Hearth Record

Savior Hospice

A hospice in Phoenix, Arizona 85028

4530 East Shea Boulevard, Suite 160, Phoenix, Arizona 85028. (480) 320-4733.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 12 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

12 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 64 hospices serving ZIP code 85028 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Apr 25, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

12 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

12 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Apr 25, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission12 deficiencies
  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 412 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 19 patient records reviewed, the written plan of care was not based on the patient’s goals and the time frames, settings, and services required to meet those goals. In the chart for RRNHV#1, the patient was admitted with metastatic cancer with pain management as an active problem. The pain management goal did not include an appropriately time based goal for the patient for whom the current pain on admission was a 6 and the goal was a 0. The goal read Patient will have pain controlled to patient’s satisfaction during this certification period. In the chart for RRNHV#2, there was no goal related to understanding of oxygen safety risks on the plan of care; the fall reduction goal timeframe was not targeted to the patient’s understanding of the fall risk reduction teaching or implementation of the recommended risk reduction interventions, rather that the patient would not fall during the certification period. This was discussed with the Administrator and Nursing supervisors. Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 19 patient records reviewed, the written plan of care was not based on the patient’s goals and the time frames, settings, and services required to meet those goals. In the chart for RRHV#1, the goals were not measurable and time based, including Patient will achieve and maintain optimal physical comfort. No time frame was included in the goal. In the chart for RRHV#2, an example was, Patient will achieve optimal breathing patterns to his/her desired level of comfort during this certification period. In the chart for RRHV#4, the music therapy goals are not included on the hospice plan of care. In the chart for RRNHV#10, there was no goal on plan of care related to the patient or caregiver’s ability to perform the tube feedings nor care to the g-tube site. There was also a goal on the plan of care which was not individualized to this NPO patient, Patient will pass food and fluid from mouth to stomach safely during these certification period. This was discussed with the Administrator and Nursing supervisors. Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 19 patient records reviewed, the written plan of care was not based on the patient’s goals and the time frames, settings and services required to meet those goals. In the chart for RRNHV#5, there was no goal on POC related to understanding of oxygen safety recommendations; the patient is a smoker. This was discussed with the Executive Director.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 19 patient records reviewed, the plan of care did not include a statement of the scope and frequency of services. In the chart for RRHV#4, the Music Therapy visit frequency was not included on the hospice plan of care. This was discussed with the Administrator and Nursing Supervisors assisting with record review.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 203 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 19 patient records reviewed, the plan of care did not include all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions including treatments necessary to meet the patient’s needs. In the chart for RRNHV#2, the plan of care did not include the wound care orders nor any individualized fall prevention interventions, rather a generic intervention to instruct on individualized fall prevention techniques. This was discussed with the Administrator and Nurses assisting with record review. Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 19 patient records reviewed, the plan of care did not include all treatments necessary to meet the patient’s needs. In the chart for RRHV#4, the Oxygen order was not on the current plan of care, nor are the music therapy interventions. In the chart for RRNHV#10, there were multiple medications (Norvasc, Lactulose, K-Phos, etc.) which were listed as oral on the plan of care for the patient who was NPO with a g-tube upon readmission to the hospice. The nutritional interventions on the plan of care were not patient specific for this NPO patient as they included adding thickener to the patient’s feedings. This was discussed with the Executive Director.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 19 patient records reviewed, the plan of care was not revised based on information from updates to the comprehensive assessment and did not address the patient’s progress toward goals. In the chart for RRHV#4, the music therapy was not included on the plan of care; there was no discussion included in the IDG meetings about the patient’s progress toward goals. This was discussed with the Administrator and Executive Director.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 19 patient records reviewed, the organization had not provided care according to the patient’s individualized plan of care. In the chart for RRHV#4, the aide services were ordered twice weekly. The aide visits had been being provided three times weekly for the entire current benefit period. This was discussed with the Nursing Supervisor assisting with record review.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(4))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 19 patient records reviewed, the organization had not collaborated to provide care. In the chart for RRDC#1, the RN documented that she removed the patient’s catheter but was unable to reinsert it. There was no indication the physician was notified nor was there documentation that the foley was ever replaced. This was discussed with the Executive Director.”

    Rule L0557. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 109 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 19 patient records reviewed, the registered nurse had not prepared written patient care instructions for the hospice aide. In the chart for RRNHV#1, there were no written aide instructions in the patient chart. The aide had seen the patient for at least one visit and documented assisted with bed bath. This was discussed with the Administrator and Nursing Supervisor. Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 19 patient records reviewed, the registered nurse had not prepared written patient care instructions for the hospice aide. In the chart for RRNHV#4, there was no aide care plan. This was discussed with the Executive Director.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(3)(ii))

    The inspectors’ words, 102 words

    “Observed in Record Review. The supervising nurse had not assessed the aide’s ability to demonstrate continued satisfactory performance in the following: creating successful interpersonal relationships with the patient and family; demonstrating competence with assigned tasks; complying with infection control policies and procedures; reporting changes in the patient’s condition. These items were not included in the hospice aide supervisory note in the organization’s EMR and thus had not been documented in any chart for a patient receiving aide services, including in the charts for RRHV#1 and RRHV#2 where it was observed. This was discussed with the Administrator and Nurses assisting with record review.”

    Rule L0633. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(3))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 19 patient records reviewed, the patient record did not include all clinical information. In the chart for RRNHV#2, on the second SN visit, the SN documented that he/she administered Morphine, however did not include the dosage or route of administration. This was discussed with the Executive Director.”

    Rule L0674. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3)(i))

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 1 home visits conducted, to a patient residing in a skilled facility, the hospice had not provided the SNF with the most recent hospice plan of care. During HV#3, it was discovered that the hospice had provided an abbreviated plan of care to the SNF which included problems and goals, however did not include any interventions. This was discussed with the Supervisor at the visit and the Hospice Executive Director.”

    Rule L0781. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3)(ii))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 1 patient records reviewed, to a patient residing in a skilled facility, the hospice had not provided the SNF with the required documentation. In the chart for RRHV#3, there was no documentation that the hospice had provided the hospice election form. During the home visit, there was no documentation in the skilled facility chart. This was discussed with the Supervisor at the visit and the Hospice Executive Director.”

    Rule L0781. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3)(iii))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 1 patient records reviewed, to a patient residing in a skilled facility, the hospice had not provided the SNF with the required documentation. In the chart for RRHV#3, there was no documentation that the hospice provided the physician CTI and recert CTI. During the home visit, there was no documentation at the facility that the hospice had provided the documents to the SNF. This was discussed with the Supervisor at the visit and the Hospice Executive Director.”

    Rule L0781. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 25, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission12 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Sep 22, 2016.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 7.9 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5.3% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 94.9% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 49% at home, 27% in assisted living, 4% in a skilled nursing facility, 1% in an inpatient hospice, 18% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day7.9 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends5.3%
Visits near death94.9% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Savior Hospice LLC owns 100% directly since Dec 5, 2016.
  • 6 owners or officers are people: Jeffrey L Smith (corporate officer, 100%); Jeffrey L Smith (corporate director, 100%); Debjoti Sensharma (managing employee (under contract)); Jeffrey L Smith (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Leon A Driss (managing employee (under contract)); Cynthia Lynn Richardson (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Savior Healthcare Holdings, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 5, 2016
Jeffrey L. Smith Living TrustOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 5, 2016
Savior Hospice LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Dec 5, 2016

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 73% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 79% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 92.7% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 58.4% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 52 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 64 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 85028, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 12.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.