Hearth Record

Acg Hospice-Enterprise

A hospice in Enterprise, Alabama 36330

201 S Main Street, Ste. 1, Enterprise, Alabama 36330. (334) 897-0650.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 10 hospices serving ZIP code 36330 had 5.5.

The last inspection on record was on Apr 2, 2025: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Feb 27, 2025: recertification inspection by the state4 deficiencies
  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 306 words

    “Based on Medical Record (MR) review, and interviews with staff members it was determined the agency failed to ensure the staff obtained and completed orders for all care performed for the patient. This affected MR # 14, one of 14 MR’s reviewed, and had the potential to negatively affect all patients cared for by this agency. 1. MR # 14 was admitted to the agency on 1/13/25 with a primary diagnosis of Malignant Neoplasm of the Bladder, Unspecified. A review of the nurse Visit Note Report dated 1/24/25 revealed the nurse documented a foley catheter was placed during the visit to promote wound healing. A review of the Hospice Certification and POC dated 1/13/25 revealed no documentation of an order for the placement of a foley catheter. Further review of the Hospice IDG Comprehensive Assessment and POC Update Reports dated 1/17/25, 1/31/25 and 2/14/25 revealed no documentation of an order for the placement of a foley catheter. A review of the nurse Visit Note Report dated 2/3/25, revealed a pressure wound stage two was identified on the coccyx. The nurse documented wound care provided as ordered. The previous nurse visit notes did not identify this wound. A review of the Hospice Certification and Plan of Care (POC) dated 1/13/25 revealed no documentation of an order for the care of a wound to the coccyx. Further review of the Hospice Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) Comprehensive Assessment and POC Update Reports dated 1/17/25, 1/31/25, and 2/14/25 revealed no documentation of an order for the care of a wound to the coccyx. An interview was conducted on 2/27/25 at 12:25 PM with EI # 1, Manager of Accreditation, Regulatory, and Compliance who confirmed the clinician failed to obtain an order and document the order for the foley placement or the care performed on 2/3/25 to the wound on the coccyx”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 530 words

    “Based on Medical Record (MR) review, interviews with staff and agency policies and procedures it was determined the agency failed to document missed visits per agency policy. This affected MR # 14 and MR # 9, 2 of 14 MR’s reviewed and had the potential to negatively affect all patients cared for by this agency. Findings include: Agency Policy: Missed Visits Policy Number: 1-028 Review date: None listed Purpose: To ensure that missed visits are documented and does not affect the quality of patient care. Policy: Missed visits will be communicated to the Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) at the IDG Meeting. A missed visit will be rescheduled that the same week if possible. Missed visits will be documented in the medical record. Procedure: ...2. If a visit missed and not rescheduled in the same week, the clinician will: ...B. Document in the patient’s medical record the following information: Patient name Date and type of visit missed Reason for the missed visit Description of any unmet needs and how the patient’s needs were met Any follow-up needed Any other person(s) that were notified of the missed visit Signature of the staff reporting the information 1.MR # 14 was admitted to the agency on 1/13/25 with a primary diagnosis of Malignant Neoplasm of the Bladder, Unspecified. A review of the Hospice Certification and Plan of Care (POC) dated 1/13/25 revealed an ordered frequency for the Hospice Aide (HA) of four times a week for one week and five times weekly for twelve weeks. A review of the HA visit notes week of 1/19/25 revealed the HA visited two times, and not five as ordered. The HA completed one missed visit note dated 1/23/25. There were no missed visit notes documented for the remaining two visits scheduled. A review of the HA visit notes week of 2/2/25 revealed the HA visited four times, and not five as ordered. No missed visit note was completed for the remaining visit scheduled. An interview was conducted on 2/27/25 at 12:25 PM with Employee Identifier (EI) # 1, Manager of Accreditation, Regulatory, and Compliance, who confirmed the clinician did not complete the documentation for the missed visits per agency policy. 2. MR # 9 was admitted to the agency on 1/27/25 with a primary diagnosis of Hypertensive Heart Disease without Heart Failure. A review of the Hospice Certification and POC dated 1/27/25 revealed an ordered frequency for the Skilled Nurse (SN) of four times a week for one week and two times a week for twelve weeks with three as needed visits for symptom management, and an ordered frequency for the Volunteer Coordinator once a month for one month. A review of the SN visit notes dated 1/27/25 revealed the SN completed three of the four scheduled visits ordered. No missed visit note was completed for the fourth visit. A review of the MR revealed no visit was made by the volunteer coordinator as ordered by the physician. An interview was conducted on 2/27/25 at 12:39 PM with EI # 1, who confirmed the clinician did not complete the documentation for the missed visit per agency policy, and the volunteer coordinator visit was never assigned to the clinician.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 444 words

    “Based on medical record (MR) review, agency policy and procedure, and interviews with staff it was determined the agency failed to ensure the Registered Nurse (RN) supervised the Hospice Aide (HHA) at least every 14 days. This deficient practice did affect 2 of 10 patients receiving HHA services including MR # 6, Home Visit (HV) # 2, and had the potential to affect all patients receiving HHA services. Findings include: Agency Policy: Standards of Care, Service, and Practice Policy Number: 2-001 Policy Date: Not Listed Purpose: To provide guidelines for developing and implementing standards of care, service, and practice... Certified Nursing Assistants (Hospice Aides): A supervisory visit will be conducted by the Registered Nurse for each Hospice Aide not less than every 14 days, if any areas of concern are noted during the visit, the Registered Nurse will provide a follow up on-site supervisory visit with the Aide in order to further assess and provide education... 1. MR # 6 transferred to ACG Hospice from another Hospice agency on 1/6/25 and recertified from 1/12/25 to 3/12/25 with a primary diagnosis of Parkinson’s Disease. Review of the Aide Care Plan Report dated 1/12/25 revealed orders for HHA two times a week and SN three times a week. Review of the physician’s order dated 1/19/25 revealed orders to increase HHA to three times a week. Review of the HHA Visit Notes revealed the HHA visited MR # 6 three times a week from 1/14/25 to 1/21/25. Review of the SN Visit Notes dated 1/14/24 to 2/24/25 revealed no documentation an HA supervisory visit was conducted. An interview was conducted on 2/27/24 at 8:40 AM with Employee Identifier (EI) # 5, Director of Operations, Montgomery, who confirmed the agency failed to ensure an Aide Supervisory visit was conducted every 14 days. 2. HV # 2 was admitted on 11/20/24 and recertified for hospice from 1/19/25 to 3/19/25. Review of the POC dated 11/20/24 revealed orders for HA two times a week for one week then three times a week for eight weeks. Review of the Aide Care Plan Report dated 1/19/25 revealed orders for HHA two times a week for one week then three times a week for eight weeks. Review of the HHA Visit Notes revealed the HHA completed three visits per week beginning 1/20/25 to 2/7/25. Review of the SN Visit Notes from 1/20/25 to 2/10/25 revealed a HHA Supervisory Visit was not conducted until 2/10/25, which was 21 days after the start of HHA services. An interview was conducted on 2/27/25 at 8:45 AM with EI # 5 who confirmed the agency failed to ensure an Aide Supervisory visit was conducted every 14 days.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 399 words

    “Based on Medical Record (MR) review, interviews with staff and the Alabama Board of Nursing Standards of Nursing Practice and Standards for Wound Assessment and Care it was determined the agency failed to ensure the clinician documented the wound and care performed. This affected MR # 14, one of three wound care charts reviewed, and had the potential to negatively affect all wound care patients served by this agency. Findings include: Alabama Board of NursingChapter 610-x-6: Standards of Nursing Practice 610-X-6-.06 Documentation Standards: (1) The standards of documentation of nursing care provided to patients by registered nurses or licensed practical nurses are based on principles of documentation regardless of the documentation format. (2) Documentation of nursing care shall be:(a) Legible(b) Accurate(c) Complete. Complete documentation includes reporting and documenting on appropriate records a patient’s status, including signs and symptoms, response,treatments, medications, other nursing care rendered, communication of pertinent information to other health team members, and unusual occurrences involving the patient... 1. MR # 14 was admitted to the agency on 1/13/25 with a primary diagnosis of Malignant Neoplasm of the Bladder, Unspecified. A review of the Hospice Certification and Plan of Care (POC) dated 1/13/25 revealed an order for Hospice Nurse/Caregiver to perform wound care to stage two pressure ulcer on left hip and left ear. Utilizing clean technique, cleanse with water, pat dry, apply Medihoney, and change every day and as needed if soiled or dislodged. Instruct caregiver in wound care. A review of the Hospice Start of Care Visit Note Report dated 1/13/25 revealed two wounds, wound number one: a stage two pressure ulcer to the left hip measuring 6 centimeters (cm) x 6 cm x 0 cm. Wound number two: a stage two pressure ulcer to the left ear measuring 1 cm x 1 cm x 0 cm. A review of the twenty nurse Visit Note Reports dated 1/14/25 to 2/25/25 revealed there was no documentation of the assessment or care performed to the wound on the left ear. A review of the seven nurse Visit Note Reports dated from 1/15/25 to 2/3/25 revealed no documentation of the wound care performed to the left hip. An interview was conducted on 2/27/25 at 12:25 PM with Employee Identifier (EI) # 1, Manager of Accreditation, Regulatory, and Compliance, who confirmed the nurse did not document the wound assessment and care of the left ear and left hip as ordered.”

    Rule L0672. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 2, 2025Recertification inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Feb 27, 2025Recertification inspection by the state4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Apr 11, 2007.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.2 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 4% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 81.8% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 92% at home, 6% in assisted living, 2% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.2 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends4%
Visits near death81.8% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Acg Mississippi, LLC owns 100% directly since Aug 23, 2024.
  • 8 owners or officers are people: Jordan Crumley (corporate director); Troy Yarborough (corporate officer); Hayley Eby (corporate director); Kathlyn Diefenderfer (managing employee (under contract)); Janelle I Plows (corporate director); Pamela A Duncan Owens (corporate officer); David W Gilligan (corporate officer); Bobbie M Harden (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Arrow Management Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 23, 2024
Acg Mississippi, LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Aug 23, 2024
Acg Mississippi, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 23, 2024
Rep Agp Holdco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies92.72%Aug 23, 2024
Acg Acquisition LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies84.39%Aug 23, 2024
Rep Agp III, L.P.Limited partner40.9%Aug 23, 2024
Rep Coinvest III Agp Blocker, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies31.7%Aug 23, 2024
Rep Coinvest III Agp Blocker, LPLimited partner30.97%Aug 23, 2024
Rep Coinvest III Agp, L.P.Limited partner26.7%Aug 23, 2024
Rep Coinvest III Agp Gp LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies26.14%Aug 23, 2024
Tvg Hcsc Blocker, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies15.61%Aug 23, 2024
Acp 2021 Lava III LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies9.67%Aug 23, 2024
Pcif IV Holding Vehicle, L.P.Limited partner6.75%Aug 23, 2024
Acp 2021 Pluto I LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies6.4%Aug 23, 2024

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 8 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 100% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 11.1% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold8 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 10 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 36330, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5.5; this one had 4.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.