Hearth Record

Copper State Hospice Inc.

A hospice in Tucson, Arizona 85718

1760 East River Road Suite 117, Tucson, Arizona 85718. (520) 612-2181.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 32 hospices serving ZIP code 85718 had 5.5.

The last inspection on record was on May 27, 2025: a follow-up inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Apr 17, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner5 deficiencies
  • Furnishing of non-core services (42 CFR 418.70)

    The inspectors’ words, 125 words

    “It is required that a hospice ensures that “non-core” services are available and provided directly by the hospice or under arrangement. THIS IS A CMS CONDITION LEVEL DEFICIENCY. This CONDITION of participation was not met as evidenced by document review and interviews with the Executive Director, which revealed the hospice: Failed to provide occupational therapy services, directly or under arrangement, in a manner consistent with accepted standards of practice [HCDT.1.I/L652/418.100(c)(1)]. The cumulative effect of these deficiencies has resulted in the hospice agency’s inability to ensure the provision of quality hospice care for the condition of participation CFR 418.70: Furnishing of non-core services. The collective deficient practice illustrated systemic process failures that had the potential to affect all patients receiving hospice aide services from the agency.”

    Rule L0601. Condition-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    The inspectors’ words, 229 words

    “It is required that hospice volunteers provide day-to-day administrative or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals five percent (5%) of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract staff. The hospice documents the cost savings achieved through volunteers. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review and interview. The document review revealed that the agency did not ensure the volunteers provided day-today administrative or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals five percent (5%) of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract staff. A review of the Volunteer Activity Report on 04/17/2025 for the period 01/01/2024-12/31/2024 revealed a cost savings of 0.03%. The report revealed a cost savings of 0.22% for the period 04/16/2024-04/16/2025. The agency did not ensure that that hospice volunteers provided administrative or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals five percent (5%) of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract staff. During a joint review of the Volunteer Activity Report and interview on 04/17/2025, the Executive Director agreed that the agency did not meet the minimum five percent cost savings requirement for the periods 01/01/2024-12/31/2024 and 04/16/2024-04/16/2025. Additionally, the Executive Director stated, “We are working on new recruitment efforts to get more volunteers.””

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Services (42 CFR 418.100(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 166 words

    “It is required that the hospice is primarily engaged in providing the following care and services in a manner consistent with accepted standards of practice: Physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech-language pathology services. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review and interview. A review of documents revealed that the agency did not ensure occupational therapy services were available. Agency Policy, “Rehabilitative Care Services, Policy No. 2-011.1,” stated in part, “The provision of rehabilitation services will be appropriate to the patient’s and family’s end of life goals, care environment, and comfort needs. All services will be provided in accordance with accepted standards of practice by or under the direction of a qualified physical, occupational, or speech therapist.” During an interview on 04/17/2025, the Executive Director agreed that the agency did not have a occupational therapist (OT) or contract for occupational therapy services available to patients. Additionally, the Executive Director stated, “We don’t have one. We are working on getting an OT from an agency.””

    Rule L0652. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 191 words

    “It is required that the hospice assesses the skills and competencies of all individuals providing care, including volunteers providing services and, as necessary, provides in-service training and education programs where required. The hospice has written policies and procedures describing the method(s) of assessing competency and maintains a written description of the in-service training provided during the previous 12 months. This standard was not met as evidenced by interview and personnel record review. In 3 of 10 (30%) personnel records reviewed revealed the hospice did not ensure the competencies of employees and volunteers were assessed. PERSONNEL RECORD 7: The Social Worker was hired on 07/08/2024. There was no documented evidence that hospice assessed the competency of the Social Worker. PERSONNEL RECORD 8: The Spiritual Counselor was hired on 09/04/2024. There was no documented evidence that hospice assessed the competency of the Spiritual Counselor. PERSONNEL RECORD 10: The Volunteer was hired on 11/15/2024. There was no documented evidence that hospice assessed the competency of the Volunteer. During a joint record review and interview on 04/17/2025, the Executive Director stated, “These were missed. We need to establish a plan for ensuring these are done.””

    Rule L0663. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 221 words

    “It is required that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care or is discharged from hospice per hospice regulation §418.26 (i.e., no longer terminally ill), the hospice forwards to the patient’s attending physician a copy of the hospice discharge summary and the patient’s record, if requested. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 2 (100%) clinical records reviewed, in which the patient revoked or was discharged for no longer being terminally ill, it was revealed that the hospice did not ensure the discharge summary was forwarded to the patient’s attending physician. CLINICAL RECORD 10: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 06/28/2024. The patient was discharged, seeking aggressive treatment at the hospital, on 12/21/2024. There was no documented evidence the discharge summary was provided to the attending physician. CLINICAL RECORD 11: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 04/23/2024. The patient was discharged, no longer terminally ill, on 07/19/2024. There was no documented evidence the discharge summary was provided to the attending physician. During a joint review of the record and interview on 04/17/2025, the Executive Director agreed there was no documented evidence the discharge summary was sent to the attending physician. Additionally, the Executive Director stated, “We need to update our process with a checklist and delegate the task.””

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 27, 2025Follow-up inspection by the Community Health Accreditation PartnerNo deficiencies cited
Apr 17, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner5 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jul 14, 2022.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 19.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 4.9% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 94.9% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 14% at home, 84% in assisted living, 2% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day19.3 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends4.9%
Visits near death94.9% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Esperanza Hospice, LLC owns 100% directly since Oct 31, 2023.
  • Esperanza Hospice, LLC runs it.
  • 6 owners or officers are people: Brian Schemp (owns 5% or more through other companies, 100%); Brian Schemp (corporate officer, 100%); Brian Schemp (corporate director, 100%); Brian Schemp (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Jason L Schemp (managing employee (under contract)); Yvonne Snyder (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Esperanza Hospice, LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Oct 31, 2023
Esperanza Hospice, LLCRuns it (operational or managerial control)100%Oct 31, 2023

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 78% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 80% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 98.7% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 68.6% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 32 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 85718, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5.5; this one had 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.