Hearth Record

Gentiva

A hospice in Little Rock, Arkansas 72205

301 Natural Resources Dr Ste 102, Little Rock, Arkansas 72205. (501) 223-8868.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

9 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 11 hospices serving ZIP code 72205 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on Aug 1, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

9 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Aug 1, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care9 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 147 words

    “Upon patient record review 2 of 27 (Patient #16,19) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment identifies the physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the hospice patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process. Patient 16: Patient admitted on 03/01/2025. Chaplain services were declined at that time. There is no evidence that the RN or the SW completed this part of the comprehensive assessment at the time of survey. Mini spiritual assessment completed on day 3rd of the survey. Patient 19: Patient admitted on 01/15/2025. Chaplain services were declined. There is no evidence that the RN or the SW completed this part of the assessment. No evidence that the assessment has been completed at the time of survey. Mini spiritual assessment completed on day 3rd of the survey.”

    Rule L0524. Standard-level.

  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 133 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 27 (Patient #11,19) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment is updated including and by: • The hospice interdisciplinary group (in collaboration with the individual’s attending physician, if any) • Changes that have taken place since the initial assessment • Information on the patient’s progress toward desired outcomes • Reassessment of the patient’s response to care • The assessment update must be accomplished as frequently as the condition of the patient requires, but no less frequently than every 15 days Patient 11: No evidence that a comprehensive assessment was completed every 15 days between 05/26/2025 and 06/12/2025. 17 days between assessments. Patient 19: No evidence that a comprehensive assessment was completed every 15 days between 07/2/2025 and 07/18/2025. 16 days between assessments.”

    Rule L0533. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 98 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 27 (Patient #16) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient 16: The clinical documentation indicated that the patient developed a wound on 05/22/2025. No evidence that the wounds were measured for the weeks of May 26, 2025 and June 9, 2025. Wound was de-activated on 06/17/2025.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 135 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 27 (Patient #3) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 3: The medical record indicated that the patient has an active diagnosis of Depression and currently take 2 medications for depression daily (Lexapro and Bupropion). There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to risk for depression included in the plan of care. COS- order written to add depression to the active plan of care during survey.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 27 (Patient #16) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. during survey. Patient 16: The current supply list included wound care supplies. The clinical documentation indicated that the wound was inactivated on June 17,2025. COS- Updated active supply list during survey.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 180 words

    “Upon client record review, 2 of 27 (Patient #18,20) did not have evidence that the IDG in collaboration with the attending physician reviewed, revised and documents the individualized plan as frequently as the patient’s condition requires but no less frequently then every 15 calendar days. Patient #18: No evidence of MSW contribution for IDGs that occurred on 04/01/25, 04/15/25, 04/29/25, 05/13/25, and 06/06/25. The MSW documented that “SW plans to see the patient before next IDG”. No patient specific information added to the basic psychosocial template. Patient #20: No evidence that the RN contributed to IDG for the initial IDG that occurred on 12/24/2024, and the following 3 IDGs that occurred on 01/07/2025, 01/21/2025, and 02/04/2025. RN signed those IDGs as being completed however Gentiva’s basic RN template within the body of the note was left blank with no patient specific information added. No evidence of MSW contribution for IDGs that occurred on 03/04/2025, 03/18/2025, and 04/01/2025. The MSW documented that “SW plans to see the patient before next IDG”. No patient specific information added to the basic psychosocial template.”

    Rule L0552. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 237 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 27 (Patient #13,15,16) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient 13: The medical record indicated that patient requested to end chaplain services on 03/19/2024. Problems, interventions, and goals related to spiritual care remain on the current the plan of care - new benefit period started on 06/22/2025. Also the current level of care listed on the active POC has the patient as respite care status. The medical record indicates that patient is currently receiving routine home care. No evidence that the patient received respite care since the time of admission, 10/31/2023. COS- new order written to remove the spiritual care plan and update the patient’s current level of care during survey. Patient 15: The medical record indicated that patient requested to end social worker services on 04/30/2025. Problems, interventions, and goals related to social services for companionship remain on the current the plan of care - new benefit period started on 06/08/2025. COS-new order written to remove social services from the plan of care during survey. Patient 16: The medical record indicated that the patient had a wound that was inactivated on June 17, 2025. Active wound care orders remain on the current plan of care. COS-new order written to remove wound care orders during survey.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 27 (Patient #7) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 7: Clinical documentation indicated that the SW completed a PRN visit on 06/26/2025. No evidence that an order was received for a PRN visit.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 105 words

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 27 (Patient #11) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient 11: No evidence that an RN completed a supervisory visit every 14 days between the following dates- 3/21/2025 and 4/30/2025 (40 days between visits), 04/30/2025 and 05/15/2025 (15 days between visits), and 05/15/2025 and 06/16/2025 (32 days between visits).”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 1, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care9 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Nov 27, 1996.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 8.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 94% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 55% at home, 13% in assisted living, 32% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day8.3 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends5%
Visits near death94.0% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Odyssey Healthcare LP, LLC owns 99% directly since Jul 1, 2001; Odyssey Healthcare Gp, LLC owns 1% directly since Jul 1, 2001.
  • 7 owners or officers are people: Ronald C Lazas (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (corporate officer, 0%); Thomas Joseph Dolan (corporate officer, 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate officer, 0%); Janet L Combs (corporate officer, 0%); Mark A Smith (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Janesa L Mcfadden (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Ch Services Midco Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2023
Curo Health Services Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Odyssey Healthcare Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 1, 2001
Charlotte Midco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Falcon Hospice, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Charlotte Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Curo Health Services LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Curo Health Services LLCOther role (CMS gives no detail)100%Mar 1, 2022
Odyssey Healthcare Holding CompanyOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 1, 2001
Kah Hospice Company, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Ch Services Group Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Ch Services Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Odyssey Healthcare LP, LLCOwns 5% or more directly99%Jul 1, 2001
Cd&r Falcon Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies60%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Humana Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Centerwell Health Services Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Dec 22, 2022
Odyssey Healthcare Gp, LLCOwns 5% or more directly1%Jul 1, 2001
Odyssey Healthcare Gp, LLCGeneral partner1%Jul 1, 2001

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 84% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 86% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.16% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 74.5% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 53 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 11 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 72205, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 9.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.