Hearth Record

Golden Years Homecare Specialists II

A home health agency in Brenham, Texas 77833

2403 South Market Street, Suite F, Brenham, Texas 77833. (979) 251-7705.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Sep 3, 2026: a recertification inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Sep 3, 2026: recertification inspection2 deficiencies
  • Develop Ep Plan, Review And Update Annually

    The inspectors’ words, 568 words

    “Develop EP Plan, Review and Update Annually CFR(s): 484.102(a) §403.748(a), §416.54(a), §418.113(a), §441.184(a), §460.84(a), §482.15(a), §483.73(a), §483.475(a), §484.102(a), §485.68(a), §485.542(a), §485.625(a), §485.727(a), §485.920(a), §486.360(a), §491.12(a), §494.62(a). The [facility] must comply with all applicable Federal, State and local emergency preparedness requirements. The [facility] must develop establish and maintain a comprehensive emergency preparedness program that meets the requirements of this section. The emergency preparedness program must include, but not be limited to, the following elements: (a) Emergency Plan. The [facility] must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be [reviewed], and updated at least every 2 years. The plan must do all of the following: * [For hospitals at §482.15 and CAHs at §485.625(a):] Emergency Plan. The [hospital or CAH] must comply with all applicable Federal, State, and local emergency preparedness requirements. The [hospital or CAH] must develop and maintain a comprehensive emergency preparedness program that meets the requirements of this section, utilizing an all-hazards approach. * [For LTC Facilities at §483.73(a):] Emergency Plan. The LTC facility must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be reviewed, and updated at least annually. * [For ESRD Facilities at §494.62(a):] Emergency Plan. The ESRD facility must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be [evaluated], and updated at least every 2 years. . This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that included an annual evaluation at least every 2 years for one of one Emergency Preparedness Plan. This failure could result in the agency’s ability to effectively communicate with the clients during an emergency activation within the community, as well as ineffectively protecting the needs of the clients in an emergency situation. Review of agency policy titled “Emergency Preparedness Plan Policy” dated 11/15/17 revealed: The Emergency Preparedness Plan must be reviewed and updated at least annually (484.22(a)). Interview with CFO on 9/2/26 at 11:15 AM in reference to missing annual evaluation for Emergency Preparedness. Asked CFO who was responsible for annual evaluation for Emergency Preparedness documentation. CFO stated this documentation is included at all annual meetings and is the responsibility of CFO and Alternate Administrator. CFO provided binder that included the Governing Body, referred to dated 12/20/25 meeting minutes. Asked CFO if agency included Emergency Preparedness annual evaluation annually as required per agency policy. CFO stated the agency previously included the annual evaluation documentation annually but then stated he had been informed this was not required since the documentation was included in the policy. Interview with Alternate Administrator on 9/3/26 at 10:00 AM in reference to annual evaluation for Emergency Preparedness. Asked Alternate Administrator if she was aware of the policy for Emergency Preparedness for the agency that included an annual evaluation annually. She stated the agency had been completing the annual evaluation annually, however; to her knowledge to did not believe this had been included in the Governing Body Meetings over the previous years. Review of the agency binder of documentation titled, “Governing Body Meeting Minutes” dated 12/20/25 revealed annual evaluation of agency items including QAPI, Patient Status, Annual Program Review, Budget for 2026, and Administrator Update. Documentation failed to include annual evaluation of Emergency Preparedness Plan. Review of agency’s policy titled “Emergency Preparedness Plan Policy” dated 11/15/17 revealed agency policy stated the plan, and related policies and procedures must be reviewed and updated at least annually.”

    Rule E0004. Standard-level.

  • Performance Improvement Projects

    The inspectors’ words, 505 words

    “Performance improvement projects CFR(s): 484.65(d)(1)(2) Standard: Performance improvement projects. Beginning July 13, 2018 HHAs must conduct performance improvement projects. (1) The number and scope of distinct improvement projects conducted annually must reflect the scope, complexity, and past performance of the HHA’s services and operations. (2) The HHA must document the quality improvement projects undertaken, the reasons for conducting these projects, and the measurable progress achieved on these projects. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record reviews and interviews, the agency failed to implement performance improvement activities that included analysis of agency services, areas for improvement, or problem areas that could lead to negative outcomes to the agency and their clients. This failure could result in significant risks to health or safety of the clients receiving care through the agency. Review of agency QAPI documentation included meetings with minutes that included complaints, client satisfaction results, and infection documentation. The information did not include performance improvement projects that agency had ongoing or completed for years 2023, 2024, and 2025. Interview with the DON on 9/2/26 at 3:30 PM in reference to missing performance improvements projects, which she stated due to the agency being so small there have been no major issues in which would warrant a PIP. DON stated their annual evaluation includes their infection control monitoring, client satisfaction reporting, and agency employee communication in coordination with agency policy. She stated the updates, if any, would have been completed by the Alternate Administrator and implemented into the documentation by DON, however, they did not have any projects to implement over the previous years (2023, 2024, 2025). Interview with Alternate Administrator on 9/3/26 at 10:00 AM in reference to performance improvement projects agency has in place currently or has completed in the past 3 years. Alternate Administrator stated she focuses on improvements that are individualized based on each employee, what the employee needs was her response. Asked Alternate Administrator if the agency focused on a ‘whole’ what improvements were needed as identified at least one per year based on state guidelines. She responded that the plan for improvements will be clearly defined in the minutes from each annual evaluation, which will be the performance improvement project for the agency. She voiced understanding of the need for having PIP in place, regardless of the size of the agency. DON with Alternate Administrator voiced she had already started making the adjustments to include performance improvement projects that would include the PIP for clearly defined documentation in the QAPI binder. Review of QAPI policy titled “Quality Assessment Improvement Plan” dated 11/15/17 revealed ‘Agency leadership has taken goals and objectives into consideration with annual evaluation for QAPI processes and needs for improvement. The Governing Body will be involved in the review and approval of any process or program changes to improve the QAPI program. Review of policy titled “Annual Program Evaluation” dated 9/23/19 revealed ‘Agency administrative staff and the Governing Body participate in an annual evaluation of the Agency’s performance in relation to its mission, purpose and objectives.”

    Rule G0658. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 3, 2026Recertification inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Mar 5, 2012.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology and medical social services.
  • Doesn’t offer home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 8 owners or officers are people: John Harris (owns 5% or more directly); John Harris (corporate director); Helen Harris (managing employee (on the payroll)); Joye Dawn Lewis (owns 5% or more directly); Joye Dawn Lewis (corporate director); Joye Dawn Lewis (managing employee (on the payroll)); Cory Cunigan (owns 5% or more directly); Cory Cunigan (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS gives no : “The number of patient episodes for this measure is too small to report.”
  • CMS gives no : “No survey results are available for this period.”
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half starsNot rated
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • CMS gives this agency no quality of patient care rating to compare.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.