide also failed to perform hand hygiene between her glove changes per the Hand Hygiene policy. This was reviewed and validated with the Administrator.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c)(5))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. In 2 of 9 HR files reviewed, the hospice surveyor observed there was no evidence of competence assessment for the Medical director in the last 3 years and the Alternate Medical Director for 2025. This was reviewed and validated with the HR assistant.”

    Rule L0619. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 272 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 7 of 14 patient records reviewed, the hospice surveyor observed that the aide assignment did not include specific precautions. In HOSRRHV #3 the patient was on an Eliquis and there were no bleeding precautions in the home health aide assignment. In HOSRRNHV #1 the patient was on Oxygen 3 liters and there were no instructions if the aide could remove the oxygen during bathing. Additionally, this patient was a fall risk and this was not included on the aide assignment as a precaution. In HOSRRNHV #2 the patient was on Oxygen 2 liters and there were no instructions as to what the aide should do when bathing the patient. In HOSRRNHV #3 the patient was on Aspirin 81 mg daily and there was no bleeding precautions in the aide assignment. This patient was also on Oxygen 2-5 liters and the range was in the aide assignment with no instructions what to do with the oxygen during bathing. In HOSRRNHV #6 the patient was on Xarelto daily and the home health assignment did not include bleeding precautions. This patient was also on oxygen 2-5 liters and there were no instructions on what the aide should do with the oxygen during bathing. In HOSRRHV #7 the patient was on 4 liters of oxygen and there were no instructions for the home health aide as to what to do with the oxygen when bathing the patient. In HOSRRNHV #5 the patient was on Oxygen 2-5 liters and the aide care plan did not specify if the oxygen could be removed with bathing. This was reviewed and validated with the Administrator.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2)(ii))

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 1 home visits conducted, where the home health aide was present and provided personal care the surveyor observed the aide failed to provide care as instructed in the aide assignment. In HOSRRHV #3 the aide assignment stated that the aide would provide oral care and nail care with each visit and neither were offered or provided. She applied deodorant but this was selected on the aide assignment. This was reviewed and validated with the Administrator.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. In 5 of 9 HR files reviewed, the hospice surveyor observed that the NP, Alternate Medical Director, RN Bereavement Coordinator, and Volunteer Coordinator did not have an initial competency done as part of their orientation. This was reviewed and validated with the HR Assistant.”

    Rule L0663. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 128 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 2 home visits conducted, where medication reconciliation was performed the hospice surveyor observed that the medication list was discovered to be inaccurate. The hospice surveyor observed in HOSRRHV #3 that the medication list from the organization was missing MiraLAX 17 gm in 8 ounces of fluid daily if no BM for 3 days. Dulcolax suppository 10 gm daily if no BM after the MiraLAX, Naloxone HCL 4 mg spray into each nostril and repeat 2-3 times as needed. Additionally, the Acetaminophen stated 650 mg 2 tablets every 6 hours for pain and as needed but the bottle showed that it was 325mg tablets 2 tablets every 6 hours and as needed for pain. This was reviewed and validated with the Administrator”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(1)(i))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 2 patient records reviewed, where the patient was discharged to another hospice the surveyor observed that the organization failed to provide a discharge summary to the receiving organization. In HOSRRDC #2 the patient was transferred to another agency and there was no proof that the discharge summary was sent. The organization failed to follow their Transfer Information Policy 2.070.1. This was reviewed and validated by the Administrator.”

    Rule L0682. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Mar 26, 2026Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission13 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Mar 7, 2017.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 17.8 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 11.5% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 100% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 47% at home, 17% in assisted living, 37% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day17.8 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends11.5%
Visits near death100.0% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Good Heart Hospice LLC owns 100% directly since Jan 28, 2019.
  • 10 owners or officers are people: Maya Mellina Thona (corporate director, 100%); Maya Mellina Thona (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Sameer Ohri (managing employee (under contract), 100%); Patrick Thona (corporate director, 100%); Maya Mellina Thona (owns 5% or more through other companies, 32.55%); Patrick Thona (owns 5% or more through other companies, 32.55%); Maya Mellina Thona (corporate officer); Maya Mellina Thona (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Patrick Thona (corporate officer); Mane Harutyunyan (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Good Heart Hospice LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Jan 28, 2019
Ei Health Care Investments LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies20.8%Dec 20, 2018

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 70% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 6.5% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 170 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91730, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 13.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 170 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 91730
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Rejuvenate Hospice Care Inc.14
Manor Hospice6
Bright Haven Hospice1
Calcare Palliative ServicesNot given
Shangrila HospiceNot given
Hospice Care Providers Inc.11
Providence Hospice Inland Empire7
Caring Hands Hospice, Inc.Not given
Good Heart Hospice & Palliative Care, Inc. This hospice13
Geo Hospice Care, Inc.36
Abbot Hospice Inc.Not given
Sacred Passion Hospice Care, Inc.Not given

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.