Hearth Record

Prestige Health Hospice

A hospice in Tucson, Arizona 85714

4555 S Palo Verde Rd Suite 163, Tucson, Arizona 85714. (520) 358-0946.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 16 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2026. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

16 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 26 hospices serving ZIP code 85714 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Apr 28, 2026: a follow-up inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.

2 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

16 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2026. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

16 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Apr 28, 2026: follow-up inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner1 deficiency
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 355 words

    “It is required that the hospice Interdisciplinary Group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completes an initial comprehensive assessment no later than five (5) calendar days after the election of hospice care, in accordance with CMS §418.24–the elements of the hospice care election statement. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 4 of 10 (40%) clinical records reviewed, in which a spiritual counselor was accepted, the agency did not ensure that the spiritual counselor when requested, provided a full spiritual assessment in the first 5 days after the election of the hospice benefit. CLINICAL RECORD 1: Election of the hospice benefit was 04/06/2026 with a primary diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. The initial comprehensive assessment was documented 04/06/2026 with a request for spiritual services. There was no documented contact from the spiritual counselor. The Interdisciplinary Group documented twice monthly spiritual counselor visits without an initial assessment. CLINICAL RECORD 2: Election of the hospice benefit was 04/05/2026 with a primary diagnosis of Multiple myeloma. The initial comprehensive assessment was documented 04/05/2026 with a request for spiritual services. There was no documented contact from the spiritual counselor evident in the record. CLINICAL RECORD 9: Election of the hospice benefit was 04/06/2026 with a primary diagnosis of Hemiplegia following cerebral infarction. The initial comprehensive assessment was documented 04/06/2026 with a request for spiritual services. There was no documented contact from the spiritual counselor evident in the record, nor was an initial spiritual assessment completed by the registered nurse. CLINICAL RECORD 10: Election of the hospice benefit was 04/04/2026 with a primary diagnosis of Heart failure. The initial comprehensive assessment was documented 04/04/2026 with a request for spiritual services. There was no documented contact from the spiritual counselor evident in the record. An interview was conducted with the Administrator on 04/28/2026 regarding the initial spiritual counselor visits not being completed. The Administrator advised the “spiritual counselor had been receiving additional training and was still ‘missing the mark’. They had decided and made a job offer to a replacement spiritual counselor who would be coming on in less than 1 month.””

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

Mar 18, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner15 deficiencies
  • Establishment of the Emergency Program (EP) (42 CFR 418.113)

    The inspectors’ words, 188 words

    “It is required that the hospice maintains a written comprehensive emergency preparedness program that demonstrates compliance with applicable federal, state, and local emergency preparedness requirements, uses an “all hazards” approach, describes the hospice’s approach to meeting the health, safety, and security of the staff, the patient population, with attention to their mobility, [and] describes how the hospice coordinates with other healthcare facilities, as well as the community, during an emergency or disaster situation. THIS IS A CMS CONDITION LEVEL FINDING This CONDITION was not met as evidenced by document review, personnel record review, and interview which revealed the agency: Failed to provide training for all employees, including contractors, in Emergency Preparedness Training at least annually, according to agency policy{ HSEP.5.D/E37/418.113(d)(1)}; and Failed to test the emergency preparedness plan annually, as required by agency policy[HSEP.6.I/E39/418.113(d)(2)}. The cumulative effect of these systemic problems resulted in the hospice agency’s inability to ensure the provision of quality health care in a safe environment for the condition of participation, CFR 418.113: Emergency Preparedness. The deficient practice illustrated systemic process failures that had the potential to affect all patients cared for by the agency.”

    Rule E0001. Condition-level.

  • Hospice aide and homemaker services (42 CFR 418.76)

    The inspectors’ words, 179 words

    “It is required that all hospice aides provided services ordered by the Interdisciplinary Group, included in the plan of care, permitted to be performed under state law and regulation, and consistent with the hospice aide training. THIS IS A CMS CONDITION LEVEL DEFICIENCY This CONDITION was not met as evidenced by clinical records review, interview, document review, and observation, which revealed the hospice: Failed to ensure the agency provided at least 12 hours of in-service training during each 12-month period {HSRM.18.I/L620/ 418.76(d)}; Failed to ensure that the Hospice Aide (HA) followed the plan of care as ordered{HCDT.16.I/L626 /418.76(g)(2)(i)}; Failed to ensure that a Registered Nurse made an annual on-site visit to observe and assess the care provided by the aide{HSRM.27.D/L632 / 418.76(h)(2)}. The cumulative effect of these systemic problems resulted in the hospice agency’s inability to ensure the provision of quality health care in a safe environment for the condition of participation CFR 418.76, Hospice Aide and Homemaker Services. The deficient practice illustrated systemic process failures that had the potential to affect all patients cared for by the agency.”

    Rule L0607. Condition-level.

  • EP Training Program (42 CFR 418.113(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 823 words

    “It is required that the hospice maintain an emergency preparedness training program that is based on the emergency preparedness plan, risk assessment, policies and procedures, and the communication plan. The training program is reviewed and updated at least every two (2) years. The hospice EP training program includes the following: For all new hospice employees and those providing services under arrangement, initial training in EP policies and procedures consistent with their expected roles; Demonstration of staff knowledge of emergency procedures; EP training of all hospice employees and individuals providing services under arrangement at least every two (2) years; More frequent training occurs if there is a significant update of EP policies and procedures; A periodic review and rehearsal of the hospice’s EP plan with hospice employees (including non-employee staff), with special emphasis placed on carrying out the procedures necessary to protect patients and others; and documentation of each training including the date(s), participants, and content. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review, interview, and personnel record review. In 10 of 10 (100%) personnel records reviewed revealed that the agency did not ensure to provide training for all employees, including contractors, in Emergency Preparedness Training at least annually, according to agency policy. DOCUMENT 2: Agency Policy, Emergency Disaster Management, AD.E10, stated in part, “Hospice employees receive annual in-service training on the Emergency Disaster Management Plan and their roles and responsibilities.” DOCUMENT 3: Agency Policy, Emergency Preparedness Plan, 6.1, stated in part, “All employees, including contractors, are oriented about their responsibilities on the Agency Emergency Preparedness and Response Plan upon hire, and the plan is reviewed at least annually with an emergency drill performed. Training will include emergency preparedness training at least annually, and maintain documentation of all emergency preparedness training.” PERSONNEL RECORD 1: The Administrator/Director of Nursing/Registered Nurse/Volunteer Coordinator was hired on 05/24/2022. The new hire orientation included education about their responsibilities on the Agency Emergency Preparedness and Response Plan. There was no documented evidence of Emergency Preparedness training annually between 06/01/2023-03/16/2026 as required by agency policy. PERSONNEL RECORD 2: The Alternate Administrator/Alternate Director of Nursing/Registered Nurse was hired on 05/24/2022. The new hire orientation included education about their responsibilities on the Agency Emergency Preparedness and Response Plan. There was no documented evidence of Emergency Preparedness training annually between 06/01/2023-03/16/2026 as required by agency policy. PERSONNEL RECORD 3: The Hospice Medical Director was hired on 01/03/2024. The new hire orientation included education about their responsibilities on the Agency Emergency Preparedness and Response Plan. There was no documented evidence of Emergency Preparedness training annually between 01/01/2025-03/16/2026 as required by agency policy. PERSONNEL RECORD 4: The Alternate Medical Director was hired on 11/02/2022. The new hire orientation included education about their responsibilities on the Agency Emergency Preparedness and Response Plan. There was no documented evidence of Emergency Preparedness training annually between 06/01/2023-03/16/2026 as required by agency policy. PERSONNEL RECORD 5: The Hospice Aide (CNA) was hired on 12/21/2022. The new hire orientation included education about their responsibilities on the Agency Emergency Preparedness and Response Plan. There was no documented evidence of Emergency Preparedness training annually between 06/01/2023-03/16/2026 as required by agency policy. PERSONNEL RECORD 6: The Chaplain was hired on 07/21/2023. The new hire orientation included education about their responsibilities on the Agency Emergency Preparedness and Response Plan. There was no documented evidence of Emergency Preparedness training annually between 07/01/2024-03/16/2026 as required by agency policy. PERSONNEL RECORD 7: The Master Social Worker/Bereavement Coordinator was hired on 05/30/2023. The new hire orientation included education about their responsibilities on the Agency Emergency Preparedness and Response Plan. There was no documented evidence of Emergency Preparedness training annually between 06/01/2024-03/16/2026 as required by agency policy. PERSONNEL RECORD 8: The Nurse Practitioner was hired on 10/07/2024. The new hire orientation included education about their responsibilities on the Agency Emergency Preparedness and Response Plan. There was no documented evidence of Emergency Preparedness training annually between 01/01/2025-03/16/2026 as required by agency policy. PERSONNEL RECORD 9: The Registered Nurse was hired on 01/30/2023. The new hire orientation included education about their responsibilities on the Agency Emergency Preparedness and Response Plan. There was no documented evidence of Emergency Preparedness training annually between 06/01/2023-03/16/2026 as required by agency policy. PERSONNEL RECORD 10: The Volunteer was hired on 10/03/2023. The new hire orientation included education about their responsibilities on the Agency Emergency Preparedness and Response Plan. There was no documented evidence of Emergency Preparedness training annually between 01/01/2024-03/16/2026 as required by agency policy. During a joint record review and interview on 03/18/2026, the Administrator (Personnel Record 1) agreed that there was no documented evidence that the employees received training in Emergency Preparedness annually as required by agency policy. Additionally, the Administrator stated, “I was in the field a lot providing patient care until I hired another nurse. These administrative items fell to the wayside. I was busy with CMS audits, and a lot of paperwork didn’t get done. I was wearing too many hats.””

    Rule E0037. Standard-level.

  • EP Testing Requirements (42 CFR 418.113(d)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 382 words

    “It is required that testing: The hospice providing care in the patient’s home conducts exercises to test the emergency preparedness plan annually, including: Participation in a full-scale exercise that is community-based every two (2) years. When a community-based exercise is not accessible, testing includes participation in an individual, facility-based functional exercise every two (2) years. If the organization experiences a natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the organization is exempt from engaging in its next required full-scale community-based exercise or individual, facility-based functional exercise following the onset of the emergency event. Conducting an additional exercise every two (2) years, opposite the year that a full-scale exercise or functional exercise is conducted. This exercise may include, but is not limited to: A second full-scale exercise that is community-based or a facility-based functional exercise; or A mock disaster drill; or A tabletop exercise or workshop that is led by a facilitator that includes a group discussion using a narrated, clinically relevant emergency scenario and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge the emergency plan. This standard was not met, as evidenced by document review and interview. A review of the Emergency Preparedness Binder revealed that the agency did not ensure to test the emergency preparedness plan annually, as required by agency policy. DOCUMENT 3: Agency Policy, Emergency Preparedness Plan, 6.1, stated in part, “The Agency will conduct exercises to test the Emergency Plan at least annually.” DOCUMENT 5: The Emergency Preparedness Binder revealed that there was no documented evidence that the emergency preparedness plan was tested at least annually between 06/01/2023-03/16/2026. During a joint record review and interview on 03/18/2026, the Administrator (Personnel Record 1) agreed that there was no documented evidence that the agency tested the Emergency Preparedness Plan annually as required by agency policy. Additionally, the Administrator stated, “We last tested in 2022. I was in the field a lot, providing patient care until I hired another nurse. These administrative items fell to the wayside. I was busy with CMS audits, and a lot of paperwork didn’t get done. I was wearing too many hats.” A review of the Emergency Preparedness Binder revealed that the agency did not ensure to test the emergency preparedness plan annually, as required by agency policy.”

    Rule E0039. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 439 words

    “It is required that the documented comprehensive assessment include a drug profile that contains the patient’s current: Prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) drugs; Supplements; Herbal remedies; Other alternative treatments that could affect drug therapy. The drug profile is updated per the hospice policy and procedure, but at a minimum, at the time of each comprehensive assessment and/or when a new medication is added or changes are made to existing medication. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, interview, and observation. In 2 of 14 (14%) clinical records reviewed and home visits observed, the hospice did not ensure that the comprehensive assessment included an updated medication profile that contained the patient’s current medications. CLINICAL RECORD 3/HOME VISIT 2: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 02/04/2025 with a diagnosis of Senile Degeneration of the Brain. The patient resided in a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF). During the home visit with the Registered Nurse (RN) (Personnel Record 9) on 03/17/2026, the patient’s hospice medication profile (printed on 03/16/2026) and SNF medication profile were compared. The hospice medication profile revealed the patient is receiving Vitamin C 500mg 1 x day and Melatonin 5mg at bedtime. The SNF medication profile revealed Vitamin C 500mg 2 x day (02/04/2025) and Melatonin 6mg at bedtime (02/04/2025). The hospice medication profile revealed Metformin 1000mg 2 x day; the SNF discontinued the Metformin on 03/26/2025. The hospice medication profile revealed Clonidine 0.1mg every 6 hours prn systolic greater than 185; the SNF discontinued the Clonidine on 03/26/2025. During the visit, the Registered Nurse stated, “I didn’t realize these weren’t updated. I will get them updated right away.” CLINICAL RECORD 6/HOME VISIT 1: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 01/02/2026 with a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary disease. The patient resided in an Assisted Living Facility (ALF). During the home visit with the Hospice Aide (HA) (Personnel Record 5) on 03/17/2026, the patient’s hospice medication profile (printed on 03/16/2026) and ALF medication profile were compared. The hospice medication profile revealed Tramadol 50mg every 6 hours as needed for pain (01/15/2026) and Loperamide 2mg four times a day as needed for loose stool (01/30/2026). The ALF medication profile did not include Tramadol or Loperamide. The ALF medication profile revealed Bisacodyl 10mg suppository one daily as needed for constipation (10/17/2025). The hospice medication profile did not include Bisacodyl. During a joint record review and interview on 03/18/2026, the Administrator (Personnel Record 1) agreed that the medication profiles were not updated with the medications identified. Additionally, the Administrator stated, “The nurse should be checking during visits, but these weren’t updated; we need to discuss expectations with the nurses.””

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 357 words

    “It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care: Reflects patient and family goals; Identifies planned interventions based on problems identified in the initial and updated comprehensive assessments; Includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness, including the following: Measurable outcomes anticipated from implementing and coordinating the plan of care. This standard was not met, as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 4 of 14 (29%) clinical records reviewed revealed that the agency did not ensure that the plan of care included measurable outcomes for the problems identified. CLINICAL RECORD 1: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 04/07/2025 with a diagnosis of Diastolic (congestive) Heart Failure. The Plan of Care (POC) identified pain as a problem on 04/07/2025 with a goal “patient’s quality of life will be at an optimal level.” The patient’s optimal quality of life was not identified. CLINICAL RECORD 3: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 02/04/2025 with a diagnosis of Senile Degeneration of the Brain. The Plan of Care (POC) identified pain as a problem on 02/04/2025 with the goal “Patient’s quality of life will be at an optimal level.” The patient’s optimal quality of life was not identified. CLINICAL RECORD 11: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 01/21/2025 and was discharged on 04/19/2025 with a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. The Plan of Care (POC) identified pain as a problem on 01/22/2025 with the goal “patient’s quality of life will be at an optimal level.” The patient’s optimal quality of life was not identified. CLINICAL RECORD 12: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 02/13/2025 and was discharged on 07/12/2025 with a diagnosis of Cirrhosis of the liver. The Plan of Care (POC) identified pain as a problem on 2/13/2025 with the goal “patient’s quality of life will be at an optimal level.” The patient’s optimal quality of life was not identified. During a joint record review and interview on 03/18/2026, the Administrator (Personnel Record 1) agreed that the patient’s optimal quality of life was not identified. Additionally, the Administrator stated, “These aren’t measurable. We are updating them now.””

    Rule L0548. Standard-level.

  • Program activities (42 CFR 418.58(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 262 words

    “It is required that performance improvement activities track adverse patient events, analyze the causes, implement preventive action, and mechanisms that include feedback and learning throughout the hospice. This standard was not met, as evidenced by document review and interview. A review of the QAPI Binder revealed that the agency did not ensure to analyze the causes of adverse patient events and implemented preventive action and mechanisms that include feedback and learning throughout the hospice. DOCUMENT 6: The QAPI Binder revealed a QAPI Committee Meeting on 07/09/2025, which documented 3 infections and 2 falls for the quarter. A QAPI Committee Meeting on 10/15/2025 documented 10 infections and 6 falls for the quarter. A QAPI Committee Meeting on 01/14/2026 documented 17 infections and 27 falls for the quarter. There was no documented evidence that the agency analyzed the data to determine the cause of increasing infections and falls. During a joint record review and interview on 03/18/2026, the Administrator (Personnel Record 1) agreed that there was no documented evidence that the data for increasing infections and falls were analyzed to determine the cause. Additionally, the Administrator stated, “I was in the field a lot providing patient care until I hired another nurse. These administrative items fell to the wayside. I was busy with CMS audits, and a lot of paperwork didn’t get done. I was wearing too many hats.” A review of the QAPI Binder revealed that the agency did not ensure to analyze the causes of adverse patient events and implement preventive action and mechanisms that include feedback and learning throughout the hospice.”

    Rule L0569. Standard-level.

  • Licensed professional services (42 CFR 418.62(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 533 words

    “It is required that licensed professionals participate in hospice-sponsored in-service training. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review, interview, and personnel record review. In 10 of 10 (100%) personnel records reviewed, the agency did not ensure that the employees completed the required annual in-services as required by agency policy. DOCUMENT 4: Agency Policy, Staff Education, HR.S55, stated in part, “Non-direct personnel have a minimum of 8 hours of ongoing education per year. Direct Care Personnel must have a minimum of 12 hours of ongoing education during each 12-month period. Yearly in-service requirements include, but are not limited to: Infection Control, HIPAA, Medical Device Act/Reporting, Emergency Management/Disaster Training, Ethics, Methods for coping with work-related issues of grief, loss, and change, Compliance Plan, Patient Rights and Responsibilities, Communication Barriers and Cultural Diversity, and How to handle complaints/grievances. The Director of Nursing maintains a written description of in-service training provided during the previous 12 months.” PERSONNEL RECORD 1: The Administrator/Director of Nursing/Registered Nurse/Volunteer Coordinator was hired on 05/24/2022 and completed in-service education in November 2022. There was no documented evidence that the required in-services were completed annually in 2023, 2024, 2025, and through 03/16/2026. PERSONNEL RECORD 2: The Alternate Administrator/Alternate Director of Nursing/Registered Nurse was hired on 05/24/2022. There was no documented evidence that the required in-services were completed annually in 2023, 2024, 2025, and through 03/16/2026. PERSONNEL RECORD 3: The Hospice Medical Director was hired on 01/03/2024. There was no documented evidence that the required in-services were completed annually in 2025 through 03/16/2026. PERSONNEL RECORD 4: The Alternate Medical Director was hired on 11/02/2022. There was no documented evidence that the required in-services were completed annually in 2023, 2024, 2025, and through 03/16/2026. PERSONNEL RECORD 5: The Hospice Aide (CNA) was hired on 12/21/2022. There was no documented evidence that the required in-services were completed annually in 2023, 2024, 2025, and through 03/16/2026. PERSONNEL RECORD 6: The Chaplain was hired on 07/21/2023. There was no documented evidence that the required in-services were completed annually in 2024, 2025, and through 03/16/2026. PERSONNEL RECORD 7: The Master Social Worker/Bereavement Coordinator was hired on 05/30/2023. There was no documented evidence that the required in-services were completed annually in 2024, 2025, and through 03/16/2026. PERSONNEL RECORD 8: The Nurse Practitioner was hired on 10/07/2024. There was no documented evidence that the required in-services were completed annually in 2025, and through 03/16/2026. PERSONNEL RECORD 9: The Registered Nurse was hired on 01/30/2023. There was no documented evidence that the required in-services were completed annually in 2024, 2025, and through 03/16/2026. PERSONNEL RECORD 10: The Volunteer was hired on 10/03/2023. There was no documented evidence that the required in-services were completed annually in 2024, 2025, and through 03/16/2026. During a joint record review and interview on 03/18/2026, the Administrator (Personnel Record 1) agreed that there was no documented evidence that the employees completed the required annual in-services as required by agency policy. Additionally, the Administrator stated, “I was in the field a lot providing patient care until I hired another nurse. These administrative items fell to the wayside. I was busy with CMS audits, and a lot of paperwork didn’t get done. I was wearing too many hats.””

    Rule L0586. Standard-level.

  • In-service training (42 CFR 418.76(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 236 words

    “It is required that a hospice aide receive at least 12 hours of in-service training during each 12-month period. In-service training may occur while an aide is furnishing care to a patient. In-service training may be offered by any organization and is supervised by a registered nurse. The hospice maintains documentation that demonstrates that requirements 1 and 2, above, have been met for each aide. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review, interview, and personnel record review. In 1 of 1 (100%) personnel records of hospice aides reviewed revealed that the agency did not ensure to provide at least 12 hours of in-service training during each 12-month period. DOCUMENT 4: Agency Policy, Staff Education, HR.S55, stated in part, “All Hospice Aides must have a total of twelve (12) in-services annually.” PERSONNEL RECORD 5: The Hospice Aide (CNA) was hired on 12/21/2022. There was no documented evidence of in-service training between 06/01/2023-03/16/2026. During a joint record review and interview on 03/18/2026, the Administrator (Personnel Record 1) agreed that there was no documented evidence that the hospice aide received 12 hours of in-service training between June 2023-March 16, 2026. Additionally, the Administrator stated, “I was in the field a lot providing patient care until I hired another nurse. These administrative items fell to the wayside. I was busy with CMS audits, and a lot of paperwork didn’t get done. I was wearing too many hats.””

    Rule L0620. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 299 words

    “It is required that a hospice aide provide services ordered by the Interdisciplinary Group; Included in the plan of care. This standard was not met, as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 12 (17%) clinical records of patients who received Hospice Aide services reviewed revealed that the agency did not ensure that the Hospice Aide (HA) followed the plan of care as ordered. CLINICAL RECORD 2: The hospice aide plan of care dated 07/25/2024 ordered hospice aide services twice weekly with instructions to shower twice weekly. For the week of 01/21/2026-01/27/2026, two visits were completed by the hospice aide. The second visit of the week on 01/22/2026 documented that a bed bath was given. For the week of 03/08/2026-03/14/2026, two visits were completed by the hospice aide. The second visit of the week on 03/12/2026 documented that a bed bath was given. The hospice aide’s plan of care did not include a bed bath as an ordered task. CLINICAL RECORD 3/HOME VISIT 2: The hospice aide plan of care dated 02/04/2025 ordered hospice aide services twice weekly with instructions to shower twice weekly. For the week of 01/04/2026-01/10/2026, two visits were completed by the hospice aide. The visits on 01/05/2026 and 01/08/2026 documented that a bed bath was given. For the week of 03/08/2026-03/14/2026, two visits were completed by the hospice aide. The visits on 03/09/2026 and 03/12/2026 documented that a bed bath was given. The hospice aide’s plan of care did not include a bed bath as an ordered task. During a joint record review and interview on 03/18/2026, the Administrator (Personnel Record 1) agreed that the hospice aide did not follow the plan of care as ordered. Additionally, the Administrator stated, “Both patients should be getting showers since that is what is ordered.””

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 235 words

    “It is required that a registered nurse make an annual on-site visit to the location where a patient is receiving care in order to observe and assess each hospice aide while he or she is performing care per the hospice’s policies and procedures. This standard was not met as evidenced by interview and personnel record review. In 1 of 1 (100%) personnel records of hospice aides reviewed revealed that the agency did not ensure that a Registered Nurse made an annual on-site visit to observe and assess the care provided by the aide. PERSONNEL RECORD 5: The Hospice Aide (CNA) was hired on 12/21/2022. There was no documented evidence that a Registered Nurse made an annual on-site visit to the location where a patient is receiving care in order to observe and assess each hospice aide while he or she is performing care in 2024, 2025, and through 03/16/2026. During a joint record review and interview on 03/18/2026, the Administrator (Personnel Record 1) agreed that there was no documented evidence that a Registered Nurse made an annual on-site visit to observe and assess the care by the hospice aide. Additionally, the Administrator stated, “I was in the field a lot providing patient care until I hired another nurse. These administrative items fell to the wayside. I was busy with CMS audits, and a lot of paperwork didn’t get done. I was wearing too many hats.””

    Rule L0632. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 460 words

    “It is required that the hospice assesses the skills and competencies of all individuals providing care, including volunteers providing services, and, as necessary, provide in-service training and education programs where required. The hospice has written policies and procedures describing the method(s) of assessing competency and maintains a written description of the in-service training provided during the previous 12 months. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review, interview, and personnel record review. In 7 of 10 (70%) personnel records reviewed revealed that the agency did not ensure that the competencies of all staff providing care. DOCUMENT 7: Agency Policy, Personnel Records, HR.P25, stated in part, “For direct care staff, skills competencies checklist (if 2 job descriptions signed, need competency checklist for both) upon hire and annually. PERSONNEL RECORD 1: The Administrator/Director of Nursing/Registered Nurse/Volunteer Coordinator was hired on 05/24/2022. The last Registered Nurse competency was documented on 05/24/2023. The last Volunteer Coordinator competency was documented on 05/31/2022. There was no documented evidence that competencies were completed annually. PERSONNEL RECORD 2: The Alternate Administrator/Alternate Director of Nursing/Registered Nurse was hired on 05/24/2022. The staff was hired as a Licensed Practical Nurse and completed a competency on 05/24/2022. The staff became licensed as a Registered Nurse on 08/14/2023 and signed a job description the same day. The Registered Nurse visits started on 10/25/2023. There was no documented evidence of a Registered Nurse competency assessment. PERSONNEL RECORD 3: The Hospice Medical Director was hired on 01/03/2024. There was no documented evidence of a Hospice Medical Director competency assessment. PERSONNEL RECORD 5: The Hospice Aide (CNA) was hired on 12/21/2022. The last hospice aide competency was completed on 12/23/2022. There was no documented evidence that competencies were completed annually. PERSONNEL RECORD 6: The Chaplain was hired on 07/21/2023. The last Chaplain competency was completed on 07/21/2023. There was no documented evidence that competencies were completed annually. PERSONNEL RECORD 7: The Master Social Worker/Bereavement Coordinator was hired on 05/30/2023. The last Bereavement Coordinator competency was completed on 08/30/2023. There was no documented evidence of a Social Worker competency. There was no documented evidence that competencies were completed annually. PERSONNEL RECORD 10: The Volunteer was hired on 10/03/2023. The last Volunteer competency was completed on 10/03/2023. There was no documented evidence that competencies were completed annually. During a joint record review and interview on 03/18/2026, the Administrator (Personnel Record 1) agreed that there was no documented evidence that the competencies were completed as required by agency policy. Additionally, the Administrator stated, “I was in the field a lot providing patient care until I hired another nurse. These administrative items fell to the wayside. I was busy with CMS audits, and a lot of paperwork didn’t get done. I was wearing too many hats.” agree”

    Rule L0663. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 207 words

    “It is required that a patient’s clinical record, containing past and current findings, be maintained for each hospice patient. The record contains correct clinical information that is available to the patient’s attending physician and hospice staff. The record may be maintained electronically or on paper. Each patient’s record includes, at a minimum: Physician orders. This standard was not met, as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 2 (100%) clinical records of patients that had a live discharge revealed that the agency did not ensure that a physician’s order was obtained for the discharges. CLINICAL RECORD 11: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 01/21/2025 and was discharged due to revocation on 04/19/2025. There was no documented evidence of a physician’s order to discharge the patient. CLINICAL RECORD 12: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 02/13/2025 and was discharged due to no longer being terminally ill on 07/12/2025. There was no documented evidence of a physician’s order to discharge the patient. During a joint record review and interview on 03/18/2026, the Administrator (Personnel Record 1) agreed that there was no documented evidence of a physician’s order to discharge the patients. Additionally, the Administrator stated, “We didn’t put the order in, we missed it.””

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 239 words

    “It is required that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care or is discharged from hospice per hospice regulation §418.26 (i.e., no longer terminally ill), the hospice forwards to the patient’s attending physician: A copy of the hospice discharge summary; The patient’s record, if requested. This standard was not met, as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 2 (100%) clinical records of patients that had a live discharge reviewed revealed that the hospice did not ensure that the discharge summary was sent to the patient’s attending physician. CLINICAL RECORD 11: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 01/21/2025 and was discharged due to revocation on 04/19/2025. There was no documented evidence of a discharge summary. There was no documented evidence that a discharge summary was sent to the patient’s attending physician. CLINICAL RECORD 12: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 02/13/2025 and was discharged due to no longer being terminally ill on 07/12/2025. There was no documented evidence of a discharge summary. There was no documented evidence that a discharge summary was sent to the patient’s attending physician. During a joint record review and interview on 03/18/2026, the Administrator (Personnel Record 1) agreed that there was no documented evidence of a discharge summary or that the discharge summaries were sent to the patient’s attending physician. Additionally, the Administrator stated, “We missed these. I’m sure we notified the doctor, but nothing is documented.””

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

  • Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 255 words

    “It is required that the hospice obtain a criminal background check on all hospice employees who have direct patient contact or access to patient records. Hospice contracts require that all contracted employees who have direct patient contact or access to patient records obtain criminal background checks. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review, interview, and personnel record review. In 2 of 10 (20%) personnel records reviewed revealed that the agency did not ensure that criminal background checks were completed upon hire on all hospice employees, including contracted staff. CONTRACT 1: The Hospice Medical Director contract on 01/03/2024 required the hospice to complete a criminal background check upon hire. PERSONNEL RECORD 3: The Hospice Medical Director was hired on 01/03/2024. There was no documented evidence that hospice obtained a criminal background check prior to hire or between 01/03/2024-03/16/2026. PERSONNEL RECORD 6: The Chaplain was hired on 07/21/2023. There was no documented evidence that hospice obtained a criminal background check prior to hire or between 07/21/2023-03/16/2026. During a joint record review and interview on 03/18/2026, the Administrator (Personnel Record 1) agreed that there was no documented evidence of a criminal background check. Additionally, the Administrator stated, “We don’t have one. We did one this morning, and it’s pending.” Additionally, the Administrator stated, “I was in the field a lot providing patient care until I hired another nurse. These administrative items fell to the wayside. I was busy with CMS audits, and a lot of paperwork didn’t get done. I was wearing too many hats.””

    Rule L0795. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 28, 2026Follow-up inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner1 deficiency cited
Mar 18, 2026Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner15 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jun 7, 2023.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.9 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 4% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 93.3% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 34% at home, 41% in assisted living, 24% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.9 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends4%
Visits near death93.3% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 3 owners or officers are people: Moriah Schweyer (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Moriah Schweyer (corporate director, 100%); Moriah Schweyer (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 40.91% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 52.4% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 26 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 85714, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 16.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.