Hearth Record

Elite Hospice

A hospice in Bryant, Arkansas 72022

4000 Highway 5 N, Suite 5, Bryant, Arkansas 72022. (501) 315-0136.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 8 hospices serving ZIP code 72022 had 7.

The last inspection on record was on Feb 20, 2025: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jan 28, 2025: recertification inspection by the state5 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 152 words

    “Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined the Agency failed to ensure a psychosocial assessment and spiritual assessment were completed within 5 days of admission as part of the comprehensive assessment for 1 (#8) of 19 (#1 - #19) clinical records reviewed. This failed practice had the potential to affect all patients on census as a delay in assessment could result in a delay in receiving proper care and services. Findings follow: Review of Clinical Record #8 with a start of care date of 12/21/24 revealed a patient with a diagnosis of Cerebral Infarction. The psychosocial and spiritual assessments were completed on 12/30/24. This was 9 days after admission. On 01/28/25 during a meeting with the administrative staff, the Executive Director stated the admission was pushed through in the computer system on the weekend which wasn’t caught in time to assign the appropriate staff to make these visits.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 225 words

    “Based on record review and personnel interview, it was determined the Agency failed to ensure routine wound measurements were completed to assess for progress toward goals for 2 (#1 and #15) of 3 (#1, #13, and #15) clinical records reviewed with wound treatments. This failed practice had the potential to affect all patients with wound treatments. Findings follow: Review of Clinical Record #1 with a start of care date of 10/09/24 revealed a patient with a diagnosis of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage 4. An order dated 10/10/24 documented the Agency was to measure wounds weekly. There were new areas documented as site #3, #4, and #5 with an onset date of 10/29/24. There were multiple missing measurements for site #5. Review of Clinical Record #15 with a start of care date of 10/30/24 revealed a patient with a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. A pressure wound with an onset date of 11/13/24 did not have any further wound measurements in the patient’s records until her death on 12/19/24. On 01/28/24, during an interview with the Executive Director, there was no further information provided regarding the wound measurements. A Policy and Procedure titled, “Wound Assessment, Documentation, Photography” provided by the Executive Director on 01/28/24 noted “.... Document the following in the medical record...Wound measurements (weekly) including the length, depth, and width of the wound in centimeters...””

    Rule L0533. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 335 words

    “Based on Clinical Record review and staff interview, it was determined the Agency did not ensure the Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) had updated the patients Plan of Care in 2 (#1 and #15) of 3 (#1, #13, and #15) Clinical Records reviewed with Pressure Ulcer orders. This lack of a Plan of Care update had the potential to disrupt patient care coordination in all patients currently receiving Pressure Ulcer treatments. Findings follow: Review of clinical record #1 with a start of care date (SOC) date of 10/09/24, revealed a patient with a diagnosis of Chronic Kidney Disease, stage 4. The Hospice IDG (Interdisciplinary Group) Comprehensive Assessment and Plan of Care Update Report dated 01/15/24 documented wound care to both heels which included cleaning with wound cleanser and cover with a dressing and entry dated 10/09/24. The wound record report documented wounds #1 and #2 on each heel were identified on 10/09/24. The wound record report documented wounds #3, #4, and #5 were identified on 10/29/24. The document also revealed there were multiple wound order changes since 10/09/24. The most current update on the wound orders were not included on the Plan of Care update report dated 01/15/24, nor did it include the wounds #3, #4, and #5. Review of clinical record #15 with a start of care date of 10/30/24, revealed a patient with a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. The Comprehensive Care Plan Report documented wound care to both feet daily and was added on 10/30/24 and edited 11/13/24. The wound to the coccyx identified on 11/13/24 and the wound to the pre-tibial and lower right leg identified on 12/13/24 were not added to the Plan of Care. On 01/28/25 a Policy and Procedure titled, “Care, Treatment & Services” was provided by the Agency. This policy documented, “.... The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including the following: ... d. Drugs, biologicals and treatments necessary to meet the needs of the patient....””

    Rule L0552. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 406 words

    “Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined the Agency failed to ensure the visits by professional healthcare staff were completed as ordered by the physician and the plan of care for 2 (#3 and #8) of 16 (#1, - #3, #5, #7- #17, and #19) patients who received aide care services. The Agency failed to ensure the physician’s orders for oxygen was followed for 1 (#3) of 3 (#3, #13, and #19) patients who had orders for continuous oxygen. This failed practice had the potential to affect patients on the census that receives aide care services, oxygen. Findings follow: A. Aide Visits Review of Clinical Record # 3 with a start of care date of 11/29/24 revealed a patient with a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. The Hospice Certification and Plan of Care with a certification period of 11/29/24 - 02/26/25 documented Hospice Aides to visit 1 time a week for the first week, then 3 times a week for 12 weeks, then 2 times a week for 1 week. On the week of 12/29/24, it was noted there was a missed aide visit. The coordination notes did not include any documentation as to the reason for this missed visit. Review of Clinical Record #8 with a start of care date of 12/21/24 revealed a patient with a diagnosis of Cerebral Infarction. The Hospice Certification and Plan of Care with a certification period of 12/21/24 - 03/20/25 documented Hospice Aides to visit 2 times a week for 13 weeks. On the week of 12/29/24, it was noted there was a missed visit. The coordination notes did not include any documentation as to the reason for this missed visit On 01/28/25, the Executive Director was informed of the missed visit for #3 and #8 and was unable to find any other information regarding why these visits were missed or to demonstrate the visits did occur. B. Oxygen Review of Clinical Record #3 with a start of care date of 11/29/24 revealed a patient with a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. The Hospice IDG (Interdisciplinary Group) Comprehensive Assessment and Plan of Care Update Report dated 01/15/25 documented Oxygen at 2 liters continuously on the medication list. The coordination notes dated 1/1/25, 1/2/25, 1/7/25, and 1/9/25 documented the use of oxygen at 4 liters. On 01/28/25, the Executive Director was asked to provide any further information regarding this finding and none was provided.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 240 words

    “Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined the Agency failed to ensure there was coordination with the patient’s clergy/ church for 2 (#7 and #9) of 19 (#1 - #19) clinical records reviewed. This failed practice had the potential to affect all clients on census in that a lack of coordination could result in the patient’s church members and clergy would not be involved at their usual level with the continued spiritual guidance and comfort needed for the patient during their end of life. Findings follow: Review of Clinical Record # 7 with a start of care date of 12/27/24 revealed a patient with a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. A chaplain visit note dated 12/31/24 documented the patient was spiritual and received spiritual support from her local church, [Name of church]. There was no documentation that the clergy was contacted by the Agency. Review of Clinical Record #9 with a start of care date of 01/08/25 revealed a patient with a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). A chaplain visit note dated 01/13/25 documented the patient was spiritual and has a faith community at [Name of church]. The visit summary documented, “... he has not met his new pastor but hopes to soon...” There was no documentation that the clergy was contacted by the Agency. On 01/28/25 the Executive Director was informed of these findings, offered to provide any further information and none was provided.”

    Rule L0598. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Feb 20, 2025Recertification inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Jan 28, 2025Recertification inspection by the state5 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Sep 1, 1995.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 14.5 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 16.8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 93.8% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 75% at home, 7% in assisted living, 14% in a nursing facility, 1% in a skilled nursing facility, 3% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day14.5 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends16.8%
Visits near death93.8% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Arkansas In-Home Healthcare Partnership-II LLC owns 100% directly since Jan 1, 2020.
  • 9 owners or officers are people: Marcus Macip (corporate officer); Kimberly Seymour (corporate officer, 0%); Kimberly Seymour (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Joni Babineaux (corporate officer, 0%); Wendy Daigle (other role (CMS gives no detail), 0%); Joshua Lee Proffitt (corporate officer); John E Love (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Amy Cormier (corporate director, 0%); Joseph W Morgan (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Arkansas In-Home Healthcare Partnership-II LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Jan 1, 2020
In-Home Healthcare Partnership LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jan 1, 2020
Unitedhealth Group IncorporatedOwns 5% or more through other companies80%Feb 22, 2023
Lhcg Partner LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies80%Jan 1, 2020
LHC Group Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies80%Jan 1, 2020
Home Health Partner LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies20%Jan 1, 2020
Lifepoint Hospitals Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies20%Jan 1, 2020
Historic Lifepoint Hospitals LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies20%Jan 1, 2020
Legacy Lifepoint Health LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies20%Jan 1, 2020

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 86% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 90% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 100% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 76.4% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 8 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 72022, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 8 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 72022
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Elite Hospice This hospice5
Baptist Health Hospice Little Rock6
Hospice Home Care LLC9
Gentiva12
Affinity Hospice8
Gentiva9
Arkansas Hospice Inc.6
Dierksen Memorial Hospice6

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.