Hearth Record

St Elizabeth Hospice Care, Inc.

A hospice in Pasadena, California 91107

3829 E Sierra Madre Blvd, Pasadena, California 91107. (626) 510-6770.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 131 hospices serving ZIP code 91107 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Jul 24, 2025: a follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jun 12, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission4 deficiencies
  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 174 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 12 patient records reviewed, the Surveyor noted an RN had not visited the hospice patient every 15 days to conduct a comprehensive assessment. In RRNHV#4, the patient had the DOPCS Nurse Practitioner (NP) visiting the patient but only to complete the Hospice Aide supervisory visits. The NP had documented the supervisory note only, and had not documented any comprehensive assessment elements. All other patient visits had been completed by the LVN using a ‘short’ form and did not include a full patient assessment. The patient had been on service for 84 days. In RRBR#2, the patient had been on service for 52 days without a nursing comprehensive visit documented. The LVN completed ‘short’ visit notes and the NP documented HA supervisory visits only. In RRDC#1 There had been no RN comprehensive visits documented in the 36 days patient was on service. In RRDC#2, there had been no RN comprehensive visits in the 83 days patient had been on service. This was validated with the Administrator and DOPCS.”

    Rule L0533. Condition-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 318 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 12 patient records reviewed, the Surveyor noted not all patient identified care needs had been included on the plan of care (POC). For example, in RRHV#2, the patient had been bedbound and a high risk for skin breakdown; however this had not been included on the POC. In RRHV#3, the patient had been a high falls risk and at risk for skin breakdown, but these had not been on the POC. This was validated with the DOPCS. Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 12 patient records reviewed, the Surveyor noted a patient with visits but there had been no orders for the visits. For example, in RRBR#1, the patient had a Hospice Aide care plan written and the HA had made visits to the patient; however there had been no frequency orders present in the patient record. This was validated with the DOPCS. Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 12 patient records reviewed, the Surveyor noted the plan of care (POC) had not been updated as the patient condition had changed. For example, in RRHV#2, the patient had a documented UTI and started on antibiotics; however, this had not been discussed at IDG and added to the POC with prevention interventions. This was validated with the DOPCS. Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 12 patient records reviewed, the Surveyor noted orders for wound care and or medications had been incomplete. For example, in RRNHV#4, the patient had Hydrocodone Bitartrate/Acetaminophen 5mg-325mg Tablet and Acetaminophen 325mg both ordered every 6 hours as needed for pain. In RRHV#2, the patient had wound care being provided to right heel. The order had been missing what the wound was to be cleansed with and the type of wrap to secure it. In RRNHV#5, the patient had Clotrimazole/Betamethasone Dipropionate 1%-0.05% Topical Cream ordered to apply to affected area. This was validated with the DOPCS.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 127 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 12 patient records reviewed, the Surveyor noted care not provided according to the patient plan of care (POC). For example, in RRHV#3, the patient had orders for nursing visits 2 times per week; however, there had only been 1 visits per week documented over the past 9 weeks. In RRNHV#4, the POC had orders for an RN to visit 2 times per week; however, there had not been an RN visit documented during the patients time on service from March. All visits made had been completed by the LVN. In RRNHV#5, there had been no visit documented by the LVN or RN in the 2nd week of February even though visits had been ordered. This was validated with the DOPCS.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Recruiting and retaining (42 CFR 418.78(c))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. The Surveyor had been unable to validate that recruitment activities had been completed as this information had not been available during the survey. The Administrator reports that he had completed recruitment, but could not locate the documentation.”

    Rule L0645. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 24, 2025Follow-up inspection by The Joint CommissionNo deficiencies cited
Jun 12, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jan 16, 2016.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 99% at home, 1% in assisted living.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • CMS’s ownership file has no owners listed for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 131 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91107, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 4.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.