Dayspring Hospice, LLC
A hospice in Enterprise, Alabama 36330
100 Professional Lane, P.O. Box 311246, Enterprise, Al 36331, Enterprise, Alabama 36330. (334) 347-2999.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 7 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 5of 5 family caregiver rating
- 9of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
7 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 10 hospices serving ZIP code 36330 had 5.5.
The last inspection on record was on Aug 28, 2024: a recertification inspection by the state.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Jul 18, 2024: recertification inspection by the state7 deficiencies
-
Arrangement with Other Facilities (42 CFR 418.113(b)(5))
The inspectors’ words, 243 words
“Based on review of the agency Emergency Operations Plan (EOP), agency policy, and staff interviews the agency failed to develop arrangements with other facilities to receive patients in the event of limitations or cessation of operations to maintain the continuity of services to agency patients. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all patients served by the agency. Findings include: Agency Policy: Emergency Preparedness Policy Number: HR 170 Effective Date: 3/1/2020 Purpose: To perform and respond as seamlessly as possible to meet patient and community needs in the event of an emergency. To delay the (and) minimize confusion, errors, and expense by detailing the course of action to follow... Policy: ...7. Suspension or Transfer of Services. a. In the event that an emergency results in the inability of the agency to continue providing services, the agency has a plan for continuity of services... c. The agency has pre-identified organizations that can deliver required services... Review of the agency EOP Plan on 7/16/24 revealed no documentation of an arrangement with another facility to receive patients in the event of limitations or cessation of operations to maintain the continuity of services to agency patients. An interview was conducted on 7/17/24 at 12:42 PM with Employee Identifier (EI) # 4, Executive Director, who confirmed there was no documentation of an arrangements with another facility to receive patients in the event of limitations or cessation of operations to maintain the continuity of services to agency patients.”
-
EP Training Program (42 CFR 418.113(d)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 271 words
“Based on review of the agency Emergency Operations Plan (EOP), agency policy, and staff interviews the agency failed to provide training to agency staff on the EOP plan at orientation and every two years. This deficient practice did affect four of five personnel files reviewed, including Employee Identifier (EI) # 8, EI # 9, EI # 10, and EI # 11, and had the potential to affect all patients served by the agency. Findings include: Agency Policy: Emergency Preparedness Policy Number: HR 170 Effective Date: 3/1/2020 Purpose: To perform and respond as seamlessly as possible to meet patient and community needs in the event of an emergency. To delay the (and) minimize confusion, errors, and expense by detailing the course of action to follow... Policy: ...8. Training a. A program for training and testing, including initial training on this policy and procedure will be conducted. i. Current staff will be trained on the new or updated EOP at the time of this publication. ii. All new (staff) will be trained on the EOP during initial orientation. Review of the agency EOP plan on 7/16/24 and personnel files on 7/18/24 revealed no documentation the following staff had been provided training on the agency EOP program: EI # 8, Registered Nurse (RN), date of hire 11/30/2020. EI # 9, RN, date of hire 4/10/23. EI # 10, Chaplain, date of hire 3/3/2020. EI # 11, Social Worker, date of hire 11/28/22. An interview was conducted on 7/18/24 at 12:53 PM with EI # 4, Executive Director, who confirmed there was no documentation the staff had been provided training on the agency EP program.”
-
EP Testing Requirements (42 CFR 418.113(d)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 374 words
“Based on the review of the agency Emergency Operations Plan (EOP), agency policy, and staff interviews it was determined the agency failed to: 1. Document actions taken by the agency during an actual event activation of the EOP. 2. Conduct an additional exercise at least every 2 years. 3. Analyze the agency response drills and emergency events to identify areas for improvement. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all patients and staff served by the agency. Findings include: Agency Policy: Emergency Preparedness Policy Number: HR 170 Effective Date: 3/1/2020 Purpose: To perform and respond as seamlessly as possible to meet patient and community needs in the event of an emergency. To delay the (and) minimize confusion, errors, and expense by detailing the course of action to follow... Policy: ...9. Testing. c. The agency will conduct a second exercise annually. This may be a full-scale exercise or a tabletop exercise. ...e. The agency will analyze the response and identify areas for improvement, and update the EOP if needed... Review of the agency EOP on 7/16/24 revealed: 1. The agency documented a disaster drill for active shooter on 12/30/19. There was no documentation the agency performed an analysis of the agency response to the emergency event. 2. The agency activated the EOP for COVID-19 on 3/3/2020 through 12/4/22. There was no documentation the agency performed an analysis of the agency response to the emergency event. 3. The agency activated the EOP for a hurricane on 9/15/2020. There was no documentation of the actions taken by the agency in response to the activation and no documentation the agency performed an analysis of the agency response to the emergency event. Further review of the agency EOP revealed no documentation of a second full-scale exercise, mock disaster drill, or tabletop exercise since 12/30/19. The agency failed to conduct an additional exercise at least every 2 years. An interview was conducted with Employee Identifier (EI) # 4, Executive Director, who confirmed there was no documentation of a second full-scale exercise, mock disaster drill, or tabletop exercise since 12/30/19, no documentation of the agency actions taken for the activation on 9/15/2020, and no documentation the agency performed an analysis of the agency response to the emergency events and drill.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))
The inspectors’ words, 505 words
“Based on review of Medical Records (MR), agency policies and procedures, and interviews, it was determined the agency failed to ensure an initial Bereavement Assessment was conducted on each patient as part of the comprehensive assessment. This deficient practice affected 4 of 19 MRs reviewed including MR # 15, MR # 1, Home Visit (HV) # 4, MR # 2, and had the potential to negatively affect all patients admitted to this hospice. Findings include: Agency Policy: Bereavement Services Policy Number: SS-040 Revised: 5/1/19 Purpose: To provide DaySpring Hospice, LLC staff with guidelines regarding bereavement services. ...Procedure: As part of the initial psychosocial assessment ..., the Social Worker will complete a bereavement risk assessment. The Social Worker will notify the bereavement coordinator of any critical risk factors... 4. MR # 15 was admitted on 1/9/24 with a terminal diagnosis of Senile Degeneration of the Brain. Review of the Hospice Plan of Care dated 1/9/24 revealed no documentation bereavement risks were included in the Plan of Care. Review of the MSW Comprehensive Assessment - Psychosocial note dated 1/10/24 revealed the Social Worker documented in the Assessment Summary, “no bereavement issues or concerns at this time.” There was no documentation a bereavement risk assessment was completed. Review of the Spiritual Assessment dated 1/10/24 revealed no documentation of a bereavement assessment. An interview was conducted on 7/18/24 at 2:05 PM with EI # 1, Clinical Manager, Dothan, who confirmed there was no documentation a bereavement assessment was performed at the start of care. 3. HV # 2 was admitted on 7/8/24 with a terminal diagnosis of Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction Affecting Left Dominate Side, Personal History of Transient Ischemic Attack, and Hypertension. Review of the Hospice Plan of Care dated 7/8/24 revealed no documentation bereavement risks were included in the Plan of Care. Review of the Medical Social Worker (MSW) Comprehensive Assessment - Psychosocial note dated 7/9/24 revealed the Social Worker documented in the Assessment Summary, “no bereavement issues or concerns at this time.” There was no documentation bereavement risk assessment was completed. An interview was conducted on 7/18/24 at 1:24 PM with Employee Identifier (EI) # 3, Clinical Manager, Enterprise, who confirmed there was no documentation a bereavement assessment was performed at the start of care. 1. MR # 1 was admitted to the agency on 11/1/23 with diagnoses including Parkinson’s Disease without Dyskinesia, without Mention of Fluctuations and Muscle Weakness. Review of the MR revealed no documentation an initial bereavement assessment was conducted. An interview was conducted on 7/18/24 at 1:54 PM with EI # 2, Clinical Manager, Andalusia, who confirmed there was no documentation an initial bereavement assessment was conducted. 2. HV # 4 was admitted to the agency on 1/8/24 with diagnoses including Malignant Neoplasm of Pancreas, Unspecified and Other Specified Diseases of Pancreas. Review of the MR revealed no documentation an initial bereavement assessment was conducted. An interview was conducted on 7/18/24 at 2:07 PM with EI # 2 who confirmed there was no documentation an initial bereavement assessment was conducted.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 607 words
“Based on review of medical records (MR), agency policies and procedures, and interviews it was determined the agency failed to ensure the visit frequency was followed for all disciplines and the physician was notified of missed visits. This affected 3 of 19 MR’s reviewed, including MR # 7, MR # 2, and MR # 3, and had the potential to negatively affect all patients admitted to this hospice. Findings include: Agency Policy: Plan of Care Policy Number: MP 550 Revised: 7/1/18 Purpose: To establish the care to be provided for the patient and family to coordinate all disciplines... Procedure: The plan of care will be established by the attending physician and/or the Hospice Physician and the Interdisciplinary Team prior to providing care and will include the following: ...6. Frequency of care... Agency Policy: Missed Visits Policy Number: ADM/HR 435 Policy: A missed visit is an alteration in the plan of care; therefore, the physician must be notified... Procedure: ...3. A missed visit which cannot be rescheduled shall be documented and communicated to the physician... 3. MR # 3 was admitted on 3/5/24 and recertified on 6/3/24 to 8/31/24 with diagnoses including Nonrheumatic Aortic (Valve) Stenosis, Pulmonary Hypertension, Unspecified, and Atherosclerotic Hear Disease of Native Coronary Artery without Angina Pectoris. Review of the Hospice Plan of Care dated 6/3/24 revealed physician’s orders for SN two visits per week for 13 weeks beginning 6/3/24. Review of the SN Visit Notes the week of 6/9/24, revealed only one SN visit was completed. Review of the Missed Visit Note dated 6/14/24 revealed the SN documented the physician was not notified of the missed visit. Review of the IDT Meetings note dated 6/19/24 revealed no documentation the physician and IDT was notified of the missed visit. An interview was conducted on 7/18/24 at 2:00 PM with EI # 1, Clinical Director of Dothan, who confirmed the physician was not notified of the missed visit and the missed visit was not discussed in the IDT meeting. 2. MR # 2 was admitted on 3/6/24 and recertified on 6/4/24 to 9/1/24 with diagnoses including Parkinson’s Disease without Dyskinesia, Essential Tremor, and Essential hypertension. Review of the Hospice Plan of Care dated 6/4/24 revealed physician’s orders for SN two visits per week for 13 weeks beginning 6/4/24. Review of the SN Visit Notes during the week of 6/30/24 revealed no SN visits were performed, and no missed visit were completed. Review of the IDT Meetings note dated 7/9/24 revealed no documentation the physician and IDT were notified of the missed visit. An interview was conducted on 7/18/24 at 1:15 PM with Employee Identifier (EI) # 1, who confirmed the physician was not notified of the missed visit and the missed visit was not discussed in the IDT meeting. 1. MR # 7 was admitted to the agency on 12/28/21 with diagnoses including Malignant Neoplasm of Unspecified Part of Unspecified Bronchus or Lung and Secondary Malignant Neoplasm of Brain. Review of the Hospice Plan of Care dated 6/15/24 revealed physician’s orders for SN (Skilled Nurse) two visits per week for eight weeks beginning 6/16/24. Review of the Missed Visit Note dated 7/5/24, week three, revealed there was a missed SN visit. There was no documentation the physician was notified of the SN missed visit. Review of the IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) Meetings note dated 7/10/24 revealed no documentation the physician and IDT was notified of the missed visit. An interview was conducted on 7/18/24 at 1:56 PM with EI # 2, Clinical Manager of Andalusia, who confirmed the physician was not notified of the missed visit and the missed visit was not discussed in the IDT meeting.”
-
In-service training (42 CFR 418.76(d))
The inspectors’ words, 199 words
“Based on review of employee’s Relias transcript, agency policy and procedure, and interviews, it was determined the agency failed to ensure the Home Health Aide earned 12 in-service hours yearly. This deficient practice affected one of 11 Home Health Aide files reviewed and had the potential to negatively affect all patients served by this hospice Findings include: Agency Policy: Home Health Aide Program Policy Number: MP-340 Revised: None listed Purpose: To establish a program for the evaluation and to monitor competencies of the Home Health Aide. Policy: It is the policy of DaySpring Hospice, LLC to have Home Health Aides that provide personal care and light housekeeping for DaySpring Hospice have met the Alabama Certified Nursing Assistant requirements. Procedure: ...5. The Home Health Aide will receive 12 hours of in-service yearly to maintain and increase their knowledge... A review of Employee Identifier (EI) # 5, Relias training for 2023, revealed the Home Health aide (HHA) did not meet the required 12 hours in-service training for the year. An interview was conducted on 7/18/24 at 12:57 PM, with EI # 4, Executive Director, who confirmed the HHA did not meet the required in-service training hours for the year of 2023.”
-
Infection control (42 CFR 418.110(j))
The inspectors’ words, 130 words
“Based on review of Hospice Volunteer files, agency volunteer training insert, and interviews, it was determined the agency failed to ensure the direct patient care volunteer received the Hepatitis B vaccination or signed a declination upon orientation. This deficient practice affected 1 of 5 Hospice Volunteers files reviewed, and had the potential to negatively affect all Volunteers recruited by this hospice. Findings include: A review of Employee Identifier (EI) # 6, personnel file revealed the direct patient care volunteer did not have a Hepatitis B (Hep B) vaccination form or a signed declination on file. An interview was conducted on 7/18/24 at 2:00 PM with EI # 7, Volunteer Coordinator, who confirmed EI # 6, Volunteer, did not have a Hep B vaccination form or a signed declination on file.”
All 2 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2024 | Recertification inspection by the state | No deficiencies cited |
| Jul 18, 2024 | Recertification inspection by the state | 7 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Jul 24, 2003.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 17.4 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5.9% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 98.6% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 80% at home, 20% in a skilled nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 17.4 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 5.9% |
| Visits near death | 98.6% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- Bristol Hospice, L.L.C. owns 100% directly since Dec 3, 2025.
- 12 owners or officers are people: Alex Edward Mauricio (corporate officer, 0%); Alex Edward Mauricio (corporate director, 0%); Alex Edward Mauricio (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); John Charles Garbarino (corporate officer, 0%); John Charles Garbarino (corporate director, 0%); Michael Derrick (corporate officer, 0%); Betty J Brennan (corporate director, 0%); Hyrum Kirton (corporate director, 0%); Jeanette Shelton (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); David A Malm (corporate officer, 0%); David A Malm (corporate director, 0%); Rick A Harrelson (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
- A private-equity firm is among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bristol Hospice Holdings Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Dec 3, 2025 |
| Bristol Ultimate Holdco, LP | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Dec 3, 2025 |
| Bristol Hospice, L.L.C. | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Dec 3, 2025 |
| Bristol Hospice Topco Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Dec 3, 2025 |
| Webster Equity Partners Bristol Cf LP | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 69.8% | Dec 3, 2025 |
| Aware Super Pty, Ltd. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 8.28% | Dec 3, 2025 |
| Webster Equity Partners IV Bristol Cf LP | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 5.72% | Dec 3, 2025 |
What do families say?
- Family caregivers rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 92% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 93% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 99.43% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 84.6% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 9 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 10 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 36330, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5.5; this one had 7.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Gentiva | 10 |
| Dayspring Hospice, LLC This hospice | 7 |
| Acg Hospice-Enterprise | 4 |
| Southerncare New Beacon Scottsboro | 13 |
| Enhabit Hospice Birmingham | 6 |
| Vitas Healthcare of Dothan | 4 |
| Aveanna Hospice of Andalusia | 0 |
| Community Hospice of Dale Medical Center | 5 |
| Compassus-Troy | 0 |
| Southerncare Greenville | 19 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.