Hearth Record

Rejuvenate Hospice Care Inc.

A hospice in Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730

9087 Arrow Route Suite 284, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. (866) 502-5710.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 14 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

14 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 170 hospices serving ZIP code 91730 had 7.

The last inspection on record was on Nov 24, 2025: a follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission.

5 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

14 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

14 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Oct 31, 2025: follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission5 deficiencies
  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    “Observed in Leadership Session. There was no evidence that the governing body and leadership had established requirements to support patient care treatment and services as evidenced by issues identified with record of care and leadership resulting in condition level findings at 418.100 and 418.104.”

    Rule L0651. Condition-level.

  • Retrieval of clinical records (42 CFR 418.104(f))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 4 patient records reviewed, the organization did not show an audit trail of the revocation documentation upon request. For example, in RRDC #1, 2, 3, and 4 the Surveyor was handed paper revocation forms for each patient despite the organization’s use of electronic medical records and denial of any paper charts. This was validated and reviewed with the Alternate Director of Patient Care Services and the Office Manager.”

    Rule L0685. Condition-level.

  • Education (42 CFR 418.60(c))

    “Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 1 HR files reviewed, the organization did not provide Infection control and Blood Borne Pathogens education and training. For example, in HR file #1 there was no evidence in the HR file Infection control and Blood Borne Pathogen education and training had been provided. This was validated and reviewed with the Alternate Administrator.”

    Rule L0582. Standard-level.

  • In-service training (42 CFR 418.76(d))

    “Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 1 HR files reviewed, the organization did not ensure the clinician had the required education hours. For example, in HR file #1 there was no evidence in the HR file the Hospice Aide completed 12 hours of education hours as required annually for 2024.”

    Rule L0620. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 1 HR files reviewed, the organization did not assess the annual competency of the clinician. For example, in HR File #1 the Hospice Aide did not have a completed annual competency as required by the organization’s policy. This was validated and reviewed with the Alternate Director of Patient Care Services.”

    Rule L0663. Standard-level.

Sep 18, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission9 deficiencies
  • Patient outcome measures (42 CFR 418.54(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 159 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 10 patient records reviewed, it was noted that the patient record was inaccurate or contained errors. For example in record RRNHV#1 on the day of admission to hospice there was an order for a heparin flush to the patient’s Port a Cath, however there was no documentation that the flush had been completed and no documentation in the initial assessment of the patient having a Port a Cath in place. In records RRBR#1 and #2 there was no documentation of the LVN contacting the physician after the patient’s death. The organization’s policy Death At Home stated the nurse will notify the attending physician of the patient’s death. It will be the attending physician’s responsibility to pronounce death. During discussion with the LVN about death visits, she stated that after checking VSs she contacts the physician by phone. However there was no documentation of these conversations. This was confirmed with the DON present.”

    Rule L0535. Condition-level.

  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    “Observed in HR File Review. There was no evidence that the governing body and leadership had established requirements to support patient care treatment and services as evidenced by...condition level findings at 418.114 human resources and 418.54 records.”

    Rule L0651. Condition-level.

  • Personnel qualification (42 CFR 418.114(a))

    “Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 9 HR files reviewed, it was noted that the organization was unable to provide the HR file for the hospice aide that documented providing patient care and as a result there was no verification or documentation of the staff credentials. This was discussed with the Administrator/DPCS the file was requested from.”

    Rule L0784. Condition-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 145 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 10 of 10 patient records reviewed, it was noted that the written plan of care was not individualized. For example in record RRNHV#1 all of the goals timeframes were dated the next recertification date in 3 months. Including Resolve pain with medications ordered. Teach Pt/Family/PCG on immediate use, efficacy and precautions. and Pt/pcg will verbalize/express understanding of medication /treatment orders and side effects. This POC also included the intervention Oxygen as ordered via ______ at ______L/min . In record RRNHV#2 all of the goals timeframes were dated the next rectification date in 3 months, including Pt/pcg will verbalize/express understanding of medication /treatment orders and side effects. Records RRNHV#3 to #7 and RRHV#1 to #3 all goals timeframes were the next recertification date and included similar goals to those quoted. This was confirmed and discussed with the DON and Administrator present.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 92 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 10 patient records reviewed, it was noted that the plan of care did not include all information of medications necessary to meet the patient’s needs. For example, in record RRNHV#4 the POC included Advil and Tylenol extra strength both as needed for pain with no further direction such as which medication to use first. In record RRNHV#7 the POC included Tylenol, Ibuprofen, Lidocaine patch, and Tramadol all as needed for pain with no further direction. This was confirmed and discussed with the Administrator and DPCS.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 169 words

    “Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 9 HR files reviewed, it was noted that the organization was unable to provide the HR file for the hospice aide that documented providing patient care and as a result the communication evaluation items were not evaluated. This was discussed with the Administrator/DPCS the file was requested from. Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 9 HR files reviewed, it was noted that the organization was unable to provide the HR file for the hospice aide that documented providing patient care and as a result there was no supervisor evaluations . This was discussed with the Administrator/DPCS the file was requested from. Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 9 HR files reviewed, it was noted that the organization was unable to provide the HR file for the hospice aide that documented providing patient care and as a result there was no evaluation of the subject areas identified. This was discussed with the Administrator/DPCS the file was requested from.”

    Rule L0615. Standard-level.

  • Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c))

    “Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 9 HR files reviewed, it was noted that the hospice aide had not successfully completed a competency evaluation before providing patient care. For example when the HR file for the HHA/hospice aide was requested the organization was unable to provide the HR file or any documentation. This was discussed with the Administrator/DPCS the file was requested from.”

    Rule L0615. Standard-level.

  • Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c)(3))

    “Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 9 HR files reviewed, it was noted that the organization had not performed the competency evaluation of the hospice aide. For example when the HR file for the HHA/hospice aide was requested the organization was unable to provide the HR file or any documentation. This was discussed with the Administrator/DPCS the file was requested from.”

    Rule L0617. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 115 words

    “Observed in HR File Review. During review of the HR files it was noted that the LVN and RN files did not include education and training for death visits. This was confirmed and discussed with the DPCS present. Observed in HR File Review. In 2 of 8 HR files reviewed, it was noted that the staff competence was not assessed and documented annually as required by the organization’s policy. For example, in the Spiritual Counselor/Bereavement Coordinator file and the Administrator/DPCS file there were documents titled Annual Competencies with boxes checked, however the documents were not signed by the staff member or an agency representative and were not dated. This was confirmed with the Administrator present.”

    Rule L0663. Standard-level.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 24, 2025Follow-up inspection by The Joint CommissionNo deficiencies cited
Oct 31, 2025Follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission5 deficiencies cited
Sep 18, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission9 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Dec 31, 2012.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • CMS’s ownership file has no owners listed for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 170 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91730, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 14.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.