Hearth Record

Yolo Hospice

A hospice in Davis, California 95618

1909 Galileo Court, Suite A, Davis, California 95618. (530) 758-5566.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 12 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

12 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 19 hospices serving ZIP code 95618 had 8.

The last inspection on record was on Nov 14, 2025: a complaint inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

12 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

12 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Mar 15, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission12 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 140 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 14 patient records reviewed, the hospice did not complete the comprehensive assessment no later than five calendar days after the election of hospice care. In review of the medical record for HOS RRNHV #7 the spiritual assessment was completed on the 6th day following the election of hospice care. Additionally, in review of the medical record for HOS RRNHV #10 the psychosocial assessment and bereavement assessment were completed on the 10th day following the election of the hospice benefit and the spiritual assessment was completed on the 12th day following the election of the hospice benefit. Finally, in review of the medical record for HOS RRDC #1 the spiritual assessment had been completed on the 6th day following the election of the hospice benefit. This was validated with the Director of Patient Care.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6)(iv))

    The inspectors’ words, 95 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 4 home visits conducted, the organization failed to assess potential medication-related problems. For HOS RRHV #3 who resided in an assisted living facility the hospice nurse conducted a medication assessment but failed to identify all medications and regime changes. The patient was receiving Plavix 75mg Orally daily which was being administered by the assisted living facility and was on their medication record since the patient’s admission to hospice five months ago however the medication was not on the hospice medication record. This was validated with the Hospice Manager.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 121 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, the written plan of care did not include individualized goals and time frames for achieving goals. In review of the medical record for HOS RRNHV #7 who had elected hospice care about 5 weeks ago, the goals on the plan of care were not individualized and specific, for example; the pain goal stated, patient verbalizes pain is controlled within their desired comfort level using a 0-10 pain scale however failed to identify what the patient’s desired comfort level was. Additionally, the goal did not include a time frame for achieving the goal but stated through the next cert period This was validated with the Director of Quality and Compliance. 
”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 169 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 2 of 4 home visits conducted, the organization did not follow their bag technique policy. The hospice staff did not follow the organization’s bag technique policy which included that the bag should be closed during the visit after retrieving needed supplies. For HOS RRHV #2 with the hospice aide the surveyor noted that the clinical bag remained open throughout the visit, this was also observed for the home visit for HOS RRHV #3 when the registered nurse left the clinical bag open throughout the duration of the home visit. This was validated with the Director of Patient Care. Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 4 home visits conducted, staff failed to perform hand hygiene consistent with the organization’s hand hygiene policy which included that hand hygiene will be performed after removing gloves. In observation of the care provided for HOS RRHV #2 the hospice aide removed her gloves but failed to perform hand hygiene. This was validated with the Director of Patient Care.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Control (42 CFR 418.60(b)(2)(ii))

    The inspectors’ words, 120 words

    “Observed in Data Session. The organization had not fully developed a hand hygiene program. Although the hospice was educating staff and monitoring hand hygiene they had not trended data and compared to written goals for improving hand hygiene compliance. In discussion with the Director of Quality & Compliance and the Director of Patient Care for the Data Session they reported that the organization had not determined baseline compliance for hand hygiene and set goals for improvement. Observed in Data Session. Although the organization had collected data they had not trended data against a goal to evaluate hand hygiene compliance for the past three years. This was validated with the Director of Quality & Compliance and the Director of Patient Care.”

    Rule L0581. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1)(iv))

    The inspectors’ words, 112 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 3 patient records reviewed, for bereavement services the hospice had not developed bereavement care plans that specify the type of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery. For example, in review of the bereavement records for HOS RRBR #1 who had been assessed at high risk, HOS RRBR #2 who had been assessed at low risk and HOS RRBR #3 who had been assessed at moderate risk the care plans were the same for each record including telephone calls and mailings and did not reflect additional interventions/services that survivors were receiving. This was validated with the Director of Bereavement Services. 
”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 114 words

    “Observed in HR File Review. In 2 of 2 HR files reviewed, the organization did not conduct an annual competency with the hospice aide. For example in review of the personnel file for HOS HR #4 of the hospice aide although competency had been assessed and documented in 2020, 2021 and 2023 there was no evidence that the competency had been completed for 2022. Additionally, for HOS HR #7 of the hospice aide a competency had been documented for 2023 but there was no evidence of competency at the time of hire in 2020 or for 2021 and 2022. This was validated with the Human Resource Manager and Director of Quality & Compliance. 

”

    Rule L0632. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 189 words

    “Observed in HR File Review. In 4 of 10 HR files reviewed, the organization did not assess hand hygiene competency as part of orientation as required by the Perfect Visit competency. In review of the personnel file HOS HR #1 of the volunteer there was no evidence that hand hygiene had been assessed as part of orientation as required by the organization. Additionally, in review of the personnel file for HOS HR #4 of the hospice aide, although there was documentation of competency assessment completed in 2020, 2021 and 2023 there was no evidence that a competency had been done in 2022. Also in review of the personnel file for HOS HR #7 of the hospice aide although a competency assessment had been completed in 2023 there was no evidence of an initial competency assessment at the time of hire or annual assessments for 2021 and 2022. Finally, in review of the personnel file for the Director of Bereavement Services there was no evidence that the organization had been assessing competencies for bereavement staff. This was validated with the Human Resource Manager and the Director of Quality & Compliance.”

    Rule L0663. Standard-level.

  • Use and mintenance of equipment and supplies (42 CFR 418.106(f)(2))

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 4 home visits conducted, the organization had not provided the patient and family an individualized emergency plan. In review of the home folder for HOS RRHV #3 the surveyor noted that the patient and his wife had not been provided with procedures to follow if care, treatment, or services are disrupted by a natural disaster or an emergency. This was validated with the Hospice Manager.”

    Rule L0702. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 135 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, the hospice plan of care failed to identify which provider is responsible for performing the functions that have been agreed upon and included in the plan of care. For example, in review of the medical record for HOS RRHV #1 the surveyor noted that daily wound care had been included on the plan of care however failed to identify which staff (hospice or facility staff) would perform the wound care and on which days. Additionally, the patient received home health aide services from the hospice twice weekly however the plan of care failed to identify which days the hospice home health aide would provide personal care and which days the facility would provide personal care. This was validated with the Director of Patient Care.”

    Rule L0774. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 1 home visits conducted, to patients in skilled nursing facilities (SNF), the organization had not provided the facility with the hospice plan of care or the physician certification of the patient’s terminal illness (CTI). In review of the facility chart for HOS RRHV #1 the surveyor noted that the IDT team updates had been provided however there was no evidence of the plan of care or CTI in the record This was validated with the Director of Patient Care.”

    Rule L0781. Standard-level.

  • Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(1))

    “Observed in Document Review. In 1 of 4 tracers conducted, the organization’s contract did not include a stipulation that the outside agency will complete criminal background checks on contracted employees who provide direct patient care or have access to patient records. In review of the pharmacy contract the surveyor noted that the contract did not include language requiring criminal background checks on employees. This was validated with the Director of Quality & Compliance”

    Rule L0795. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 14, 2025Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Mar 15, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission12 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Mar 7, 1994.
  • Ownership: other.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.8 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.7% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 94.5% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 44% at home, 43% in assisted living, 13% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.8 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends7.7%
Visits near death94.5% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 13 owners or officers are people: Sharon Blaha (corporate director); Patricia Timothy (corporate director); Kristine L Kirkendall (managing employee (on the payroll)); Craig Dresang (managing employee (on the payroll)); Scott D Christensen (corporate director); Nancy Bramberg (corporate director); Rose Marie Hendricks (corporate director); Marion Franck (corporate director); Colleen Perry (corporate director); Kendra Hutchinson (managing employee (under contract)); Jackie Clark (corporate director); Virginia Joyce (corporate director); Keith Volkerts (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
California Hospice NetworkOther role (CMS gives no detail)Sep 1, 2021
Yolo Hospice, Inc.Other role (CMS gives no detail)May 4, 1981

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 86% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 89% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.25% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 57.9% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 19 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 95618, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 8; this one had 12.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.