Hearth Record

Elements of Elder Care LLC

A hospice in Phoenix, Arizona 85028

2990 East Northern Avenue #c103, Phoenix, Arizona 85028. (602) 641-9505.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 64 hospices serving ZIP code 85028 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Aug 20, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Aug 20, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner5 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 214 words

    “It is required that the hospice Interdisciplinary Group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completes an initial comprehensive assessment no later than five (5) calendar days after the election of hospice care, in accordance with CMS §418.24–the elements of the hospice care election statement. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 14 (7%) clinical records reviewed revealed the agency did not ensure that the hospice Interdisciplinary Group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completes an initial comprehensive assessment no later than five (5) calendar days after the election of hospice care, CLINICAL RECORD 4: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 07/02/2026 with a diagnosis of Heart disease, unspecified. A review of the clinical record revealed that the psychosocial assessment was conducted on 07/08/2026, which exceeded 5 days after the election of hospice care. There was no documented evidence explaining a reason for the delay, a missed visit, or attempts to complete the assessment within the first five days. During an interview on 08/20/2026, the Executive Director/Director of Clinical Services (Personnel Record 1) stated, “I have reviewed the clinical record and agree that there is no documentation explaining why the psychosocial assessment was not completed in a timely manner.””

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6)(iii))

    The inspectors’ words, 296 words

    “It is required that the documented comprehensive assessment includes a drug profile that contains the patient’s current prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) drugs; supplements; herbal remedies; and other alternative treatments that could affect drug therapy. The medication review process includes identifying the following: the effectiveness of drug therapy; drug side effects; actual or potential drug interactions; duplicate drug therapy; and drug therapy associated with laboratory monitoring. The assessment includes evidence that common medication side effects in the hospice population are anticipated and, as appropriate, preventive measures are implemented to manage them. The drug profile is updated per the hospice policy and procedure, but, at minimum, at the time of each comprehensive assessment and/or when new medication is added or changes are made to existing medication. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 14 (7%) clinical records reviewed revealed that the agency did not ensure that the documented comprehensive assessment included a drug profile that contained the patient’s current prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) drugs, supplements, herbal remedies, and other alternative treatments that could affect drug therapy, and the medication review process included the identification of actual or potential drug interactions. CLINICAL RECORD 1: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 07/27/2026 with a diagnosis of acute-on-chronic combined systolic and diastolic congestive heart failure. A review of the clinical record revealed that the medication profile dated 07/27/2026 included a lidocaine 4% patch 1 (topical) to the affected area 1 time per day. The instructions did not specify the lidocaine patch was to be applied. During an interview on 08/20/2026, the Director of Clinical Services (Personnel record 1) stated, “I have reviewed the medication profile and agree that the documentation does not include the part of the body that is affected.””

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 404 words

    “It is required that the Interdisciplinary Group, in collaboration with the individual’s attending physician (if any), review, revise, and document the individualized care plan as frequently as the patient’s condition requires, but no less frequently than every 15 calendar days. A revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and a record of the patient’s progress toward the outcomes and goals specified in the plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 3 of 14 (21%) clinical records reviewed revealed that the agency did not ensure the Interdisciplinary Group, in collaboration with the individual’s attending physician (if any), reviewed, revised, and documented the individualized care plan no less frequently than every 15 calendar days. CLINICAL RECORD 11: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 08/06/2025 with a diagnosis of atherosclerosis of the native coronary artery and died on 08/26/2026. A review of the clinical record revealed that a comprehensive Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) assessment was completed on 08/12/2026. The IDG assessment dated 08/26/2026 did not provide documented evidence of a review of the plan of care for the patient’s discharge status or bereavement needs and was not signed by the IDG members. This was not completed within 15 days of the previous IDG assessment. CLINICAL RECORD 12: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 08/27/2025 with a diagnosis of cerebral infarction and died on 09/08/2025. A review of the clinical record revealed that the comprehensive IDG assessment dated 09/09/2025 did not provide documented evidence of the discussion of the patient’s admission status, review of the plan of care, medication review, or discharge status, including bereavement needs, and was not signed by the IDG members. CLINICAL RECORD 13: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 04/29/2026 with a diagnosis of atherosclerosis of the native coronary artery and revoked the hospice benefit on 05/29/2026. A review of the clinical record revealed that a comprehensive Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) assessment was completed on 05/05/2026 and 05/19/2026. The IDG assessment dated 05/29/2026, did not provide documented evidence of a review of the plan of care for the patient’s discharge status and was not signed by the IDG members. During an interview on 08/20/2026, the Executive Director/Director of Clinical Services (Personnel Record 4) stated, “I have reviewed the clinical record and agree that the IDG assessments were not completed. We do, however, always discuss the discharges in IDG.””

    Rule L0552. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 719 words

    “It is required that hospice aides are assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse who is a member of the Interdisciplinary Group. Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide are prepared by a RN who is responsible for the supervision of the hospice aide. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 6 of 14 (43%) clinical records reviewed revealed that the agency did not ensure that written patient care instructions for a hospice aide are prepared by a RN (Registered Nurse) who is responsible for the supervision of the hospice aide. DOCUMENT 1 : (Name of State) Revised Statutes Title 32. Professions and Occupations §32-1650. Certified medication assistants; medication administration; delegation, “32-1650. Certified medication assistants; medication administration; delegation states in relevant parts, “A. A nurse who is licensed pursuant to this chapter may delegate medication administration to a licensed nursing assistant who is also certified by the board as a medication assistant or to a student in an approved medication assistant program.” CLINICAL RECORD 1: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 07/26/2026 with a diagnosis of acute on chronic systolic and diastolic congestive heart failure. A review of the clinical record revealed that the Registered Nurse documented in the initial comprehensive assessment dated 07/26/2026 that the patient required aspiration precautions for dysphagia and that a supra pubic catheter was present. The hospice aide care plan did not include documented evidence that written instructions for aspiration precautions or how to care for the suprapubic catheter site during bathing. CLINICAL RECORD 3: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 06/20/2025 with a diagnosis of cerebrovascular disease. A review of the clinical record revealed that the Registered Nurse documented written instructions in the aide plan of care dated 08/11/2026 for the aide to apply nystatin cream to the abdomen, buttocks, and lower back. There was no documented evidence that the aide was certified by the board as a medication assistant or a student in an approved medication assistant program according to the (Name of State) Revised Statutes Title §32-1650 CLINICAL RECORD 5: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 04/22/2026 with a diagnosis of heart disease, unspecified. A review of the clinical record revealed that the registered nurse documented in the initial plan of care dated 04/22/2026 that the patient was receiving oxygen. A physician’s order dated 4/22/2026 ordered oxygen 2-3 liters per minute via nasal cannula continuously. The hospice aide care plan dated 04/22/2026 and the updated hospice aide care plan dated 08/01/ 2026 did not include did not include documented evidence of written instructions for oxygen use and precautions. CLINICAL RECORD 10: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 06/02/2026 with a diagnosis of cerebral infarction, unspecified. A review of the clinical record revealed that the Registered Nurse documented in the initial comprehensive assessment dated 06/02/2026 that the patient had dysphagia and difficulty swallowing. The hospice aide care plan dated 06/02/2026 and the updated hospice aide care plan dated 08/10/2026 did not include did not include documented evidence of written instructions for aspiration precautions. CLINICAL RECORD 11: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 08/06/2025 with a diagnosis of atherosclerosis of the native coronary artery. A review of the clinical record revealed that the Registered Nurse documented in the initial comprehensive nursing assessment dated 08/06/2025 that the patient was using oxygen at 2-3 liters per minute via nasal cannula for shortness of breath as needed. The hospice aide care plan dated 08/06/2025 did not include documented evidence of written instructions for oxygen use or safety precautions. CLINICAL RECORD 12: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 08/27/2025 with a diagnosis of cerebral infarction. A review of the clinical record revealed that the registered nurse documented in the comprehensive nursing assessment dated 08/27/2026 that the patient was using oxygen 2-4 liters per minute via nasal cannula for shortness of breath. The hospice aide care plan dated 08/27/2025 did not include did not include documented evidence of written instructions for oxygen use and precautions. During an interview on 08/20/2026, the Director of Clinical Services (Personnel Record 1) stated, “I have reviewed Clinical Records 1, 3,5,10,11, and 12, and agree that the written instructions for precautions are not documented as noted. I have entered the missing information and instructed the nurses accordingly.””

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 392 words

    “It is required that the hospice medical director, physician-designee, or physician member of the IDG provides written and signed recertification of the terminal illness to meet the hospice care benefit requirement. Recertification for the hospice care benefit is informed by the medical director or physician designee’s review of the patient’s clinical information. Recertification is completed no later than two (2) calendar days after the first day of each benefit period, and no more than fifteen (15) days before the next benefit period begins. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 14 (14%) clinical records reviewed revealed that the agency did not ensure that the recertification of the terminal illness was completed no later than two (2) calendar days after the first day of each benefit period, and no more than fifteen (15) days before the next benefit period begins. CLINICAL RECORD 2: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 02/02/2026 with a diagnosis of atherosclerotic heart disease. A review of the clinical record revealed that the recertification of terminal illness for benefit period 3 dated 08/01/2026 - 09/29/2026 did not include a physician’s narrative and was not signed and dated as of 08/18/2026. This exceeded the 2-day requirement by 16 days. CLINICAL RECORD 3: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 06/25/2025 with a diagnosis of cerebrovascular disease and was recertified on 09/18/2025, 12/17/2025, 02/15/2026, 04/16/2026, 06/15/2026, and 08/14/2026. A review of the clinical record revealed that the Physician’s certification of terminal illness (CTI) for the recertification dated 09/18/2025-12/16/2025 was completed on 09/30/2025, which exceeded two (2) calendar days after the first day of the benefit period. The CTI for the recertification dated 02/15/2025-04/15/2025 was completed on 02/27/2026, which exceeded two (2) calendar days after the first day of the benefit period. The CTI for the recertification dated 04/16/2026-06/14/2026 was completed on 04/30/2026, which exceeded two (2) calendar days after the first day of the benefit period. The CTI for the recertification dated 08/14/2026-10/12/2026 was completed on 08/18/2026, which exceeded two (2) calendar days after the first day of the benefit period. During an interview on 08/18/2026, the Executive Director (Personnel Record 1) stated, “We always have a discussion in the IDG prior to the recertification date. The physician provides a verbal certification and then signs everything by the end of the month.””

    Rule L0676. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 20, 2026Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner5 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Oct 15, 2020.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.9 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 3.9% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 94.2% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 56% at home, 11% in assisted living, 1% in a skilled nursing facility, 32% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.9 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends3.9%
Visits near death94.2% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Cranage LLC owns 50% directly since Jan 1, 2023; Palliative Hospice Holdings LLC owns 50% directly since Jan 1, 2023.
  • 8 owners or officers are people: Lisa R Ling (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Lisa R Ling (owns 5% or more through other companies, 50%); Lisa R Ling (corporate officer, 50%); Kirsten Sheldrake (owns 5% or more through other companies, 50%); Lisa R Ling (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Richard Daniel Schweichler (corporate director, 0%); Ceraya Ahlling (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Marco Canulla (managing employee (under contract), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Cranage LLCOwns 5% or more directly50%Jan 1, 2023
Palliative Hospice Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more directly50%Jan 1, 2023

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 88% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 81% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 8 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 93.48% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 67.3% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold8 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 64 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 85028, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.