Hearth Record

Gentiva

A hospice in Texarkana, Arkansas 71854

210 North State Line Avenue, Suite 502, Texarkana, Arkansas 71854. (870) 330-7798.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 14 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

14 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 17 hospices serving ZIP code 71854 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on Oct 31, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

14 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

14 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Oct 31, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care14 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 19 (Patient #8) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice interdisciplinary group completed the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Patient 8: The initial comprehensive spiritual assessment was completed 10/3/24 with start of care 9/25/24”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 19 (Patient #11) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment identifies the physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the hospice patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process. Patient 11. There was no evidence of a comprehensive spiritual assessment. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0524. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 142 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patients #2,#3,#6) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications. Patient 2: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of oxygen. There was no evidence of oxygen included on the medication profile. Corrected on site. Patient 3: During observation of home visit, the patient’s wife stated they did not have acetaminophen suppositories that were on the medication profile and that the patient takes one tablet of lisinopril daily, not twice daily per medication profile. Corrected on site. Patient 6: During observation of home visit, the facility medication profile did not contain lorazepam and the hospice medication profile did not contain clonidine, levsin, naloxone HCl nasal liquid, and nystatin topical powder that were on the facility medication profile. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 118 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patients #2,#3,#4,#10) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient 2: The initial bereavement assessment was completed 9/12/24 with start of care 7/25/24. Patients 3,4: There was no evidence of bereavement assessments. Corrected on site. Patient 10: The initial bereavement assessment was completed 6/7/24 with start of care 5/30/24”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 199 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patients #6,#12,#14) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient 6: During the home visit observation, the facility treatment orders contained wound care orders for a coccyx wound received 10/9/24. There was no evidence of nursing documentation of a coccyx wound. Corrected on site. Patient 12: There was no evidence of wound measurements to the bilateral great toes, left heel, and coccyx wounds since 10/15/24. Agency policy requires weekly assessments and measurements. Corrected on site with measurements and assessment completed 10/29/24. Patient 14: There was no evidence of wound measurements between 9/30/24 and 10/23/24. There was a refusal dated 10/16/24 and patient was unable to tolerate 10/11/24, however agency policy was not followed for documentation with refusal to include reasons provided for refusal, education completed and to whom, and notification of the attending physician as well as report of refusals to medical director and other IDG members.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 149 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patients #4,#8) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 4: The patient was on hospice services for a terminal diagnosis of COPD. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to respiratory dysfunction included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 8: The medical record contained nursing documentation identifying patient excoriation to skin folds since admission. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to skin impairment included in the plan of care. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 115 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patients #2,#6) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 2: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of oxygen and 10/4/24 identifying facility wraps patients legs daily to help with edema. There was no evidence of an order for oxygen or edema treatment. Corrected on site. Patient 6: During the home visit observation, the facility treatment orders contained wound care orders for a coccyx wound. There was no evidence of wound care orders in the hospice medical record. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 364 words

    “Upon patient record review, 8 of 19 (Patients #1,#2,#3,#5,#8,#9,#10,#13) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 1: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of a Hoyer lift for transfers. There was no evidence of an order for the DME included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 2: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of a trapeze. There was no evidence of an order for the DME included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 3: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon recertification 9/24/24 identifying patient use of a Hoyer lift and use of a wheelchair since admission. There was no evidence of an order for the DME included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 5: The medical record contained nursing documentation 9/23/24 identifying patient use of a over the bed table, commode, and wheelchair, and 10/14/24 identifying use of one half side rail. There was no evidence of orders for the DME included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 8: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of bedrails, chair lift, wheelchair, shower chair, and a raised toilet seat. There was no evidence of orders for the DME included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 9: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of a cane. There was no evidence of an order for the DME included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 10: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of a walker. There was no evidence of an order for the DME included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 13: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon recertification identifying patient use of a commode, and documentation upon admission identifying use of a walker and over bed table. There was no evidence of orders for the DME included in the plan of care. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patients #11,#19) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient 11: There was no evidence the plan of care was updated from full code to DNR status. DNR order was received 10/16/24. Corrected on site. Patient 19: There was no evidence the plan of care was revised to reflect the plan to discharge patient due to extended prognosis.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #11) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are specific to the patient’s preferences and needs. Patient 11: There was no evidence the aide care plan was updated to reflect the needs of the patient who was documented as preferring bed baths over showers since 10/11/24 which was reported to the RN. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 95 words

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 19 (Patient #1) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient 1: The medical record contained an ordered aide frequency of once weekly. There was no evidence of a visit completed the week of 10/6/24. Corrected on site with late entry documentation of reason for missed visit.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the annual report documents the use of volunteers providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract personnel. The agency had a volunteer utilization rate of 0% for 2023.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 119 words

    “Upon patient client record review, 2 of 19 (Patients #2,#19) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 2: The medical record contained inappropriately authenticated documentation 10/4/24 identifying patient is a full code, however patient is DNR per orders and plan of care. Corrected on site with addendum to documentation. Patient 19: The medical record contained inappropriately authenticated documentation regarding the patient’s continued eligibility during IDG 10/8/24. The patient was discharged due to extended prognosis 9/26/24.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 148 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #6) did not have evidence that the hospice provided the following information: • The most recent hospice plan of care specific to each patient • Hospice election form and any Advance Directives specific to each patient • Physician certification and recertification of the terminal illness specific to each patient • Names and contact information for hospice personnel involved in hospice care of each patient • Instructions on how to access the hospice’s 24-hour on-call system • Hospice medication information specific to each patient • Hospice physician and attending physician (if any) orders specific to each patient Patient 6: During observation of home visit, there was no evidence the facility had received a list of hospice personnel involved with care, election form, certification of terminal illness, and current plan of care. The last POC provided was dated 9/28/24. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0781. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Oct 31, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care14 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Mar 10, 1993.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.6 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.2% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 95.8% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 67% at home, 5% in assisted living, 18% in a nursing facility, 10% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day12.6 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6.2%
Visits near death95.8% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Odyssey Healthcare LP, LLC owns 99% directly since Feb 1, 2016.
  • 8 owners or officers are people: Ronald C Lazas (corporate officer); David Robinson Arnold (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (other role (CMS gives no detail), 0%); Thomas Joseph Dolan (corporate officer); James Miller (managing employee (under contract)); David Allen Causby (corporate officer); Janet L Combs (corporate officer); Adrian Sidwell (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Ch Services Midco Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%May 1, 2022
Curo Health Services Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%May 1, 2022
Odyssey Healthcare Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 1, 2016
Charlotte Midco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Falcon Hospice, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Charlotte Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%May 1, 2022
Curo Health Services LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Odyssey Healthcare Holding CompanyOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 1, 2016
Kah Hospice Company, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%May 1, 2022
Ch Services Group Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%May 1, 2022
Ch Services Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%May 1, 2022
Odyssey Healthcare LP, LLCOwns 5% or more directly99%Feb 1, 2016
Odyssey Healthcare LP, LLCLimited partner99%Feb 1, 2016
Cd&r Falcon Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies60%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Humana Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Centerwell Health Services Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Dec 22, 2022
Odyssey Healthcare Gp, LLCGeneral partner1%Feb 1, 2016

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 79% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 74% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 97.05% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 76.5% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 17 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 71854, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 14.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.