Hearth Record

Select Home Hospice

A hospice in Mesa, Arizona 85202

65 S Sycamore Ste 2b, Mesa, Arizona 85202. (480) 608-7030.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 12 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

12 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 67 hospices serving ZIP code 85202 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Jun 27, 2025: a complaint inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

12 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

12 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Aug 16, 2024: complaint inspection by the state12 deficiencies
  • Develop EP Plan, Review and Update Annually (42 CFR 418.113(a))

    “Based on review of hospice documents, observations and interviews, it was determined the hospice failed to comply with regulations required for an Emergency Preparedness Plan. This deficient practice poses a risk to patients and staff members health and safety if staff are not able to provide patients a safe environment during an emergency situation. Findings include: A request was made for the hospice Emergency Preparedness Plan, not provided. Interview with Administrator and DON confirmed that no Emergency Preparedness Plan existed for the hospice.”

    Rule E0004. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 132 words

    “Based on review of documents, observations and interviews, it was determined that the hospice: Failed to involve the patient in the development of the patients plan of care Failed to update the patient care plan regarding missed visits and calendar changes. This deficient practice poses a risk to the health and safety of patients if patients are not provided consistent care and services. Findings include: Review of patient records for Patients #1 through #12 revealed no documentation of communication regarding missed visits. Review of patient records for Patients #1 through #12 revealed no documented updates or any subsequent changes in the plan of care regarding missed visits. Interview with Administrator and DON confirmed that no missed visit communication was made with patients and no updates were made to the plan of care.”

    Rule L0513. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 127 words

    “Based on hospice documents, observations and interviews, it was determined the hospice failed to develop and maintain a system of communication and integration to provide for and ensure the ongoing sharing of information between all disciplines. This deficient practice poses a risk to the health and safety of patients if patients are not provided consistent care and services. Findings include: Review of patient records for Patients #1 through #12 revealed no documentation of communication regarding missed visits. Review of patient records for Patients #1 through #12 revealed no documented updates or changes in the plan of care regarding missed visits. Interview with Administrator and DON confirmed that no missed visit communication was made with patients or physicians, and no updates were made to the plan of care.”

    Rule L0557. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Program scope (42 CFR 418.58(a)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 121 words

    “Based on review of documents and interview, it was determined that the Hospice facility failed to assess quality in all areas of operations that might be adversely affecting patient care or core hospice services. This deficient practice poses a risk to patients if the Hospice facility does not monitor services provided to ensure quality care and services are being provided to patients. Cross reference: L0559, L0561, L0563, L0579 Findings include: Request was made for the Hospice facilitys Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan. The Hospice could not provide one. QAPI plan was requested, not received. Interview with Administrator on 08/15/2024 confirmed that the Hospice did not have a QAPI Plan in place and was not conducting or monitoring QAPI indicators.”

    Rule L0562. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Program data (42 CFR 418.58(b)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 101 words

    “Based on interviews, record review and observation it was determined that the governing body failed to ensure the quality assessment and performance improvement program (QAPI) was in compliance or appoint an individual to administer a QAPI program for the hospice. This deficiency poses a risk to the identification and reduction of adverse events for patients. Request made for the Governing Body minutes regarding the Quality assessment and performance improvement program (QAPI) for the past 12 months, none was provided. Interview with Administrator on 08/15/2024 confirmed that no governing body minutes were documented, no information was presented at the time of survey.”

    Rule L0565. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Executive responsibilities (42 CFR 418.58(e)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 137 words

    “Based on review of documents and interview, it was determined that the hospice failed to designate an individual(s) to operate the QAPI program. This deficient practice poses a risk to patients if the Hospice facility does not monitor services provided to ensure quality care and services are being provided to patients. Findings include: Request was made to speak to the individual in charge of the Hospice facilitys QAPI program. The Hospice facility has no designated individual. Request was made for the Hospice facilitys Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan. The Hospice could not provide one. Interview with Administrator on 08/15/2024 confirmed that The Hospice did not have a designated person in charge of the QAPI program.Administratot confirmed that the Hospice did not have a QAPI Plan in place and was not conducting or monitoring QAPI indicators.”

    Rule L0576. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 148 words

    “Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the hospice failed to follow accepted standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases. This deficient practice poses the potential risk to health and safety of patients when infections and communicable diseases are spread amongst patients and staff of the hospice. Findings include: A copy of the facility’s policy regarding infection control was requested. None was provided. Review of personnel files revealed that TB testing was only documented in two (2) out of five (5) employees in the personnel files Interview with Administrator and DON on 08/15/2024 confirmed that personnel files revealed that TB testing was only documented in two (2) out of five (5) employees in the personnel files. Interview with DON on 08/15/2024 confirmed that there was no documentation of TB testing or surveillance survey for the other three (3) staff members”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 130 words

    “Based on review of facility policy, record review, and interview it was determined that the hospice failed to provide supervised assessment and competency based orientation to personnel. This deficiency poses a risk to the patients if unqualified staff are providing patient care. Cross reference: L0583 Findings include: Hospice Policy No. 4A.10.1, and 4A.14.1 titled, “;Initial” and “Competency Based Orientation”, respectively, revealed, “;... Policy Hospice ensures that the competency of all personnel is assessed on hire, prior to providing care to hospice patients. A review of Clinical Employees files #2, #4, #5, #8, #9, and #10 revealed that no skills verification had been performed or documented by the DON or a supervisory clinical member. Interview with Administrator and DON on 08/15/2024 confirmed that no skills verification was being conducted with employees.”

    Rule L0617. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Role (42 CFR 418.78(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 93 words

    “Based on review of documents, personnel files and interviews, it was determined that the Hospice facility failed to ensure volunteers were being utilized to assist in providing services to patients. This deficient practice poses a risk to patients when volunteers are not utilized to assist in meeting the needs of patients. Findings include: Review of all personnel files for Select Home Hospice revealed no designated Volunteer Coordinator or volunteers being used in the hospice facility. Interview with Administrator on 0815/2024 confirmed the Hospice does not utilize volunteers or have a designated Volunteer coordinator.”

    Rule L0644. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 139 words

    “Based on record review, observation and interviews it has been determined the governing body has failed to ensure responsibility for hospice services and continuous quality assessment and performance improvement. This standard deficiency poses a risk to patients and family members health and safety. Findings include: Request made for the documentation of individuals designated to implement and manage the hospice quality assessment and performance improvement (QAPI) program. None were provided. A request was made for the Governing Body minutes for 2023 and 2024 to review Governing Body approval of QAPI information, none were provided. Interview with Administrator on August 15, 2024 confirmed that there was no QAPI program at the facility and no QAPI coordinator or designee who had been assigned to operate a QAPI program for the hospice. Governing Body minutes for 2023 or 2024 were requested, not received.”

    Rule L0651. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Professional management responsibility (42 CFR 418.100(e))

    “Based on record review and interview it was determined that the hospice facility failed to ensure responsibility and oversight of services provided under arrangement. This standard deficiency poses a risk to the health and safety of patients. Findings include: Request was made for the hospice facilities current contracts with other agencies, individuals, or organizations to furnish any services under arrangement. None were provided. Interview with Administrator and DON on 08/15/2024 confirmed that no hospice services contracts were available for review.”

    Rule L0655. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Retrieval of clinical records (42 CFR 418.104(f))

    The inspectors’ words, 144 words

    “Based on interview and observation it was determined that the hospice facility failed to make clinical records readily available upon request by an appropriate authority. This standard deficiency poses a risk in determining the hospices compliance with patient health and safety requirements. Findings include: A review of Select Home Hospice Patient Record Retention No. 11.8.1 titled “RECORD RETENTION” revealed the process and timeframes of retention of clinical, administrative, financial and personnel records. Select Home Hospice’s policy is that the clinical record shall be retained for six (6) years... Request for five (5) patient medical records for discharged patients was requested. None were provided. Interview on August 16, 2024 with Administrator confirmed that the five (5) of 5 of patient files were missing and could not be located at the facility. Administrator stated, “I can’t find the records. I have no idea where they are.””

    Rule L0685. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 27, 2025Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Aug 16, 2024Complaint inspection by the state12 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jan 12, 2023.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 12 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 84% at home, 13% in assisted living, 3% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • CMS’s ownership file has no owners listed for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 67 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 85202, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 12.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.