Hearth Record

Shanti Hospice, LLC

A hospice in Chandler, Arizona 85224

3180 North Alma School Road, Suite 2, Chandler, Arizona 85224. (480) 788-7284.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

8 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 82 hospices serving ZIP code 85224 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Sep 20, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

8 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Sep 20, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care8 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 228 words

    “Upon patient record review 5 of 14 (Patient #1,#2,#3,#6,#8) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment identifies the physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the hospice patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process. Patient#1,#3: The record indicates chaplain met with patient to perform the initial spiritual assessment. There is no evidence that a comprehensive assessment was completed where patient needs were identified. Documentation indicates patient was awake, frequency of future visits, provided spiritual care encouragement and support, and closed visit with prayer. Patient#2: The record indicates chaplain met with patient to perform the initial spiritual assessment on 4/5. There is no evidence that a comprehensive assessment was completed where patient needs were assessed. Patient#6: The record indicates chaplain met with patient to perform the initial spiritual assessment. Documentation states chaplain met with a wife and a friend as patient unable to verbalize. Documentation states patient and care concerns were discussed. There is no evidence what the concerns or needs are. Patient#8: The record indicates chaplain met with patient to perform the initial spiritual assessment on 9/13. Documentation states patient was in a deep sleep during visit, frequency was listed and closed in prayer. There is no evidence that a comprehensive assessment was completed where patient needs were identified.”

    Rule L0524. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 157 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 14 (Patient #1,#2,#4,#5,#10) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient#1: The record indicated for A&D zinc oxide cream to be applied one time daily. Thera is no evidence of a specific area of application. Corrected on site. Patient#2,#5,#10: The record indicated for A&D zinc oxide cream to be applied one time daily. There is no evidence of a specific area of application. Corrected on site. Patient#4: The record indicated for acetaminophen 325mg give 2 every 4 hours PRN pain/fever. There is no evidence of a parameter for when to administer for fever. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 176 words

    “Upon patient record review, 9 of 14 (Patient #1,#2,#3,#4,#6,#7,#8,#9,#10) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient#1,#2,#3,#4,#7,#8,#10: The record indicates the chaplain did make a visit to complete initial bereavement assessment. There is no evidence of a primary bereaved being identified. The assessment only stated the risk level. There is no evidence of of how the risk level was determined, topics assessed, or any needs, culture, or ability to cope. Patient#6,#9: The record indicates the chaplain did make a visit to complete initial bereavement assessment. The assessment only stated the risk level. There is no evidence of of how the risk level was determined, topics assessed, or any needs, culture, or ability to cope.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 97 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #6) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient#6: The record indicates patient had a wound on admit visit 7/19 which the nurse documents wound was assessed and measured. There is no evidence of wound being assessed/measured after admit until nurse visit on 8/20.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 337 words

    “Upon patient record review, 8 of 14 (Patient#2,#3,#4,#5,#6,#7,#8,#9) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient#2: The record indicated the patient was receiving wound care and was incontinent. There is no evidence of patient goals or interventions related to these needs on plan of care. COS. Patient#3: The record indicates patient has depression, incontinence, diabetes, and was receiving wound care. There is no evidence of patient problems goals or interventions related to these needs on plan of care. COS. Patient#4: The record indicates patient has aspiration precaution, dysphagia, and G tube care. There is no evidence of patient problems, goals or interventions related to these needs on plan of care. COS. Patient#5: The record indicates patient has diabetes (taking metformin), soft diet, dysphagia, and incontinence. There is no evidence of patient problems, goals or interventions related to these needs on plan of care. COS. Patient#6: The record indicate patient has dysphagia, puree diet, and thickened liquids. There is no evidence of patient problems, goals or interventions related to these needs on plan of care. On admit the documentation indicates patient had COVID. There is no evidence of problems, goals or interventions on plan of care. Patient#7: The record indicates the patient has incontinence. There is no evidence of patient problems, goals or interventions related to these needs on plan of care. COS. Patient#8: The record indicates the patient has ascites. There is no evidence of patient problems, goals or interventions related to these needs on plan of care. COS. Patient#9: The record indicates the patient has incontinence and dysphagia. There is no evidence of patient problems, goals or interventions related to these needs on plan of care. COS.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #6) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #6: The record indicates that the patient diet was changed to puree per nurse documentation on 9/3/24. There is no evidence of a physician order for change in diet. COS.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 302 words

    “Upon patient record review, 8 of 14 (Patient #3,#4,#5,#6,#7,#8,#9,#10) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient#3: The record indicates patient having oxygen concentrator, nebulizer, e tanks, protective underwear, incontinence supplies, and hygiene supplies There is no evidence these items on the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient#4: The record indicates patient having Oxygen concentrator and supplies, suction, and wound care supplies. There is no evidence these items on the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient#5: The record indicates patient having bed side table, shower bench, walker, hygiene supplies, incontinence supplies, and PPE supplies. There is no evidence these items on the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient#6: The record indicates patient having hospital bed, special mattress, half rails, bed side table, reclining wheelchair, oxygen concentrator, hoyer lift, e tanks, incontinence supplies, hygiene supplies. There is no evidence these items on the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient#7: The record indicates patient having walker, lift, shower chair, bedside table, incontinence supplies, hygiene supplies, and gloves. There is no evidence these items on the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient#8: The record indicates patient having oxygen concentrator, E-tanks, hygiene supplies, gloves. There is no evidence these items on the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient#9: The record indicates patient having wheelchair, hospital bed, bedside table, incontinence supplies, hygiene supplies, and gloves. There is no evidence these items on the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient#10: The record indicates patient having wheelchair with foot rest, hospital bed, mattress, bedside table, oxygen concentrator, shower bench, incontinence supplies, hygiene supplies, and gloves. There is no evidence these items on the plan of care. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 113 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #6,#9) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient#6: The record indicates per nurses documentation on 9/3 the patient’s diet was changed to puree. There is no evidence of an update to the plan of care reflecting problems/goals/interventions of this change. Patient#9: The record indicates per nurses documentation on 8/12 that patient diet was changed to soft diet and meds were to be crushed. There is no evidence of an update to the plan of care reflecting problems/goals/interventions of this change.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 20, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care8 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Dec 2, 2015.
  • Ownership: other.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.9 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.1% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 99% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 30% at home, 26% in assisted living, 43% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.9 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6.1%
Visits near death99.0% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 6 owners or officers are people: Bibhuti Banerjee (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Bibhuti Banerjee (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Bibhuti Banerjee (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Ana Cu (corporate officer, 0%); Ana Cu (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Monica M Banerjee (managing employee (under contract), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 90.91% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 73% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 82 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 85224, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 8.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 82 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 85224
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Shanti Hospice, LLC This hospice8
Traditions HealthNot given
Prism HospiceNot given
Valley Care Hospice, Inc.0
A Tlc Hospice LLC14
Sapphire HospiceNot given
Agave Hospice and Palliative CareNot given
Vital Hc, Inc.10
Copper Sky Hospice LLC4
Expert Hospice Care Inc.38
Universal Hospice Care ServicesNot given
Pristine Hospice LLC4

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.