Hearth Record

Faith & Hope Hospice Care, Inc.

A hospice in Pasadena, California 91104

1575 N Lake Ave Suite 208, Pasadena, California 91104. (818) 559-1460.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

6 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 145 hospices serving ZIP code 91104 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Aug 22, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

6 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Aug 22, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission6 deficiencies
  • Patient outcome measures (42 CFR 418.54(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 366 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 19 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to document accurate documentation in the clinical record regarding the patient’s pain levels and visit frequencies. For example, in RRDC #1 on the IDT meeting review the Skilled Nurse (SN) documented on page 1 patient denies any pain or any discomfort at this time and on page 4 documented since last IDT patient had increased episodes of pain which was managed with Norco. The SN also documented during the SN visits conducted over a 2 week timeframe the patient had pain during every SN visit. There is documentation in the clinical record that the patient has always had pain and discomfort. IN RRNHV #3 on the plan of care under spiritual interventions: the documentation indicated, a follow up in two months, 1 as needed/benefit period to offer prayer and presence for the patient and family then reassess upon recertification. Then further within the plan of care under additional details/patient/caregiver agreement with plan of care it was documented, the family has expressed gratitude for the hospice team and is in full agreement with the current plan of care including monthly spiritual care visits. On clinical nursing note the SN documented the patient had intermittent pain to the abdomen when nauseous and leg pain but rated the pain at a 0 then documented the patient expressed the current pain as burning/sharp. The SN also documented, patient continues to experience constipation with increased abdominal cramping. The note asked the SN to describe symptom management: the SN documented partial-nausea controlled with Zofran, constipation improving post enema, but continued poor intake and discomfort present. In RRNHV #5, the Chaplain documented, the patient/caregiver declined Chaplain visits but on the plan of care it was indicated for frequencies of one times a day x 5 days. In RRNHV #4 the Skilled Nurse documented on the aide care plan, report to the SN if no BM in 2 days and pain above 5 on the aide note the documentation stated, report to the Skilled Nurse if no BM in 3 days and pain above: any reports of pain. This was validated and reviewed with the Director of Patient Care Services.”

    Rule L0535. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 430 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 19 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to establish a timeframe for the goals on the plan of care. For example, in RRDC #2 the respiratory goals stated, changes in respiratory status will be identified/reported and managed during hospice care. Another goal indicated, the patient, family and caregiver will verbalize understanding to express increased episodes of shortness of breath during activities/at rest. Another example, RRNHV #1 under other goals the Skilled Nurse documented, family/caregiver will be informed and able to correctly use all medical equipment provided for the patient’s care. Patient will be kept comfortable by receiving their medications on time and exactly as prescribed by the physician during hospice services. In RRNHV #4 the goals stated, help the patient find spiritual peace and acceptance in her end of life journey, provide emotional and spiritual comfort to the patient and spouse as they process their faith struggles and increased pain for the patient. The goals only contained a start effective date but no timeframe was indicated as to when the goals would be achieved. This was validated and reviewed with the Director of Patient Care Services. Observed in Record Review. In 8 of 19 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to establish appropriate length of times for the care plan goals. For example, the Skilled Nurse established in RRNHV #1 the care plan goal, the patient will remain free from pain or report pain at a tolerable level of 3 out of 10 throughout hospice care and changes in respiratory status will be identified/reported and managed during hospice care. In RRNHV #2 the goal stated, patient and family will verbalized understanding on how to manage dyspnea with current medications and interventions including non-pharmacologic interventions. In RRHV #4, the goals stated, patient will verbalize a pain level ? 5/10 within 60 minutes of PRN Morphine administration, patient and caregiver will demonstrate comfort with medication administration and appropriate use of PRN Morphine, patient will maintain pain and dyspnea at a tolerable level as defined by patient, and patient will verbalize understanding of Morphine use for pain and dyspnea. All goals was indicated to be achieved by the end of certification period despite the need for a shorter goal duration for symptom management and comfort. There were similar findings in RRNHV#3, RRNHV #4, RRNHV #5, RRNHV #6, in benefit period #3, RRNHV #7, RRNHV #8, RRNHV #9, and RRNHV #10 and in the nutrition, psych/mental/emotional/behavioral, integumentary, CV, and GI/GU/Endocrine goals for each clinical record. This was validated and reviewed with the Director of Patient Care Services.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 117 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 19 patient records reviewed, the Certified Home Health Aide failed to follow the plan of care. For example, in RRNHV #4 the CHHA selected oral care was performed but the care plan did not indicate oral care should be performed, the aide care plan indicated footcare and change bed linen should be performed but the aide note did not indicate footcare nor the change of bed linen were performed. The aide care plan also did not indicate the patient should be up as tolerated but the aide note documentation indicated the CHHA performed the task, up as tolerated. This was validated and reviewed with the Director of Patient Care Services.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1)(iv))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 3 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to develop a bereavement care plan. For example, in RRBR #3 there is no evidence of a bereavement care plan in the clinical record to specify the types of bereavement services needed and the frequency of the delivery of services. This was validated and reviewed with the Chief Operating Officer.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(3)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 104 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 19 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to complete the initial bereavement risk assessment. For example, in RRBR #3 there is no documentation to support an initial bereavement risk assessment. The only documentation is a missed visit on day 5 after the start of care visit in which the Bereavement Coordinator documented a phone call was made and a visit made to the home, there was no answer to the phone call nor at the home. There is no evidence of a follow up was made thereafter. This was validated and reviewed with the Chief Operating Officer.”

    Rule L0598. Standard-level.

  • Serving the hospice patient and family (42 CFR 418.100(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 98 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 4 home visits conducted, the organization failed to maintain the patient’s privacy when providing personal care. For example, in RRHV #2 the patient was exposed while preparing for bathing. The Certified Home Health Aide did not close the door before removing the patient’s upper clothing and thus the patient was visible from the hallway of the Assisted Living Facility. There were also at least three residents who had entered the patient’s room at the doorway during vital sign and range of motion care. This was reviewed with the Chief Executive Officer.”

    Rule L0650. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 22, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission6 deficiencies cited
May 9, 2024Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Oct 27, 2009.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 20.5 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5.3% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 96.3% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 70% at home, 27% in assisted living, 3% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day20.5 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends5.3%
Visits near death96.3% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 6 owners or officers are people: Vigen Khojayan (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Vagram Antonian (owns 5% or more directly); Vagram Antonian (corporate director); Vagram Antonian (managing employee (on the payroll)); Dennis Laureano (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Inesa Antonyan (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 77% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 82% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 98.51% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 12.3% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 52 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 145 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91104, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 6.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.