Hearth Record

Livinrite Home Health Services

A home health agency in Manassas, Virginia 20109

10550 Linden Lake Plz Suite 100, Manassas, Virginia 20109. (703) 369-6677.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2025. Most serious: Element-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Aug 28, 2025: a recertification inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2025. Most serious: Element-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Aug 28, 2025: recertification inspection3 deficiencies
  • Rn Performs Assessment

    The inspectors’ words, 591 words

    “RN performs assessment CFR(s): 484.55(a)(1) A registered nurse must conduct an initial assessment visit to determine the immediate care and support needs of the patient; and, for Medicare patients, to determine eligibility for the Medicare home health benefit, including homebound status. The initial assessment visit must be held either within 48 hours of referral, or within 48 hours of the patient’s return home, or on the physician or allowed practitioner - ordered start of care date. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, interviews, and policy review, the Home Health Agency (HHA) failed to complete an initial assessment to determine the patients immediate care needs within 48 hours of the referral date, the inpatient discharge date, or the practitioner ordered start of care (SOC) date for two of 17 patients (Patient (P) 12, and P17). The delay in the initial assessment had the potential to affect patient safety or delay identification of signs or symptoms of health concerns which could result in rehospitalization. Findings include: Review of the agency policy titled, “Initial Assessment/Comprehensive Assessment,” dated January 2024, revealed, “An Agency that is unable to complete the initial assessment within 48 hours of referral or the patient’s return home, will not request a different start of care date from the ordering physician to ensure compliance with the regulation or to accommodate the convenience of the Agency.” 1. Review of P12’s “Patient Information Sheet” located in the electronic medical record (EMR) in the “Profile” tab revealed a referral date of 8/8/25 and a SOC date of 08/15/25. Review of P12’s OASIS (Outcome and Assessment Information Set) Comprehensive Assessment dated 08/15/25 located in the EMR in the “Assessment” tab revealed services included skilled nursing (SN) for wound care. Review of a “Change Order” located in the EMR in the “Episode” tab under “Orders” revealed an order written by the Administrator on 08/08/25 and signed by a physician on 08/20/25 which showed, “Start of care for Skilled Nursing services to begin 08/15/25 secondary to pending patient financial responsibility form.” 2. Review of P17’s “Patient Information Sheet” located in the EMR in the “Profile” tab revealed a referral date of 07/29/25 and a SOC date of 08/08/25. Review of a referral form located in the “Episode” tab revealed a faxed date of 07/28/25 and showed, “Ambulatory referral for Home Health … SN 1 visit … PT [Physical Therapy] …recommendations for exercises, balance and mobility in the home …2w4 [two times a week for four weeks] 8 visits … Diagnoses: Ambulatory dysfunction, Alzheimer’s disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic heart failure.” Review of a “Change Order” located in the EMR in the “Episode” tab under “Orders” revealed an order written by the Director of Clinical Operations (DCO) on 07/29/25 and signed by the physician on 08/25/25 which showed, “Start of care for skilled Physical Therapy services to begin on 08/08/25 secondary to pending patient financial responsibility form.” During an interview on 08/28/25 at 3:30 PM, the DCO stated the agency always completes the SOC comprehensive OASIS assessment at the initial visit. He/she stated the delay of the initial visit for P12 and P17 was due to difficulty getting approval from the insurance providers. During an interview on 08/28/25 at 3:50 PM, the Administrator stated, “We do call the patient and let them know we are a home health agency and that we are trying to get approval or they could be responsible financially if we go without approval. Patients will usually refuse if there is a chance they might have to pay.””

    Rule G0514. Element-level.

  • Visit Schedule

    The inspectors’ words, 592 words

    “Visit schedule CFR(s): 484.60(e)(1) Visit schedule, including frequency of visits by HHA personnel and personnel acting on behalf of the HHA. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on document review and interviews, the Home Health Agency (HHA) failed to provide a written schedule of visit frequency consistent with the current plan of care (POC) for six of six patients (Patient (P) 11, P12, P13, P14, P15, P17) reviewed during home visit observations. This failure had the potential to lead to missed patient visit due to conflict with other appointments. Findings include: Review of the HHA’s provided policies failed to identify the requirement to provide patients with a written schedule of visit frequency. Review of the HHA’s admission folder provided to each patient on admission revealed it included a blank “Medication Profile” and on the bottom section of the form was a space for identifying services to be provided and the frequency of the services. 1. Review of P13’s HHA admission folder on 08/26/25 at 4:00 PM revealed the section for identifying services provided and frequency of visits was blank. During an interview on 08/26/25 at 4:20 PM, Family Member (FM)1 stated, “I don’t know when they are coming. He/she stated “OT has only been out one-time weeks ago and I don’t know when they are coming again. The staff call the night before and give me a two-hour window of when they are coming.” FM1 confirmed P13 was not provided a written schedule of services provided and frequency of visits. 2. Review of P11’s HHA admission folder during a home visit observation on 08/27/25 at 10:30 AM revealed the section on the “Medication Profile” for identifying services provided and frequency of visits was blank. During an interview on 08/27/25 at 11:00 AM, FM2 confirmed that the HHA had not provided a written schedule of services and frequency of visits. 3. Review of P14’s HHA Admission folder during a home visit observation on 08/27/25 at 12:00 PM revealed the section on the “Medication Profile” for identifying services provided and frequency of visits was blank. During an interview on 08/27/25 at 12:30 AM, FM4 confirmed that the HHA had not provided a written schedule of services and frequency of visits. 4. Review of P17’s HHA Admission folder during a home visit observation on 08/27/25 at 1:30 PM revealed the section of the “Medication Profile” for identifying services provided and frequency of visits was blank. 5. Review of P12’s HHA Admission folder during a home visit observation on 08/28/25 at 10:30 AM revealed the section on the “Medication Profile” for identifying services provided and frequency of visits was blank. During an interview on 08/28/25 at 11:00 AM, FM3 confirmed that the agency had not provided a written schedule of services and frequency of visits. FM3 stated, “The nurse will call the night before the visit.” 6. Review of P15’s HHA Admission folder during a home visit observation on 08/28/25 at 12:00 PM revealed the section on the “Medication Profile” for identifying services provided and frequency of visits was blank. During an interview on 08/28/25 at 12:30 PM, P15 confirmed that the agency had not provided a written schedule of services provided and frequency of visits. P15 stated, “They usually tell me when they are going to come next.” During an interview on 08/28/25 at 9:15 AM, the Administrator stated, “the frequency can change frequently, that is why we do not put it in writing and instead call the patient the evening before and again prior to heading over to the patients home.””

    Rule G0614. Element-level.

  • Patient Medication Schedule/Instructions

    The inspectors’ words, 599 words

    “Patient medication schedule/instructions CFR(s): 484.60(e)(2) Patient medication schedule/instructions, including: medication name, dosage and frequency and which medications will be administered by HHA personnel and personnel acting on behalf of the HHA. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on document review and interviews, the Home Health Agency (HHA) failed to provide the patient or caregiver with written medication list written in plain language that does not contain medical abbreviations for five of six patients (Patient (P) 11, P12, P14, P15, and P17) reviewed during home visit observations. This failure had the potential to result in medication errors. Findings include: Review of the HHA policy titled, “Patient Admission” dated March 2024, revealed, “During the initial visit, the admitting professional will: … Develop or review a medication schedule/instruction including medication name, dosage, route and frequency …” Review of the HHA’s admission folder provided to each patient on admission revealed it included a blank “Medication Profile” form. 1. Review of P11’s “Medication Profile” form in the HHA admission folder during a home visit observation on 08/27/25 at 10:30 AM revealed a notation written on it showing “See list.” The form did not include any names of medications, purpose, dosages, or times of administration. During an interview on 08/27/25 at 11:00 AM, FM2 stated he/she had completed a written list of P11’s medications. FM2 confirmed that HHA staff had not provided a written list of P11’s medications. 2. Review of P14’s “Medication Profile” form in the HHA Admission folder during a home visit observation on 08/27/25 at 12:00 PM revealed a notation written on it showing “Meds [medications] reviewed.” The form did not include any names of medications, purpose, dosages, or times of administration. During an interview on 08/27/25 at 12:30 PM, FM4 confirmed that HHA staff had not provided a written list of P14’s medications. FM4 stated they had been using the medication list provided by the facility at the time P14 was discharged. 3. Review of P17’s “Medication Profile” form in the HHA Admission folder during a home visit observation on 08/27/25 at 1:30 PM revealed it was completed but the handwriting was illegible and medical abbreviations were apparent. 4. Review of P12’s “Medication Profile” form in the HHA Admission folder during a home visit observation on 08/28/25 at 10:30 AM revealed a notation written on it showing “see attached” however there was no evidence of an attached medication list. During an interview on 08/28/25 at 11:00 AM, FM3 confirmed that the agency had not provided a written list of medications. FM3 stated he/she was using the medication list provided when P12 was discharged from the facility prior to the HHA admission. 5. Review of P15’s “Medication Profile” form in the HHA Admission folder during a home visit observation on 08/28/25 at 12:00 PM revealed a notation written on it showing “see attached” however there was no evidence of an attached medication list. During an interview on 08/28/25 at 12:30 PM, P15 confirmed that the agency had not provided a written medication list. During an interview on 08/28/25 at 9:15 AM, the Administrator stated, “The staff always look at the medication list the patient has and reconciles it against the medications the patient has in the home. Doesn’t it count that they write on the medication list form to see the medication list which references the list the patient may have if they were discharged from a facility.” The Administrator did confirm that it is not the HHA practice to complete the “Medication Profile” form on admission or provide the patient with a medication schedule written in plain language.”

    Rule G0616. Element-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 28, 2025Recertification inspection3 deficiencies cited
Aug 7, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Sep 22, 2004.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 15 owners or officers are people: Julie Ann Mccormick (owns 5% or more directly, 51%); Brendan Mccormick (owns 5% or more directly, 49%); Colin Jc Elliot (corporate officer); Colin Jc Elliot (managing employee (on the payroll)); Colin Jc Elliot (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Talesha Sutermeister (managing employee (on the payroll)); Julie Ann Mccormick (corporate officer); Julie Ann Mccormick (corporate director); Julie Ann Mccormick (managing employee (on the payroll)); Julie Ann Mccormick (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Brendan Mccormick (corporate officer); Brendan Mccormick (corporate director); Brendan Mccormick (managing employee (on the payroll)); Brendan Mccormick (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Sophie Elliot (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 2.5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (130 surveys completed): 80% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 78% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, better; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars2.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 53 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate92.81% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate6.25% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.46% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 45 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 20109, where this agency’s office is, 38 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.5 of 5, and this one is rated 2.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.