Hearth Record

Legacy Hospice, Inc.

A hospice in Osceola, Arkansas 72370

925 West Keiser, Osceola, Arkansas 72370. (870) 563-9995.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

6 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 6 hospices serving ZIP code 72370 had 4.5.

The last inspection on record was on Nov 21, 2024: an initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

6 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Nov 21, 2024: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care6 deficiencies
  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 284 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patient #3, 6, 12, 13) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 3:The comprehensive nursing assessment, subsequent patient visits, and supply list indicates that the patient utilizes an indwelling catheter; however, the plan of care does not include orders and instructions for ongoing care and maintenance of the catheter. Additionally, the plan of care includes wound care orders for the SN/CG to cleanse wound with wound cleanser, pat dry with gauze, leave open to air; wound to be cleaned PRN. This order fails to indicate the location of the wound and does not contain a specifier for the PRN indication. (corrected onsite) Patient 6:The plan of care includes catheter orders for SN to insert indwelling Foley catheter. This order fails to indicate the size of the catheter or balloon, frequency of changing, need for irrigation or other maintenance/patency, etc. (corrected onsite) Patient 12: The plan of care includes wound care orders to cleanse wound with wound cleanser, pat dry with gauze, apply medihoney and calcium alginate, cover with foam dressing; wound care daily and PRN soilage. This order fails to indicate the location of the wound and does not indicate who will be performing the wound care. (corrected onsite) Patient 13: The plan of care includes wound care orders to cleanse wound with wound cleanser, pat dry with gauze, apply medihoney, cover with foam dressing; wound care daily and PRN soilage. This order fails to indicate the location of the wound and does not indicate who will be performing the wound care. (corrected onsite)”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #3, 13) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 3, 13: The patient had nebulized medications ordered for use during the ongoing provision of hospice services; however, a nebulizer was not added to the plan of care. (corrected onsite)”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice is directed by a Board of Directors/governing body which assumes full legal authority and responsibility for the operation of the hospice. There was evidence of the governing body appointing two Administrators with the agency having one CCN number assigned to the agency. Personnel #6 and #7 had personnel records with job descriptions as Administrators.”

    Rule L0651. Standard-level.

  • Hospice multiple locations (42 CFR 418.100(f)(1)(iii))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence that the lines of authority, professional and administrative control must be clearly delineated in the provider’s organizational structure and in practice, and must be traced to the location issued the certification number. There was evidence of two appointed Administrators with the agency having one CCN number assigned to the agency. Personnel #6 and #7 had personnel records with job descriptions as Administrators.”

    Rule L0658. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #16) did not have evidence that the discharge summary includes all required information. Patient 16: There was no evidence of a discharge summary.”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level.

  • Professional management (42 CFR 418.112(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 455 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #2, 6) did not have evidence that the hospice assumes responsibility for professional management of the resident’s hospice services in accordance with the hospice plan of care. The hospice is responsible for providing all hospice services including: • Ongoing assessment, care planning, monitoring, coordination and provision of care by the Hospice IDG • Assessment, coordination and provision of any needed general inpatient or continuous care • Consultation about the patient’s care with facility staff • Coordination by the hospice RN for the implementation of the plan of care for the patient • Provision of hospice aide services, if these services are determined necessary by the IDG to supplement the nurse aide services provided by the facility • Provision, in a timely manner, of all supplies, medications, and DME needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions • Financial management responsibility for all medical supplies, appliances, medications and biologicals related to the terminal illness and related conditions • Determination of the appropriate level of care to be given to the patient (routine homecare, inpatient, or continuous care) • Arranging any necessary transfers from the facility, in consultation with the facility personnel Patient 2: The patient was admitted for hospice services on 06.01.2024 with a terminal diagnosis of protein calorie malnutrition. Weekly MAC measurements were ordered and obtained by the hospice nurse. On 06.06.2024, labs were ordered, including albumin. In July 2024, the patient’s diet was changed to pleasure feedings and weekly MAC measurements were discontinued. There was no evidence in the hospice charting relating to the ordered labs. It was determined by the hospice nursing director that the SNF had collected and reviewed the lab results, and they were present in the SNF chart. The hospice failed to monitor and coordinate care with the SNF relating to this patient. It is unclear if all relevant information was reviewed by the hospice IDG prior to making changes to the care plan and related interventions, such as changes to the patient’s diet. Patient 6: On 11.02.2024, the patient was noted to have a UTI. This infection did not respond to antibiotics and on 11.13.2024 alternate antibiotics and a KUB Xray were ordered. There was no evidence in the hospice charting relating to the ordered Xray. It was determined by the hospice nursing director that the SNF had performed and reviewed the X-ray, and it was present in the SNF chart. The hospice failed to monitor and coordinate care with the SNF relating to this patient. It is unclear if all relevant information was reviewed by the hospice prior to making changes to the care plan and related interventions, such as changes to the patient’s medication.”

    Rule L0762. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 21, 2024Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care6 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jun 22, 2004.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.7 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 11.3% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 97% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 68% at home, 1% in assisted living, 30% in a nursing facility, 1% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.7 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends11.3%
Visits near death97.0% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Legacy Operating Company LLC owns 100% directly since Dec 3, 2019.
  • 9 owners or officers are people: James G Corbin (managing employee (on the payroll)); James G Corbin (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Matthew A Quick (managing employee (under contract)); Carol Ziegler (corporate officer); Carol Ziegler (managing employee (on the payroll)); Carol Ziegler (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Brandi Davis (managing employee (on the payroll)); Andrew P Lofaso (managing employee (on the payroll)); Andrew P Lofaso (runs it (operational or managerial control)).
  • A private-equity firm is among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Bcdi Legacy Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Nov 10, 2025
LH Holding Company LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 3, 2019
Bcdi Legacy Midco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Nov 10, 2025
Bcdi Legacy Topco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Nov 10, 2025
Legacy Operating Company LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Dec 3, 2019
Bcdi Legacy Investor, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies96.71%Nov 10, 2025
BAIN Capital Double Impact Fund III, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies76.82%Nov 10, 2025
Bcip Double Impact II, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies6.27%Nov 10, 2025

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 81% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 78% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 100% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 76.5% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 6 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 72370, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4.5; this one had 6.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 6 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 72370
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Legacy Hospice, Inc. This hospice6
Gentiva4
St Bernards Regional Med Ctr H5
Elite Hospice7
Lester Dierksen Memorial Hospice, LLC4
River Valley Hospice2

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.